[Discussion] Are rape laws actually the biggest form of white-knighting? Ever?

speedtypingincel

speedtypingincel

height > x
-
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
2,479
Think about it, a law has been implemented which forces men who have put their dick in a pussy to go to jail. No I mean, think about it. Police, an armed force, goes around arresting people who dared to push their dick inside that tight warm hole.

What's just another dick to those sluts who ride the cock carousel since 13? Nothing.

That's not the same with anal rape though because men have anuses too so we wouldn't want degenerate faggots go around raping people and then serving no jail time.
 
Vermilioncore

Vermilioncore

permavirgin failure
-
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
11,514
BabyFuck McGirlsex

BabyFuck McGirlsex

Alienwarecel
-
Joined
Sep 23, 2019
Messages
935
Think about it, a law has been implemented which forces men who have put their dick in a pussy to go to jail. No I mean, think about it. Police, an armed force, goes around arresting people who dared to push their dick inside that tight warm hole.

What's just another dick to those sluts who ride the cock carousel since 13? Nothing.

That's not the same with anal rape though because men have anuses too so we wouldn't want degenerate faggots go around raping people and then serving no jail time.
The definition of rape has been bastardised by feminazis and cucks

  • Touching a foids arm is rape
  • A subhuman running daygame and just saying hie to foids is rape
  • Looking at a foid wearing revealing clothing is a micro aggression and rape
  • Not using proper pronouns to address a mentally ill person larping as a female is rape
  • Not being a chad makes you a rapist automatically
The term rape has been weaponized and has loss all meaning tbh ngl
 
freakinasuit

freakinasuit

[MISOGYNIST]™
-
Joined
Apr 2, 2019
Messages
1,360
Foids are more likely to orgasm during rape than during regular consensual sex. Therefore, rapists are doing a foid a favour by raping them. By enacting rape laws, policymakers are deny foids an orgasm.
 
speedtypingincel

speedtypingincel

height > x
-
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
2,479
If they wanted to help a foid, they would get in line behind the rapist and have their turn.
I think you should remove this one or else you'll get warned.

Aside from that yes, there have been numerous studies on the topic showing that they orgasm during rape.
 
FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
-
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
7,003
That's not the same with anal rape though because men have anuses too so we wouldn't want degenerate faggots go around raping people and then serving no jail time.
And you think women want incels coming anywhere near them? If your logic for this is "Why would a woman dislike sex with me" I think you forgot that you're incel.
 
speedtypingincel

speedtypingincel

height > x
-
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
2,479
And you think women want incels coming anywhere near them? If your logic for this is "Why would a woman dislike sex with me" I think you forgot that you're incel.
The original was going to be "anal rape though is not the same with vaginal rape so it deserves punishment" but then I shouldn't care about women, even if they get anally raped, why do I care?
 
Glokta

Glokta

Inquisitor
-
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
626
Rape isn't what foids think it is. Women are property. They lose value with each new dick entering their pussy. Rape is an unlawful destruction of another man's property. You don't want your daughter to whore around. You don't want her to get raped either. In both cases she just lost all her value which makes trying to marry her off harder which means she's going to be a burden for your family longer, possibly forever. No man wants to get cucked and rape is cucking another male by getting pussy without paying for it. At least, that's how it used to be. The idea of a marital rape is even more ludicrous. How can a man rape his own property that he's paying for it?
 
grondilu

grondilu

Captain
-
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Messages
1,581
That's not the same with anal rape though because men have anuses too so we wouldn't want degenerate faggots go around raping people and then serving no jail time.
Men are more likely to be able to defend themselves. At least in a one-to-one situation.
If rape is ever decriminalized, that will be a risk we'd have to face.
 
FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
-
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
7,003
The original was going to be "anal rape though is not the same with vaginal rape so it deserves punishment" but then I shouldn't care about women, even if they get anally raped, why do I care?
The reason we punish rape is because it's a violation of a person's right to be protected from certain things they don't consent to. You have the right to not be raped in the same way you have the right to not be killed, because we hold that a person has the right to their life. Well, most people anyway.

Foids are more likely to orgasm during rape than during regular consensual sex. Therefore, rapists are doing a foid a favour by raping them. By enacting rape laws, policymakers are deny foids an orgasm.
Not sound, just because you force someone to have an orgasm doesn't mean they'll like it. I've said this before, if you drug me with Viagra, then forcibly jack my dick, I'll have an orgasm, but I'll hate it and it'll probably be painful and also you're a dude I don't want you touching my dick.
 
vodkacel

vodkacel

truest slavcel of them all
-
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
749
This post will be on today's evening cuck tears programme
 
grondilu

grondilu

Captain
-
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Messages
1,581
Rape isn't what foids think it is. Women are property. They lose value with each new dick entering their pussy. Rape is an unlawful destruction of another man's property. You don't want your daughter to whore around. You don't want her to get raped either. In both cases she just lost all her value which makes trying to marry her off harder which means she's going to be a burden for your family longer, possibly forever. No man wants to get cucked and rape is cucking another male by getting pussy without paying for it. At least, that's how it used to be. The idea of a marital rape is even more ludicrous. How can a man rape his own property that he's paying for it?
Based.
The thing is : women are de facto inferior beings, whether they like it or not. As a result, they can only be free and safe as a result of men giving them rights and protection. In the Western World, men as a collective give those rights and offer this protection.
So it can be said that this is a form of collective ownership of women : the idea that women are property is not denied, it's just socialized. If communism is the idea that private property should be replaced by State ownership, feminism is the application of this principle to the ownership of women.
The fact that no-fault divorce is a thing proves it : marriage is no more any form of ownership of a woman, it's just a temporary, even symbolical lease agreement. If anything, marriage is more about women owning a slave, aka husband.
 
Last edited:
speedtypingincel

speedtypingincel

height > x
-
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
2,479
The reason we punish rape is because it's a violation of a person's right to be protected from certain things they don't consent to.
The reason rape is punished is because it's an evolutionary crime. Raping carries the risk of impregnating and therefore tainting an entire genetic bloodline. If a female gets impregnated by an incel then she will give birth to subhuman genes. Even if you assume that she won't give birth, she will retain some of the rapist's DNA.
You have the right to not be raped in the same way you have the right to not be killed, because we hold that a person has the right to their life.
Humans used to live in tropical rainforests (jungles) with absolutely no laws. The one and only rule that has persisted in nature, and still does, is might makes right. If you want to have a right, you have to earn it by having the physical ability to defend yourself. Whether or not civlization is governed by cucks who decide what rights we have or else we'll go to jail, is another thing.

Nobody has inherently a right to anything.
Not sound, just because you force someone to have an orgasm doesn't mean they'll like it. I've said this before, if you drug me with Viagra, then forcibly jack my dick, I'll have an orgasm, but I'll hate it and it'll probably be painful and also you're a dude I don't want you touching my dick.
A woman puts on 2 tonnes of makeup so she can go out with her friends at Saturday night and sleep with a high-value male (Chad). She sees the alpha male and gets wet. She ends up fucking him and orgasms. Did she enjoy it? Hell yeah she did. Did they have BDSM sex? Yeah they did, and she orgasmed, so she enjoyed it.

BDSM is basically a form of rape, only with the fact that the one raping her is a high-value male, that's why every blackpill scholar knows that, evolutionarily speaking, raping as a chad is not a crime.

It's as simple as this: She orgasms = she enjoys it.
You orgasm = you enjoy it.

Stop the mental gymnastics, you sound autistic.
 
Last edited:
Pai Mei

Pai Mei

White Eyebrows
-
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
208
After some careful thought, I'd have to say that strict liability laws when it comes to statutory rape/statutory sexual assault is the biggest form of white-knighting in Western law. Even in circumstances where there is irrefutable proof of deception on the part of the plaintiff, in the majority of cases there is literally no legal defense. In most jurisdictions, all a prosecutor has to prove is a complainant's age and that there were sexual relations with the defendant, and that will suffice for a conviction.

Disclaimer: no, I am not into loli's/pedo shit and I don't condone/advocate sexual relations with minors.
 
BrapZilian

BrapZilian

Hello IT
-
Joined
Nov 4, 2019
Messages
609
This will end up on IT jfl
 
FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
-
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
7,003
The reason rape is punished is because it's an evolutionary crime. Raping carries the risk of impregnating and therefore tainting an entire genetic bloodline. If a female gets impregnated by an incel then she will give birth to subhuman genes. Even if you assume that she won't give birth, she will retain some of the rapist's DNA.

Humans used to live in tropical rainforests (jungles) with absolutely no laws. The one and only rule that has persisted in nature, and still does, is might makes right. If you want to have a right, you have to earn it by having the physical ability to defend yourself. Whether or not civlization is governed by cucks who decide what rights we have or else we'll go to jail, is another thing.

Nobody has inherently a right to anything.
Humans used to do a lot of primitive things, just because we used to do it originally doesn't make it right. In most cases, that makes it wrong. We don't base our laws around "Might Makes Right" or whatever monkey priorities monkeys have. We base our laws around what self-evident rights an individuals has, and what self-evident obligations an individual has.

A woman puts on 2 tonnes of makeup so she can go out with her friends at Saturday night and sleep with a high-value male (Chad). She sees the alpha male and gets wet. She ends up fucking him and orgasms. Did she enjoy it? Hell yeah she did. Did they have BDSM sex? Yeah they did, and she orgasmed, so she enjoyed it.

BDSM is basically a form of rape, only with the fact that the one raping her is a high-value male, that's why every blackpill scholar knows that, evolutionarily speaking, raping as a chad is not a crime.

It's as simple as this: She orgasms = she enjoys it.
You orgasm = you enjoy it.

Stop the mental gymnastics, you sound autistic.
BDSM is violent, but what makes it legally distinct from rape is that the parties both consent to it. If I ask you to jack my Viagra dick, even if it is painful, and even if I regret it later, it's not rape, because I said "Go ahead, I don't care, I'll try getting my dick forcibly jacked."
 
Bangkok or bust

Bangkok or bust

A face that doesn't fit in
-
Joined
Mar 22, 2018
Messages
2,340
They are the most anti-ugly male laws, yes.

Its like with loli porn. Why is it always ugly bastards that get arrested for having a small stash of 16yo girls masturbating on Stickam?
 
Red Pill Rage

Red Pill Rage

Major
-
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Messages
2,065
Rape laws were created to protect females' pussies from unattractive men.
 
gymletethnicel

gymletethnicel

When it never begun you must keep yourself sane
-
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
2,861
High IQ post and observation.
 
Mainländer

Mainländer

Coping till the end
-
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
21,671
I think society wouldn't be able to function if rape was legal.

The true white knight laws are things like: women having sexual freedoms, women being able to work and study in university just like men, AoC laws (especially if unreasonably high), women deciding with whom they marry, divorce/alimony laws, DNA tests for paternity verboten, watching pixels being criminalized because muh feelings and so on.
 
LiteralGoblin

LiteralGoblin

Ugly manlet
-
Joined
Nov 12, 2019
Messages
346
If women stayed in the kitchen where they belong, they wouldn’t need to worry about getting raped.
 
speedtypingincel

speedtypingincel

height > x
-
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
2,479
If women stayed in the kitchen where they belong, they wouldn’t need to worry about getting raped.
Exactly, they used to stay at home all day and take care of the kids. They didn't have the chance to be raped. It's only in the last 150 years or so that this happened.

Humans used to do a lot of primitive things, just because we used to do it originally doesn't make it right. In most cases, that makes it wrong. We don't base our laws around "Might Makes Right" or whatever monkey priorities monkeys have. We base our laws around what self-evident rights an individuals has, and what self-evident obligations an individual has.
If you're going to deny this simple evolutionary truth, you might as well say that lookism theories are bullshit. Our DNA, our habits, the way we judge people, the way we talk, everything, is based on 300 million years of evolution. Civilization (merely 70,000 years) doesn't change habits formed from so many years of evolution. Sorry but that's not how it works.
BDSM is violent, but what makes it legally distinct from rape is that the parties both consent to it. If I ask you to jack my Viagra dick, even if it is painful, and even if I regret it later, it's not rape, because I said "Go ahead, I don't care, I'll try getting my dick forcibly jacked."
And there it is. Not all countries have the same rape laws. A lot of countries base the law of rape on coercion (physical violence, threats) so the law of "consent" is low iq garbage. If the law of rape was changed to "coercion" universally then that would mean your argument is bullshit.

You should use a logic that follows a more consistent pattern and not base it on the laws. This type of logic is what I talked about on my other thread where people call us pedos: https://incels.co/threads/pedos.157404/
 
Last edited:
FinnCel

FinnCel

Alcoholcel
-
Joined
Dec 13, 2018
Messages
16,874
OP is right.
I can understand if a virgin woman gets raped; that's a horrible action.
If the girl has had 99 guys, you rape her, you're just 1% to her
 
SirIncel

SirIncel

Veteran
-
Joined
Jun 17, 2018
Messages
1,057
Rape laws used to make sense, but nowadays it's just a joke. They're treating low value men who fuck a hole which has been fucked by hundreds of guys before like someone who is worse than a murderer.
 
BodyFat10orRope

BodyFat10orRope

Veteran
-
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
1,043
Yes. Some of us have been saying for a while that police are the ultimate white knight cockblockers.

Rape is an outdated concept. Women are no longer property so you are not damaging / stealing another man's property. These women are also not chaste. They are sluts so one more dick makes zero difference. It's just white knight faggotry.

Also yes, heterosexual rape is natural, it's entirely different from sodomizing another man.
 
Last edited:
FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
-
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
7,003
If you're going to deny this simple evolutionary truth, you might as well say that lookism theories are bullshit. Our DNA, our habits, the way we judge people, the way we talk, everything, is based on 300 million years of evolution. Civilization (merely 70,000 years) doesn't change habits formed from so many years of evolution. Sorry but that's not how it works.
I don't deny that attractive people are at an advantage. And I don't deny I know what ugly looks like when I see it. But I do deny the paranoid frustration that we are all destined by some primordial code. We're human beings, we can decide for ourselves what our lives will be about. Our monkey ancestors did one thing, but we're smarter than them and have decided a different way.

And there it is. Not all countries have the same rape laws. A lot of countries base the law of rape on coercion (physical violence, threats) so the law of "consent" is low iq garbage. If the law of rape was changed to "coercion" universally then that would mean your argument is bullshit.

You should use a logic that follows a more consistent pattern and not base it on the laws. This type of logic is what I talked about on my other thread where people call us pedos: https://incels.co/threads/pedos.157404/
Pretty much every rape law is the same in principle: You cannot violate someone's consent. The definition of "consent" wavers from case to case, but in every case the question asked is "Did both parties consent?"
 
speedtypingincel

speedtypingincel

height > x
-
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
2,479
We're human beings, we can decide for ourselves what our lives will be about. Our monkey ancestors did one thing, but we're smarter than them and have decided a different way.
Humans are still animals
firefox_io0rcftsno-png.168844

If we really were smarter then lookism wouldn't exist. We wouldn't be voting tall presidents. or CEOs based on how tall they are.

And what is this megacope about free will? You were born in a western country, ugly/short/ethnic/dumb or a combination of all, you probably had bad parents too, you were bullied, you have desires, addictions, you went through events that can't change the way you are. Some people end up on the streets even though they weren't homeless before all because they are short (homeless people are always short, ALWAYS). If you go out and socialize you will need to jestermaxx to be accepted to the group. You're coping hard thinking about free will.
Pretty much every rape law is the same in principle: You cannot violate someone's consent. The definition of "consent" wavers from case to case, but in every case the question asked is "Did both parties consent?"
Clearly you didn't read a single word of what I said.
 
FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
-
Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
7,003
Humans are still animals
View attachment 168844
If we really were smarter then lookism wouldn't exist. We wouldn't be voting tall presidents. or CEOs based on how tall they are.
No we aren't. What separates us from animals is that we're smarter than animals. You can vote for a President because he's attractive and still not be animal stupid. A human might impulsively be attracted to certain humans against better judgement, but that's not "animal stupid." "Animal stupid" means things like not being able to form a society with rule of law. Things animals do but humans don't do. That's why we talk about "what separates us from the animals." The many, many, many many many things that separate us from the animals.

When you go on Google and search "definition of animal" you're being deliberately obtuse. You could search "definition of food" and get "any nutritious substance that people or animals eat or drink or that plants absorb in order to maintain life and growth." Therefore technically holly berries, milkweed, and skunk cabbage are food. Because certain animals can eat it. But humans can't. That's why we don't call holly berries "food," same as we don't call persons "animals."

And what is this megacope about free will? You were born in a western country, ugly/short/ethnic/dumb or a combination of all, you probably had bad parents too, you were bullied, you have desires, addictions, you went through events that can't change the way you are. Some people end up on the streets even though they weren't homeless before all because they are short (homeless people are always short, ALWAYS). If you go out and socialize you will need to jestermaxx to be accepted to the group. You're coping hard thinking about free will.
That's tragic, but what does it have to do with sapient free will and how persons have it? I didn't say free will prevented inceldom, just that it exists in persons.

Clearly you didn't read a single word of what I said.
But I did. Your point was "Rape laws vary by country." And I said "No they don't, not in the way that matters." Because they're all about punishing violations of consent. My argument wasn't "You can rape someone without threatening them with violence," I never made an attempt to describe what a violation of consent is. Just that the game plan is to stop violations of consent.
 
Uglyethnicrat

Uglyethnicrat

Alpha subhuman ❤
-
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Messages
1,526
I hate cucks
 
MaxZM98

MaxZM98

Socially constructed loser
-
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
1,898
the vagina was created to get fucked. men evolved to be stronger than women so we can overpower them to overcome their hypergamous nature. men were never meant to be incel.
 
speedtypingincel

speedtypingincel

height > x
-
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
2,479
the vagina was created to get fucked. men evolved to be stronger than women so we can overpower them to overcome their hypergamous nature. men were never meant to be incel.
In a sexually dimorphic species only the alpha male (chad) gets to fuck pussy. The rest of the group's men were meant to be sexless and not pass on their genetics. The majority of men were ALWAYS meant to be sexless.
 
Robtical

Robtical

Incels without hate still can't get a date
-
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Messages
17,326
That's not the same with anal rape though because men have anuses too so we wouldn't want degenerate faggots go around raping people and then serving no jail time.
They'd only serve no jail time if they raped another faggot.
 
Top