Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based Boojies - for president

For real. Can't this guy just say he hates religion and he's a socialist ?. Also politics is cope. All democracies are rigged.

I am not involved with politics to any extent whatsoever. My political party is called "science."


Lysenkoism (Russian: Лысе́нковщина, tr. Lysenkovshchina) was a political campaign conducted by Trofim Lysenko, his followers and Soviet authorities against genetics and science-based agriculture. Lysenko served as the director of the Soviet Union's Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Lysenkoism began in the late 1920s and formally ended in 1964.

In modern usage, the term lysenkoism has become distinct from normal pseudoscience. Where pseudoscience pretends to be science, lysenkoism aims at attacking the legitimacy of science itself, usually for political reasons. It is the rejection of the universality of scientific truth, and the deliberate defamation of the scientific method to the level of politics.

There is nothing political about any of the statements I've made, all of which are fully scientific and devoid of political affiliation. I unambiguously and emphatically reject politics. I already have science. Why do I need politics? Politics can't do anything other than mislead me from the truth of science.

Science indicates Socialist Libertarianism is optimal.
 
Last edited:
i read every word he ever posted on this forum.
wow.
I can't wait for absolute justice to come to the USA.




When absolute justice comes to the USA, the members of our supreme court who sat by complacently while these religious atrocities unfolded in our nation are going to have their religious brains pushed out of their heads.

When absolute justice comes to the USA, the fabricators of the fiction materials of the illegally respected 20th century establishments of religion are going to be lined up against walls and sent into a world just as make believe as the ones they fabricated in themed fiction materials.

I cannot wait for absolute justice to reign throughout this nation.

I cannot wait for these religious terrorists and traitors to comprehend what absolute justice is:








I can't wait for the traitors to the constitution of the United States of America who committed treason with president Nixon to comprehend what absolute justice is:




I can't wait until there is absolute justice in the United States of America.

When there is absolute justice in the United States of America, the constitution will actually be followed because the members of our military who swore to protect our constitution from domestic threats will actually kill the treason committers on our supreme court who conspire to subvert our constitution by referencing the fiction materials of 20th century establishments of religion.

When absolute justice comes to the USA, the God van of the police who abduct our citizens and bring them in handcuffs to church will look as such:

561eb6b9c461887e6e8b45c5.jpg


aaahhhu3.jpg


When absolute justice comes to the USA, we will free the slaves who violated the dictates of the believers in the fiction materials of the 20th century establishments of religion, and we will exterminate the religious traitors from our government. We will purge the religious treason committers until they haven't a single traitor disgracing our nation, and will ensure that the establishments of religion of the treason committers haven't the slightest iota of respect paid to them ever again.

We will be stripped 100% of all special treatment given to the religious when absolute justice comes to the USA. We will take their religious slogans off our money, blow up their religious monuments they've built with public money and put in front of our courts and such.

cut4qtc.jpg


170628111920-02-arkansas-10-commandments-monument-damaged-exlarge-169.jpg


I can't wait for absolute justice to come to the USA.

ap_dea_drug_trafficking_thg_120622_wg.jpg


burn-isis-flag.jpg

ISIS-dead-at-Baghuz-Syria-via-YPG-source-International-Volunteers-Report-500.jpg


I can't wait until the supreme court justices comprehend what absolute justice is. I am so excited for them to realize what absolute justice is like. It's a lot like being executed for committing treason in respect of your establishment of religion.

NewGroupPhoto.jpg


hangings-nuremberg-trials-300x210.jpg
didn red
 

How about you be more honest regarding what happened? You read my posts asking that the Sex Cultists demonstrate the science in support of their establishment of religion, as you attempted to defend your establishment of religion by presenting two things that you thought were scientific documents that refuted me, and merely took to posting "didn't read" in the threads I'm active in after I handed you your ass by pointing out that my tier one peer reviewed academic science journal citations with the highest impact factors outweigh your not peer reviewed citation to a collection of slides from a university in Japan, and after I took the time to unravel your other citation to the actual 0.8 impact factor journal publication it ultimately was even with every pain taken (by the Sex Cultists who you found the link from on wikipedia) to disguise this fact and to dress it up to look like an actual legitimate journal had supported Sex Cultist scriptures rather than naively cited them even though there are higher impact factor original research studies indicating oppositely from the Sex Cultists' fraudulent hardly above intelligent design publishing tier journal.

That is honest.

Honestly, you read my posts, attempted to demonstrate science in support of your establishment of religion, failed, and then took to saying "didn't read" after you couldn't find any actual high impact factor science actually in support of your establishment of religion.


@DoctorBlythe --- do you remember when I posted:



Consuming child pornography alone is not a risk factor for committing hands-on sex offenses – at least not for those subjects who had never committed a hands-on sex offense. The majority of the investigated consumers had no previous convictions for hands-on sex offenses.


BMC Psychiatry

[...]

Impact Factor 2.419

versus


The Journal of Family Violence is a quarterly peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the study of family violence. It was established in 1986 and is published by Springer Science+Business Media. The editor-in-chief is Rebecca J. Macy (UNC School of Social Work). According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2016 impact factor of 0.871.[1]


The goal was to determine whether the former group of offenders were “merely” collectors of child pornography at little risk for engaging in hands-on sexual offenses, or if they were contact sex offenders whose criminal sexual behavior involving children, with the exception of Internet crimes, went undetected. Our findings show that the Internet offenders in our sample were significantly more likely than not to have sexually abused a child via a hands-on act. They also indicate that the offenders who abused children were likely to have offended against multiple victims, and that the incidence of “crossover” by gender and age is high.




and asked for higher impact science that refuted the superior paper I'd provided?




and then you posted.....


According to one paper from the Mayo Clinic of the U.S.A. based on case reports of those under treatment, 30% to 80% of individuals who viewed child pornography and 76% of individuals who were arrested for Internet child pornography had molested a child.

The citation you provided me with is:


Studies and case reports indicate that 30% to 80% of individuals who viewed child pornography and 76% of individuals who were arrested for Internet child pornography had molested a child. 1,21

citation 21:

21. Kim C. From fantasy to reality: the link between viewing child pornography and molesting children. Child Sexual Exploitation Update. 2004;1(no. 3). Available at: www.ndaa.org/. Accessed February 19, 2007.

is to this:


In a 2000 study issued by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, 76% of offenders convicted of internet-relat-ed crimes against children admitted to contact sex crimes with children previously undetected by law enforcement and had an average of 30.5 child sex victims each. 10

citation 10 of that,

10
Internet Child Pornography: Before the House Subcomm. on Crime,Terrorism, and
Homeland Security, Comm. on the Judiciary,
107th Cong. (2002) (statement of
Michael J. Heimbach, Crimes Against Children Unit, Criminal Investigative
Division, FBI).

is to this,


\30\ Andres E. Hernandex, Psy.D. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Self-
Reported Contact Sexual Offenses by Participants in the Federal Bureau
of Prisons' Sex Offender Treatment Program: Implications for Internet
Sex Offenders.
(In November 2000, the Federal Bureau of Prisons
released a study on Internet sex offenders who used the Internet to
download, trade, and distribute child pornography as well as offenders
who lure children for sexual abuse and exploitation. The study examined
two groups: those convicted of sexual contact crimes against children
and those convicted of nonsexual contact crimes against children. The
nonsexual contact crimes consisted of those convicted under the child
pornography laws and those convicted of traveling to meet a child with
the intent to sexually exploit that child. Of the 90 subjects of the
study 66 were convicted of crimes that did not include sexual contact.
Out of the 66 who were convicted of non-contact crimes, 62 were still
related to the sexual exploitation of children through child
pornography or traveling to meet a child with the intent to sexually
abuse a child. Of the 62, 49 were convicted of child pornography
(trading or possessing child pornography) and 13 were convicted for
traveling to meet a child. None of those convicted were producers of
pornography. Of the 62 convictions for non-contact crimes against
children, 76 percent of offenders admitted to sexually abusing or
exploiting a child. These offenders admitted to an average of 30.5
victims per offender.)

The Hernandez study was originally not peer reviewed (I realize this isn't a peer reviewed journal, but it is cited by jaapl)

jaapl has 1.102 equivalence impact factor:



From both a clinical and an actuarial statistical perspective, an early retrospective study conducted at a Federal Civil Commitment Facility in Butner, North Carolina, inferred an association between accessing child pornography and hands-on sexual offending.3 That study has been criticized regarding its methodology and lack of scientific rigor.4 More recent prospective data have questioned the contention that there is a correlation between accessing child pornography and hands-on offending.5 For example, one such study found that less than one percent of 231 men who had viewed child pornography (but with no evidence of a prior hands-on sexual offense) had gone on to commit a hands-on sexual offense.6 From a purely statistical standpoint (all else being equal) individuals with no history of a hands-on sexual offense against a child, but who have accessed child pornography, are at low risk as a group of committing a hands-on sexual offense in the future.5

citation 4 is to this (the not a peer reviewed journal article)


Nevertheless, Dr. Hernandez privately distributed his study widely, without peer review or any other oversight, and thus bypassed normal opportunities for either scientific validation or refutation by experts in the field of sexual offender diagnosis and treatment. He distributed his study to a limited but very receptive audience nationally (and later internationally, specifically Great Britain), including law enforcement officials and agencies, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and state and federal prosecutors. But it was the policy makers who especially welcomed the study‘s implications.

The original Hernandez study was eventually rejected by the legal system because of not being in a peer reviewed journal, which prompted a second study called the Redux version, which is this,


The goal was to determine whether the former group of offenders were “merely” collectors of child pornography at little risk for engaging in hands-on sexual offenses, or if they were contact sex offenders whose criminal sexual behavior involving children, with the exception of Internet crimes, went undetected. Our findings show that the Internet offenders in our sample were significantly more likely than not to have sexually abused a child via a hands-on act. They also indicate that the offenders who abused children were likely to have offended against multiple victims, and that the incidence of “crossover” by gender and age is high.

Which was published in this journal,


The Journal of Family Violence is a quarterly peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the study of family violence. It was established in 1986 and is published by Springer Science+Business Media. The editor-in-chief is Rebecca J. Macy (UNC School of Social Work). According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2016 impact factor of 0.871.[1]

Which has an impact factor of 0.871. So even if we do your paper's citation 21 the honor of upgrading it to the second study that was actually peer reviewed instead of the first study that wasn't even peer reviewed or published in a journal, it only equals an impact factor of 0.871. The other citation is to a book that wasn't peer reviewed and which was published by an FBI agent (though one who is more trustable) and NCMEC (which is an establishment of religion).


Consuming child pornography alone is not a risk factor for committing hands-on sex offenses – at least not for those subjects who had never committed a hands-on sex offense. The majority of the investigated consumers had no previous convictions for hands-on sex offenses.

It has an impact factor of 2.419


BMC Psychiatry

[...]

Impact Factor 2.419



Remember when we came right back to where we started from? Remember when you still didn't demonstrate that your establishment of religion had a superior scientific foundation? And rather just demonstrated the standard obfuscation engaged in by the Sex Cultists?


Here is a hint. Don't use wikipedia to try to support your establishment of religion. The religious treason committers who have seized control of the pertinent wikipedia page ensure that only the scripture of their establishment of religion is published on Wikipedia, as evidenced by the fact that it cites the headlines of newspaper articles refuted by the article bodies and ignores the world leading science journals.


The United Kingdom children's charity NCH has stated that demand for child pornography on the Internet has led to an increase in sex abuse cases, due to an increase in the number of children abused in the production process.[38]

Note that this wikipedia article incorrectly cites the following article by its click bait headline as opposed to by its content which is contrary to its own headline:


Demand for child pornography on the internet has led to an increase in sex abuse cases, it was claimed today.

Children's charity NCH - formerly National Children's Homes - said there was evidence that the 1,500% rise in child pornography cases since 1988 would be reflected in more children being abused to produce the pictures.


"The scale of the problem has changed beyond recognition in just over a decade," said NCH's internet consultant John Carr.

"The increased demand has made child pornography into big business and the consequences for children in all parts of the world are horrifying."

As you can see they go from saying there was an increase in sex abuse cases caused by the viewing of CP to saying that there was evidence indicating there WOULD BE an increase in sex abuse correlating with the viewing of CP. In reality scientific statistical analyses have determined that there is an inverse correlation between the viewing of CP and the child sexual abuse rate, which supports the substitution hypothesis:


In the realm of sexual offenses, there has been a decrease in hands‐on offenses, but an increase in online offenses against children.


Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.

Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.

The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children


Impact factor (2017) 3.223

The journal was established in 1971 by Richard Green, who served as its editor-in-chief until 2001.[1] He was succeeded by Kenneth J. Zucker.[1] It is published by Springer Science+Business Media[2] and has become a leading journal in its field.[3] Associated with its editorial board and the International Academy of Sex Research are many of the world's leading figures in gender and sexuality research, including Richard Green, Kenneth Zucker, Milton Diamond, Michael Baily, and Carol Martin.

Archives of Sexual Behavior is abstracted and indexed in Biological Abstracts, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, EMBASE, Family & Society Studies Worldwide, Health and Safety Science Abstracts, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Psychological Abstracts, PsycINFO, Referativny Zhurnal, Risk Abstracts, Sage Family Studies Abstracts, Scopus, Sexual and Relations Therapy, Social Sciences Citation Index, Social Science Index,Sociological Abstracts, Studies on Women & Gender Abstracts, and Violence and Abuse Abstracts.[2] According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal's 2013 impact factor is 2.783.[4] Based on the 2011 impact factor (3.52), of 2,943 Social Science journals, Archives was ranked 102nd (96th percentile). Of 109 journals classified as Psychology (Clinical), Archives was ranked 11th (90th percentile). Of 89 journals classified as Social Science, Interdisciplinary, Archives was ranked 1st. [5]


One concern is that the accessibility of online CP has caused increases in child sexual abuse. Some research suggests that CP may trigger sexual abuse by activating and validating sexual urges in CP viewers that were previously suppressed or con- trolled (Beech et al., 2008; Quayle & Taylor, 2003; Wilson & Jones, 2008). There is no evidence of increasing abuse in the United States, however. In fact, rates of child sexual abuse have declined substantially since the mid-1990s, a time period that corresponds to the spread of CP online. Statistics from U.S. child protective service agencies show that from 1992 to 2007, child sexual abuse declined 53% (Jones & Finkelhor, 2009), including interfamilial abuse (Finkelhor & Jones, 2006). Evidence of this decline also comes from victim self-report surveys and U.S. criminal justice system data (Finkelhor & Jones, 2008; Finkelhor, Turner, Ormrod, & Hamby, 2010), as well as the child pro-tective services data collection system. The fact that this trend is revealed in multiple sources tends to undermine arguments that it is because of reduced reporting or changes in investigatory or statistical procedures.
I used to be upset by such things. But now I just remember that it will be worse for the religious treason committers in the end. Because the Friends of the Constitution are going to violently shove your establishment of religion the fuck out of the United States of America, and are going to arrest and execute each treason committer in the government of the United States of America who participated in this unconstitutional and treasonous religious insurrection.

You are all dead men and women. You will be arrested, lined up against walls and shot to death for your treason committed against the United States of America.

I suggest the members of our supreme court abolish this legislation immediately so that we give them painless deaths. That is the point we are at with the supreme court. The members of our supreme court need to decide whether they want to be shot in their heads or tortured to death. If they abolish this legislation immediately, we might just do them the favors of shooting them in their fucking heads instead of cutting them to pieces.

Supreme Court justices, please clarify whether you want to be shot in your heads for your treasonous religious insurrection, or tortured to death for them.

FBI, please demonstrate that you don't want to be tortured to death by arresting the religious traitors who have committed the crime of treason from our supreme court. If you refuse to arrest the religious traitors from our supreme court, your leaders and the entire sex crimes units of your entire agency are going to be tortured to death as the punishment for your illegal, unconstitutional conspiracy to commit treason against our constitution in respect of your establishment of religion.

Please understand. It is over. Your religious terrorism is over. We have scientifically refuted your illegally respected establishment of religion, which will have its legislation abolished before or after the religious traitors are shot off the seats they have disgraced of and have zero place on of our supreme court.

You are traitors, religious treason committers, and your rulings for your entire legal careers are abolished, and the legislation passed by the traitors on our congress is abolished, and the executive orders of the presidents who have been in office while your establishment of religion wasn't constrained by our constitution have nothing.

We are a new nation. We have no place for religious traitors to the constitution in our government. Your entire existence in government is nullified. Your entire history of legal rulings is stricken from the history of the constitutional United States of America. Your entire history of passing legislation is stricken from the books of the United States of America.

The religious traitors have lost 100% of all political capital they ever had. You have no supreme court justices, and you have no congresspeople, and all legislation your congresspeople have passed is stricken, and all rulings your supreme court justices have passed are abolished.

That should provide deterrence to any future religious traitors who attempt to commit the crime of treason. There is no benefit to be had by treason committing. You have lost all of your legitimacy. You have no legitimate authority in my nation. The members of my military will arrest your fucking treasonous asses if you dare to show up to congress or the supreme court ever again. You have absolutely zero place in our government.

Military: Take control of this government and declare marital law. The United States needs to be restructured on account of so many members of our government having zero political power on account of being traitors who committed the crime of treason in a failed religious insurrection.

We need to decide what to do about the sudden lack of members of the government of the United States of America. We can do this from the white house, after the military kicks out every single person in it and kills anyone who tries to stop them.
 
Last edited:
Did not read one single letter
 
I can't believe that the entire constitution of the United States of America is a false signal, that the government has allowed for these abominations to manifest, and that the citizenry allowed it to happen.

It's really reminiscent of the holocaust. I just never in my life expected it to turn out that I would grow up in the USA, come to be wickedly despised ultimately because I don't believe in delusional scientifically refuted religious bullshit, would be able to demonstrate so clearly why this was wrong, but only have nearly everyone just tell me that they don't care and it's too long so they didn't read it, even while I was being honest and drawing attention to important things that constituted human rights violations.

Congratulations on destroying any moral high horse your nation ever had. Congratulations on destroying what could have been a land of freedom and tolerance, and turning it into a psychotic religious shit hole where schizophrenics are in control of our legal system and armed bands of militarized terrorists spread death and destruction because they are delusional and think that they are moral because they believe that they are literally inside of a nonexistent reality that is described in the fiction materials of a 20th century establishment of religion of zero legitimacy whatsoever.

I have lost all semblances of allegiance I ever once had to the USA, which is lie of a nation and nothing but disgraceful. I have absolutely zero allegiance to the USA any longer. The entire government of the United States of America failed to uphold my constitutional rights that my father actually risked his life defending --- which he thoroughly regrets having done, mind you. The nearly entire population of the United States of America didn't care that the near entirety of the government failed to uphold my constitutional rights, and rather they were rude to me, called me names, and treated me like shit because I referenced the science literature instead of denying science and supporting their illegally respected establishment of religion in being wicked to people who didn't do anything wrong outside of the delusional imaginations of the insane and the primitive monkey brains of primitive man.

In sincerity, I hope that the members of our supreme court who allowed this to happen are arrested and executed, and the congresspeople who allowed it to happen are arrested and executed, and that the presidents who allowed it to happen are arrested and executed. I will feel that justice has been done when nearly everyone who has ever held a position in the US government is executed, along with huge swathes of the police.

I have literally stopped even caring about my life, which I have opted instead to dedicate solely to causing a highly destructive mass social mania or panic in the United States of America with the ultimate goal of causing it to collapse and the government of it to be systematically exterminated in the ongoing chaos.

My sole goal in life is destroying the United States of America and ensuring that every member of its government is tortured to death.

I don't even care that you didn't read a single letter though. I don't care that you can see me demonstrate to you that science has refuted your establishment of religion and still to cling to your scientifically refuted fiction materials like the actually mentally ill anosognosic psychotic patients that nearly all humans on this planet are. I am done caring that the stupid primitive life of this planet doesn't care what I have to say, and instead will just focus my efforts solely on inducing a mass social mania in your nation and having you all killed in the bloody revolution that follows from the mass psychotic decompensation I will induce with the sole objective of causing the collapse of the United States of America and mass causalities of the citizenry and government of it.
 
Last edited:
My sole goal in life is destroying the United States of America and ensuring that every member of its government is tortured to death.
Based
 

The Taiping Rebellion, which is also known as the Taiping Civil War or the Taiping Revolution,[6] was a massive rebellion or civil war that was waged in China from 1850 to 1864 between the established Manchu-led Qing dynasty and the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom.

Remember when someone in China declared himself God and caused one of the bloodiest uprisings in history by inducing a wave of social mania? Who has studied these matters more than nearly anyone else in the world? Well, I sure am bad at bringing an end to these things, but it's so much easier when you can just fabricate fiction materials instead of needing to conduct science or have any validity whatsoever.


Social manias are mass movements which periodically sweep through societies. They are characterized by an outpouring of enthusiasm, mass involvement and millenarian goals. Social manias are contagious social epidemics, and as such they should be differentiated from mania in individuals.

Social manias come in different sizes and strengths. Some social manias fail to 'catch fire', while others persist for hundreds of years (although sometimes in severely attenuated form). Common to all is a vision of salvation, a new way of life, which if realized would radically change everyday life, ushering in a new world of freedom and justice.

The Taiping Rebellion is an excellent illustration, as it was both widespread and destructive and has no modern adherents to whom its use as an example would be a distraction. The Ghost dance which was briefly embraced by Native Americans of the Great Plains in 1890 is another excellent example which may be viewed in some historical perspective, as may The Crusades. Almost any form of religion could be argued to be a long-standing social mania, many of which have persisted through thousands of years.

The USA is going to beg for the reign of terror to replace the horrors that I will unleash onto it by the induction of mass manic psychotic decompensation.

I've finally realized, that I don't give a fuck about your moral panics, your social manias, your mass hysterias, your violation of my constitutional rights, your endless attacking of me for my disbelief in your establishment of religion, and general maltreatment of me that has clearly crossed over beyond even illegal into the realm of actually treasonously and unconstitutionally so.

I don't care because my sole purpose in life was to induce the social mania that sees the collapse of the United States of America as the direct result of it, which I can do entirely just by copying the fucking treason committing traitors of the Sex Cult, the people of the anti vaccination movement, and so on, but using my insight into the phenomena that you lack, and my analytical abilities, and so on.

My sole purpose in life is to wipe out the United States of America.

Don't worry any longer FBI, I don't care that you have committed treason as you very well know, for I am not even aiming to stop your illegal and unconstitutional moral panics any longer. I've decided to join you in the fabrication of false realities described in themed collections of fiction materials, but my 21st century establishment of religion is going to cause your nation to collapse into bloody ruins and to make your nation an irrelevant footnote in history by rendering your nation to a fucking smoking crater in the ground as all that will be left after the unprecedented social mania that I will induce in your nation with the sole intention of wiping you out, even entirely without concern for myself in the process.

I will let you explain to the millions of psychotic decompensating people I add onto my botnet that their fiction materials aren't real --- you can have a lot of fun telling the millions of manically psychotic people that I instruct to mass detonate themselves into heaven throughout your cities in highly decentralized and autonomous manners about how their fiction materials aren't actually correlated to existence --- but something tells me they aren't going to care and that anything you say will be autistic and TL : DR in any case.
 
Last edited:
The fact is that the Drug War and the Sex Cult have been scientifically refuted, but like all religiously psychotic people the believers in them seem to either be incapable of comprehending this or otherwise caring about it. It doesn't matter how much evidence you show them demonstrating as much. You can show them the highest impact factor science journals regarding the matter and it is like you didn't even show them anything. No matter what they rationalize their belief in the fiction materials of their establishment of religion, which they are fanatically committed to, which they spend untold millions of dollars of value organizing and promoting.

There is little that can be done regarding the matter apparently, even though what is manifesting in the USA is unambiguously unconstitutional, illegal, and constitutes the crime of treason. Even though there is absolutely no actual valid legitimacy to these movements, even though the constitution forbids them, even though all respect paid to them and laws passed based on the belief in their fiction materials is forbidden, it simply doesn't matter because the believers in these establishments of religion will just manifest cognitive anosognosia if push really comes to shove, and it's like arguing with an anosognosic stroke victim at that point, which is essentially entirely a waste of time, or at least I've had no luck with the religiously insane.



Anosognosia in Schizophrenia: Hidden in Plain Sight
...
“I don’t need medicine—there is nothing wrong with me. I just came here for a check-up.”


Anosognosia is defined as the impaired ability of patients with neurological disorders to recognize the presence or adequately appreciate the severity of their deficits [1]. Torrey (2012) cites three examples of anosognosic patients; a stroke victim with a paralyzed arm claimed he couldn’t lift it because he had a shirt on; a woman with paralysis in her left arm was asked to raise it, and instead raised her left leg. When this was pointed out to her she responded that some people call it an arm, others a leg, and jokingly inquired as to the difference; the Supreme Court Justice, William Douglas, was paralyzed on his left side. He claimed this was a myth, and was still inviting people to go hiking [2].


Essentially, anosognosic patients hold quasi-delusional beliefs about their paralysed limbs, in spite of all the contrary evidence, repeated questioning, and logical argument.

Just replace limbs with "genre of intension" and there is essentially no difference. In spite of all of the contrary evidence, which is the highest impact science literature regarding the matter and the position of the pertinent academic community regarding the matter,



Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.

Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.

The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children


Impact factor (2017) 3.223

The journal was established in 1971 by Richard Green, who served as its editor-in-chief until 2001.[1] He was succeeded by Kenneth J. Zucker.[1] It is published by Springer Science+Business Media[2] and has become a leading journal in its field.[3] Associated with its editorial board and the International Academy of Sex Research are many of the world's leading figures in gender and sexuality research, including Richard Green, Kenneth Zucker, Milton Diamond, Michael Baily, and Carol Martin.

Archives of Sexual Behavior is abstracted and indexed in Biological Abstracts, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, EMBASE, Family & Society Studies Worldwide, Health and Safety Science Abstracts, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Psychological Abstracts, PsycINFO, Referativny Zhurnal, Risk Abstracts, Sage Family Studies Abstracts, Scopus, Sexual and Relations Therapy, Social Sciences Citation Index, Social Science Index,Sociological Abstracts, Studies on Women & Gender Abstracts, and Violence and Abuse Abstracts.[2] According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal's 2013 impact factor is 2.783.[4] Based on the 2011 impact factor (3.52), of 2,943 Social Science journals, Archives was ranked 102nd (96th percentile). Of 109 journals classified as Psychology (Clinical), Archives was ranked 11th (90th percentile). Of 89 journals classified as Social Science, Interdisciplinary, Archives was ranked 1st. [5]

Despite the repeated questioning about their stereotyped argumentation that is clearly logically fallacious, such as not caring that people can see a video of a child have his heart cut out but thinking that even a 17 year old can't take a picture of his dick without abusing himself.

Despite the logical argumentation to the contrary and so on, they eternally cling to their delusional belief in the fiction materials of their establishments of religion. It isn't even quasi-delusional, they are full blown psychotic decompensatory and cognitively anosognosic.



“merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image.” This is some mystical religious thinking. Like in Voodoo. And note, this was said by a respectable lawyer to appease a judge. And this logic is used over and over, for example by Australian Government web sites.


"... every time somebody looks at that image it's like the crime is taking place all over again…"


"we hear that in court that they feel like they are victimized every single time someone downloads their videos or looks at their videos they feel like they are being raped all over again,” said Canonico


The children might feel like being raped time and again when someone watches it.

It's really amazing to see how despite an ocean of evidence refuting them, despite the fact that they don't actually have anything in support of them --- with nearly everything they put forth being severely eviscerated when held up to even the slightest scrutiny ---- despite the fact that they are unambiguously wrong as one would imagine any thinking human could simply reason to realizing, but which the near totality of the scientific literature makes abundantly clear to any who would for whatever reason imagine otherwise.

Despite all of this, they continue clinging to the fiction materials of their establishment of religion and acting as if they are referencing actual reality through them rather than the delusional imaginations of schizophrenics.

They are mentally ill, unambiguously. Indeed, they are convergently psychotic and concomitantly cognitively anosognosic, and they reference likewise themed collections of fiction materials as if they were referencing actual reality through them rather than the delusional imaginations of convergences of psychotic decompensating schizophrenics and manics.

9cWWGfc.png


They are the adherents to scientifically refuted 20th century establishments of religion that they are incapable of ending their belief in. It's really scary, bizarre, and somewhat interesting but primarily alarming because of the fact that they are in power and literally reigning terror against the disbelievers in the scientifically refuted fantasy worlds described in their genres of scientifically refuted religious fiction materials.

I keep hoping that they will eventually just all wake up, as is predicted to happen eventually, but who knows how long it will be. I feel pretty much like my life is already over and wasted though. I had the misfortune of having lived the majority of my life in the dark ages period of the early 21st century, when the believers in the fiction materials of the subsequently refuted 20th century establishments of religion had come to completely dominate the United States of America and world, and in which life had no value because of the government's willingness to simply enslave everyone, when people lived in terror, simply because psychotic religious terrorists couldn't end their belief in their scientifically refuted fiction materials.

I don't even know how to feel any longer honestly. I am not so much scared any longer regarding the issue, as I am just entirely hopeless regarding it and the future of humanity as a whole. I used to be upset when I would post endless evidence demonstrating my correctness while people acted as if they had opinions on the matter despite refusing to read anything I said. I used to be upset when I saw fraud after fraud after fraud from these people. I used to be upset when I noticed the government wasn't following the law, but it has just been such a perennial trait of the government throughout all of my exposures to it that I simply have come to expect a complete lack of adherence to the law or constitution from every single member of it.

I don't know what one can do when powerful movements believe in alternate worlds described in themed collections of fiction materials and manifest cognitive anosognosia to all argumentation against their faiths. I honestly, sincerely did not think that I could even be subjected to such people in the United States of America, but that was back when I thought that we actually had a constitution and system of law that was followed.

I certainly didn't imagine that I would be trying to convince religiously psychotic believers in scientifically refuted religious fiction materials that they couldn't actually enforce their religious blasphemy legislation by ruining the lives of those who disrespected their sacred things. I didn't think that I would ever need to actually deal with this situation, in which religiously insane people referenced scientifically refuted fantasy worlds through themed collections of religious scriptures and attacked me with the support of the government of the United States of America for the crime of disbelieving in the scientifically falsified fantasy world described in their 20th century genres of scientifically refuted religious scriptures.

I thought that I was safe from such things in the USA, but that was back when I thought that the religious only had god themed delusions,


A professor at Stanford University, Robert Sapolsky, has said that religion is a mental illness, and that the behaviours exhibited by ‘prophets’ in religious texts are diagnosable acts.

The self-described atheist, who is also a neuroendocrinologist, argues that religion is comparable to a shared schizophrenia.



Social manias are mass movements which periodically sweep through societies. They are characterized by an outpouring of enthusiasm, mass involvement and millenarian goals. Social manias are contagious social epidemics, and as such they should be differentiated from mania in individuals.

Social manias come in different sizes and strengths. Some social manias fail to 'catch fire', while others persist for hundreds of years (although sometimes in severely attenuated form). Common to all is a vision of salvation, a new way of life, which if realized would radically change everyday life, ushering in a new world of freedom and justice.

The Taiping Rebellion is an excellent illustration, as it was both widespread and destructive and has no modern adherents to whom its use as an example would be a distraction. The Ghost dance which was briefly embraced by Native Americans of the Great Plains in 1890 is another excellent example which may be viewed in some historical perspective, as may The Crusades. Almost any form of religion could be argued to be a long-standing social mania, many of which have persisted through thousands of years.

livingwithschizophreniauk.org/religious-spiritual-delusions-schizophrenia/

For many people religion is one way that we understand the world and give meaning to our lives and certainly religion and spirituality play an important part in many people’s experiences of schizophrenia. For some sufferers religious delusions or intense religiously-based irrational thinking may be a component of their symptoms, for instance they may believe that they have been sent by God to become a great prophet.

I didn't realize that I dodged being burned at the stake by the convergent psychotics having god themed delusional ideation only to be burned at the stake by those having sex abuse and poisoning themed delusions. Burned at the stake through the same exact process mind you, of heresy accusations, of blasphemy accusations, and so on. There is fundamentally no difference between the god themed religions and the poisoning and sex abuse themed religions. There are just superficial distinctions between them really --- the underlying essence, the underlying meat of things is almost exactly identical, in that convergences of crazy fucks are referencing the fiction materials produced by the even more mentally ill as if they were referencing actual reality, the disbelievers in their fiction materials are heretics, those who disrespect their sacred things guilty of blasphemy and so on.

There has been essentially zero significant progress made toward the freedom that I thought had been established, which is greatly disappointing and induces a sense of hopelessness. I didn't realize that we had just hardly gotten to the point of not being put to death by the religious believers in god themed intension only to now what? Have to go through the same process with all of the other convergences of mentally ill believers in fiction materials?



Since the early 1980s, with the breakdown of the Communist empire, sex abusers have become the most common persecutors for paranoids.

andrewtaustin.com/catatonic-schizophrenia/themes-of-schizophrenic-delusions

The most commonly cited example is that of the person who comes to believe that his family is poisoning him.

This isn't an issue we should even be dealing with though. Because theism is but one type of an establishment of religion, with all of the other themed being equally religious even if not equally theistic. Theism and religion are not the same thing, rather theism is a sort of religion. The first amendment of our constitution doesn't prohibit a theistic establishment of religion from being respected, but rather it prohibits any establishment of religion of any form from being respected.



Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]

That alone renders the entirety of the Drug War and Sex Cult legislation invalid, but it isn't like I seriously except for my constitutional rights to be upheld, and the citizenry of our nation certainly doesn't give the slightest damn that the governmental representatives they elected are cheaters who don't follow the constitution or the law as it suits them because nobody is going to do shit about it anyway.
 

Similar threads

Lonelyus
Replies
5
Views
163
Robb97
Robb97
FrothySolutions
Replies
4
Views
116
5ft4ropeconnoisseur
5ft4ropeconnoisseur
blackpillscience
RageFuel I hate boomers
Replies
5
Views
215
blackpillscience
blackpillscience
L
Replies
6
Views
181
loser313
L

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top