Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [Hard To Swallow Edition] The Reason Why There Are So Many Incel Factions Is Because Most Incels Are Just Ugly Normies (Doesn't Value Objectivity)

An incel in some way causes a nuclear attack that results in the death of your family and millions?

  • 1. Unacceptable (will stop celebrating mass murder attacks, will give up on the black pill)

    Votes: 8 10.7%
  • 2. Neutral (never celebrated such attacks, will not be against them either, society caused this)

    Votes: 36 48.0%
  • 3. Acceptable (continue to celebrate, they were the casualties of war society won't admit exists)

    Votes: 31 41.3%

  • Total voters
    75
BlkPillPres

BlkPillPres

Self-banned
-
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Posts
19,752
The reason why we have so many factions within inceldom is because nobody wants to objectively define the criteria of inceldom, because everybody wants inceldom to be whatever they "feel" it should be. Incels like to speak about normies like they are "emotional" and "illogical" all the time, but the truth is, most incels are just like normies, they just happen to be ugly, they are no different, just hypocrites complaining that they got the short end of the stick, and if the tables turned they'd be doing the same things normies are doing, they were never black pilled and they don't want to be, identifying with the label "black pill" is something they do because that's all that's left for them in this life, but they don't take it seriously, whenever someone tries to be objective to an extreme degree they just refer to it as "autistic" or going "too far", they often speak about inceldom in the ways that a woman would, always focusing on some emotional aspect rather than the objective realities

Subjective criteria has no place in defining inceldom, when we take that route, we'll just fall into the same traps as the political left do, trying to create universally accepted subjective standards, which is why the left always cannibalizes itself. If everyone gets to be right and have "personal truths" then nobody is right, feminists will argue that women are not "equal" to men because their PERSONAL DEFINITION of equality revolves around EQUALITY OF OUTCOME NOT EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY, and they will always be at odds with the transgender community because "Trans Women" believe that what defines a woman ISN'T PHYSICAL BIOLOGY, so now all the effort feminists have put into helping women gain an "upper hand" are ironically being used by biological males today who "feel" like they are women, SUBJECTIVITY ALWAYS LEADS TO CHAOS

If we rely on subjective criteria to define what makes someone incel (love, acceptance, validation, etc) we are no different than them, and that's why there are so many factions in inceldom and we seem to be just as illogical AS THE NORMIES WE OH SO LIKE TO SPEAK OF AS LESS LOGICAL THAN US

That's the sad part, all the incels on this site always speaking about how illogical normies are, but they always want to arbitrarily draw a line in the sand of where objectivity has gone too far, and say that people who are taking it to higher levels are just "being autistic". They are really no different than normies, they don't see how such a stance is ironically very normie like, and they are literally making themselves the "normies of the incelosphere" by taking such a stance

There are basically a large amount of "sleep agents" within incel communities, one day something world changing will happen and all of those sleeper agents will abandon ship because they were never really serious about this to begin with, there are a lot of "incels" who basically have one foot in the door of the black pill and one foot outside the door into the blue pill world

I have a perfect example of such a scenario that would make I'd say 80% of so called incels abandon the label, even the black pill, which will be asked in a poll on this thread
 
Last edited:
Normies are illogical end of.
 
If you are hoping that scientist will find way to make yourself live longer/forever you are not incel.
 
Incel stands for involuntary celibate, very different from being blackpilled and bluepilled.

In this hypothetical nuclear attack I would be against because he killed my family.
 
Wow. A lot of idiotic edgelords who participated in the poll. I'm proud to have gone with option 1. I'll take not dealing with disease from nuclear fallout, intense grieving, and economic chaos over standing in solidarity with some ER on steroids any day of the week.
 
Pseudo-intellectual rant: Check
TL;DR: Check
Post expresses a smug sense of superiority over the majority of the forum: Check
Fantasizing about an edgy and impossible scenario: Check

Classic BlkPillPres post.
 
Inceldom is a toxic label (I know, "toxic" :soy::soy::soy:), I prefer "blackpill". Because everyone can be blackpilled, even Chads.
 
Incel = involuntarily celibate.
Anyone who cannot get sex despite him trying.

There you have your objective definition. It has nothing to do with black pill nor killing every human with a nuclear attack, this is so far fetched.

Also very clever of you to equate option 1 with abandoning the black pill.

95% of those that voted 2 or 3 are just voting that so they fit your definition of being black pulled out of fear to not belong in this 'elite' group
Pseudo-intellectual rant: Check
TL;DR: Check
Post expresses a smug sense of superiority over the majority of the forum: Check
Fantasizing about an edgy and impossible scenario: Check

Classic BlkPillPres post.
Pretty much sums up what I was thinking
 
Pseudo-intellectual rant: Check
TL;DR: Check
Post expresses a smug sense of superiority over the majority of the forum: Check
Fantasizing about an edgy and impossible scenario: Check

Classic BlkPillPres post.

Short snobby criticisms towards extremism that really amount to nothing: Check

Classic ............... 80% of this forum post

There's actually nothing distinct about you all, guys like you are just the normies of the incelosphere, truth is you haven't taken the black pill to its logical conclusion, nihilism



Also very clever of you to equate option 1 with abandoning the black pill

If your stances and decisions are clouded by emotions, infact lets be specific, positive emotions (love, empathy, sympathy, etc) THEN YOU AREN'T REALLY BLACK PILLED, you will always be subjective to manipulation from blue pilled influence, something bad only needs to happen to you personally and you will abandon any "negative" belief

Serious point I want to make here:
IF YOU CELEBRATED PAST MASS SHOOTINGS OR DEATHS OF NORMIES, AND YOU ONLY NOW WANT TO BE AGAINST THESE THINGS WHEN SOMEONE CLOSE TO YOU IS HURT, YOU ARE A HUGE FUCKING HYPOCRITE THAT SHOULD JUST STFU

95% of those that voted 2 or 3 are just voting that so they fit your definition of being black pulled out of fear to not belong in this 'elite' group

I made voting anonymous on purpose (username doesn't show) to avoid that very thing so I call BS, the people voting 2 and 3 genuinely would likely take that stance, I think guys like you (normies of the incelosphere) just want to think that you're the "right kind of incel" and the "extremists" are just going "too far", when really and truly YOU ARE JUST HALF ASSING YOUR LIFE CHOICES
 
Last edited:
I don't really care about my family. I'd go as far as to say I would kill one of my parents for maximum angst and mischief in GTA V. So if an incel manages to do it, I may have enough fight in me to praise him.
 
Some incels are just failed cucks
 
I don't really care about my family. I'd go as far as to say I would kill one of my parents for maximum angst and mischief in GTA V. So if an incel manages to do it, I may have enough fight in me to praise him.

Some incels are just failed cucks

This, really just failed cucks who like the "edgy" feeling that comes with the label "black pilled", but ironically they only just half ass it and call anyone who tries to do it completely an "edgelord" JFL.

It reminds of those criminals who murder but they have a "no women or children" rule as though they are somehow better for it, either way you are ending lives, whats the point of such a pointless subjective standard based on life span and sex, if you are going to kill, kill, nobody is off limits
 
I am an adult male virgin. I’m below average height, ugly, framelet, no woman has ever shown interest. I am not: a psychopath that celebrates people dying. If that doesn’t meet the definition of acceptability then just ban me. I guess I got more into the “FA” label anyway.
 
1568657329201


Such an event would make my life more exciting, which is why I used to frequent happening threads on /pol/ before I realized it's over and nothing epic will happen within my lifetime. I don't know if it's mostly because of my autism or because of the way I've been treated, but I don't have much empathy.
 

This is the pinnacle of the proverbial pot calling the kettle black.

Classic ............... 80% of this forum post

If you hate the vast majority of the forum, why do you still keep coming back here? Just to have someone to talk down to from your (imaginary) high horse?

truth is you haven't taken the black pill to its logical conclusion, nihilism

I don't think you know what that word means. You're not being nihilistic at all, you're just being a smug edgelord. A nihilist wouldn't be getting so worked up writing TL;DR posts that he feels the constant need to type in ALL CAPS IN BOLD. A nihilist wouldn't care so much about who adopts the "incel" label and who doesn't. A nihilist wouldn't care about what the vast majority of the forum thinks or says, you obviously care a lot since you feel the need to keep posting about it. You're like the opposite of a nihilist.
 
Last edited:
I am an adult male virgin. I’m below average height, ugly, framelet, no woman has ever shown interest. I am not: a psychopath that celebrates people dying. If that doesn’t meet the definition of acceptability then just ban me. I guess I got more into the “FA” label anyway.

1. If its psychopathy to revel in the death and destruction of your enemies then all of humanity are psychopaths, people celebrate the death, torture, etc of nazi's as a norm in these times, they are also human, but because they are seen as "the enemy", its ok to think this way about them, in times of war humans always do this. You lack perspective, you see the world as black and white, its never that simple, there is no such thing as "good" or "evil"

2. Some questions
What is your end goal?
What is the end result of your stance?

Lets be honest and stop denying the truth, nothing is ever going to change for us without violence, slavery likely would never have ended, if there weren't rebellions on plantations that resulted in loss of money for investors and slave owners, and deaths of whites, we all like to think about the legislative factors that led to the emancipation of slaves, but I'd bet my life it was the physical (militaristic) factors that sealed the deal, as time went on it became harder and more expensive to own slaves, so people stopped (also industrialization helped make slaves obsolete)

Violence is the only way any laws will be made in our favor, society has to see our "individual problems" as "societal problems"
 
Last edited:
annihilate humanity or cuck.
 
I don't think you know what that word means. You're not being nihilistic at all, you're just being a smug edgelord. A nihilist wouldn't be getting so worked up writing TL;DR posts that he feels the constant need to type in ALL CAPS IN BOLD.

Nihilism: "the rejection of all religious and moral principles, in the belief that life is meaningless."

I think its you who doesn't understand the definition, more like you are projecting pre-concieved notions about it, nihilism doesn't mean you have no concept of self interest, you seem to be conflating nihilism with "hopelessness" or "lack of will". Nihilism is "nothing has inherent meaning", it isn't "I should do nothing and stop caring about personal benefit", as conscious beings we still exist, have wills, have things that are to our benefit or detriment, being aware that nothing in existence matters, doesn't magically make food stop tasting good or make water stop quenching your thirst, I doubt you are even getting the point here, you're not the kind of poster known for understanding these kinds of abstract arguments, so I guess I'm wasting my time
 
Incel: Want to have sex but you can not. Simple and objective. People here have only further blurred the meaning to fit their own experience. But it's not without reason. There are shades of gray formed by every objective fact. Because we are solipsistic we determine our own value of objective facts.

I don't give a fuck if a normie hasn't had sex in a week and he wants to. Objectively he's an incel but subjectively I don't give a fuck because I've never had sex without escortcelling for over 15 years.

Inceldom at the very core is about a lack of control over sexual reproductive resources. Every man wants this! How we obtain this is compeletly individualistic because certainly we can't form war parties and obtain sexual resources. .

Humans are violent creatures that easily dehumanize out-groups when it suits their purposes. You simply determined that all people are an out-group and you don't care if they suffer.
 
Incel: Want to have sex but you can not. Simple and objective. People here have only further blurred the meaning to fit their own experience. But it's not without reason. There are shades of gray formed by every objective fact. Because we are solipsistic we determine our own value of objective facts.

I don't give a fuck if a normie hasn't had sex in a week and he wants to. Objectively he's an incel but subjectively I don't give a fuck because I've never had sex without escortcelling for over 15 years.

Inceldom at the very core is about a lack of control over sexual reproductive resources. Every man wants this! How we obtain this is compeletly individualistic because certainly we can't form war parties and obtain sexual resources. .

Humans are violent creatures that easily dehumanize out-groups when it suits their purposes. You simply determined that all people are an out-group and you don't care if they suffer.

This was actually a pretty good response, wasn't expecting something like this in the thread, was just expecting the emotional "peacels" and moralfags to come out of the woodworks
 
Nihilism: "the rejection of all religious and moral principles, in the belief that life is meaningless."

I think its you who doesn't understand the definition, more like you are projecting pre-concieved notions about it, nihilism doesn't mean you have no concept of self interest,

How is it in your self-interest to police who can and can't adopt the label "incel"?

Also how would the deaths of millions of random people benefit you specifically?
 
Last edited:
How is it in your self-interest to police who can and can't adopt the label "incel"?

Let me answer that question with another one (since you just asked me a question you know the answer to)

Why don't we let women call themselves incel, I mean whats the harm? (the answer to this question is basically the same answer to yours)

Also how would the deaths of millions of random people benefit you specifically?

1. Revenge is cathartic

2. Reduction in population means an increase in collective resources

3. A decrease in the male population (especially in extremes) leads to an increase in relative male SMV (if you live in/move to that region)

4. Less man power means more leverage as a worker (an increase in the value of ones labor as a resource)

5. HERE'S THE MOST IMPORTANT PART
Its not that just millions of people die, its WHY they die, if all these people die and it was a known fact that an incel caused this due to as @HonklerTheConqueror put it:

lack of control over sexual & reproductive resources

Then society would have no choice but to acknowledge the problem, and acknowledge that things would only get worse if they kept repressing males, people always like to say the cliche line of "we don't negotiate with terrorists", but that's completely false and we all know it, terror is how one influences others period, think about how laws function, you obey or the government sends its goons to kill/rob/imprison you, LAWS AND LAW MAKING REVOLVES AROUND TERROR, its how you influence humans to do what you want

Without law enforcers, laws have no meaning, and with fear we have no leverage, I know a lot of you are quite content on living your same shitty lives till your death, me not so much, I'm willing to help anyone make something like this happen even if it means dying or going to jail
 
Last edited:
Anyone who doesn’t pick option 3 is a fakecel and not blackpilled at all. Jfl borderline cucks

If you have any emotions at all then you are 1 bj away from running back to the plantation. It’s over for undercover bluepillcels
 
Last edited:
Let me answer that question with another one (since you just asked me a question you know the answer to)

Why don't we let women call themselves incel, I mean whats the harm?

I mean, technically I can't prevent someone from calling themselves "incel".

1. Revenge is cathartic

Fair enough, but a nihilist wouldn't care about things like "revenge" for purely emotional reasons.

2. Reduction in population means an increase in collective resources

A pretty large chunk of the global population would have to die off for the earth's finite resources to significantly increase in value. Not only that but if that were to happen, you make the mistake of assuming that you would get a fair slice of the pie rather than it just helping out the wealthy, megacorps, and governments.


3. A decrease in the male population (especially in extremes) leads to an increase in relative male SMV (if you live in/move to that region)

You specifically mentioned a nuclear attack in your poll. A nuclear attack would kill roughly as many women as men, so the gender ratio would be unchanged. The only way to justify a mass killing to achieve this goal would be a global genocide of men only. It would have to be global because if you were to kill off a large chunk of the male population in only a certain area, word would quickly spread that were was a (part of a) country that had a dearth of men...which would lead to millions of incels and normies moving there, and you're be back to square one.

4. Less man power means more leverage as a worker (an increase in the value of ones labor as a resource)

Millions of people dying would mean millions of consumers dying, which would mean less demand for production. So this would cancel things out in that regard.


5. HERE'S THE MOST IMPORTANT PART
Its not that just millions of people die, its WHY they die, if all these people die and it was a known fact that an incel caused this due to as @HonklerTheConqueror put it:



Then society would have no choice but to acknowledge the problem, and acknowledge that things would only get worse if they kept repressing males, people always like to say the cliche line of "we don't negotiate with terrorists", but that's completely false and we all know it, terror is how one influences others period, think about how laws function, you obey or the government sends its goons to kill/rob/imprison you, LAWS AND LAW MAKING REVOLVES AROUND TERROR, its how you influence humans to do what you want

Without law enforcers, laws have no meaning, and with fear we have no leverage, I know a lot of you are quite content on living your same shitty lives till your death, me not so much, I'm willing to help anyone make something like this happen even if it means dying or going to jail

This is by far the dumbest part of this post, and that's saying a lot. If an incel caused millions of deaths and it was known that person was incel, then that would lead to a mass genocide of incels. Governments, Chads, women, normies, et al would be united against incels and incels would have no hope of defending themselves. Anyone even remotely suspected (even if wrongfully) of being incel would be swiftly killed without question. It would be a global hysteria and witch hunt that would last for generations.
 
I mean, technically I can't prevent someone from calling themselves "incel".

JFL nice cop out, ok by that logic then we need to stop complaining about women calling themselves incels and welcome them into the fold. You ask a question with an obvious answer as if to prove a point, when I rephrase the question back at you, you give this weasel answer

If I had responded to your question: "How is it in your self-interest to police who can and can't adopt the label "incel"? "

With: "I mean, technically I can't prevent someone from calling themselves "incel" "

Would you have accepted that answer, if not see how much of a hypocrite you are with this cop out BS, don't ask questions you yourself would try and dodge

Fair enough, but a nihilist wouldn't care about things like "revenge" for purely emotional reasons.

Allow me to repeat myself:
being aware that nothing in existence matters, doesn't magically make food stop tasting good or make water stop quenching your thirst

You are conflating nihilism with being "hopeless", "wantless", "desireless", its a fallacious argument. I don't stop enjoying various stimuli just because I know said stimuli has no inherent meaning

Does schadenfreude stop existing because I understand that existence is meaningless, no it still exists, and I can still experience it

You might as well say - "Fair enough, but a nihilist wouldn't care about life at all since its all meaningless so you'd just kill yourself"

Stop with this fallacious BS argument, you don't understand what Nihilism is, you are conflating it with basically being something that lacks consciousness, like a vegetable in a coma

A pretty large chunk of the global population would have to die off for the earth's finite resources to significantly increase in value. Not only that but if that were to happen, you make the mistake of assuming that you would get a fair slice of the pie rather than it just helping out the wealthy, megacorps, and governments.

I didn't mean it in the sense of me just acquiring resources, I meant it in the sense that there will be more for everyone that's more easily acquired, and by resources I wasn't thinking stuff like gold, minerals, etc, I'm thinking more like land, housing, employment, etc

You specifically mentioned a nuclear attack in your poll. A nuclear attack would kill roughly as many women as men, so the gender ratio would be unchanged. The only way to justify a mass killing to achieve this goal would be a global genocide of men only. It would have to be global because if you were to kill off a large chunk of the male population in only a certain area, word would quickly spread that were was a (part of a) country that had a dearth of men...which would lead to millions of incels and normies moving there, and you're be back to square one.

More men always die in these things period, the attack is indiscriminate, but who is sent in rescue efforts isn't, its mostly men, equal amounts would die in the blast, unequal amounts from radioactive poisoning, burns, accidental deaths, etc

I mean either way it would be a blast ;)

Millions of people dying would mean millions of consumers dying, which would mean less demand for production. So this would cancel things out in that regard.

It would mean millions of national consumers dying, but there'd still be international consumers, so companies would just start shipping elsewhere more

If an incel caused millions of deaths and it was known that person was incel, then that would lead to a mass genocide of incels

The irony of this being your response to the "dumbest part", how do they identify who is "incel", a lot of average looking men are falling into the category today, so do governments just go around killing...................... idk every single man?, every man who doesn't have a GF or wife?, whats the criteria, seems like you are just making shit up to try and dissuade from the point

It would be a global hysteria and witch hunt that would last for generations.

It would last forever actually in your crazy "normies will start killing random ugly men en masse" prediction, because incels would never stop being born
 
Last edited:
most normies are incel in 2019
 
5. HERE'S THE MOST IMPORTANT PART
Its not that just millions of people die, its WHY they die, if all these people die and it was a known fact that an incel caused this due to as @HonklerTheConqueror put it:

Then society would have no choice but to acknowledge the problem, and acknowledge that things would only get worse if they kept repressing males, people always like to say the cliche line of "we don't negotiate with terrorists", but that's completely false and we all know it, terror is how one influences others period, think about how laws function, you obey or the government sends its goons to kill/rob/imprison you, LAWS AND LAW MAKING REVOLVES AROUND TERROR, its how you influence humans to do what you want

Without law enforcers, laws have no meaning, and with fear we have no leverage, I know a lot of you are quite content on living your same shitty lives till your death, me not so much, I'm willing to help anyone make something like this happen even if it means dying or going to jail
I forgot that there was great public support for Islam after 9/11, and primitivism after the Unabomber's spree. Sure, it raises awareness around these issues, but they become tainted, just like the blackpill is now
 
JFL nice cop out, ok by that logic then we need to stop complaining about women calling themselves incels and welcome them into the fold. You ask a question with an obvious answer as if to prove a point, when I rephrase the question back at you, you give this weasel answer

If I had responded to your question: "How is it in your self-interest to police who can and can't adopt the label "incel"? "

With: "I mean, technically I can't prevent someone from calling themselves "incel" "

Would you have accepted that answer, if not see how much of a hypocrite you are with this cop out BS, don't ask questions you yourself would try and dodge

Except i'm not the self-professed nihilist here.



Allow me to repeat myself: You are conflating nihilism with being "hopeless", "wantless", "desireless", its a fallacious argument. I don't stop enjoying various stimuli just because I know said stimuli has no inherent meaning

Does schadenfreude stop existing because I understand that existence is meaningless, no it still exists, and I can still experience it

You might as well say - "Fair enough, but a nihilist wouldn't care about life at all since its all meaningless so you'd just kill yourself"

Stop with this fallacious BS argument, you don't understand what Nihilism is, you are conflating it with basically being something that lacks consciousness, like a vegetable in a coma

The logical extension of nihilism would be a complete indifference towards the world (life is meaningless anyway, so why care unless you are directly affected) unless you were affected personally. I've already explained how your fantasy edgelord scenario wouldn't be of any benefit towards you at all.


More men always die in these things period, the attack is indiscriminate, but who is sent in rescue efforts isn't, its mostly men,

Sure, the rescue efforts would be almost exclusively male, but you're talking about a very small percent of the death toll, not nearly enough to significantly affect the gender ratio.

I mean either way it would be a blast ;)

Ok, I gotta ask. How old are you?


It would mean millions of national consumers dying, but there'd still be international consumers, so companies would just start shipping elsewhere more

Another thing to consider is that a nuclear attack would kill lots of employers and places of business. Also even if it did create a labor shortage, hypothetically, then corporations would just import even more workers from poorer countries, thus driving wages right back down to what they previously were.


The irony of this being your response to the "dumbest part", how do they identify who is "incel", a lot of average looking men are falling into the category today, so do governments just go around killing...................... idk every single man?, every man who doesn't have a GF or wife?, whats the criteria, seems like you are just making shit up to try and dissuade from the point

It would last forever actually in your crazy "normies will start killing random ugly men en masse" prediction, because incels would never stop being born

Think of it this way. There have only been two incel attacks resulting in the deaths of 16-17 people (depending on if you count Elliot's death in the total) and that number goes up to 20 max if that yoga shooter is included. How did the general public react to this? With outrage of course. Now "incel" is used as an insult on pretty much every place on the internet that isn't directly part of the incelosphere. "Incel" is synonymous with homicidal, racist, alt-right, pro-rapist psychopaths. And thats just with 2 or 3 mass killers.

Think of what the reaction from greater society would be if there was an unprecedented nuclear attack that killed millions of people, all of whom were non-combatants, perpetrated by a type of person that society already hates. The backlash would be far greater than you can possibly fathom. Laws would change overnight. The world would be united against incels and governments would spare no expense in eliminating them as efficiently as possible.

What criteria they would use specifically i dont know. Could be just ugly guys, governments might use AI to profile people, there's any number of ways. Sure, it would be a somewhat broad criteria and some non-incels would be killed off in the witch hunts, but such an attack would make people so blood thirsty for revenge that they wouldn't care how many non-incels would have to die.

And think of it this way, there have been numerous mass killings in human history, and all of them happened with far less motivation than such an unprecedented attack that would, by a very wide margin, dwarf any other attack that has ever happened in all of human history.
 
Think of what the reaction from greater society would be if there was an unprecedented nuclear attack that killed millions of people, all of whom were non-combatants, perpetrated by a type of person that society already hates.
JFL at caring about it. Optics cuck.
 
So if governments were very specifically genociding people like you, you wouldn't care?
Obviously I would be terrified and bargaining for my life. That doesn't mean it's within the realm of possibility.
So if you were a farmer and you had a pig barn and one day a thunder struck one of your pigs and became a Zombie Pigman, you wouldn't care?
That's basically how what you asked me sounds like to a non-delusional person.
I'm out now, I was expecting you not to retort at all but now I get the impression that you're unhinged and I absolutely can't change your mind.
 
Obviously I would be terrified and bargaining for my life. That doesn't mean it's within the realm of possibility.

Of course it's not within the realm of possibility, but that's simply because an incel being able to successfully launch a nuclear attack killing millions (OP's proposed scenario) is equally outside the realm of possibility.
 
I've already explained how your fantasy edgelord scenario wouldn't be of any benefit towards you at all.

No you haven't, I've already explained how it is, just on the schadenfreude alone it would create for me and fellow incels it is a benefit to our psychological health, to feel redeemed and avenged, it would be a boon to our spirits

Why do you think ER threads get labelled as lifefuel, it makes incels feel good, is feeling good no longer a benefit?, is feeling peace for once rather than sadness and rage not a benefit?

I think its obviously a benefit due to the reduced stress levels it would give us, to finally see normies suffering for once rather than just living it up in the flawed world they have perpetuated

Ok, I gotta ask. How old are you?

I'm 12 years old buddy boyo :feelsokman:

The backlash would be far greater than you can possibly fathom. Laws would change overnight. The world would be united against incels and governments would spare no expense in eliminating them as efficiently as possible.

That I agree on, laws would change very quickly, internet privacy laws for one, big whoop, incels would stop communicating online on sites like this, they'd meet up on the deep web instead, but how would any of these laws stop another guy from doing something else on that scale, you can't stop it, incels from that point on would always be trying to up the ante or do it on that scale, and it would happen again, and again, and again until society finally relented and decided to make concessions, as it would become more costly to try and stop the "incel hive collective" than to concede to its demands

What criteria they would use specifically i dont know. Could be just ugly guys, governments might use AI to profile people, there's any

Yeah dude sounds legit, legal grounds to arrest and/or kill average and below average looking guys will be put into place, you do realize there arer ugly and average looking guys who are in the military right, who the hell is going to go along with that law when it means they themselves or family members who they know are innocent will die

I (and many other incels) would just immediately stop using this site and other incel sites if it happens, problem solved, what now. Also how do you profile individuals with no social media foot print to profile, I don't have facebook or anything like that, I only have here really, and if something extreme like that ever happened, I'd stop interacting online completely, and just bask in the greatness of the attack, and play video games, wait for the hype to die down in a few years and then join the next incel forum that spawns

You are forgetting that its normies who are handicapped by laws, norms, values, etc, they still have to play the game and so do governments, because once they let loose such anarchy its a slippery slope that will encroach upon the rights of the very people supporting it, the end result would be fun to observe anyways

Allow me to quote you in response to this ridiculous prediction of society illegally hunting incels:
Ok, I gotta ask. How old are you?

Yes, it would be illegal, you can't get anything like what you are suggesting into law without creating legal grounds for the government to do it to anyone else
 
Last edited:
"acceptable" because I want a nuclear holocaust, doesn't matter if that's from an incel.
 
Im the second one tbh but I still believe in the black pill to some degree. I just don’t care when ppl bully incels in school, work, etc and then the incel comes back shooting and everyone is “surprised”.
 
"acceptable" because I want a nuclear holocaust, doesn't matter if that's from an incel.

TBH I don't care who does it, but it sure would feel great if it was an incel, imagine that going down in history

"leave men sexually starved, risk having the planet destroyed"

That would really change a lot of peoples perspective about how important a sexually satisfied male population is to society

I don't want the entire planet to get wiped out though, everyone just dying like that is a mercy, some people have to live on to regret the decisions they and their forefathers made
 
(((hoaxes))) me
 
TBH I don't care who does it, but it sure would feel great if it was an incel, imagine that going down in history

"leave men sexually starved, risk having the planet destroyed"

That would really change a lot of peoples perspective about how important a sexually satisfied male population is to society

I don't want the entire planet to get wiped out though, everyone just dying like that is a mercy, some people have to live on to regret the decisions they and their forefathers made
Remove alcohol from existence and reduce social media and see something that has never happened in history. I’m sure I could quit alcohol easier than others but can you? Of course I meant after said this attack happens and society rebullid somehow.
 
Remove alcohol from existence and reduce social media and see something that has never happened in history. I’m sure I could quit alcohol easier than others but can you? Of course I meant after said this attack happens and society rebullid somehow.

Really and truly the only thing one would need to remove is women's rights, you do that and everything else would fall into place, religion would make a come back, degeneracy would decrease, marriage and child bearing would go up, etc

Women having rights is literally the root of all social problems society faces today
 
Incel - Involuntary Celibate

Meaning that there is some reason that is keeping you from women finding you attractive and having sex with you.

There is no clear definition but that's the TL;DR. You seem to be making the lines blurred of no "clear definition" of an incel, but there really is. It's for that.

Now it's different when it comes to the reason of someone being an incel. You could be a solid 7/10 but serious autism or another mental blockade from allowing women to find you attractive or connect with you. Same goes for height, frame, face, or any blemishes/facial symmetry that keeps you from being attractive (please note that being fat does NOT make you an incel, as you can take the time to get in shape).

If we rely on subjective criteria to define what makes someone incel (love, acceptance, validation, etc) we are no different than them, and that's why there are so many factions in inceldom and we seem to be just as illogical AS THE NORMIES WE OH SO LIKE TO SPEAK OF AS LESS LOGICAL THAN US

We are different because ourselves, from learning the blackpill, are the ones who are able to recognize that in our modern society, many foids and males alike in reality have vapid, shallow personalities that many cucked incels and regular normies either fail to understand or choose not to believe in it, but this idea travels back for centuries in philosophy.


Do incels lack validation, love, acceptance, etc. ? Yes, absolutely. Most incels do. However, that is not what defines what an incel is, it's simply collateral damage for ourselves being very unattractive males. Me being short, bald(ing), and generally unattractive is what makes me an incel. The lack of love and acceptance is simply what comes with it.

Once again, love your posts and theories but this seems like another case of you twisting what we truly believe in.
 
I'm 12 years old buddy boyo :feelsokman:

I mean your actual chronological age, not your mental age.



but how would any of these laws stop another guy from doing something else on that scale, you can't stop it, incels from that point on would always be trying to up the ante or do it on that scale, and it would happen again, and again, and again until society finally relented and decided to make concessions, as it would become more costly to try and stop the "incel hive collective" than to concede to its demands

You act like incels are some powerful force, when the reality is we're disenfranchised lower class men (i.e. at the bottom of society). The powers that be (world leaders, billionaires, high profile politicians, CEOs of megacorps, etc.) are not incel.

Not to mention the fantasy terrorist attack scenario you propose is literally impossible in the real world. It would take anime superpowers to pull off such a feat.

you do realize there are ugly and average looking guys who are in the military right,

What's your point? They could be stripped of their positions easily.

wait for the hype to die down in a few years and then join the next incel forum that spawns

Uh...you think the hype from a nuclear terrorist attack killing millions would just "die down" in a few years? It would be centuries before the hysteria died down.

Also the first amendment would be scrapped completely. As would the 2nd and 4th amendment. And once those are gone, they're not coming back. Hell, even without a catastrophic terrorist attack, it's very likely that those amendments will be scrapped in the future, or in the very least trampled on and ignored to the point where they might as well not even exist in the first place. This generation is embracing authoritarianism and censorship.

Allow me to quote you in response to this ridiculous prediction of society illegally hunting incels:

You seriously pulling a "NO U" here?

Anyway if you think society wouldn't be out for blood in the event of a terrorist attack killing literally millions perpetuated by one of the most hated types of people on the planet, you're beyond delusional.
 
I mean your actual chronological age, not your mental age.

What's your point? They could be stripped of their positions easily.

Yes dude, stripped of their positions for being unattractive after years of service, I'm definitely the one here with the mental age of a 12 year old, I half think you are trolling right now, because only an idiot would seriously argue this could happen, such actions would ironically lead to increasing the ranks of incels, men who never identified with incels would now start listening, and now you'd have men trained in guns, stripped of their honor and livelihood, with nothing to lose, man that sure sounds like a genius government policy :feelskek:

I'm done dude, there's no point in debating this any further, something either will happen or it won't happen, we'll see
 
my INT isnt high enough for this thread
 
I half think you are trolling right now

You're the one being a trollish edgelord bringing up impossible scenarios. I'm just saying what would logically happen in reaction to your childish fantasy edgelord scenarios.

now you'd have men trained in guns, stripped of their honor and livelihood, with nothing to lose, man that sure sounds like a genius government policy :feelskek:

The vast majority of people submit when they are met with a force far more powerful than themselves. With most genocides in history there was very little fighting back.

Fact is, if even a single cop kicked down the door of your mom's basement, you'd surrender and start crying. Like most keyboard warriors, your tough guy persona is no doubt the antithesis of what you are like in real life.

something either will happen or it won't happen, we'll see

If you seriously think anything like your edgelord incel nuclear terrorist attack will happen you're delusional. Time to grow up and give up these childish angsty revenge fantasies.
 
Last edited:
you haven't taken the black pill to its logical conclusion, nihilism
WTF, you are bluepilled AF.

“There’s no personal solution to systemic problems” is the opposite of nihilism.
 
Let me answer that question with another one (since you just asked me a question you know the answer to)

Why don't we let women call themselves incel, I mean whats the harm? (the answer to this question is basically the same answer to yours)



1. Revenge is cathartic

2. Reduction in population means an increase in collective resources

3. A decrease in the male population (especially in extremes) leads to an increase in relative male SMV (if you live in/move to that region)

4. Less man power means more leverage as a worker (an increase in the value of ones labor as a resource)

5. HERE'S THE MOST IMPORTANT PART
Its not that just millions of people die, its WHY they die, if all these people die and it was a known fact that an incel caused this due to as @HonklerTheConqueror put it:



Then society would have no choice but to acknowledge the problem, and acknowledge that things would only get worse if they kept repressing males, people always like to say the cliche line of "we don't negotiate with terrorists", but that's completely false and we all know it, terror is how one influences others period, think about how laws function, you obey or the government sends its goons to kill/rob/imprison you, LAWS AND LAW MAKING REVOLVES AROUND TERROR, its how you influence humans to do what you want

Without law enforcers, laws have no meaning, and with fear we have no leverage, I know a lot of you are quite content on living your same shitty lives till your death, me not so much, I'm willing to help anyone make something like this happen even if it means dying or going to jail
You are god. Based and ultimate IQ.
 
Everything brought to fruition was once nothing but a "childish fantasy"

....That's not how this works....that's not how any of this works. Likelihood of future events can range from inevitable on one extreme, to "impossible childish fantasy". Let me give you the spectrum with some examples.


Inevitable: The sun will rise next morning. Can be predicted down to the minute.

Extremely likely: Trump will be the Republican nominee.

Very likely: The next president will be a Republican or Democrat

Likely: The winner of the 2020 election will be Biden, Trump, Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg or Harris

Unlikely: The winner of the 2020 election will be Yang, Booker, O'rourke, or Gabbard,

Very unlikely: The winner of the 2020 election will be a third party candidate

Extremely unlikely The winner of the 2020 election will be Amy Klobuchar

Impossible childish fantasy: Christine Weston Chandler wins the 2020 presidential election in an unprecedented 50 state + DC landslide and wins 99 percent of the popular vote and on inauguration day, the interdimensional merge comes to fruition.
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
23
Views
770
SteelCentaur
SteelCentaur
BlackCel_from_ZA
Replies
61
Views
1K
GodspeedPeasant
GodspeedPeasant
Stupid Clown
Replies
39
Views
1K
DarkClown97
DarkClown97
Awesome Opossum
Replies
24
Views
736
highiqpostmaxxer
highiqpostmaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top