Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Drumpf inciting his supporters to violence then backstabbing them

Atavistic Autist

Atavistic Autist

Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
Joined
May 28, 2018
Posts
9,297
 
He’s pro Zionis and tranny what do you expect
 
Last edited:
If jews love Trump so much but they also control the media, why does the media portray him so negatively?
 
If jews love Trump so much but they also control the media, why does the media portray him so negatively?
Ultra-Zionist Jews and liberal-diaspora Jews are distinct yet related entities.
 
Atavistic Autist
 
He only incited them to commit mild violence not extreme violence.
 

inciting his supporters to violence​

Donald Trump said:
We’re going walk down to the Capitol,
and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women.
I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building
to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.
okay moishe
 
okay moishe
Having a Jewish lawyer write your speech to be literally legal while in sentiment provoking a riot is a master stroke.

Btw, how do you explain the Pentagon refusing aid to the Capitol Police upwards of six times? Your narrative of the DC mayor declining aid from the federal government doesn't make much sense anymore, does it boomer?

 
Last edited:
your speech to be literally legal
while in sentiment provoking a riot
Parroting MSM narrative that Trump incited doesn't make it true.
Trump promoted peaceful assembly, and spinning that as riot-provocation is basically an attempt to censor peaceful assemblies and those who call for them.
Btw, how do you explain the Pentagon refusing aid to the Capitol Police upwards of six times?
Your narrative of the DC mayor declining aid from the federal government doesn't make much sense anymore, does it boomer?
Did you actually read the article you just linked?
Chief Steven Sund told The Washington Post he asked the Senate and House sergeants at arms multiple times for permission to request National Guard support.
The departing Capitol Police chief said he tried six times to summon reinforcements .. but was blocked from doing so by his superiors.

The sergeants and arms aren't members of the Pentagon. His superiors were locals. It's the locals who dropped the ball:

You can see how they stalled him for an hour:
  • At 1:09 p.m. Sund called House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving and Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger to get permission to deploy the National Guard. He said that the pair told him they would "run it up the chain," but he didn't hear back.
  • After that Sund called Irving twice more for a follow-up.
  • After that Sund called Stenger once more for a follow-up.
  • At 2:10 p.m. Sund got approval from Irving to call for National Guard support.

Allegations seem to focus around accusations of what happened regarding Piatt:
  • At 2:26 p.m. Sund joined a call with Pentagon officials and asked them to deploy the National Guard. Lt. Gen. Walter E. Piatt, the director of the Army Staff, is said to have told those on the call that he could not recommend calling in the Guard.
  • Sund recalled saying on the conference call with Piatt and others: "I am making an urgent, urgent immediate request for National Guard assistance. I have got to get boots on the ground."
  • Sund said Piatt responded: "I don't like the visual of the National Guard standing a police line with the Capitol in the background."

The problem here with pushing this angle is it's not confirmed: Piatt has disputed saying this and pointed out that NG were deployed adjacent to that time.

In a statement to Insider Monday afternoon, Piatt denied blocking Sund's request, saying: "I did not make the statement or any comments similar to what was attributed to me by Chief Sund in the Washington Post article."

"Neither I, nor anyone else from DoD, denied the deployment of requested personnel," he added, stressing that while he was leading the call, during which he told participants that he was not the approval authority, the secretary of the Army was talking to the acting defense secretary to get approval.

Piatt said that approval to deploy the National Guard came through roughly 40 minutes after that call started.

You can also see that Sund admits Irving was the one who fucked up:

According to The Post, Sund said he asked House and Senate security officials two days before the attack whether he could request that the National Guard be placed on standby. He said he was denied.

Irving, the House sergeant at arms, told Sund he didn't like the "optics" of essentially broadcasting that authorities were expecting an emergency, Sund said.

Irving reported to the HOR which is controlled by democrats. There's a reason he stepped down: he knew he failed his responsibilities by colluding with the people who wanted a riot to happen. Stenver and Sund also resigned.

The reason the general didn't resign is because the arguments they made about him are BS, they have no vid confirming he said what they attributed to him.
 

Similar threads

Eremetic
Replies
2
Views
214
ResentER
R
copemaxx9002
Replies
1
Views
89
failednormie_
failednormie_
AsiaCel
Replies
25
Views
502
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
NatsumeSouseki
Replies
8
Views
110
NatsumeSouseki
NatsumeSouseki

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top