Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill A dissertation on why femoids aren't human and why they shouldn't have rights

ReasonableResolver

ReasonableResolver

localdoctorcel
-
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Posts
407
In the past, men used to die quickly and early. And by past I mean ever since we were Neanderthals and monkey-like beings. So anyway due to diseases, wild animals, intertribal and intratribal conflicts, hunting accidents making out to the age of reproducing was not as common. And since the most healthy, strongest, and most social monkey-like being(which I will shorten it as MLB from now on) had the best chances of survival,reproducing, gathering food, winning conflicts,avoiding conflicts, dealing with predators, diseases, and other environmental factors, femoids who chose the Chad MLB's had a lot better chance of surviving and reproducing successfully. Thus, those femoids MLB's who did so was able to reproduce, those who didn't did not. Eventually, over a course of many years, Only femoids who had a genetic predisposition to look for and reproduce with Chad MLB's survived. We descend from those femoids.This is the scientific explanation as to why they are so hypergamous. You can do the mental legwork from here to see why they prefer tall men over short men etc.

As I've said, Our femoid ancestors had a genetic disposition to select for Chad MLB's. But I didn't say that they had to be loyal to one Chad only. Even the strongest Chad can't do much if a random venomous snake bites you out of nowhere(snakes are the reason why we can differentiate between so many different shades of green, not really related except in the sense that evolution is real and it has big consequences). Even the strongest Chads sometimes died. And not all femoids were able to get such a Chad. So what's the optimal strategy for femoids here? Well, in any case, femoids had to have options to monkey branch from one Chad MLB to another. Those who selected for Chads and were quick to jump from one Chad to another had the best chances of surviving and reproducing. And, as you can guess from now on, eventually only femoids who selected for Chad MLB's and weren't loyal to their partner remained. We descend from inherently disloyal femoids who betrayed their partner when they got sick for another Chad. And this is why they are inherently disloyal.

They are also inherently immoral due to same reasons. For a femoid, whatever is prevalent and accepted in the status quo is the most moral option. Unlike men, they are incapable of questioning the current moral understanding of the society they are in, nor are they capable of coming up with their own values. To them, the most correct thing to do is whatever "feels" right to them, they don't attempt to form a rational framework that supports the set of actions they commit to. This is also why all philosophers worth reading are men. Femoids are just npc scripts named "Fuck_Chad.exe". They don't care to know how the world works, they don't have an innate curiosity to understand their surroundings, that's why almost all scientists were men (inb4 muh margaret hamilton).

Going back to the original point, because they are inherently immoral,irrational and disloyal, they are not human. What separates humans from animals is our ability to have ideals that we can be loyal to, and a rational framework of morality that we can adhere to, and our capability and tendency to understand and make use of the world. Femoids aren't capable of such things, that is why the rights that extend to men should not be extended to them. Just like we don't spout "muh bodily autonomy" bullshit for cattle or sheep, we shouldn't be spouting the same nonsense for femoids. The only difference is that femoids are a much more valuable livestock, and they should be treated as such. It's just that their functions are different. Otherwise there is no difference in the sense that they don't deserve human rights and they are just mindless, cruel animals slaves to their biological coding.
 
In the past, men used to die quickly and early. And by past I mean ever since we were Neanderthals and monkey-like beings. So anyway due to diseases, wild animals, intertribal and intratribal conflicts, hunting accidents making out to the age of reproducing was not as common. And since the most healthy, strongest, and most social monkey-like being(which I will shorten it as MLB from now on) had the best chances of survival,reproducing, gathering food, winning conflicts,avoiding conflicts, dealing with predators, diseases, and other environmental factors, femoids who chose the Chad MLB's had a lot better chance of surviving and reproducing successfully. Thus, those femoids MLB's who did so was able to reproduce, those who didn't did not. Eventually, over a course of many years, Only femoids who had a genetic predisposition to look for and reproduce with Chad MLB's survived. We descend from those femoids.This is the scientific explanation as to why they are so hypergamous. You can do the mental legwork from here to see why they prefer tall men over short men etc.

As I've said, Our femoid ancestors had a genetic disposition to select for Chad MLB's. But I didn't say that they had to be loyal to one Chad only. Even the strongest Chad can't do much if a random venomous snake bites you out of nowhere(snakes are the reason why we can differentiate between so many different shades of green, not really related except in the sense that evolution is real and it has big consequences). Even the strongest Chads sometimes died. And not all femoids were able to get such a Chad. So what's the optimal strategy for femoids here? Well, in any case, femoids had to have options to monkey branch from one Chad MLB to another. Those who selected for Chads and were quick to jump from one Chad to another had the best chances of surviving and reproducing. And, as you can guess from now on, eventually only femoids who selected for Chad MLB's and weren't loyal to their partner remained. We descend from inherently disloyal femoids who betrayed their partner when they got sick for another Chad. And this is why they are inherently disloyal.

They are also inherently immoral due to same reasons. For a femoid, whatever is prevalent and accepted in the status quo is the most moral option. Unlike men, they are incapable of questioning the current moral understanding of the society they are in, nor are they capable of coming up with their own values. To them, the most correct thing to do is whatever "feels" right to them, they don't attempt to form a rational framework that supports the set of actions they commit to. This is also why all philosophers worth reading are men. Femoids are just npc scripts named "Fuck_Chad.exe". They don't care to know how the world works, they don't have an innate curiosity to understand their surroundings, that's why almost all scientists were men (inb4 muh margaret hamilton).

Going back to the original point, because they are inherently immoral,irrational and disloyal, they are not human. What separates humans from animals is our ability to have ideals that we can be loyal to, and a rational framework of morality that we can adhere to, and our capability and tendency to understand and make use of the world. Femoids aren't capable of such things, that is why the rights that extend to men should not be extended to them. Just like we don't spout "muh bodily autonomy" bullshit for cattle or sheep, we shouldn't be spouting the same nonsense for femoids. The only difference is that femoids are a much more valuable livestock, and they should be treated as such. It's just that their functions are different. Otherwise there is no difference in the sense that they don't deserve human rights and they are just mindless, cruel animals slaves to their biological coding.
In the end it doesn´t even matter.
I hope a meteorite hits this shithole in the future.
Nothing of value will be lost.
 
High IQ post tbh, foids will never be like men mentally just like they'll never be like men physically and it's time we started handling them properly.
(snakes are the reason why we can differentiate between so many different shades of green, not really related except in the sense that evolution is real and it has big consequences)
this is a neat factoid as well
 
High IQ. Deserve to be pinned.
 

Similar threads

I
Replies
50
Views
1K
NotTheElliot
NotTheElliot
I
Replies
6
Views
191
faded
faded
decafincel
Replies
9
Views
398
illumizoldyck
illumizoldyck
Fancy Alcoholic
Replies
24
Views
486
Todd Thundercock
Todd Thundercock

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top