What do you think?
@Adolf_Hitler
Attacking Poland was a big mistake, it only gave the UK and France a casus belli to attack. They should have exerted more diplomatic effort in bringing Poland into the Axis. If they avoided war with the west it was winnable. The Soviets slaughtered 50,000 Polish elites in the Katyn massacre after their victory, I bet they regretted relying on the French and Brits. Also drop the Japs and keep support for Nationalist China, just makes you look like the good guy and you don't have a useless ally.
Last edited:
Hitler destroyed Poland and conquered the French, so he got his revenge. But no, the German economy was not large enough to win a prolonged large scale war. Economic power dictates the outcome of war.
Yes, the war against Russia to secure a larger industrial base was supposed to happen in the autumn of 1941. When Barbarossa failed outside Moscow, the war was lost.
There are some quality youtubers such as TIK who are worth watching on the topic of the economic system of Hitlers Germany.
Had he only dealt with russia 1 on 1 or britain and us 2 v1 instead of all 3 v1 he would have won
The axis of WW2 did a poor job of representing itself. Slaughtering people makes you look bad and leads to sanctions. Had Hitler avoided Russian winter, did some sort of national blockage by invading nearby weaker countries he would have better chance. Also wtf is with the declaration of war against USA.
Germany needed to win in the Eastern front, which was the most challenging part of the war. They needed to win the war fast because their economy would have collapsed in the long run (out-produced by the allies, the lack of raw materials also was a huge problem). Germany also lacked oil in the war, they needed to either take control of the oil fields in libya and the middle east, or the oil fields in the Caucasus (which could have been possible if they were more successful in Stalingrad). All Odds were against Germany in WW2, they basically had to fight against the entire world. Hitler should have not intervened with his generals plans.
I wish they won
Even though I don't like him stalin was smart. he executed all generals after coming to the power and replaced them with his own commanders.such as georgy zhukov,he was very smart and strategic general you can't underestimate succes of the soviet army
I don't see how he could lose with Russia on his side
2
Maybe. But russia is really strong. Its hard question to ask
Well considering how he was soundly defeated, I would say no
G
If they waited a bit longer to develop technologically wed all be speaking German now.
You could say the same thing about the brits after they declared war on germany for invading poland
The soviets were pants on head retarded sending wave after wave of mongol farmers to the front line, their k/d ratio was abysmal
bro No. They'd nuke berlin to shit
Yes if he had taken the oil fields, but he didn't and the ones he did take the soviets destroyed before they left.
This is what crippled Germany ultimately, and Italy being incompetent didn't help.
This is what crippled Germany ultimately, and Italy being incompetent didn't help.
Last edited:
The U.S. would've destroyed him no matter what.
Link?
This is the one about germany need for oil, he has lots of videos about ww2 in detail
Thanks.
D
The Germans didn't have the technology for the bomb, they only had the math to show it's feasibility.
You are wrong they had it.
He could of won WW2 if he had done things a bit differently.
Maybe, without chad worshipping
Probably not. It’s a nice fantasy though.
D
During Operation Gunnerside in 1943, a small team of British trained Norwegian Commandos were able to blow up the German's capabilities to produce heavy water at the Vemork Hydro Electric Plant in Occupied Norway. There were other sabotage operations (Operation Grouse, Operation Freshman) but they became failed missions. Operation Gunnerside was successful. The British trained Norwegian Commandos were sent into Occupied Norway to sabotage and destroy the Vemork Hydro Electric Plant with explosives. At the time this was the only plant the Germans controlled that was capable of producing heavy water. The saboteurs destroyed the plant's production capabilities. With the little heavy water that remained the German's tried to transport it out on a ferry. The Kompani Linge were again sent by the British to blow up the ferry transporting the heavy water. Again the Norwegian Commandos were successful as the ferry was sunk by the saboteurs explosives. Without the heavy water, critical to the production of a nuclear bomb, there is no way the Germans could build a bomb. For more information look up, "The Real Heros of Telemark."
Ive known it.
if only germans had more time
I think the Germans could've won the East if they'd at least secured peace with Britain. There's no way Operation Sealion would've been a success, so outright invading them was a fantasy from the get-go, but without the Allies bombing their factories, opening another two fronts in Europe, and supplying the Soviets with lend-lease, Germany would've had the means to capture the oil fields and push the Soviets at least up to Leningrad.
I could continue my experiments if he had won. An alternate reality where he did won
I have seen a few of this guys videos and I don't like him.
He seems to like the fact the allies won and all his commentors are faggots
D
They could have won if They gave the soldiers and scientists cute adorable loli of culture
Stalin was a fuckin disaster. He purged all the officers core which resulted in the army being pretty shit. Finland a fraction of the size of the USSR humbled and embarrassed them. He also didn't listen to credible information that the germans were going to attack, and his no retreat orders caused tens of thousands to be killed and captured rather than being able to fall back and regroup. Stalin was a ruthless paranoid thug. He was no grand strategist. Trokisy would of made a much more competent leader if he had the chance instead.
R
He probably could of held a bit longer, but Germany would of collapsed eventually due to lack of resources to keep their forces going.
He could've won with the help of (((them)))
Yes tbh but then the US joined and it went downhill
The good guys lost WW2
The good guys lost WW2
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
