As an accelerationist, I actually believe an incelocalypse is likely to happen someday

Leucosticte

Leucosticte

Quasi-neoreactionary libertarian
-
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Posts
2,018
Online
14h 7m
By "incelocalypse" I mean, the day when incels seize pussy by force. All the incelocalypse is, is the abolition of feminism (a fairly new innovation), and the restoration of patriarchy. Patriarchy is a system in which foids are treated as property to be transferred from father to husband; typically this will be done when they are in their jailbait years, to maximize their lifetime value to the husband and minimize the expense of the father's raising them in preparation for marriage. This is how it works during peacetime; during war, of course, foids may be seized by force as war brides.

We could just as easily use a neoreaction-inspired term, and call the incelocalyptic event the Restoration. A Restoration is when a monarchy is brought back to power. Since patriarchy is just monarchy on a familial scale, all we are really doing is restoring men to their rightful position as kings of their households.

When I look at politics, I see no signs that there's going to be a switch back to patriarchy through the electoral process. We've gotten to the point where even the cuckservatives who timidly put some pro-family idea out there (e.g. "maybe we wouldn't have so many school shootings if there weren't so many boys being raised by single moms") get shamed. They can't even talk about specific proposals for reducing the number of single moms, since all the workable ideas would involve giving men authority over foids. Even the third parties, like the Libertarian Party, are a bunch of bluepilled cucks when it comes to relations between the sexes, despite the fact that they hardly ever win elections and therefore have little to lose.

Moreover, there are no signs that the trend toward doubling down on feminism is going to stop any time soon. On the contrary, in 2018, more foids have been nominated for Congress than ever before in history. This is going to be a self-perpetuating cycle, in which feminist policies lead to more female officeholders, who then enact more feminist policies, etc. They're going to be training the young foids to be "leaders" as well.

Eventually, the whole system will collapse under its own weight, because it's going to be impossible for any group of male dissidents to put a stop to the advance of feminism. Till the bitter end, they're all going to be frantically scrabbling for whatever pussy they can get (or think they can get), rather than wanting to stick their necks out and demand change. We never see men organize and protest in the streets for patriarchy, the way that foids do, because men don't create male-only spaces anymore that would be conducive for setting up a united front like that. It's foids who are always setting up "women's leadership programs" and other female-only groups, where they can freely plot against men.

Once foids are in charge of everything, even the state will stagnate and eventually collapse, just like what happens to every other big enterprise run by foids. The state will not be able to carry out its functions properly when so much of its energies are devoted to feel-good stuff like inclusivity codes of conduct and endless new measures against sexual harassment, designed to eliminate intelligent but unattractive men from the organization and better facilitate the alpha-fucks/beta-bucks feminine imperative. High-quality people will not be attracted to an organization like that, or allowed to remain in it.

Meanwhile, the demographic situation will continue to worsen. The fertility rate will continue to plunge, and humanity will retrogress to a more primitive state due to the dysgenic effect of feminist practices. Since this is unsustainable, it will have to end eventually. Maybe the bulk of mankind will regress to a subhuman state by the time of the final collapse, and it will be like the Planet of the Apes.

When you see historic events like foids gaining more power than they've ever had before, you should rejoice, because it means we're not standing still; we're making more progress toward the collapse and rebuilding. When the end of civilization does come, the new civilization will have to be built along patriarchist lines, because that is the fundamental human instinct and what we always go back to, whenever the state doesn't get in the way. The male wants to be dominant and the female wants to be submissive, so people will revert back to that when they have the opportunity.

Maybe the new order will also get corrupted by feminism and collapse, but hopefully in the meantime there will be a golden era that we can enjoy. The new society could very well be monarchical or otherwise undemocratic, since those types of systems seem to promote manliness more than democratic systems, which are arguably feminine in nature. Democracy is about diffusion of responsibility among the legislators, much like what foids do whenever anyone tries to hold them accountable.

The cool thing is, you don't necessarily have to do anything to make the incelocalypse happen. You just have to watch the signs of the impending collapse and at the appropriate time, make the preparations to survive and be in a good position to scoop up that jailbait pussy when it becomes available. Till then, it's mostly just a matter of LDAR'ing or whatever.

Now, am I just saying all this to try to cope with the fact that I can't be in politics anymore, and am unlikely to go ER? Maybe. But it seems like almost everyone else is the same way. Maybe as we get closer to the incelocalypse, and the state's grip on power begins to weaken, and perhaps the means of providing food and other necessities to the people begins to break down, there will be more ERs and Minassians. Like communism, feminism is an egalitarian system that has unlimited potential for fucking up both government and private industry, so I wouldn't rule out such possibilities.
 
Last edited:
E

Evil Genius

Hiiiii
-
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
5,066
Online
0
This planet needs a big ass asteroid to hit it again. Beautiful planet, ruined by its the dumb cucks and whores who roam it.

No lie, I will sleep like a baby if that happens. Fuck normies, fuck numales, fuck chads and fuck femoids.
 
leafmanlet

leafmanlet

Zabbaleenboo
★★
Joined
Jul 11, 2018
Posts
2,155
Online
8d 5h 37m
Ascent God

Ascent God

Banned
-
Joined
Aug 5, 2018
Posts
226
Online
0
Are you Nathan Larson?
 
lonelyistheworld

lonelyistheworld

cockroach
★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
2,613
Online
0
High iq thread. Please keep posting here. I would vote for you.
 
jerrycan dan

jerrycan dan

autistic retard
-
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Posts
9,190
Online
43d 10h 33m
If you think incels are going to be the main driver behind the coming -pocalypse you're pretty retarded.
It's going to be way, way bigger. Dumb roasties in yoga pants are gonna be the least of your problems when people start dying in the streets. You'll probably realise that when water stops coming out of your tap.
 
Leucosticte

Leucosticte

Quasi-neoreactionary libertarian
-
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Posts
2,018
Online
14h 7m
If you think incels are going to be the main driver behind the coming -pocalypse you're pretty retarded.
No, I think feminism is going to be the driver of it. Incels will just be the beneficiaries of it -- or at least, those incels who are able to survive the collapse and get back on their feet.
 
SelfCrucified

SelfCrucified

blockhead
Joined
May 6, 2018
Posts
3,058
Online
28d 19h 19m
So by accelerationism, should we have voted in Clinton over Trump? Would the incelpocalypse come sooner that way?
 
Leucosticte

Leucosticte

Quasi-neoreactionary libertarian
-
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Posts
2,018
Online
14h 7m
So by accelerationism, should we have voted in Clinton over Trump? Would the incelpocalypse come sooner that way?
My thought is that since we'd just gotten done with 8 years of Obama, it was a good idea to switch parties and elect a Republican. We can wreak a lot of chaos by throwing out new governments at the first opportunity, since they won't even have much chance to settle in before they'll be out the door again. It makes it harder for them to build up a deep state that favors any particular ideology. That's how the police departments minimize corruption; they put term limits on the vice squad and internal affairs guys.

Trump was also an unusual guy. He was an outsider representing a whole new zeitgeist. What usually happens is that if there's a guy who truly poses a threat to the establishment, they'll find some way to get rid of him. E.g., maybe he's gonna get impeached soon. I think they worry he might tell too much truth, the way Duterte is, saying all this atheistic stuff lately in a Catholic country.

If a politician has the impression that he's a lame duck who isn't going to get re-elected, then he'll tend to speak his mind and vote his conscience more, so politically volatile times could be good for trying to get the truth out there. For example, on the last day a president is in office, we tend to see a wave of pardons; that's when we see his true colors.

What I don't want to do is get taken for granted by any political party that thinks I'm going to just choose them every election because they're supposedly the lesser evil.
 
SelfCrucified

SelfCrucified

blockhead
Joined
May 6, 2018
Posts
3,058
Online
28d 19h 19m
My thought is that since we'd just gotten done with 8 years of Obama, it was a good idea to switch parties and elect a Republican. We can wreak a lot of chaos by throwing out new governments at the first opportunity, since they won't even have much chance to settle in before they'll be out the door again. It makes it harder for them to build up a deep state that favors any particular ideology. That's how the police departments minimize corruption; they put term limits on the vice squad and internal affairs guys.

Trump was also an unusual guy. He was an outsider representing a whole new zeitgeist. What usually happens is that if there's a guy who truly poses a threat to the establishment, they'll find some way to get rid of him. E.g., maybe he's gonna get impeached soon. I think they worry he might tell too much truth, the way Duterte is, saying all this atheistic stuff lately in a Catholic country.

If a politician has the impression that he's a lame duck who isn't going to get re-elected, then he'll tend to speak his mind and vote his conscience more, so politically volatile times could be good for trying to get the truth out there. For example, on the last day a president is in office, we tend to see a wave of pardons; that's when we see his true colors.

What I don't want to do is get taken for granted by any political party that thinks I'm going to just choose them every election because they're supposedly the lesser evil.
I just the idea seeing your blog post saying you would vote for the black woman running for representative (forgot her name). Maybe trying to accelerate things so badly could back fire in some way...
 
Leucosticte

Leucosticte

Quasi-neoreactionary libertarian
-
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Posts
2,018
Online
14h 7m
I just the idea seeing your blog post saying you would vote for the black woman running for representative (forgot her name). Maybe trying to accelerate things so badly could back fire in some way...
Well, right now both parties have us on an unsustainable path, so we have to resort to extreme measures. If we just continue voting Republican, we'll get more of the same as what we have under the current Republican leadership. We gotta purge out the cuckservatives one way or another.

It's not just that the path we're on isn't the best path -- it's that it's actually leading us to total destruction. Whether we get there faster or slower doesn't even matter, since it's the same destination either way.

The thing about politics (or anything else) is, what demoralizes you the most isn't when your enemies attack you; it's when your supposed friends and allies attack you. When Trump's family and his fellow Republicans and whatnot try to influence him, that probably has more of an effect on him than when the Democrats and the media talk shit about him. So we gotta get rid of these Republicans who try to sabotage his agenda and lead him down the wrong path. Even if he ends up with a smaller group of supporters, if it's a more loyal group, that's more aligned with his goals, he'll be better off.

What keeps Republicans from nominating better candidates is that they say, "We gotta pick the most electable candidate," which is usually going to be someone moderate. If you show them that you're going to vote against the moderate, then the more radical candidate seems more electable.

We saw in 2012 that the Republicans were like, "Oh, we gotta nominate Mitt Romney because he's more electable. We can't nominate someone like Ron Paul." They lost anyway, so they might as well have picked Ron Paul. He probably would have helped incels by getting rid of some of foids' entitlements.

As long as Democrats aren't in power, they'll always say, "Give us power and we'll show you how we can govern." Well, what happens when we give them total power? Then they prove that they actually can't govern worth shit. The more power we give them, the more the system will collapse, till it's obvious to everyone that their way doesn't work. Then the time will be ripe to take the power back.

We did that with Prohibition, we did that with communism (in Russia), and now we can do that with feminism -- give the other side a chance to put their ideas to the test by taking them to the extreme, and seeing what happens. Once we've tried the experiment and undergone all the suffering that it caused, people won't want to try it again.

It's time to feminism-maxx, leftism-maxx, etc. till society falls apart and we get our chance to rebuild it from scratch.
 
Last edited:
D

dsar9012

Banned
-
Joined
Jan 11, 2018
Posts
138
Online
0m
I wish, but realistically 99% of incels are cowards to a certain extent. And incels are very divided, just look at this forum. Race is a big divide, and I would rather kill ethnic incels than white normies or Chads, because the ethnic incels are not my group and bully and harass me. So NO, realistically that won't happen.
 
IntolerantSocialist

IntolerantSocialist

Nazbol Blackpilled Amoralist
-
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Posts
4,508
Online
2h 13m
I do the same thing, as I said on a political forum, incels are often blacklisted from every side of the political compass and transcended it much radical Islam. its become its own ideology, ipso facto, something feminism can't do.
I do the same thing, as I said on a political forum, incels are often blacklisted from every side of the political compass and transcended it much radical Islam. its become its own ideology, ipso facto, something feminism can't do.
 
SelfCrucified

SelfCrucified

blockhead
Joined
May 6, 2018
Posts
3,058
Online
28d 19h 19m
Well, right now both parties have us on an unsustainable path, so we have to resort to extreme measures. If we just continue voting Republican, we'll get more of the same as what we have under the current Republican leadership. We gotta purge out the cuckservatives one way or another.

It's not just that the path we're on isn't the best path -- it's that it's actually leading us to total destruction. Whether we get there faster or slower doesn't even matter, since it's the same destination either way.

The thing about politics (or anything else) is, what demoralizes you the most isn't when your enemies attack you; it's when your supposed friends and allies attack you. When Trump's family and his fellow Republicans and whatnot try to influence him, that probably has more of an effect on him than when the Democrats and the media talk shit about him. So we gotta get rid of these Republicans who try to sabotage his agenda and lead him down the wrong path. Even if he ends up with a smaller group of supporters, if it's a more loyal group, that's more aligned with his goals, he'll be better off.

What keeps Republicans from nominating better candidates is that they say, "We gotta pick the most electable candidate," which is usually going to be someone moderate. If you show them that you're going to vote against the moderate, then the more radical candidate seems more electable.

We saw in 2012 that the Republicans were like, "Oh, we gotta nominate Mitt Romney because he's more electable. We can't nominate someone like Ron Paul." They lost anyway, so they might as well have picked Ron Paul. He probably would have helped incels by getting rid of some of foids' entitlements.

As long as Democrats aren't in power, they'll always say, "Give us power and we'll show you how we can govern." Well, what happens when we give them total power? Then they prove that they actually can't govern worth shit. The more power we give them, the more the system will collapse, till it's obvious to everyone that their way doesn't work. Then the time will be ripe to take the power back.

We did that with Prohibition, we did that with communism (in Russia), and now we can do that with feminism -- give the other side a chance to put their ideas to the test by taking them to the extreme, and seeing what happens. Once we've tried the experiment and undergone all the suffering that it caused, people won't want to try it again.

It's time to feminism-maxx, leftism-maxx, etc. till society falls apart and we get our chance to rebuild it from scratch.
Things will get worse before they get better, it seems. Well if we want to leftism max, should we just move to Europe? I don't want the USA to be as cucked as the EU but it's only a matter of time, right?
 

Similar threads