RageFuel Chad at work is constantly touching women yet he gets a free pass

[Uglyme]

I fucking hate this guy. He's arrogant, foulmouthed, he smokes like a chimney, he's licking the feet of every boss just to get favors like coming in late or an extra smoke break. Yet, he's attractive and tall. He kind of looks like Robert Redford when he was young, but with darker hair. He's been in the company for just five months and he already has gained more than a dozen female orbiters. He also has a gf but he goes about touching foids every time he talks to them. He goes to their cubicles and places his hands in their shoulders or grabs their waists when they're walking down the hallway. Of course they are delighted with that, I see it in their eyes. In fact, he doesn't even need to go where they are, women go to his spot to hug-greet him. Once, I saw a group of 4 foids who went to his spot to greet him and each of them gave him a hug and a kiss in turns. They stood there waiting for their turn to hug him!

I've been working for that company for 4 years, and I've never got even a single hug from my female coworkers. And you can't tell me its because of his personality cause he's a total jerk, one time he made a rather obscene joke about fat people in my prescence (I'm fat) and everyone laghed and some turned to look at me. But of course cucktears will say it's his great sense of humor and amazing personality what allows him to attract women.

 

[Gymcelled]

You're not imagining things, science agrees with you.

Spoiler

Women's definition of 'harassment' in online dating depends on the attractiveness of the man
A simulation of online dating was performed with fictional male profiles of varying attractiveness and social status. 128 female college students from a small northeastern public university participated to interact with these fictional male profiles. The male profiles then sent the female participants messages of increasing harassment. Researchers assessed how much harassment the women were willing to tolerate.

Results very clearly indicated that the strongest predictor of women's tolerance for "online harassment" was the attractiveness and social status of the "harasser" (ie. her interest in dating him).

Quotes:

• Participants' self reported likelihood to date a bogus male dating candidate was predictive of tolerance for sexual harassment.
• As a profile’s likelihood to date rating increased, so did the number of sexually harassing responses that participants were willing to tolerate.
• We found that participants exposed to a physically attractive bogus candidate were willing to receive more sexually harassing responses from the bogus candidate, as were participants exposed to a high status bogus candidate.
• Physically attractive individuals are perceived as less sexually harassing than unattractive individuals (Hendrix, Rueb, & Steel,1998).
• Women also reported being least upset when they imagined being harassed by a man of high occupational status (e.g., premedical student, graduate student, successful rock star) and most upset when being harassed by a man of low occupational status (e.g., construction worker, garbage collector, cleaning men, gas station attendant) (Buss, 1994).

References:

• Angelone DJ, Mitchell D, Carola K. 2009. Tolerance of sexual harassment: a laboratory paradigm. Arch Sex Behav. 38(6): 949-58. [Abstract] [FullText]

The attractiveness of a male 'harasser' determines if the experience is enjoyable or traumatic
Fairchild (2010) conducted an online survey on perceptions of sexual harassment incidents of (N = 1,277) relatively young (mean age 28.11) women. The women were given a series of questions from a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) (e.g.,"Have you ever experienced unwanted sexual attention or interaction from a stranger?"; "Have you ever experienced catcalls, whistles, or stares from a stranger?") to measure if and/or how often they had been the recipient of such harassing behaviors.

The participants were then presented with a list of 17 contextual factors including (attractiveness, time of day, race, and location) and asked to select which of the features would make a experience of harassment by a stranger more frightening, which would make the experience more enjoyable, and which would make them more likely to react verbally. It was found that the primary factors that determined how enjoyable or traumatic women found the experience to be were:

• Physical Attractiveness: More attractive men most significantly increased women's enjoyment of the 'harassment'.
• Age: Similar or younger age in relation to the participant increased women's enjoyment of the 'harassment'.
• Race: Different race of man made women more likely to rate it as traumatic.

Quotes:

• Similar behaviors from an attractive and unattractive man are viewed differently with the attractive man receiving more leeway in the potentially harassing behavior.
• Likewise, there is a contrast between younger harasser (18% responded more enjoyable) and older harasser (33% responded more frightening); this suggests that age may be an important contextual factor, particularly for determining if a situation is threatening enough to induce fear.
• It can only be assumed that the women (46% of participants) feel that stranger harassment is an unpleasant experience that cannot be improved. However, it is equally likely that these women (or some of them) find the experience highly enjoyable and such enjoyment cannot be increased.

References:

• Fairchild K. 2010. Context Effects on Women's Perceptions of Sexual Harassment. Sexuality & Culture. 14:19. [FullText]

 

[Deleted member 20659]

Lmao

 

[Uglyme]

You're not imagining things, science agrees with you.

Spoiler

Women's definition of 'harassment' in online dating depends on the attractiveness of the man
A simulation of online dating was performed with fictional male profiles of varying attractiveness and social status. 128 female college students from a small northeastern public university participated to interact with these fictional male profiles. The male profiles then sent the female participants messages of increasing harassment. Researchers assessed how much harassment the women were willing to tolerate.

Results very clearly indicated that the strongest predictor of women's tolerance for "online harassment" was the attractiveness and social status of the "harasser" (ie. her interest in dating him).

Quotes:

• Participants' self reported likelihood to date a bogus male dating candidate was predictive of tolerance for sexual harassment.
• As a profile’s likelihood to date rating increased, so did the number of sexually harassing responses that participants were willing to tolerate.
• We found that participants exposed to a physically attractive bogus candidate were willing to receive more sexually harassing responses from the bogus candidate, as were participants exposed to a high status bogus candidate.
• Physically attractive individuals are perceived as less sexually harassing than unattractive individuals (Hendrix, Rueb, & Steel,1998).
• Women also reported being least upset when they imagined being harassed by a man of high occupational status (e.g., premedical student, graduate student, successful rock star) and most upset when being harassed by a man of low occupational status (e.g., construction worker, garbage collector, cleaning men, gas station attendant) (Buss, 1994).

References:

• Angelone DJ, Mitchell D, Carola K. 2009. Tolerance of sexual harassment: a laboratory paradigm. Arch Sex Behav. 38(6): 949-58. [Abstract] [FullText]

The attractiveness of a male 'harasser' determines if the experience is enjoyable or traumatic
Fairchild (2010) conducted an online survey on perceptions of sexual harassment incidents of (N = 1,277) relatively young (mean age 28.11) women. The women were given a series of questions from a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) (e.g.,"Have you ever experienced unwanted sexual attention or interaction from a stranger?"; "Have you ever experienced catcalls, whistles, or stares from a stranger?") to measure if and/or how often they had been the recipient of such harassing behaviors.

The participants were then presented with a list of 17 contextual factors including (attractiveness, time of day, race, and location) and asked to select which of the features would make a experience of harassment by a stranger more frightening, which would make the experience more enjoyable, and which would make them more likely to react verbally. It was found that the primary factors that determined how enjoyable or traumatic women found the experience to be were:

• Physical Attractiveness: More attractive men most significantly increased women's enjoyment of the 'harassment'.
• Age: Similar or younger age in relation to the participant increased women's enjoyment of the 'harassment'.
• Race: Different race of man made women more likely to rate it as traumatic.

Quotes:

• Similar behaviors from an attractive and unattractive man are viewed differently with the attractive man receiving more leeway in the potentially harassing behavior.
• Likewise, there is a contrast between younger harasser (18% responded more enjoyable) and older harasser (33% responded more frightening); this suggests that age may be an important contextual factor, particularly for determining if a situation is threatening enough to induce fear.
• It can only be assumed that the women (46% of participants) feel that stranger harassment is an unpleasant experience that cannot be improved. However, it is equally likely that these women (or some of them) find the experience highly enjoyable and such enjoyment cannot be increased.

References:

• Fairchild K. 2010. Context Effects on Women's Perceptions of Sexual Harassment. Sexuality & Culture. 14:19. [FullText]

"But... mu personality..."

 

[Deleted member 23944]

You're not imagining things, science agrees with you.

Spoiler

Women's definition of 'harassment' in online dating depends on the attractiveness of the man
A simulation of online dating was performed with fictional male profiles of varying attractiveness and social status. 128 female college students from a small northeastern public university participated to interact with these fictional male profiles. The male profiles then sent the female participants messages of increasing harassment. Researchers assessed how much harassment the women were willing to tolerate.

Results very clearly indicated that the strongest predictor of women's tolerance for "online harassment" was the attractiveness and social status of the "harasser" (ie. her interest in dating him).

Quotes:

• Participants' self reported likelihood to date a bogus male dating candidate was predictive of tolerance for sexual harassment.
• As a profile’s likelihood to date rating increased, so did the number of sexually harassing responses that participants were willing to tolerate.
• We found that participants exposed to a physically attractive bogus candidate were willing to receive more sexually harassing responses from the bogus candidate, as were participants exposed to a high status bogus candidate.
• Physically attractive individuals are perceived as less sexually harassing than unattractive individuals (Hendrix, Rueb, & Steel,1998).
• Women also reported being least upset when they imagined being harassed by a man of high occupational status (e.g., premedical student, graduate student, successful rock star) and most upset when being harassed by a man of low occupational status (e.g., construction worker, garbage collector, cleaning men, gas station attendant) (Buss, 1994).

References:

• Angelone DJ, Mitchell D, Carola K. 2009. Tolerance of sexual harassment: a laboratory paradigm. Arch Sex Behav. 38(6): 949-58. [Abstract] [FullText]

The attractiveness of a male 'harasser' determines if the experience is enjoyable or traumatic
Fairchild (2010) conducted an online survey on perceptions of sexual harassment incidents of (N = 1,277) relatively young (mean age 28.11) women. The women were given a series of questions from a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) (e.g.,"Have you ever experienced unwanted sexual attention or interaction from a stranger?"; "Have you ever experienced catcalls, whistles, or stares from a stranger?") to measure if and/or how often they had been the recipient of such harassing behaviors.

The participants were then presented with a list of 17 contextual factors including (attractiveness, time of day, race, and location) and asked to select which of the features would make a experience of harassment by a stranger more frightening, which would make the experience more enjoyable, and which would make them more likely to react verbally. It was found that the primary factors that determined how enjoyable or traumatic women found the experience to be were:

• Physical Attractiveness: More attractive men most significantly increased women's enjoyment of the 'harassment'.
• Age: Similar or younger age in relation to the participant increased women's enjoyment of the 'harassment'.
• Race: Different race of man made women more likely to rate it as traumatic.

Quotes:

• Similar behaviors from an attractive and unattractive man are viewed differently with the attractive man receiving more leeway in the potentially harassing behavior.
• Likewise, there is a contrast between younger harasser (18% responded more enjoyable) and older harasser (33% responded more frightening); this suggests that age may be an important contextual factor, particularly for determining if a situation is threatening enough to induce fear.
• It can only be assumed that the women (46% of participants) feel that stranger harassment is an unpleasant experience that cannot be improved. However, it is equally likely that these women (or some of them) find the experience highly enjoyable and such enjoyment cannot be increased.

References:

• Fairchild K. 2010. Context Effects on Women's Perceptions of Sexual Harassment. Sexuality & Culture. 14:19. [FullText]

How IT can't admit this is staggering. Sexual harassment is codified lookism in the workplace/law. It means that ugly man aren't even permitted to try or express themselves sexually in any way.

If you're ugly you're basically perceived and supposed to operate as a sexless being.

 

[Deleted member 20811]

You're not imagining things, science agrees with you.

Spoiler

Women's definition of 'harassment' in online dating depends on the attractiveness of the man
A simulation of online dating was performed with fictional male profiles of varying attractiveness and social status. 128 female college students from a small northeastern public university participated to interact with these fictional male profiles. The male profiles then sent the female participants messages of increasing harassment. Researchers assessed how much harassment the women were willing to tolerate.

Results very clearly indicated that the strongest predictor of women's tolerance for "online harassment" was the attractiveness and social status of the "harasser" (ie. her interest in dating him).

Quotes:

• Participants' self reported likelihood to date a bogus male dating candidate was predictive of tolerance for sexual harassment.
• As a profile’s likelihood to date rating increased, so did the number of sexually harassing responses that participants were willing to tolerate.
• We found that participants exposed to a physically attractive bogus candidate were willing to receive more sexually harassing responses from the bogus candidate, as were participants exposed to a high status bogus candidate.
• Physically attractive individuals are perceived as less sexually harassing than unattractive individuals (Hendrix, Rueb, & Steel,1998).
• Women also reported being least upset when they imagined being harassed by a man of high occupational status (e.g., premedical student, graduate student, successful rock star) and most upset when being harassed by a man of low occupational status (e.g., construction worker, garbage collector, cleaning men, gas station attendant) (Buss, 1994).

References:

• Angelone DJ, Mitchell D, Carola K. 2009. Tolerance of sexual harassment: a laboratory paradigm. Arch Sex Behav. 38(6): 949-58. [Abstract] [FullText]

The attractiveness of a male 'harasser' determines if the experience is enjoyable or traumatic
Fairchild (2010) conducted an online survey on perceptions of sexual harassment incidents of (N = 1,277) relatively young (mean age 28.11) women. The women were given a series of questions from a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) (e.g.,"Have you ever experienced unwanted sexual attention or interaction from a stranger?"; "Have you ever experienced catcalls, whistles, or stares from a stranger?") to measure if and/or how often they had been the recipient of such harassing behaviors.

The participants were then presented with a list of 17 contextual factors including (attractiveness, time of day, race, and location) and asked to select which of the features would make a experience of harassment by a stranger more frightening, which would make the experience more enjoyable, and which would make them more likely to react verbally. It was found that the primary factors that determined how enjoyable or traumatic women found the experience to be were:

• Physical Attractiveness: More attractive men most significantly increased women's enjoyment of the 'harassment'.
• Age: Similar or younger age in relation to the participant increased women's enjoyment of the 'harassment'.
• Race: Different race of man made women more likely to rate it as traumatic.

Quotes:

• Similar behaviors from an attractive and unattractive man are viewed differently with the attractive man receiving more leeway in the potentially harassing behavior.
• Likewise, there is a contrast between younger harasser (18% responded more enjoyable) and older harasser (33% responded more frightening); this suggests that age may be an important contextual factor, particularly for determining if a situation is threatening enough to induce fear.
• It can only be assumed that the women (46% of participants) feel that stranger harassment is an unpleasant experience that cannot be improved. However, it is equally likely that these women (or some of them) find the experience highly enjoyable and such enjoyment cannot be increased.

References:

• Fairchild K. 2010. Context Effects on Women's Perceptions of Sexual Harassment. Sexuality & Culture. 14:19. [FullText]

I would love to see IT try to deny this . JFL the facts are right in front of them

 

[Genetic Dead End]

And you can't tell me its because of his personality.

Their personality detectors determined that this was a lie.

 

[Gymcelled]

How IT can't admit this is staggering. Sexual harassment is codified lookism in the workplace/law. It means that ugly man aren't even permitted to try or express themselves sexually in any way.

If you're ugly you're basically perceived and supposed to operate as a sexless being.

I've heard horror stories of HR getting men fired/in trouble just for saying hi how are you doing or your dress looks good etc. It doesn't even have to be sexual, just talking to a foid gets you in trouble if you're ugly.

I would love to see IT try to deny this . JFL the facts are right in front of them

I've never seen them address any studies. All they do is call us neckbeards or violent psychos despite the fact that prisons are filled with sex havers and incels aren't the ones pummeling women every night.

 

[Deleted member 23944]

I've heard horror stories of HR getting men fired/in trouble just for saying hi how are you doing or your dress looks good etc. It doesn't even have to be sexual, just talking to a foid gets you in trouble if you're ugly.

Exactly every single compliment on looks is perceived to be sexual/desperate if you are ugly.

 

[Deleted member 22571]

At my old job, the waitresses would always hug the tall Chad cooks/waiters whenever they came in for their shifts. They never hugged any of the shorter guys. I got pissed everytime I saw it.

 

[Uglyme]

At my old job, the waitresses would always hug the tall Chad cooks/waiters whenever they came in for their shifts. They never hugged any of the shorter guys. I got pissed everytime I saw it.

Brutal, it never begun for us

 

[Wristlet 2]

I fucking hate this guy. He's arrogant, foulmouthed, he smokes like a chimney, he's licking the feet of every boss just to get favors like coming in late or an extra smoke break. Yet, he's attractive and tall. He kind of looks like Robert Redford when he was young, but with darker hair. He's been in the company for just five months and he already has gained more than a dozen female orbiters. He also has a gf but he goes about touching foids every time he talks to them. He goes to their cubicles and places his hands in their shoulders or grabs their waists when they're walking down the hallway. Of course they are delighted with that, I see it in their eyes. In fact, he doesn't even need to go where they are, women go to his spot to hug-greet him. Once, I saw a group of 4 foids who went to his spot to greet him and each of them gave him a hug and a kiss in turns. They stood there waiting for their turn to hug him!

I've been working for that company for 4 years, and I've never got even a single hug from my female coworkers. And you can't tell me its because of his personality cause he's a total jerk, one time he made a rather obscene joke about fat people in my prescence (I'm fat) and everyone laghed and some turned to look at me. But of course cucktears will say it's his great sense of humor and amazing personality what allows him to attract women.

ERfuel

 

[TheIncredibleIncel]

I fucking hate this guy. He's arrogant, foulmouthed, he smokes like a chimney, he's licking the feet of every boss just to get favors like coming in late or an extra smoke break. Yet, he's attractive and tall. He kind of looks like Robert Redford when he was young, but with darker hair. He's been in the company for just five months and he already has gained more than a dozen female orbiters. He also has a gf but he goes about touching foids every time he talks to them. He goes to their cubicles and places his hands in their shoulders or grabs their waists when they're walking down the hallway. Of course they are delighted with that, I see it in their eyes. In fact, he doesn't even need to go where they are, women go to his spot to hug-greet him. Once, I saw a group of 4 foids who went to his spot to greet him and each of them gave him a hug and a kiss in turns. They stood there waiting for their turn to hug him!

I've been working for that company for 4 years, and I've never got even a single hug from my female coworkers. And you can't tell me its because of his personality cause he's a total jerk, one time he made a rather obscene joke about fat people in my prescence (I'm fat) and everyone laghed and some turned to look at me. But of course cucktears will say it's his great sense of humor and amazing personality what allows him to attract women.

Have you tried reporting him? Preferably anonymously?

 

[Uglyme]

Have you tried reporting him? Preferably anonymously?

I will send an e-mail to HR

 

[Idotms]

It's over for you.

Women wants to be treated good, but won't treat incels with any dignity or respect.

 

[GeneticDysfunction]

Jfl the sluts over at HR probably want to get their pussies destroyed by him too, the only way to win as an incel is to not play the game/rope.

 

[Deleted member 23682]

(I'm fat)

bruh

 

[Emba]

I will send an e-mail to HR

Be anonymous about it bro. Don't want to be seen as a sour grapes dude.

Make it seem like a fearful foid...

 

[ThoughtfulCel]

It wont touch this