That's right, if you're a homeless man, you're evil and deserve to suffer, and don't deserve any help--that help should only go to women.
Hypocrisy Feminist professor says homeless men perpetuate hegemonic masculinity
Some quotes from the article:
Dej also interviewed “Ron,” a 41-year-old homeless man with depression and PTSD. Ron used various drugs to cope with his mental health issues, and by age 41, this had taken a heavy toll on him, causing breathing problems and muscle weakness.
“I walked down the street and, like, a little girl could have killed me. That’s how weak I was,” Ron told Dej during an interview. Extrapolating from this comment, Dej then suggested that Ron somehow views women en masse negatively.
“For Ron, the feminine subjectivity acts as the ultimate exemplar of physical weakness and the most absurd hyperbole of who constitutes a threat,” Dej wrote in her essay. She opines: “He has failed to live up to the basic tenets of hegemonic masculinity.”
Not surprisingly, Dej writes that the only alternative for these men is to become more emotional, insofar as men should “confront, display, and work through their emotions, adding to the complexity of what it means to be masculine.”
But even men who are open about their emotions are problematic. If a man opens up about his emotions, Dej laments that it still allows “masculinity to prevail without necessarily challenging the patriarchal foundation upon which it rests.” Catch 22.
Professor Dej declined to comment. According to her CV, she has been awarded at least $185,000 by the Canadian government to research homelessness since 2009, and she notes that this new study is an outgrowth of her previous research.
Dej also interviewed “Ron,” a 41-year-old homeless man with depression and PTSD. Ron used various drugs to cope with his mental health issues, and by age 41, this had taken a heavy toll on him, causing breathing problems and muscle weakness.
“I walked down the street and, like, a little girl could have killed me. That’s how weak I was,” Ron told Dej during an interview. Extrapolating from this comment, Dej then suggested that Ron somehow views women en masse negatively.
“For Ron, the feminine subjectivity acts as the ultimate exemplar of physical weakness and the most absurd hyperbole of who constitutes a threat,” Dej wrote in her essay. She opines: “He has failed to live up to the basic tenets of hegemonic masculinity.”
Not surprisingly, Dej writes that the only alternative for these men is to become more emotional, insofar as men should “confront, display, and work through their emotions, adding to the complexity of what it means to be masculine.”
But even men who are open about their emotions are problematic. If a man opens up about his emotions, Dej laments that it still allows “masculinity to prevail without necessarily challenging the patriarchal foundation upon which it rests.” Catch 22.
Professor Dej declined to comment. According to her CV, she has been awarded at least $185,000 by the Canadian government to research homelessness since 2009, and she notes that this new study is an outgrowth of her previous research.
L
This is the problem with modern "leftism". It's completely free from the critique of materialism/inequality in the world and therefore nothing more than neoliberalism with an even bigger tranny fetish and bioleninism (e.g. hatred for white people and men). While the materialistic component was removed, the most important ideological stuff (e.g. believing in something bigger than the pleasure/hedonism of the individual) was also completely removed. The modern "leftist" has absolutely no problem licking the asshole of corporations, because it's not capitalistic oppression when "Trans Rights" is written on it.
She has no right to talk about such hardships, she will never understand or relate to a man in such a position in life
Based
And then he loses his job for saying this and end up homeless.
They are centrists.
So she's have been given 185.000 to shit on broken homeless people because she twist his words? Next thing she will claim that homeless Men oppress her because of non existing patriarchy(in Canada patriarchy is long dead).
men perpetrators, wahmen victims
D
FUCK FUCK FUUUUUUUUCK this CUCKED Country, planet, WE NEED CLEANSING.
Okay, then judging by that logic, homeless women are also evil and deserve to suffer?
D
This is the only logical response to that. A whore has been given $185,000 to research homelessness and she starts bullshitting about emotions and masculinity and shit like that. Unbelievable.
Exactly. If there's a hegemony, it's the feminists in universities and politics telling the rest of us that we not allowed anything.
Jesus Christ, please come back. This clown world is becoming more hellish every day.
Really? Someone pays you $185k to study homelessness and the only thing you can think of is, "Are homeless men misogynists?"
They keep looking for reasons to hate non-Chads. The more hypergamous they get, the harder they try to validate their superficial nature.
Really? Someone pays you $185k to study homelessness and the only thing you can think of is, "Are homeless men misogynists?"
D
Women will look for any reason to kick dirt in the face of struggling men to get attention from others.
Cucknada will be the first country to put non chad men in reeducation camps.
Wherever white women are in charge and have lots of power and influence in the Anglosphere, you have mass inceldom, very high amounts of WMAF, homelessness, methamphetamine abuse, and a very large wealth gap.
All emblematic of the white woman's extreme callousness and hypocrisy.
Wherever you have white women in check, say for example in conservative rural areas in southern states of the US, all that I mentioned above practically doesnt exist.
All emblematic of the white woman's extreme callousness and hypocrisy.
Wherever you have white women in check, say for example in conservative rural areas in southern states of the US, all that I mentioned above practically doesnt exist.
Last edited:
Similar threads
Izayacel
Users who are viewing this thread
