Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Based Islamcel slaps a rostie for insulting his religion, but then gets attacked by whiteknight cucked fags.

Robtical

Robtical

Had it with these cucks!
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Posts
33,512
Nice. He got a clean slap on that annoying roastie.
 
Warrior of Allah. Fuck valhalla. To jannah my brothers.
 
based, why didn't he detonate himself?
 
Based. I hate when supposed anti-feminists get upset about a female being hit just because a MENA, Hispanic, or black guy did it. If he did that to a guy, no one would bat an eye because it wasn't even that hard. The guy would be expected to defend himself.
 
Based. I hate when supposed anti-feminists get upset about a female being hit just because a MENA, Hispanic, or black guy did it. If he did that to a guy, no one would bat an eye because it wasn't even that hard. The guy would be expected to defend himself.
High iq, that's what edmund said.

Screen Shot 2020 10 26 at 81452 PM
 
:feelshaha:
 

Attachments

  • Bildschirmfoto 2020-10-27 um 09.36.53.png
    Bildschirmfoto 2020-10-27 um 09.36.53.png
    329.2 KB · Views: 12
After surrounding him and beating him they continued to chase after him and try to attack him.
And just in response to him slapping a woman with an open hand once.

It's disproportionate response. Normies really do live to show off to women.
 
After surrounding him and beating him they continued to chase after him and try to attack him.
And just in response to him slapping a woman with an open hand once.

It's disproportionate response. Normies really do live to show off to women.
If a rostie did that to a man preaching "misogyny" I bet the cucks wouldn't do anything, or laugh, or assault the man with her. This is why simps need to be shamed, they're dangerous faggots when there's many of them around.
 
If a rostie did that to a man preaching "misogyny" I bet the cucks wouldn't do anything, or laugh, or assault the man with her. This is why simps need to be shamed, they're dangerous faggots when there's many of them around.
Simps might be shamed but men jumping in to protect women will always be seen as manly and worthy of respect and praise by society no matter what the situation is tbh
It's more a matter of scaling down on that postive reinforcement for violent whiteknighting that is likely to be more effect imo.
 
Simps might be shamed but men jumping in to protect women will always be seen as manly and worthy of respect and praise by society no matter what the situation is tbh
It's more a matter of scaling down on that postive reinforcement for violent whiteknighting that is likely to be more effect imo.
I'm sure those cucks in the video beating that one guy looked "manly". Only a soyfag would think that, even rosties know they're pathetic simps. They would never step up to a bigger and stronger man, everyone with a functioning brain can tell they're cowardly bitches.
 
I'm sure those cucks in the video beating that one guy looked "manly". Only a soyfag would think that, even rosties know they're pathetic simps. The would never step up to a bigger and stronger man, everyone with a functioning brain can tell they're cowardly bitches.
They are but this isn't going to stop happening so frequently until so many people stop rewarding it.
Women will never stop rewarding it because it's in their favor.
Therefore men have to voice disapproval, disgust and show negative reactions to this kind of thing happening where men step in to violently "check" a man that "disrespected" a woman.
 
Therefore men have to voice disapproval, disgust and show negative reactions to this kind of thing happening where men step in to violently "check" a man that "disrespected" a woman.
High iq. The whores will keep cheering those pathetic low iq cucks on, so it's up to uncucked men to stop them as well as shame the whores for encouraging their cowardly simp behavior.
 
High iq. The whores will keep cheering those pathetic low iq cucks on, so it's up to uncucked men to stop them as well as shame the whores for encouraging their cowardly simp behavior.
That means in any situation too.
Imo these days it means if a woman is assaulted and she fights back you have to hold back any kind of reaction and not be like people cheering them on.

Men can't afford to extend anymore gratitude or goodwill to women. It's always abused and further normalizes nonchad men's subordinate position to women.
 
That means in any situation too.
Imo these days it means if a woman is assaulted and she fights back you have to hold back any kind of reaction and not be like people cheering them on.

Men can't afford to extend anymore gratitude or goodwill to women. It's always abused and further normalizes nonchad men's subordinate position to women.
They take advantage of it, and it lowers nonchad men's collective smv. Rosties would be a lot nicer to non chads if there weren't any whiteknighting simps around. Men aren't meant to protect random foids anyway, that's what the media brainwashed them to do. Men are only meant to protect their families, or their tribe, not random whores who get hit in the street.
 
They take advantage of it, and it lowers nonchad men's collective smv. Rosties would be a lot nicer to non chads if there weren't any whiteknighting simps around. Men aren't meant to protect random foids anyway, that's what the media brainwashed them to do.
One-sided traditionalism is what radical feminists are trying to return to.
It will be even worse for men if that succeeds.

Men are only meant to protect their families, or their tribe, not random whores who get hit in the street.
True that's the only valid time the protective instinct should be used. Otherwise it just normalizes men throwing their lives away for women that aren't related to them and further emboldens women to see men as expendable.
 
One-sided traditionalism is what radical feminists are trying to return to.
It will be even worse for men if that succeeds.
Fuck that one sided traditionalism shit. We need to stop it from continuing.
True that's the only valid time the protective instinct should be used. Otherwise it just normalizes men throwing their lives away for women that aren't related to them and further emboldens women to see men as expendable.
High iq. The best way for nonchads to increase their value in front of foids is to not act like disposable pathetic simps with negative iq's.
 
Based. I hate when supposed anti-feminists get upset about a female being hit just because a MENA, Hispanic, or black guy did it. If he did that to a guy, no one would bat an eye because it wasn't even that hard. The guy would be expected to defend himself.
Imo there's some truth to how overall many MRAs and most traditionalist anti-feminists care more about white males than other races of males.

Fuck that one sided traditionalism shit. We need to stop it from continuing.
Exactly. Nonchad men should never forget how lowly women view them.
Nonchad men can't be easily fooled by women wanting to have the benefits of traditionalism and the special treatment socially, sexually and legally granted to them by feminism.

High iq. The best way for nonchads to increase their value in front of foids is to not act like disposable pathetic simps with negative iq's.
And oppose anyone that tries to make them act otherwise. Don't forget a lot of men didn't willingly sacrifice their lives for women like the narrative is spun as but were forced to at the threat of gunpoint or other violence.

 
Last edited:
Exactly. Nonchad men should never forget how lowly women view them.
Nonchad men can't be easily fooled by women wanting to have the benefits of traditionalism and the special treatment socially, sexually and legally granted to them by feminism.
These things aren't hard to understand, nonchad men just need to stop being retarded.
And oppose anyone that tries to make them act otherwise. Don't forget a lot of men didn't willingly sacrifice their lives for women like the narrative is spun as but were forced to at the threat of gunpoint or other violence.

Ragefuel. So that's how those soy faggots made the men not get on the safety ships. Like I said, real simps are cowards, and when they're about to face death or serious injury all their whiteknighting nonsense they were brainwashed with goes out the window.
 
These things aren't hard to understand, nonchad men just need to stop being retarded.
Yeah at the end of the day if nonchad men don't look out for their interests nobody will and they'll find themselves even more marginalized and trodden down on.

Ragefuel. So that's how those soy faggots made the men not get on the safety ships. Like I said, real simps are cowards, and when they're about to face death or serious injury all their whiteknighting nonsense they were brainwashed with goes out the window.
Exactly. It's a lie to think it was done willingly. And even the wikipedia entry on women and children states that the whole women and children first law on the maritime seas originated in the 1800s.
In other words there wasn't necessarily a long standing precedent in all countries for sparing women although it's a popular theme in movies and pop culture.

Even RREEEEEEEEE had made a thread about how the Mongols spared neither woman or man when raiding villages

So much for the narrative that men have always been disposable compared to women.
I really question the motivations of people that insist that biologically men are disposable compared to women.

It's no different than saying that a certain group of race has always been more disposable compared to another race.
Remember the same arguments "from biology" were used to justify slavery.
 
Exactly. It's a lie to think it was done willingly. And even the wikipedia entry on women and children states that the whole women and children first law on the maritime seas originated in the 1800s.
In other words there wasn't a long standing precedent for sparing women.
Women and children first is not part of maritime law. It's just an unwritten rule some cucked captains used to uphold.

Screen Shot 2020 11 03 at 102029 PM


So much for the narrative that men have always been disposable compared to women.
I really question the motivations of people that insist that biologically men are disposable compared to women.

It's no different than saying that a certain group of race has always been more disposable compared to another race.
Remember the same arguments "from biology" were used to justify slavery.
High iq. It's just something the politician simps made up to "maintain order" it seems. They want the men to be low iq sexless weak bluepilled simps who won't stand up to being cucked. Men are definitely not biologically meant to be disposable, according to this post they don't uphold that unwritten rule any more and men are the main survivors of ship wrecks.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/jhcep9/til_women_and_children_first_when_evacuating_a/
 
Women and children first is not part of maritime law. It's just an unwritten rule some cucked captains used to uphold.

View attachment 366350
But it was still enforced as recently as 2011 in the US where women were rescued first if the women and children first wikipedia entry is correct.

I remember the outrage about the Costa Concordia disaster and how men didn't let women go first.
Of course during the Dark Night Rises many men sacrificed their lives to save their girlfriends but at least it wasn't random women they were sacrificing their lives for.

High iq. It's just something the politician simps made up to "maintain order" it seems. They want the men to be low iq sexless weak bluepilled simps who won't stand up to being cucked. Men are definitely not biologically meant to be disposable, according to this post they don't uphold that unwritten rule any more and men are the main survivors of ship wrecks.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/jhcep9/til_women_and_children_first_when_evacuating_a/

Lifefuel.
Yet redditors will still pretend that men are biologically disposable because they want them to be.

Infact the whole idea that women are more valuable than men is usually repeated ad nauseum on sites like reddit and twitter these days.
Twitter is also where the WW3 scare with Iran was trending and where women "joked" about staying home and letting men fight the war. Same on tiktok.
Social media is an anti nonchad male echochamber tbh
 
I remember the outrage about the Costa Concordia disaster and how men didn't let women go first.
Of course during the Dark Night Rises many men sacrificed their lives to save their girlfriends but at least it wasn't random women they were sacrificing their lives for.
Men fought in wars for their tribes and their family's lives, they had no choice. That's where cucks and whore's get the idea they should be "disposable" to random rosties at any given time.
Lifefuel.
Yet redditors will still pretend that men are biologically disposable because they want them to be.

Infact the whole idea that women are more valuable than men is usually repeated ad nauseum on sites like reddit and twitter these days.
Twitter is also where the WW3 scare with Iran was trending and where women "joked" about staying home and letting men fight the war. Same on tiktok.
Social media is an anti nonchad male echochamber tbh
I remember that. They will start "joking" about it again when another threat of war happens. If simps want to continue to be cucks the least they should do is not drag uncucked men down with them, and force them to be disposable too.
 
Men fought in wars for their tribes and their family's lives, they had no choice. That's where cucks and whore's get the idea they should be "disposable" to random rosties at any given time.
Yeah there's so much deliberate confusion and lies about men wanting to sacrifice their lives for women.
Most men may love women but the survival instinct is still stronger.

I remember that. They will start "joking" about it again when another threat of war happens.
Yup beginning of this year. And then the media gleefully ran with it and rubbed in how selective service and the draft still apply to men.
Which is why another threat of war is always bad tbh I'd rather nothing happens as unlikely as that is in the long term.

If simps want to continue to be cucks the least they should do is not drag uncucked men down with them, and force them to be disposable too.
Agreed. But they get a sick twist out of dragging other males down to their deaths with them.
 
Yup beginning of this year. And then the media gleefully ran with it and rubbed in how selective service and the draft still apply to men.
Which is why another threat of war is always bad tbh I'd rather nothing happens as unlikely as that is in the long term.
I just want some more war "scares" to happen so we can see rosties keep going back and forth from pretending to be dainty housewives to strong independent wahmen.
Agreed. But they get a sick twist out of dragging other males down to their deaths with them.
They need to keep getting called out for behaving in that sick way, and soon we'll be beating them down when they try to force us into their cuckdom. It was also those cuck's idea to take uncucked men's taxes and give them to rosties, and allow rosties to vote so uncucked men will be forced to follow cucked laws.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top