Ban Discussion Megathread

Personalityinkwell

Personalityinkwell

Lonely white weirdo trying to quit alcohol
-
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Messages
2,693
@Thebiggestloser
 
OverBeforeItBegan

OverBeforeItBegan

One man's trash is another man's wife
-
Joined
Jul 26, 2018
Messages
4,592
Brutally over for @needsolution. I really thought he would surpass Cuyen someday. RIP nigga.
 
OverBeforeItBegan

OverBeforeItBegan

One man's trash is another man's wife
-
Joined
Jul 26, 2018
Messages
4,592
is he perma banned ?
Yup, and no chance to appeal again.

 
IamJacksBrokenHeart

IamJacksBrokenHeart

Trash of this Forum
-
Joined
May 7, 2018
Messages
5,026
Brutally over for @needsolution ...
i still remember when he joined ..
Still the biggest postmaxxer to date tbh
 
ScornedStoic

ScornedStoic

All I wanted was that girl
-
Joined
Apr 5, 2018
Messages
11,297
Don't understand how so many users get banned for dumb shit tbh. I've been here since 2018 and I've never been banned. Some bans are over the top but lots are just users being retarded.
 
Colvin76

Colvin76

170.2cm (5'7") Autistic Gymcel
-
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
5,684
Don't understand how so many users get banned for dumb shit tbh. I've been here since 2018 and I've never been banned. Some bans are over the top but lots are just users being retarded.
This is the price to pay for a strict mod team. If the mods werent so brutal, this place would turn into a shithole like /r9k/.

I know, mods can seem strict at times, but its only for the greater good of the forum.
 
AlexanderTheGreat11

AlexanderTheGreat11

youngcel
-
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Messages
7,274
@Barnacle

@needsolution legendary postmaxxer , goodbye
 
ScornedStoic

ScornedStoic

All I wanted was that girl
-
Joined
Apr 5, 2018
Messages
11,297
This is the price to pay for a strict mod team. If the mods werent so brutal, this place would turn into a shithole like /r9k/.

I know, mods can seem strict at times, but its only for the greater good of the forum.
I was saying most of these bans are deserved. The people are being retarded. Some of the bans are unjustified, but mostly I'm sitting here as an early2018cel wondering how all these late2018cels and 2019cels are getting banned.
 
Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

When I wake up, the real nightmare begins!
-
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Messages
3,349
@Barnacle what happened? why was he banned?
 
TigerFestival

TigerFestival

Weebcel,Gamercel and Neetcel all in one.
-
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
3,813
@Reddit_is_for_cucks temp or perm?
 
ThePlagueDoctor

ThePlagueDoctor

Will this plague go away?
-
Joined
Nov 28, 2019
Messages
1,382
I was saying most of these bans are deserved. The people are being retarded. Some of the bans are unjustified, but mostly I'm sitting here as an early2018cel wondering how all these late2018cels and 2019cels are getting banned.
They’re :feelstastyman:
 
Ryo_Hazuki

Ryo_Hazuki

Modcel
-
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Messages
4,648
@Barnacle what happened? why was he banned?
Perm. He got up to 100 percent after his 6th warning specifically for cherrypicking. Another moderator had a discussion with him via PM specifically for cherrypicking, but he did it 2 more times after that anyway.
 
Convergence

Convergence

brazilian spergcel
-
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Messages
503
I think punishments regarding freedom of speech need to be toned down or banished. Lots of incels are banned for saying they love someone because it's worshipping.
TBH this fear of the forum turning into /r9k/ is unjustified. Mods spent half their days in here and can't even afford to be competent enough to filter the influx of new accounts. You have a full box asking applicants to describe their lives and beliefs, use it accordingly instead of restraining current users.
 
BrendioEEE

BrendioEEE

Prophet
-
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
7,686
The biggest threat to Incels on this forum at the moment seems to be getting banned for reasons unrelated to a users Inceldom, and that's a problem in my eye. If someone makes a bad argument by for example "cherrypicking" let people point it out instead of giving them a warning/ban.

We all know which types of Incels gets targeted the most because of that rule the most, and then of course there's the low effort rule. It'd be one thing if it was just mass spam or random gibberish cluttering up the forum, that is worthy of a ban, if not a permanent one, but that's not what most people get warned/banned for in regards to low effort.

And then of course there's shitposting/jokes taken the wrong way, and trolling. Is this really such a big deal? This stuff is male humor at its peak, and we're supposed to be a male community, we should embrace these things, not shun them. These things make communities stronger, not weaker.

I don't think anyone here truly wants this place to be lawless, but shouldn't the rules be used to target non Incels/people who actually genuinely hate us/are trying to hurt Incels, rather than our own whether we agree with or disagree with them?
 
IamJacksBrokenHeart

IamJacksBrokenHeart

Trash of this Forum
-
Joined
May 7, 2018
Messages
5,026
The biggest threat to Incels on this forum at the moment seems to be getting banned for reasons unrelated to a users Inceldom, and that's a problem in my eye. If someone makes a bad argument by for example "cherrypicking" let people point it out instead of giving them a warning/ban.

We all know which types of Incels gets targeted the most because of that rule the most, and then of course there's the low effort rule. It'd be one thing if it was just mass spam or random gibberish cluttering up the forum, that is worthy of a ban, if not a permanent one, but that's not what most people get warned/banned for in regards to low effort.

And then of course there's shitposting/jokes taken the wrong way, and trolling. Is this really such a big deal? This stuff is male humor at its peak, and we're supposed to be a male community, we should embrace these things, not shun them. These things make communities stronger, not weaker.

I don't think anyone here truly wants this place to be lawless, but shouldn't the rules be used to target non Incels/people who actually genuinely hate us/are trying to hurt Incels, rather than our own whether we agree with or disagree with them?
based
imo think it isnt much of a problem when it stays in offtopic
i guess most people get banned cause they go low inhib in Inceldom Discussion
Its good that the main forum is limited to serious discussion tbh .
Maybe the rules should be a little less strict in offtopic ...
 
Convergence

Convergence

brazilian spergcel
-
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Messages
503
The biggest threat to Incels on this forum at the moment seems to be getting banned for reasons unrelated to a users Inceldom, and that's a problem in my eye. If someone makes a bad argument by for example "cherrypicking" let people point it out instead of giving them a warning/ban.

We all know which types of Incels gets targeted the most because of that rule the most, and then of course there's the low effort rule. It'd be one thing if it was just mass spam or random gibberish cluttering up the forum, that is worthy of a ban, if not a permanent one, but that's not what most people get warned/banned for in regards to low effort.

And then of course there's shitposting/jokes taken the wrong way, and trolling. Is this really such a big deal? This stuff is male humor at its peak, and we're supposed to be a male community, we should embrace these things, not shun them. These things make communities stronger, not weaker.

I don't think anyone here truly wants this place to be lawless, but shouldn't the rules be used to target non Incels/people who actually genuinely hate us/are trying to hurt Incels, rather than our own whether we agree with or disagree with them?
did you quote me before? I got a notification here.
 
Edmund_Kemper

Edmund_Kemper

When I wake up, the real nightmare begins!
-
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Messages
3,349
Perm. He got up to 100 percent after his 6th warning specifically for cherrypicking. Another moderator had a discussion with him via PM specifically for cherrypicking, but he did it 2 more times after that anyway.
What do you mean by cherry-picking?
 
Ropemaxx

Ropemaxx

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 13, 2019
Messages
2,999
Perm. He got up to 100 percent after his 6th warning specifically for cherrypicking. Another moderator had a discussion with him via PM specifically for cherrypicking, but he did it 2 more times after that anyway.
What type of cherrypicking? For bluepill?

Im glad that moron got banned talking about the driverlicense pill. That shit is a fucking joke. We got lastgerman doing it we dont need more.
The biggest threat to Incels on this forum at the moment seems to be getting banned for reasons unrelated to a users Inceldom, and that's a problem in my eye. If someone makes a bad argument by for example "cherrypicking" let people point it out instead of giving them a warning/ban.

We all know which types of Incels gets targeted the most because of that rule the most, and then of course there's the low effort rule. It'd be one thing if it was just mass spam or random gibberish cluttering up the forum, that is worthy of a ban, if not a permanent one, but that's not what most people get warned/banned for in regards to low effort.

And then of course there's shitposting/jokes taken the wrong way, and trolling. Is this really such a big deal? This stuff is male humor at its peak, and we're supposed to be a male community, we should embrace these things, not shun them. These things make communities stronger, not weaker.

I don't think anyone here truly wants this place to be lawless, but shouldn't the rules be used to target non Incels/people who actually genuinely hate us/are trying to hurt Incels, rather than our own whether we agree with or disagree with them?
Nah, we have enough trolling and shitposting. Keep that shit in offtopic. No need to turn a serious cause into a low IQ meme.
 
Toadman

Toadman

:D
-
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
5,292
This is the price to pay for a strict mod team. If the mods werent so brutal, this place would turn into a shithole like /r9k/.

I know, mods can seem strict at times, but its only for the greater good of the forum.
Agreed.
 
BrendioEEE

BrendioEEE

Prophet
-
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
7,686
Nah, we have enough trolling and shitposting. Keep that shit in offtopic. No need to turn a serious cause into a low IQ meme.
The funny side is how we win. Comedy shapes society. If we can make people laugh we win.
 
Personalityinkwell

Personalityinkwell

Lonely white weirdo trying to quit alcohol
-
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Messages
2,693
The funny side is how we win. Comedy shapes society. If we can make people laugh we win.
This is true. Those Virgin vs Chad memes are a big power tool for incels.
 
MountainGorilla

MountainGorilla

✸e̲n̲d̲a̲n̲g̲e̲r̲e̲d̲ ̲s̲p̲e̲c̲i̲e̲s̲✸
-
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
1,383
@Edmund_Kemper is temp banned
 
Total Imbecile

Total Imbecile

Honorary ethnic
-
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
7,438
This is the price to pay for a strict mod team. If the mods werent so brutal, this place would turn into a shithole like /r9k/.

I know, mods can seem strict at times, but its only for the greater good of the forum.
Colvin76

 
Justdone

Justdone

Veteran
-
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Messages
1,482
I don’t think I’ll be missed if I’m banned then again no one misses me from real life anymore not since I was 12.
 
blickpall

blickpall

O T L
-
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
4,709
I messaged him, his ban reason was pretty lame tbh
I'm sure if you ask any person why they were banned or warned, they'd give the same type of response that paints their actions in an innocent light and that mods are wrong, e.g. "it was a joke bro" or "I only baited people to post about the topic I didn't post on the topic itself" (which in itself breaks the rules).
 
ScornedStoic

ScornedStoic

All I wanted was that girl
-
Joined
Apr 5, 2018
Messages
11,297
I'm sure if you ask any person why they were banned or warned, they'd give the same type of response that paints their actions in an innocent light and that mods are wrong, e.g. "it was a joke bro" or "I only baited people to post about the topic I didn't post on the topic itself" (which in itself breaks the rules).
What do you seriously want from users then? We ask for ban reasons, you tell us to PM the user. We PM the user and you say their account of things must be taken lightly. But what do you expect will happen when you refuse to give information but instead direct people to biased people for information on ban reasons?

This is basically abdicating responsibility in regards to anything bans. I'm fine with that, that's how the vast majority of sites operate, but I tire of the veneer of pure fairness and transparency. Just call a spade a spade.
 
Top