Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Can an Incel have standards?

What standards can an Incel have?


  • Total voters
    71
Hate_my_life

Hate_my_life

Genetic Failure - Never began
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 30, 2018
Posts
16,090
Inspired by an old thread by @SaintElliotreeeee (not sure if you're allowed to bump old threads tbh): https://incels.is/threads/can-an-incel-have-standards-if-so-which-ones.116380/page-2

Can an Incel have standards? (Also Inspired by @KingOfRome's comment in his thread)
The only reason iam still an incel is because my looksmatch has plenty of chad options by using dating apps and i dont want to dumpsterdive.


So you're admittedly a fakecels jfl


  • Alone75
  • Damo the incel
  • Klikklakkek
  • FaceandHFD
  • SoyUnPerdedor
  • Darth Cialis
  • FinnCel
  • ChinaCurry
  • Dstig97
  • Algeriancel
You guys all voted that an Incel can not have any standards whatsoever, therefore you'd all be fine with dating this:

nintchdbpict000323831913.jpg

or this:

an-old-woman-holding-a-hot-water-bottle-B75KFR.jpg
You guys would happily engage in intercourse and enter a relationship with any woman that showed interst in you?


What standards can an Incel have without being considered Volcel?
Do all Incels have to dumpster-dive to be considered an Incel or are they a Volcel?



I personally believe no Incel can have any standards that would supercede their way of lives or would make the women far better than they are (punching above his weight).
For example, if a 300lb 5'9 4/10 guy wants a 4/10 100lb foid then he's a volcel (unless he loses weight).
 
Of course we can, the only way to rate foids is by their looks and an ugly foid would change anything. I would rather starve than eat shit
 
Non fat and young
 
@chudur-budur @Currymanlet
You'd date absolutely any foid that showed interest in you?
 
Last edited:
It isn't that not having standard means you'll date and have sex with them. You have to be attracted to then to date them.

I find some girls below my looksmatch attractive, but they all go for chads.
 
We can and we should have standards, however, they are different from each other. Some incels are OK about dating fat girls but not if they obesse, other ones only want skinny girls but not if they have bitchy attitudes. It depends on preferences.
 
I want a white thin woman my age. I don't care about looks or height.
 
You should be able to have standards as far as traits influenced heavily by shit behavior like extreme overeating, stupid fashion, ugly tattoos and such things. You really just should not have standards as far as facial bones or frame/body other such things if you are a truecel like me.
 
You should be able to have standards as far as traits influenced heavily by shit behavior like extreme overeating, stupid fashion, ugly tattoos and such things. You really just should not have standards as far as facial bones or frame/body other such things if you are a truecel like me.
 
Not old, not fat, good shape, no STDs, no tattos, not masculine. Most of the time, standards higher than this are volcel.

You should be able to have standards as far as traits influenced heavily by shit behavior like extreme overeating, stupid fashion, ugly tattoos and such things. You really just should not have standards as far as facial bones or frame/body other such things if you are a truecel like me.
High IQ
 
Not old, not fat, good shape, not masculine. Most of the time, standards higher than this are volcel.
Agreed, those are my standards tbh, but I'd say you can only have those standards if you yourself are not old and in good shape.
I'm not saying that in all cases fatcel = volcel, but you can't bake a cake and want to eat it whole as well.
 
Agreed, those are my standards tbh, but I'd say you can only have those standards if you yourself are not old and in good shape.
I'm not saying that in all cases fatcel = volcel, but you can't bake a cake and want to eat it whole as well.
Yeah. fatcel = volcel, unless you have one of those (RARE) genetic disorders that make it impossible to lose fat.
 
Not fat, not old as fuck and not disable, this are the only things I ask in a woman, yeah I know is impossible for a incel to have a woman that is not one of this things but I would prefer to die alone than dating some fat old retarded foid.
 
No fat chicks.
Depends on the disability.
Anything else is sufficient.
 
No matter what standards we have, it will still be over for many men.
 
Just no landwhales
 
Incels should only have to desire women that do not make you feel sick if you were to see them naked. No sober man would get it up for an obese or elderly woman so saying that you have to desire those to be incel is a retarded cope.
 
Not old, not fat, good shape, no STDs, no tattos, not masculine. Most of the time, standards higher than this are volcel.


High IQ

Same also add no piercings as well, because that shit is gross.
 
An incel having standards is like a leaf falling on a river, happens all the time but nobody cares.
 
Honestly, I'd prefer a landwhale over granny

But volcel if you wouldn't
 
@chudur-budur @Currymanlet
You'd date absolutely any foid that showed interest in you?

Yup, even I'll be more than happy to shag one of these gorgeous ladies --

gS0eUBB.jpg
vNQh5Nh.jpg
6PaAwkT.jpg
mPhFBnK.jpg
mvXfgrn.jpg
p5zVoxd.jpg
FFA0rVR.jpg

The last one is my fav, which one is yours?
 
I believe in reasonable standards. If you're young, in shape, healthy, then you should expect a woman that is similar no matter what the feminists tells you.

"B-but you have to conform to the gynocentric dating markett! You can't just ask for your looksmatch this is 2019 females are gods and men are trash!"
Volcelboogeyman
 
Last edited:
Only standarts are that I'm sexually attracted to her,so basically non fat,not very ugly,not old
 
I think a lot of people here are average looking standardcels who underrate females on purpose so they can then say above-average females are actually their looksmatch--which they're entitled to, of course. (Not.) Genuinely average looking females get mocked on incel forums for being ugly landwhales all the time and I'm fairly certain that kind of person is who's behind it.
 
I think a lot of people here are average looking standardcels who underrate females on purpose so they can then say above-average females are actually their looksmatch--which they're entitled to, of course. (Not.) Genuinely average looking females get mocked on incel forums for being ugly landwhales all the time and I'm fairly certain that kind of person is who's behind it.
People have distorted views I would say beginning with the wide access to television
For me it's just under 50, I am not attracted to black or dark Indian women
 
People have distorted views I would say beginning with the wide access to television
For me it's just under 50, I am not attracted to black or dark Indian women
Some people here are definitely shut-ins who can't tell the difference between Hollywood average and real world average due to sheer lack of exposure.
 
Ofcourse you can have standards as an incel. If you don't think so you have bought into the feminist double standard without even realizing it.
A guy who goes to the gym several times a week is entitled to not fuck a god damn land whale, and that doesnt make him a fucking volcel. On the other hand that doesnt even mean that landwhale would accept his advances so he can still be a truecel in that regard anyway.
I think race standard is fine too. Something about my genetics has made it that so i have 0% attraction for black females.

And obviously some incels have extreme standards, like wanting a virgin gf only ( top 1% smv female in other words)
 
Last edited:
Some people here are definitely shut-ins who can't tell the difference between Hollywood average and real world average due to sheer lack of exposure.

Thank you!

I got mocked on another thread because someone else claimed Emma Watson is "average", and I disagreed.
 
That is a very complex subject. I personally define inceldom as the incapacity to find a satisfactory romantic/sexual partner, but what leeway you have with your standards (and also how do your standards related to your own looks level, age, etc) is very debatable, there isn't a clear line. If you only want to date Aryan teenage supermodels and members of royal families, most people will not take you seriously when you talk about being an incel, but if you claim that an incel must marry the first obese 60 yo single mom of 5 1/10 that shows the slightest interest in him or he's a fakecel, most people will also not take you seriously.

I personally have different standards for different practices. I always said I'd fuck an older and ugly foid unless she was really 0% attractive (though I'm now trying to quit a life of adultery), but I'm not interest in serious committed relationships with older, very ugly or high-mileage girls.

My standards for a committed relationship would be: young (not set in stone, basically AoC-early 20s), attractive TO ME (doesn't need to be that much conventionally attractive), low-mileage/virgin (for marriage).
 
Incel is unable to get your looksmatch, slightly above looksmatch, or slightly below.

If I'm not a fatass then why should I date one. Although it makes no difference since landwhales are able to get sex anyways.

Standards for an incel should not exceed slightly above looksmatch IMO.
 
I think a lot of people here are average looking standardcels who underrate females on purpose so they can then say above-average females are actually their looksmatch--which they're entitled to, of course. (Not.) Genuinely average looking females get mocked on incel forums for being ugly landwhales all the time and I'm fairly certain that kind of person is who's behind it.

Men dont underrate females. Whats possible (and this is supported by studies) is that men are more likely to overrate themselves compared to women and hence might have an unrealistic view of their female looksmatch. That being said, women are much more likely to turn down their looksmatch and shoot far above their league compared to men. Any idiot on a dating app should have realized this by now.

The whole concept of looks match is very recent. In the old days, women had to look good and men had to earn and provide. society worked much better as the rules were pretty clear.
Incel is unable to get your looksmatch, slightly above looksmatch, or slightly below.

If I'm not a fatass then why should I date one. Although it makes no difference since landwhales are able to get sex anyways.

Standards for an incel should not exceed slightly above looksmatch IMO.

I agree. But as an incel, youre a filthy beggar by social standards. No woman wants to touch you, simply because you have been preselected (or not preselected) by 1000s of women to be an incel. How dare you have any standards at all you filthy creature ?

This is the viewpoint most people have when it comes to incels.
 
Yup, even I'll be more than happy to shag one of these gorgeous ladies --

gS0eUBB.jpg
vNQh5Nh.jpg
6PaAwkT.jpg
mPhFBnK.jpg
mvXfgrn.jpg
p5zVoxd.jpg
FFA0rVR.jpg

The last one is my fav, which one is yours?




its beyond over for you man
 
Absolutely yes. If man is below average in physical measurements - does not mean should look for femoid who is below too, because man is more than looks, and value of femoid is mostly in looks
 
No single moms, or landwhales twice your body weight
 
Thank you!

I got mocked on another thread because someone else claimed Emma Watson is "average", and I disagreed.

If an incel wouldn't smash Emma Watson with the force of Nuclear payload, I say he's a QUEER.
 
Virgin looksmatch
 
The only thing required to be incel is to not be able to generate sexual interest in women.

Your standards are completely irrelevant until a point where you're literally turning down sex, which I imagine almost nobody here ever has.

Even if you have the most fakecel 10/10 virgin Stacy only standards, that doesn't mean you'd be able to bang a 1/10 even if you wanted to. Your standards have no bearing on how desirable you are.

But if you do ever turn down sex you are a 100% fakecel. :chad:
 
to put it simple if i can get hard im going in.
Yup, even I'll be more than happy to shag one of these gorgeous ladies --

gS0eUBB.jpg


The last one is my fav, which one is yours?
her id fuck so horny right now jfl
 
> Other? (Elaborate down below please)

No women who seek degeneracy ("open relationship", "cuckoldry")
No women with psychopathic behavior that could attempt to kill me at any minute
No women who are blatant gold diggers (only wants your money without any personal engagement or at least simulated affection)

With that aside, I only wouldn't date massive landwhales (chubbies are fine) or grannies.
I would have no problems dating women with disabilities as long as she looked and acted normally overall (yes, I know I would have to be a caretaker).
 
Last edited:
Only standarts are that I'm sexually attracted to her,so basically non fat,not very ugly,not old

Most women are fat and its getting worse.
Most women turn to average men or below only after they the wall
Most women are pretty ugly without fake up.

While i agree with those standards, you have to be in the top 20% of men to even hope to get a woman like that.
 
Of course, incels can standards too but those standard shouldn't be very high.

For example, if there is a 23 years old 3/10 looking lean incel who likes foid who is between 19 to 26 of age, is lean and is 3/10 looking, then his standards are fine.

However, if the incel is 35 years old, 2/10 looking and fat but demands 18 years old 6/10 looking slim virgin girl, then his standards are very high and he should not be considered incel but volcel.
 
My standard is exactly the way I am. Absolute 0 deviation, same racially build, same eye/hair color, same facial level.
 
I have standards because my dick doesnt want absolute subhumans and I dont support hypergami.
 
Id fuck a 3/10 and ltr a 4/10
 
Of course we can. No cucking, ever.
 

Similar threads

Mortis
Replies
35
Views
711
XtremeMax
XtremeMax
lonelysince2006
Replies
54
Views
755
The Enforcer
The Enforcer
Void.
Replies
70
Views
2K
kay'
kay'
AsiaCel
Replies
15
Views
586
edger0uter
edger0uter

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top