Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy Apparently, killing a human embryo is completely fine but doing gene-editing experiment with it is not

  • Thread starter Deleted member 1060
  • Start date
Deleted member 1060

Deleted member 1060

5'2" ugliest currycel, freak of nature.
-
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Posts
15,300
So this Chinese professor is now detained because he did some gene-editing experiments with human embryo.

https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/29/c...etically-engineered-babies-is-being-detained/

Degenerate killer whores are aborting killing their children on a daily basis and abortion clinics are popping up like mushrooms in the west. Because it's her body and her choice. But this professor supposedly did some successful experiments with gene editing and now he is on house arrest and his lab got shut down. LMAO WTF.
 
>creates enhanced person
>gets jailed for it

Just lol.
 
this world is so fucking backwards.

I refuse to believe that this isn't a simulation.
 
We have been doing this with animals for thousands of years. But when we try to improve ourselves everyone gets touchy. Be it eugenics or modern technology. Whats the point in creating handicapped people and incels when its not necessary?
84322949.jpg
 
We need nazism now
 
most court judges are whores women
 
We have been doing this with animals for thousands of years. But when we try to improve ourselves everyone gets touchy. Be it eugenics or modern technology. Whats the point in creating handicapped people and incels when its not necessary?
84322949.jpg
 
Pro-choicers will argue "The reason making a mutant freak baby is bad, but killing that same baby is okay, is because a mutant freak baby will eventually be born. A dead baby will not be born. And it's only bad to hurt those who will be born."

That's the mistake a lot of pro-choicers are making, I think. Assuming pro-lifers are pro-life because they only care about the baby that could "potentially" be. Pro-lifers don't hate abortion because someday that fetus might become a baby, and babies are too sophisticated/human an organism to ethically kill. Pro-lifers hate abortion because that fetus, right now, is sophisticated/human enough that you shouldn't kill it. That's why abortion legislation is based around things like "When can it feel pain? When does its heart beat?" And other factors that determine whether or not the organism is just a meaningless clump of cells, or developed enough that it's close enough to human that killing it would be "cruelty to a person."
 
We have been doing this with animals for thousands of years. But when we try to improve ourselves everyone gets touchy. Be it eugenics or modern technology. Whats the point in creating handicapped people and incels when its not necessary?
84322949.jpg
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top