PM_ME_STRIPPERS
IYAIYAI
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 15,821
Young Females no longer want to be like their older parts ( mothers/ aunts etc). They no longer want to become a good wife, raise a normal family and grow old with their man. No, these days its all about fashion, makeup, having expensive and newest phones and other material crap, having casual sex with a good looking male, being lookist and hypergamous bitches, treating men they see as below them as dirt and so much more.
Sure, you can make a case that these women eventually seek relationships and "settle down" ( not in the red pill sense) but they refuse to, unless the man has good looks. Thats why u will never see the younger generational female with a unattractive/ ugly male. These females refuse to accept that a lot of themselves look like a pile of trash ( actually trash looks better) without their makeup so they compensate by seeking the most attractive male they are able to obtain.
We are not the only ones who have noticed this, the average male who is getting fuck all is too. But they are the silent ones as well. They refuse to speak up or they will be labelled as "sexist/ misogyist etc" and they will hurt their chances of what little they get too. Yes they still pull, but not as much as their same age group did years ago too.
The world is a different place than it was even 10 or 15 years ago.For most of civilized history, there was a social contract that existed between men, women, and governments. The social contract basically stated that if you, as a man, served your nation you would be rewarded with at least a decent looking woman to settle down and have kids with. You would serve your country and in return get to pass on your genetics. Sounds like a pretty good deal to me.
Times seem to be reverting back to what they were before civilized society. There is evidence to show that before the advent of modern civilizations, 1 in every 17 men were able to breed. The rest of men were essentially “Incels” and died off. In an ancient society one could argue that this would be beneficial. That women were the choosers and would select the strongest men to carry on society as any other life form does (see Darwinian theory). However, we have more than moved on from stupid archaic ways of choosing mates and you could argue that smart people are generally superior to facially attractive people now.
When the cucks, Sean Rad and Jonathan Badeen, invented the concept of the commercialization of dating with Tinder, they directly targeted it FOR women. You see, Tinder puts dating in the hands of women because men are willing to meet up with multiple women, whilst women are not. In ancient times, this was not a bad thing because the physically strongest would pass on their genes, but nowadays we need smarter people to carry us forward.
Tinder, and all the other cucked and lookist dating apps, reduce people to aesthetically good looking faces, but makes women overlook everything else. Back in the 1950’s you actually had to judge someone based on their personality and looks. Nowadays, women only care about who is good looking and who is the easiest to obtain and fits the criteria out of them and couldn’t care less about lesser looking males.
A sample Chad v Virgin meme that the EU wants to ban:
Sure, you can make a case that these women eventually seek relationships and "settle down" ( not in the red pill sense) but they refuse to, unless the man has good looks. Thats why u will never see the younger generational female with a unattractive/ ugly male. These females refuse to accept that a lot of themselves look like a pile of trash ( actually trash looks better) without their makeup so they compensate by seeking the most attractive male they are able to obtain.
We are not the only ones who have noticed this, the average male who is getting fuck all is too. But they are the silent ones as well. They refuse to speak up or they will be labelled as "sexist/ misogyist etc" and they will hurt their chances of what little they get too. Yes they still pull, but not as much as their same age group did years ago too.
The world is a different place than it was even 10 or 15 years ago.For most of civilized history, there was a social contract that existed between men, women, and governments. The social contract basically stated that if you, as a man, served your nation you would be rewarded with at least a decent looking woman to settle down and have kids with. You would serve your country and in return get to pass on your genetics. Sounds like a pretty good deal to me.
Times seem to be reverting back to what they were before civilized society. There is evidence to show that before the advent of modern civilizations, 1 in every 17 men were able to breed. The rest of men were essentially “Incels” and died off. In an ancient society one could argue that this would be beneficial. That women were the choosers and would select the strongest men to carry on society as any other life form does (see Darwinian theory). However, we have more than moved on from stupid archaic ways of choosing mates and you could argue that smart people are generally superior to facially attractive people now.
When the cucks, Sean Rad and Jonathan Badeen, invented the concept of the commercialization of dating with Tinder, they directly targeted it FOR women. You see, Tinder puts dating in the hands of women because men are willing to meet up with multiple women, whilst women are not. In ancient times, this was not a bad thing because the physically strongest would pass on their genes, but nowadays we need smarter people to carry us forward.
Tinder, and all the other cucked and lookist dating apps, reduce people to aesthetically good looking faces, but makes women overlook everything else. Back in the 1950’s you actually had to judge someone based on their personality and looks. Nowadays, women only care about who is good looking and who is the easiest to obtain and fits the criteria out of them and couldn’t care less about lesser looking males.
A sample Chad v Virgin meme that the EU wants to ban:
Last edited: