That study is nonsense because it was done on 11 year olds.not surprising
although at the age of 11 i was a handsome kid, puberty fucked me up really really bad
So since women have much higher SMV than men, I suppose they are smarter ?
Give me a break.
I'm not buying any of this.
But even if this were true, so fucking what ?
If Chad is so smart, why does he take my money to raise his kids ?
All I'm asking, is not to be cucked. If these attractive people are so superior to us, why do they need our taxes for everything they do ? Public education, subsidized reproductive healthcare, welfare to single mothers... all of this has to end.
Chad needs to finance his harem by himself. Since he's so smart, I'm sure he'll figure out a way. Unless of course the way he found is to force us to pay.
Well if that's the case he's not going to get away with it for ever. He may be smart, but we're more numerous. All it would take is for us all to wake up to the cuckolding we're subjected to.
Maybe because their brain development wasnt stunted by receiving the necessary attention, ways to deal with their hormones (teen love) and validation. Unlike many men who are left trying to figure out what went wrong for decades to come while also having to face the harsh demands of life without any support or guidance. That is why.
Degenerates or low iq reproduce more cause standard of living are noticable higher than 100 or 200. Think about it. 300 or even 100 years ago africa population was low as fuck, cause mortality of infants. Now due to western medicine healthcare they don't have high newborns death rate, but still have their high reproduction rate. Same with brown people ( Arabs, Turks, Persians or Indians ) they were in same situation like africans couple centuries ago. Cause they have lower iq and thanks to white man empathy ( stupidity ) they have high populations. Plus also it's worth to mention that high iq people didn't have a lot of kids...only maqnificient scholar with big amount of children is leonhard euler...Da vinci, Newton, Tesla never had children and didn't pass their genes.Natural selection pressure has been lowered ... have you noticed degenerates reproducing en masse? yeah. Infant mortality rate is also extremely low nowadays.
But females themselves can have inferior genes (most of them actually do)Foids don't let ''inferior'' people to pass their genes. That's eugenics for me.
What about those ugly incels who have depression, brain fog and mental illness. They develop these and become low IQ due to looks.OP being retarded as usual. Literally picking one study and basing an entire thread on it just to fuel his self hatred and retardation.
But this is complete bullocks.That makes a lot of sense, doesn't it? Intelligence is genetically determined due to multiple variants; attractiveness is also genetically determined. It's not weird to assume that good looking people win at every aspect in life.
Yeah, they're usually better off financially speaking, I guess. I haven't spent much time in curryland myself to know the dynamics. All I know is that middle-class and upper-class femorrhoids were all trying to be like western girls.But this is complete bullocks.
In curry land all the good looking people are in all the groups and shit. But they're not neccessarily more intelligent. They're just in a huge circle jerk.
The thing about those shit skin whores is that no matter how much they do this kinda shit, they will never be white. They will always be the Hindu-Muslim pajeet whore they always were. They have no true appreciation for western civilization other than chad's cock.Yeah, they're usually better off financially speaking, I guess. I haven't spent much time in curryland myself to know the dynamics. All I know is that middle-class and upper-class femorrhoids were all trying to be like western girls.
From asking in incel vc groups in discord im guessing that most of this forums birthdays are in april. never started tbh"The National Child Development Study (NCDS) includes all babies born during the week of 03-09 March 1958 in Great Britain (England, Wales, and Scotland), and has followed them for more than half a century throughout their lives. When the children were 7 and again when they were 11, their teachers were asked to describe them physically. For the purpose of the analysis below, the children are defined to be attractive if they were described as attractive at both age 7 and age 11. They were defined to be unattractive otherwise. 62% of the NCDS respondents are coded as attractive. Their intelligence is measured with 11 different cognitive tests at three different ages (7, 11, and 16). NCDS has the best measure of general intelligence available in any large-scale survey data.
As the graph below shows, attractive NCDS respondents are significantly more intelligent than unattractive NCDS respondents. Attractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 104.23, whereas unattractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 91.81. The difference between them is 12.42. "
It is truly over if you are ugly and ended up on this forum. We are not only uglier than beautiful people but also dumber on average. 12.5 iq points difference, more than a SD.
JFL at this life