Serious Foids are misanthropist genocidal maniacs

[GermaniaIncelia]

You might think that Hitler or Mao were enemies of humankind, but in comparison to foids they were extremely moderate.

Let's be generous, let's say the pareto principle of 80/20 holds and not the more realistic model of 99/1. Women would still want 80% of men dead, gone from the face of the earth because they view them as subhumans. 80% of men translates to 40% of human population. Foids literally want at least 40% of the human population gone.

A gigantic contrast to people like Hitler who merely targeted minor ethnic groups. The total ethnic jewish world population was at 17 million in 1940, with a world population at the time of 2.34 billion, which means the jews Hitler targeted were at most a 0.7% of the world population if he made no exceptions. And even if you add further groups up like the gypsies, you don't get much higher.

According to mainstream views of politics, foids would fall under the far-right extremist category and Hitler would be a moderate centrist.

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

high IQ

women and their emancipation can wreck more civilizations than Hitler ever could, and this will soon become patently obvious

 

[Selinity]

Women don't want 80% of men dead.

high IQ

women and their emancipation can wreck more civilizations than Hitler ever could, and this will soon become patently obvious

This isn't high IQ because it's based on shit science and incorrect interpretations of data. Low-tier garbage post worthy of the sewers

 

[Ecstasy]

Women being eugenicist is actually their best trait (after ass and tits)

 

[kikecel]

Women don't want 80% of men dead.

by not having sex with them they do

 

[LDARbeforeROPE]

How are they maniacs? Also eugenics does not equal genocide as they are not killing anyone yet.

Women don't want 80% of men dead.

This isn't high IQ because it's based on shit science and incorrect interpretations of data. Low-tier garbage post worthy of the sewers

Women being eugenicist is actually their best trait (after ass and tits)

 

[NaserOric]

by not having sex with them they do

They want them to be sexless contributors to society. Without those 80% of men, society could not exist.

That's actually worse, because that's slavery since sex is the most important thing in the life of a male.

 

[Ecstasy]

How are they maniacs? Also eugenics does not equal genocide as they are not killing anyone yet.

I didnt call them maniacs or genociders. Abortion may be genocide, depending on your definition. Imo its just immoral

 

[radishman]

Every foid related grievance can be summed with: why were they given rights? Because all of the problems we are facing begin and end with the gender enemy,

 

[Selinity]

by not having sex with them they do

they don't only have sex with 20% of guys. High-tier normies get girls and sex too, sub-8 theory is just a cope used to make people feel better about themselves.

"See guys, only 20% of men get women, that means that almost everyone is an incel."

We're a minority. Most above average male has had sex.

 

[LDARbeforeROPE]

I didnt call them maniacs or genociders. Abortion may be genocide, depending on your definition. Imo its just immoral

I was refering to OP. I quoted you because i agreed

 

[Deleted member 32326]

Women being eugenicist is actually their best trait (after ass and tits)

Yeah the same cunts who are 4'11 and choose to get impregnated by a 6'4 monster chad are being real good eugenicists at making male offspring that are short and ugly as shit

BRAVO GENIUS!!!!!

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

Women don't want 80% of men dead.

don't forget your medicine bro

How are they maniacs?

they suffer from cluster B disorders

 

[Selinity]

don't forget your medicine bro

Sub-8 theory isn't true, that's not bluepilled, that's a fact.

6 and 7 out of ten guys still have sex, they still have relationships and they lead normal lives.

Again, we are the minority, the majority of males aren't incels.

 

[Glast]

They want them to be sexless contributors to society. Without those 80% of men, society could not exist.

That's actually worse, because that's slavery since sex is the most important thing in the life of a male.

I wholeheartedly agree, brocel.

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

Again, we are the minority, the majority of males aren't incels.

that's even more bluepilled than your previous statement. the majority of men are incels or at the very least borderline incels but just not aware of it.

 

[Ecstasy]

View attachment 396875


Yeah the same cunts who are 4'11 and choose to get impregnated by a 6'4 monster chad are being real good eugenicists at making male offspring that are short and ugly as shit

BRAVO GENIUS!!!!!

Happened how many times? Even if, its better to weed out the 4'11 offspring

I was refering to OP. I quoted you because i agreed

Oh, thanks I guess. Its weird how many incels have that faggy leftist attitude preaching acceptence for the weak and ugly.
I'd rather leave inceldom or fucking kill myself than wanting the whole world to become subhuman enablers.

 

[NaserOric]

Sub-8 theory isn't true, that's not bluepilled, that's a fact.

6 and 7 out of ten guys still have sex, they still have relationships and they lead normal lives.

Again, we are the minority, the majority of males aren't incels.

Truecels are a minority even under western zoomers yeah. But the amount of men that have 0 to 1-3x sex a year is like 80% under western zoomers and it's getting exponentially worse.

 

[Selinity]

that's even more bluepilled than your previous statement. the majority of men are incels or at the very least borderline incels but just not aware of it.

it's not bluepilled bro, it's the truth. Keep living with your delusions, JFL. Most young people have girlfriends and stuff.
statistics show that
30 percent of men haven't had sex in the past year.

that means 70% of men have had sex in the past year, 70% of men aren't celibate. That's a little more than 20%, right?

 

[radishman]

Having sex once and then never again somehow isn't incel LOL.

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

it's not bluepilled bro, it's the truth. Keep living with your delusions, JFL. Most young people have girlfriends and stuff.
statistics show that
30 percent of men haven't had sex in the past year.

that means 70% of men have had sex in the past year, 70% of men aren't celibate. That's a little more than 20%, right?

that's only statistics from a sample, only from within a single country of a cohort.
if for you incel is equivalent to truecels only this means genetically the most defective people then you would have a point even though that would be nothing but semantics and not refute that the majority of males never had sex or even if they did have, their amount of women was within a single digit range at most. the latter is not incel anymore but it is not far off to be lucky with a girl once

 

[Selinity]

that's only statistics from a sample, only from within a single country of a cohort.
if for you incel is equivalent to truecels only this means genetically the most defective people then you would have a point even though that would be nothing but semantics and not refute that the majority of males never had sex or even if they did have, their amount of women was within a single digit range at most.

I'm not saying they're slayers but the easy distinction between them and us is that they have unpaid sex.

If you still want to go "80 percent of men are virgins," then fine. Keep coping

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

they have unpaid sex.

have had. not have. there is a huge difference.

 

[randomguy1235]

View attachment 396875


Yeah the same cunts who are 4'11 and choose to get impregnated by a 6'4 monster chad are being real good eugenicists at making male offspring that are short and ugly as shit

BRAVO GENIUS!!!!!

 

[Deleted member 27204]

KeithInc. 8 hours ago #74037
Genocide's kind of a leap. Even if women were only sexing one fifth of the males, they still need someone Operating society.

Just becsuse you incels would cheerfully kill off zznyone that you don't wanna fuck, doesn't mean any other person has thgat outlook.

lol at thinking those sexless males would willingly operate a society to benefit people that have sex. Delusional.

Also where did all that talk go about how assuming men can operate society is misogynist and that women are just as capable of doing that work as men are?

And people on the website you are on have made a lot of veiled threats and cheered on the death of incels so you don't have a lot of room to talk about how people don't want to kill off incels and that there isn't any other person that has that outlook.

Copexodius Maximus #sexist

ShySaxon #sexist

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

have not heard any valid arguments that would speak against this perspective so far aside from the semantic argument of where inceldom starts and where it ends.

lol at thinking those sexless males would willingly operate a society to benefit people that have sex. Delusional.

Also where did all that talk go about how assuming men can operate society is misogynist and that women are just as capable of doing that work as men are?

And people on the website you are on have made a lot of veiled threats and cheered on the death of incels so you don't have a lot of room to talk about how people don't want to kill off incels and that there isn't any other person that has that outlook.

Copexodius Maximus #sexist

ShySaxon #sexist

i don't understand why incels or anyone for that matter would argue with literal nazis and marxists and jews who slaughtered millions of Europeans including slavs, caucasians and more.

 

[Deleted member 27204]

i don't understand why incels or anyone for that matter would argue with literal nazis and marxists and jews who slaughtered millions of Europeans including slavs, caucasians and more.

Nazis? The people on that site are the average US democrat tbh

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

Nazis? The people on that site are the average US democrat tbh

And people on the website you are on have made a lot of veiled threats and cheered on the death of incels

Choose.

They are either nazis, marxists, jews or a combination of any of these. Which are largely interchangable because they all share the same goal of holodomoring/holocausting.

 

[Deleted member 27204]

Choose.

They are either nazis, marxists, jews or a combination of any of these. Which are largely interchangable because they all share the same goal of holodomoring/holocausting.

You'll probably find a mix of liberals, antifa and classic intolerant leftists there tbh
That's beside the point though. You don't have to be a nazi to have the goal of wanting to kill or silence groups of people @Uggo Mongo @DonezoTheClown

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

You'll probably find a mix of liberals, antifa and classic intolerant leftists there tbh
That's beside the point though. You don't have to be a nazi to have the goal of wanting to kill or silence groups of people @Uggo Mongo @DonezoTheClown

antifa are marxists. Their flag of black, red is a literal marxist symbol. The black stands for anarchism, the red for socialism. And they are organised largely by globalists. They pretend to fight and hate cops, but they are mobs of people who get incited by undercover cops.

democrats are biggest criminals of our times. their views align perfectly with those of marxists and nazis.
and 'liberals' don't understand what liberalism is. It's like those guys who claim to be libertarian but are actually authoritarian af.

It's very easy to identify nazis tbh. That one documentary that was posted about Incels being a hate group was for example spearheaded by a woman who was a literal former member of the Stasi. As you can see, I mean in the most literal sense possible these guys are nazis.

 

[Deleted member 27204]

antifa are marxists. Their flag of black, red is a literal marxist symbol. The black stands for anarchism, the red for socialism. And they are organised largely by globalists. They pretend to fight and hate cops, but they are mobs of people who get incited by undercover cops.

democrats are biggest criminals of our times. their views align perfectly with those of marxists and nazis.
and 'liberals' don't understand what liberalism is. It's like those guys who claim to be libertarian but are actually authoritarian af.

tbh they aren't classical liberals but authoritarian liberals and leftists.

It's very easy to identify nazis tbh. That one documentary that was posted about Incels being a hate group was for example spearheaded by a woman who was a literal former member of the Stasi. As you can see, I mean in the most literal sense possible these guys are nazis.

I was just saying nazi has a very specific meaning and it doesn't help to use it in a general context to mean a genocidal authoritarian when there are plenty of authoritarians that were leftist and most certainly didn't subscribe to the official tenets of nazism. Stasis weren't nazis either, they were the Secret Police in Socialist East Germany.

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

it doesn't help to use it in a general context to mean a genocidal authoritarian when there are plenty of authoritarians that were leftist and most certainly didn't subscribe to the official tenets of nazism. Stasis weren't nazis either, they were the Secret Police in Socialist East Germany.

of course it does. The labels of left and right are trivial because when people say left or right what they actually want to refer to is libertarian vs authoritarian.
which can be or includes the weird political spectrum that soys think along. it's important not to make the trivial differentation of soys otherwise they just keep thinking within that frame of left-right where they think one side stands for moral superiority and the other for the harshness of reality or smth like that.

within that frame you can talk all day about how horrible the holodomor was but it will all be drowned by idealist lies of "but they had good intentions". No they didn't. They deliberately killed millions just for laughs

 

[Deleted member 27204]

of course it does. The labels of left and right are trivial because when people say left or right what they actually want to refer to is libertarian vs authoritarian.
which can be or includes the weird political spectrum that soys think along. it's important not to make the trivial differentation of soys otherwise they just keep thinking within that frame of left-right where they think one side stands for moral superiority and the other for the harshness of reality or smth like that.

Of course nazis, stasis, authortarians are more toward the totalitarian and lack of civil liberties side of things. But they aren't all the same thing. I get what you are saying about how the dichotomy between left-right can convince a lot of people that one side is more justified than the other and the libertarian-authoritarian spectrum is more valid for describing these political ideologies. But that's more a value judgement that others would make anyway regardless of how objectively you classified things.

within that frame you can talk all day about how horrible the holodomor was but it will all be drowned by idealist lies of "but they had good intentions". No they didn't. They deliberately killed millions just for laughs

Authoritarian communists, socialists, fascists, nazis and monarchists that were responsible for the genocide of millions of people are all bad. I'm not denying that. Also not arguing the people that did the holodomor had good intentions. Just that while many leftists are authoritarians just like nazis were, they still aren't the same as nazis.

 

[Irredeemable]

Women being eugenicist is actually their best trait (after ass and tits)

I don't mind some eugenics, but the problem is that they only select males based on looks. They don't care about productivity or IQ hence why foids love (attractive) thugs who do nothing but destroy society. High iq people usually end up as STEMmaxxed incels. You can't say breeding 90 iq criminals is good for the gene pool.

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

But that's more a value judgement that others would make anyway regardless of how objectively you classified things.

i still didn't get the argument for why to talk to hostile nazis, marxists and jews.


politics are like that one 4chan game. everyone plays THE GAME. You play the game by avoiding to think about the game. Once you out that the game exists or that anyone plays the game, you lost the game.

 

[Deleted member 27204]

i still didn't get the argument for why to talk to hostile nazis, marxists and jews.


politics are like that one 4chan game. everyone plays THE GAME. You play the game by avoiding to think about the game. Once you out that the game exists or that anyone plays the game, you lost the game.

Because they attack us first and sometimes their hypocrisy is too blatant to ignore.

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

Because they attack us first and sometimes their hypocrisy is too blatant to ignore.