Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill By repeating "get someone your own age/looks level" or "why don't incels just fuck each other", people are just inadvertedly confirming the blackpill

Mainländer

Mainländer

Songwritercel
★★★★★
Joined
May 2, 2018
Posts
38,284
They are confirming various core blackpill tenets, such as women having more SMV than men on average, young women having more SMV than older ones and, above all, that being attractive as a whole makes you a higher SMV person, not only that, a perceived more valuable (and even more deserving) person in general.

When someone tells an old man "get someone your own age", what they're really communicating is: "come on, do you really think you deserve a cute loli/teen or even young adult? Look at yourself, old fart, you deserve some old used-up foid IF THAT. Seeing you forming a sexual/romantic couple with a young person would be unsettling and disgusting to me because of how OLD you LOOK".

No one says anything when underage people have sex with each other, and no one says anything either when people violate an underage person's consent by forcing them to do tons of other stuff, some of which are arguably not even beneficial for them. So don't give me that "consent" bullcrap. Either someone can understand/consent or they can't; also, if in some situations it's ok to violate their consent, then it's not consent that is the problem here. You can't just come up with the "it's different" excuse pulled out of your emotional lookist ass, this is not an argument.

When someone tells an ugly man "get someone ugly like yourself" what they're really communicating is: "attractive people have more value and are more deserving than unattractive people, therefore, you can't just expect an attractive person to put up with dating human garbage like you". Notice that no one ever tells a 9/10 Chad something like "why are you dating that 5/10 average slut, are you crazy bro? Quit that, you must only date supermodels". Just like no one would send an underage girl to jail for sexually harassing an adult man; the person perceived as the most valuable one calls the shots, no exceptions.

When someone tells incels "just become gay and ascend with each other", what they're really communicating is: "women have more value, higher standards, etc, than men, being therefore harder to get. So if you can't get a woman, tune it down and try a man instead, that's how much you can bargain". Which is basically one of the cornerstones of the blackpill, that some delusional people dare to deny.

tl;dr: it's all about looks and attractive people have more value and are considered more deserving
 
Last edited:
Cliffs: IT platitudes are, sometimes, blackpilled.
 
It also has a lot to them being confused by modern culture. Cucked modern males see foids as a friend/partner, not as an object under your control (as nature intended). The law also treats foids like men and they're raised to act like men. So if an older man is with a younger foid, it's "creepy" because it's to them like an older man being friends with a teenage male or young man.
 
It also has a lot to them being confused by modern culture. Cucked modern males see foids as a friend/partner, not as an object under your control (as nature intended). The law also treats foids like men and they're raised to act like men. So if an older man is with a younger foid, it's "creepy" because it's to them like an older man being friends with a teenage male or young man.
Pedophilia is basically seen as cheating in a very unscrupulous way. An old guy with poor looks who wouldn't be able to get even a 4/10 if he aimed for young adult women, for instance, can get a 9/10 angelic loli through pedophilia because children are gullible and manipulable.

I agree that having sex with prepubescents is wrong, but not for the same reasons most people think that. Also, they extrapolate that notion to also encompass teenagers, which doesn't apply because 1) teenagers are sexually mature and 2) they're not nearly as easy to manipulate as little children. In fact, teenage girls have the highest standards among all women on average.
 
Last edited:
Mating behaviors, since the dawn of times, were not based on looks, at least not in a symmetrical way. Women were beautiful, men were powerful. Women used the fact that men were attracted by women to take advantage of the power of the men.

Looks still mattered for men, though, but only to a small fraction of men. Women slept with those men in secret, cuckolding their husbands. The fact that most men are not sexually attractive to women proves that looks has not been the primary selective pressure on men.

I wrote about it and I'll write it again : men and women have different selective pressure on them, and consequently the concepts of attractiveness are different for both genders.

To women, the primary selective pressure is childbirth. It is a very difficult process for our species and it often kills the mother. As a result, women find most attractive the men whose semen is the least likely to cause a failed pregnancy. Those are the men with the fewest genetic anomalies, even if those genetic anomalies could be beneficial from the male point of view. Because you see, here is a crucial point : even if the mother dies, the child can survive. C-section has existed during all historical times, and it's not absurd to imagine it has existed ever since humans were capable to cut flesh, and that is millions of years (before even Homo Sapiens). So a mutation that would kill a mother can still be beneficial for the father. The mother has died so her lineage ends there, but the father can find an other woman to impregnate.

To men, the primary selective pressure is survival in the environment. That doesn't depend at all from the kind of females the male can mate with, because for males reproduction is not dangerous. In terms of attraction to females, the male just has not to waste his time, sperm and energy with a poorly fertile woman. Therefore men are attracted to females that show signs of health and youth.

All this to say the following : women are much more picky than men when it comes to chose a sexual partner based on looks only. Humans used to not give women much choice in that regard, and it's very understandable that women were not happy about that.

Sadly though, if we let women free to fuck whoever they want and only who they want, the world is screwed, because their choice will do very little for the improvement or even continuation of the quality of our species (women will reject beneficial mutations), and because it would deprive a vast majority of men of sex, relationship and thus motivation to contribute in any meaningful way to society. It should actually eventually lead those men to rebel against this society and wage a war against women and the minority of sexually attractive men.
 
Last edited:
I was about to open a very similar thread. People are politically correct online but when a ugly guy manages to find a girlfriend they will always say that he will end up bad if she is too looking compared to him.
 
They're extremely stupid and utterly lack any modicum of self awareness.

What did you honestly expect?
 
Mating behaviors, since the dawn of times, were not based on looks, at least not in a symmetrical way. Women were beautiful, men were powerful. Women used the fact that men were attracted by women to take advantage of the power of the men.

Looks still mattered for men, though, but only to a small fraction of men. Women slept with those men in secret, cuckolding their husbands. The fact that most men are not sexually attractive to women proves that looks has not been the primary selective pressure on men.

I wrote about it and I'll write it again : men and women have different selective pressure on them, and consequently the concepts of attractiveness are different for both genders.

To women, the primary selective pressure is childbirth. It is a very difficult process for our species and it often kills the mother. As a result, women find most attractive the men whose semen is the least likely to cause a failed pregnancy. Those are the men with the least genetic anomalies, even if those genetic anomalies could be beneficial from the male point of view. Because you see, here is a crucial point : even if the mother dies, the child can survive. C-section has existed during all historical times, and it's not absurd to imagine it has existed ever since humans were capable to cut flesh, and that is millions of years (before even Homo Sapiens). So a mutation that would kill a mother can still be beneficial for the father.

To men, the primary selective pressure is survival in the environment. That doesn't depend at all from the kind of females the male can mate with, because for males reproduction is not dangerous. In terms of attraction to females, the male just has not to waste his time, sperm and energy with a poorly fertile woman. Therefore men are attracted to females that show signs of health and youth.

All this to say the following : women are much more picky than men when it comes to chose a sexual partner based on looks only. Humans used to not give women much choice in that regard, and it's very understandable that women were not happy about that.

Sadly though, if we let women free to fuck whoever they want and only who they want, the world is screwed, because their choice will do very little for the improvement or even continuation of the quality of our species (women will reject beneficial mutations), and because it would deprive a vast majority of men of sex, relationship and thus motivation to contribute in any meaningful way to society. It should actually eventually lead those men to rebel against this society and wage a war against women and the minority of sexually attractive men.
Bulls-eye. Allowing women to pick whom they fuck, based on looks on top of that (because of lack of surviving pressure that would otherwise force women to mate strong/resourceful/powerful men), it's something completely anti-natural.

Women are low testosterone as fuck, they don't have nowhere near the sex drive even a soyboy has, let alone a high T ogre. They simply don't want to fuck that much,look at lesbian couples, they barely have sex (if you can even call what they do sex).

This bizarre state of things is only possible because of things like modern medical technology, etc. Imagine how society would be if women were losing a good deal of the babies they had and tons of people were dying during childhood as well, like used to be the case before modern medicine and sanitation. Most western countries are already experiencing demographic winter as it is, with the vast majority of children surviving to adulthood.
 
Oh no, I already got refuted by IT. I truly stand no chance against such powerful arguments from those world-class intellectuals :lul:

Rebuttal


Brazilian Sigma is quick on the trigger today.
 
Oh no, I already got refuted by IT. I truly stand no chance against such powerful arguments from those world-class intellectuals :lul:

View attachment 171870

Brazilian Sigma is quick on the trigger today.
They are honestly delusional. 'I don't like the truth so I shall deny it'.
 
They are confirming various core blackpill tenets, such as women having more SMV than men on average, young women having more SMV than older ones and, above all, that being attractive as a whole makes you a higher SMV person, not only that, a perceived more valuable (and even more deserving) person in general.

When someone tells an old man "get someone your own age", what they're really communicating is: "come on, do you really think you deserve a cute loli/teen or even young adult? Look at yourself, old fart, you deserve some old used-up foid IF THAT. Seeing you forming a sexual/romantic couple with a young person would be unsettling and disgusting to me because of how OLD you LOOK".

No one says anything when underage people have sex with each other, and no one says anything either when people violate an underage person's consent by forcing them to do tons of other stuff, some of which are arguably not even beneficial for them. So don't give me that "consent" bullcrap. Either someone can understand/consent or they can't; also, if in some situations it's ok to violate their consent, then it's not consent that is the problem here. You can't just come up with the "it's different" excuse pulled out of your emotional lookist ass, this is not an argument.

When someone tells an ugly man "get someone ugly like yourself" what they're really communicating is: "attractive people have more value and are more deserving than unattractive people, therefore, you can't just expect an attractive person to put up with dating human garbage like you". Notice that no one ever tells a 9/10 Chad something like "why are you dating that 5/10 average slut, are you crazy bro? Quit that, you must only date supermodels". Just like no one would send an underage girl to jail for sexually harassing an adult man; the person perceived as the most valuable one calls the shots, no exceptions.

When someone tells incels "just become gay and ascend with each other", what they're really communicating is: "women have more value, higher standards, etc, than men, being therefore harder to get. So if you can't get a woman, tune it down and try a man instead, that's how much you can bargain". Which is basically one of the cornerstones of the blackpill, that some delusional people dare to deny.

tl;dr: it's all about looks and attractive people have more value and are considered more deserving
You're right. They wouldn't have a problem with a 102 year old man dating a 19 year old IF he looked like a 23 year old Chad. This century, we may be able to test this hypothesis. As technology may progress to the point of reversing aging. So you'll have 75 year old guys who look every bit of 25 and they'll be going after teens, 20s foids. But the reality will be that despite the look, he's actually 75 years old.
 
So fucking true. These cucks lack self awareness
 
Age gap cops are a bunch of annoying fags
 
Mating behaviors, since the dawn of times, were not based on looks, at least not in a symmetrical way. Women were beautiful, men were powerful. Women used the fact that men were attracted by women to take advantage of the power of the men.

Looks still mattered for men, though, but only to a small fraction of men. Women slept with those men in secret, cuckolding their husbands. The fact that most men are not sexually attractive to women proves that looks has not been the primary selective pressure on men.

I wrote about it and I'll write it again : men and women have different selective pressure on them, and consequently the concepts of attractiveness are different for both genders.

To women, the primary selective pressure is childbirth. It is a very difficult process for our species and it often kills the mother. As a result, women find most attractive the men whose semen is the least likely to cause a failed pregnancy. Those are the men with the fewest genetic anomalies, even if those genetic anomalies could be beneficial from the male point of view. Because you see, here is a crucial point : even if the mother dies, the child can survive. C-section has existed during all historical times, and it's not absurd to imagine it has existed ever since humans were capable to cut flesh, and that is millions of years (before even Homo Sapiens). So a mutation that would kill a mother can still be beneficial for the father. The mother has died so her lineage ends there, but the father can find an other woman to impregnate.

To men, the primary selective pressure is survival in the environment. That doesn't depend at all from the kind of females the male can mate with, because for males reproduction is not dangerous. In terms of attraction to females, the male just has not to waste his time, sperm and energy with a poorly fertile woman. Therefore men are attracted to females that show signs of health and youth.

All this to say the following : women are much more picky than men when it comes to chose a sexual partner based on looks only. Humans used to not give women much choice in that regard, and it's very understandable that women were not happy about that.

Sadly though, if we let women free to fuck whoever they want and only who they want, the world is screwed, because their choice will do very little for the improvement or even continuation of the quality of our species (women will reject beneficial mutations), and because it would deprive a vast majority of men of sex, relationship and thus motivation to contribute in any meaningful way to society. It should actually eventually lead those men to rebel against this society and wage a war against women and the minority of sexually attractive men.

Stratospheric IQ.
 
Mating behaviors, since the dawn of times, were not based on looks, at least not in a symmetrical way. Women were beautiful, men were powerful. Women used the fact that men were attracted by women to take advantage of the power of the men.

Looks still mattered for men, though, but only to a small fraction of men. Women slept with those men in secret, cuckolding their husbands. The fact that most men are not sexually attractive to women proves that looks has not been the primary selective pressure on men.

I wrote about it and I'll write it again : men and women have different selective pressure on them, and consequently the concepts of attractiveness are different for both genders.

To women, the primary selective pressure is childbirth. It is a very difficult process for our species and it often kills the mother. As a result, women find most attractive the men whose semen is the least likely to cause a failed pregnancy. Those are the men with the fewest genetic anomalies, even if those genetic anomalies could be beneficial from the male point of view. Because you see, here is a crucial point : even if the mother dies, the child can survive. C-section has existed during all historical times, and it's not absurd to imagine it has existed ever since humans were capable to cut flesh, and that is millions of years (before even Homo Sapiens). So a mutation that would kill a mother can still be beneficial for the father. The mother has died so her lineage ends there, but the father can find an other woman to impregnate.

To men, the primary selective pressure is survival in the environment. That doesn't depend at all from the kind of females the male can mate with, because for males reproduction is not dangerous. In terms of attraction to females, the male just has not to waste his time, sperm and energy with a poorly fertile woman. Therefore men are attracted to females that show signs of health and youth.

All this to say the following : women are much more picky than men when it comes to chose a sexual partner based on looks only. Humans used to not give women much choice in that regard, and it's very understandable that women were not happy about that.

Sadly though, if we let women free to fuck whoever they want and only who they want, the world is screwed, because their choice will do very little for the improvement or even continuation of the quality of our species (women will reject beneficial mutations), and because it would deprive a vast majority of men of sex, relationship and thus motivation to contribute in any meaningful way to society. It should actually eventually lead those men to rebel against this society and wage a war against women and the minority of sexually attractive men.
giphy.gif


Sophocles IQ
 
Women choosing = eugenics
Women choosing = civilizational collapse
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
56
Views
735
NorthernWind
NorthernWind
Despicablecel
Replies
5
Views
188
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit
Diomedes_1112
Replies
61
Views
2K
NorthernWind
NorthernWind
SlayerSlayer
Replies
40
Views
1K
droppeddogs
droppeddogs
Dr. Autismo
Replies
7
Views
344
Gendocel
Gendocel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top