Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [Hard To Swallow Edition] There Is Nothing "Beautiful", "Magical" Or "Special" About Any Biological Process Or Existing Period (Stop Coping)

BlkPillPres

BlkPillPres

Self-banned
-
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Posts
19,752
I notice a lot of incels on this site say that sex can be "beautiful" or "magical" if its "with your wife" or "someone you love" and other nonsense (ironically sounding like normies)

First off they are using circular logic, there was nothing beautiful about the act of sex to begin with, its just more of the nonsense we were all socialized to think in modern society (its what were all raised to believe)

Allow me to pose a question:
Please tell me what is beautiful about two animals grinding into eachother until they are a sweaty mess while excreting bodily fluids all over eachothers bodies and inside eachothers various orifices, go on, tell me? JFL

WHEN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT SEX IS IN A "RAW" MANNER, NO SUGAR COATING, NO FLOWERED WORDS, YOU CAN SEE IT FOR WHAT IT IS!

Sex isn't "beautiful" if its "teen love"

Sex isn't "beautiful" if its two "virgins"

Sex isn't "beautiful" if its "within the sanctity of marriage" (no religiouscels, its still the same disgusting sloppy act of swapping saliva and cum)

It isn't beautiful period, those are just the cultural values you were raised to believe, just like you were raised to be blue pilled, but I notice a lot of incels like to conveniently hold onto certain beliefs and reject others as "blue pilled", they make all these weird special exceptions and refuse to change their minds about it certain things

Sex is just sex, calling sex beautiful is as weird as calling the digestive process beautiful, its like calling the act of eating or taking a shit beautiful UNDER SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES JFL (not it isn't, its disgusting, accept what you are)

MANY OF YOU JUST DON'T WANT TO ACCEPT WHAT YOU ARE (Its as simple as that, and tbh THAT'S MOST HUMANS)

Its just biology, that's it, there's nothing special and there are no special circumstances in which such an inherently disgusting act just magically becomes beautiful (that includes all biological processes/acts)




It reminds me of how normies try to sugar coat child birth as "magical" or "beautiful"

Allow me to pose a question:
How is a woman screaming her lungs out in excruciating pain, with blood, body fluids, etc coming out of her vagina, and sometimes getting her belly cut open (C Section) to give birth now "beautiful"?, go on, validate such a ridiculous claim

You have to literally LIE TO YOURSELF and DENY REALITY to convince yourself that ANYTHING TO DO WITH A BIOLOGICAL EXISTENCE IS "BEAUTIFUL", "MAGICAL" OR "SPECIAL" (a world view like that IS AS BLUE PILLED AS IT GETS AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED)

BONUS:
Did you know that SOME WOMEN ORGASM WHILE GIVING BIRTH? (Google it, its true, and its a lot more common than you think, because very few would admit to something so disgusting that makes them feel guilty)


A few of us on this site have made at least one woman orgasm :feelskek:........:feelspuke:

THERE IS NOTHING "BEAUTIFUL", "MAGICAL" OR "SPECIAL" ABOUT ONES EXISTENCE AS A BIOLOGICAL CREATURE

ITS INHERENTLY DISGUSTING

HUMANS JUST LIKE TO SUGAR COAT, MYSTIFY AND ROMANTICIZE EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF OUR EXISTENCE, TO COPE WITH BEING SELF AWARE OF THE REALITY OF BEING A BIOLOGICAL CREATURE (A DISGUSTING AND DISHEARTENING EXISTENCE)


Humans like these kinds of copes because THEY ARE UNWILLING TO ACCEPT WHAT THEY ARE AND THAT THEY ARE NOT SPECIAL
 
Last edited:
Dis gonna b gud:feelsPop:
 
I respectfully disagree.

Just because our assessment of the "beauty" of an experience is based on a biological imperative doesn't mean that assessment isn't pertinent.

Sex and love can be wonderful, even if deep down it's just biochemistry in our bodies.

The objective description of reality doesn't invalidate the relevance of our subjective experience of it.

 
HUMANS JUST LIKE TO SUGAR COAT, MYSTIFY AND ROMANTICIZE EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF OUR EXISTENCE, TO COPE WITH BEING SELF AWARE OF THE REALITY OF BEING A BIOLOGICAL CREATURE (A DISGUSTING AND DISHEARTENING EXISTENCE)

Humans like these kinds of copes because THEY ARE UNWILLING TO ACCEPT WHAT THEY ARE AND THAT THEY ARE NOT SPECIAL
I have no opinion on the rest but I believe this to be true. It is the same reason everything simple these days seems to be hidden between arbitrary intricacys, euphemisms, and double-speak. People love to run from uncomfortable truths and painful realizations.
 
Last edited:
didn't read a single word

red font is retarded and hurts my eyes
 
I've had similar thoughts before, my body somewhat disgusts me tbh.
 
I'm sorry but I've literally never heard anyone on here say this
 
The objective description of reality doesn't invalidate the relevance of our subjective experience of it.

You have the "onus" confused, objectivity holds the higher ground as it is observable reality, it is subjectivity that has to try and invalidate objective reality

Objective descriptions don't have to invalidate any subjective experience BECAUSE SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCES HOLD NO WEIGHT OR TO BEGIN WITH lol

You are ironically fitting what I said in the last lines to a T

Humans like these kinds of copes because THEY ARE UNWILLING TO ACCEPT WHAT THEY ARE AND THAT THEY ARE NOT SPECIAL
 
I respectfully disagree.

Just because our assessment of the "beauty" of an experience is based on a biological imperative doesn't mean that assessment isn't pertinent.

Sex and love can be wonderful, even if deep down it's just biochemistry in our bodies.

The objective description of reality doesn't invalidate the relevance of our subjective experience of it.

subjectivity is for cucks, objectivity is for the woke.
 
You can literally apply this logic to anything considered 'beautiful/magical'.

This is just cope so that you don't feel terrible about missing out on having a loving relationship with a woman.


A few of us on this site have made at least one woman orgasm :feelskek:........:feelspuke:
:lul: :lul: :lul:
 
I've had similar thoughts before, my body somewhat disgusts me tbh.

I'm not disgusted by it, I'm indifferent to it, I'm "just there" inside of it, that's what it feels like to me, I'm completely removed from my existence as a human, life often feels like a "3rd person perspective" to me even though I'm viewing it from a "1st person perspective"
 
I don't see any room for disagreement here. Your sex drive is temporarily suppressing your disgust in the sex act; when it is all over, the post-orgasm clarity reveals to you how disgusting the deed was. For people who do cunnilingus, I imagine this sudden clarity is all the worse: licking a vagina that has been cummed in thousands of times by different men. I'm sure we've all had this disgust happen after fapping to certain types of porn.

If I had my way, sex should be abolished altogether and replaced with music and literature.
 
didn't read a single word

red font is retarded and hurts my eyes
it's just schizoposting. I use these types of people as arguments for why inceldom will rot your brain lole. Smile politely, we're witnessing mental illness.
 
I'm sorry but I've literally never heard anyone on here say this
Op believes that escorting can take care of our incel needs. People here do disagree with him. Some say escorting is not the same as legit relationship. Others are outright disgusted by it.
 
Op believes that escorting can take care of our incel needs. People here do disagree with him. Some say escorting is not the same as legit relationship. Others are outright disgusted by it.
Escorting is good but doesn't make up for social issues like bullying n isolation n havin no irl social contact n all dat
 
Escorting is good but doesn't make up for social issues like bullying n isolation n havin no irl social contact n all dat
I think he is strictly talking about issue of sex and relationship. The other things you mentioned could be experienced by sex havers as well.
 
I agree @Ping And Pong , and your point is? (you seem to be asserting that I wouldn't apply this to everything else, I do, this topic just focuses on a common example)

Well its strange, your point is technically true, but in a roundabout way its cope.
By downplaying the value of romantic relationships you can live more at ease thinking that by missing out on a gf/wife its not significant at all.
Good for you if this mindset works for you, but for a lot of us the biological urges are too strong to downplay.
 
Allow me to pose a question:
Please tell me what is beautiful about two animals grinding into eachother until they are a sweaty mess while excreting bodily fluids all over eachothers bodies and inside eachothers various orifices, go on, tell me? JFL

So... why exactly do you go to whores?
 
I'm sorry but I've literally never heard anyone on here say this
Hes just making shit up at this point


But the cultural traditions relating to sex and partnerships are what separate us from every other species. it's surely beautiful to have at least 1 faithful women to sleep with

I'm interested in caressing and loving too, not just using her holes.

This is why you have your "life goal" as fucking dirty prostitutes in Philippines; you don't actually understand the purpose of sex. Sex is magical when done properly, and it can lead to the creation of new life forms (if that isn't magic then I don't know what is). Separating the act of sex from love is perhaps the biggest mistake in our culture today and it was absolutely done on purpose as a method of destabilization, which you have fallen for very nicely.

Those are just two examples I found on short notice, I've seen this A LOT from incels, ESPECIALLY RELIGIOUS INCELS

Who go on and on about SEX BEING SPECIAL "WITHIN THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE"

The two of you probably just never pay attention and ITS NO WONDER I IRONICALLY HAVE BOTH OF YOU BLOCKED

You kind of just proved why, you're low IQ idiots who aren't observant, good bye now :feelsokman:
 
Last edited:
The only thing that is special is the Nintendo 64 and playing the Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time game on it.
 
I think he is strictly talking about issue of sex and relationship. The other things you mentioned could be experienced by sex havers as well.
R u dumb blud? Chads being bullied and socially isolated?
 
Those are just two examples I found on short notice, I've seen this A LOT from incels, ESPECIALLY RELIGIOUS INCELS

Who go on and on about SEX BEING SPECIAL "WITHIN THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE"

The two of you probably just never pay attention and ITS NO WONDER I IRONICALLY HAVE BOTH OF YOU BLOCKED

You kind of just proved why, you're low IQ idiots who aren't observant, good bye now :feelsokman:

Of your two examples, one is a graycel and the other a foid.
It's not that common for an incel to claim that sex is beautiful. It's an extreme minority opinion.
 
Those are just two examples I found on short notice, I've seen this A LOT from incels, ESPECIALLY RELIGIOUS INCELS

Who go on and on about SEX BEING SPECIAL "WITHIN THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE"

The two of you probably just never pay attention and ITS NO WONDER I IRONICALLY HAVE BOTH OF YOU BLOCKED

You kind of just proved why, you're low IQ idiots who aren't observant, good bye now :feelsokman:
Imagine quoting @XOR, a user who was a female lmao nice cherrypicking buddy. Btw you’re too much of a pussy to respond to my thread i made about you.
 
Those are just two examples I found on short notice, I've seen this A LOT from incels, ESPECIALLY RELIGIOUS INCELS

Who go on and on about SEX BEING SPECIAL "WITHIN THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE"

The two of you probably just never pay attention and ITS NO WONDER I IRONICALLY HAVE BOTH OF YOU BLOCKED

You kind of just proved why, you're low IQ idiots who aren't observant, good bye now :feelsokman:
I just don't care for the topic of discussion therefore I dn rd and i haven't sin it been said b4 and you're again proving that you're not a nihlihst and have an ego
 
Well its strange, your point is technically true, but in a roundabout way its cope.
By downplaying the value of romantic relationships you can live more at ease thinking that by missing out on a gf/wife its not significant at all.
Good for you if this mindset works for you, but for a lot of us the biological urges are too strong to downplay.

It isn't significant though

I'm pretty sure using DMT or other hallucinogenic substances is an amazing experience, one might even call it "magical", I'm pretty sure "being high" feels great, but ITS NOT REAL and ITS NOT SPECIAL

That's my point, those experiences making you feel special doesn't make the experiences themselves special

Its pretty much circular logic to assert that because you value something that makes it valuable

Also my focus is on what is of objective value not subjective value, there is no point in arguing about subjectivity because its subjective, anyone can claim they are right




NIGGA you quoted 4 people. :feelstastyman:

Like I said before:
Dude, be honest, you know its the truth, you never read, you make short responses and completely ignore all arguments, don't pretend like that's not what you're known for already :feelsokman:

Failing to read and comprehend is @RREEEEEEEEE specialty lol

I'm begging you dude, pick up a book, when you read it over you'll realize its you that looks like the :feelstastyman:

Come on man you can't really be THIS fucking stupid :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
Objective descriptions don't have to invalidate any subjective experience BECAUSE SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCES HOLD NO WEIGHT OR TO BEGIN WITH lol

Beauty does exist. You can't deny that, as it's common sense.

Smells exist, some are pleasant, others are disgusting. Yet they are just produced by the effect if different molecules going through our nose.

Democritus told us that most things are illusions : colors, sounds, smells. In the end, only atoms and empty space exist.

Yet these illusions are part of our experience of the World, or at least of its structure, and as such they are pertinent descriptions of reality. An apple is not just a group of atoms, it's a particular arrangement of atoms, one that makes all apples different instances of the same concept that we call "apple". Its color, texture, the sound it makes when we bite it, its taste, all this defines the concept of apple even if all of this is subjective and has emerged from the fact that millions of years ago our ancestors evolved to eat these things. An apple typically tastes "good", but by your argument it does not since it's related to our biological existence. Thing is : almost everything is related to our biological existence.

If someone says "love is beautiful", he's referring to a particular sentiment love is susceptible to generate to a human being. He is saying something that is understandable and at least plausible.
 
Last edited:
Imagine quoting @XOR, a user who was a female lmao nice cherrypicking buddy. Btw you’re too much of a pussy to respond to my thread i made about you.

1. I have you blocked, I won't see your shit

2. So you're saying religious incels don't say sex within marriage is "special"? (literally every religious incel I've spoken to has said this, so again, you guys aren't observant at all, or you are just pretending to be ignorant and making disingenuous statements)
 
Normies are. Gl ones. And they do get to have sex regardless
D518802fbfe0180d5c818f388e5979a8
 
I don't see why there's necessarily a contradiction between what people choose to infuse into something and what that thing objectively is. It seems to me you're doing that very thing when you're calling biological existence "inherently disgusting" when disgust of course is a subjective human sensory perception that has nothing to do with objective reality which you seem to regard as the sole determinant of what things are. The post is self contradictory
 
I don't see why there's necessarily a contradiction between what people choose to infuse into something and what that thing objectively is. It seems to me you're doing that very thing when you're calling biological existence "inherently disgusting" when disgust of course is a subjective human sensory perception that has nothing to do with objective reality which you seem to regard as the sole determinant of what things are. The post is self contradictory

There is no contradiction

When I say disgusting, I mean within the context of what humans already see as disgusting (not my personal beliefs), but we make special exceptions for certain acts to help us cope (example: sex and child birth, both are just as disgusting as taking a shit, but we treat them as "beautiful" and "magical", because its the only way to cope with doing the act and to make it something special)

I don't really see it as "disgusting" like I'm disgusted by it and don't want to do it, I am an escortcel
I'm not disgusted by it, I'm indifferent to it, I'm "just there" inside of it, that's what it feels like to me, I'm completely removed from my existence as a human, life often feels like a "3rd person perspective" to me even though I'm viewing it from a "1st person perspective"


Its the same way that when I'm in an argument with a christian I say that "God is evil" or "God is immoral" when I'm a nihilist, I don't believe in "evil" or "morality", but I have to "argue within context" to get my point across, so I have to use their value system and their understanding of reality to show them the contradictions of their beliefs even if I agreed with them to be true
 
Last edited:
It isn't significant though

I'm pretty sure using DMT or other hallucinogenic substances is an amazing experience, one might even call it "magical", I'm pretty sure "being high" feels great, but ITS NOT REAL and ITS NOT SPECIAL

That's my point, those experiences making you feel special doesn't make the experiences themselves special

Its pretty much circular logic to assert that because you value something that makes it valuable

Also my focus is on what is of objective value not subjective value, there is no point in arguing about subjectivity because its subjective, anyone can claim they are right






Like I said before:




I'm begging you dude, pick up a book, when you read it over you'll realize its you that looks like the :feelstastyman:

Come on man you can't really be THIS fucking stupid :feelskek:
Jfl, u mad son?
 
When I say disgusting, I mean within the context of what humans already see as disgusting, but we make special exceptions for certain acts to help us cope (example: sex and child birth, both are just as disgusting as taking a shit, but we treat them as "beautiful" and "magical", because its the only way to cope with doing the act and to make it something special)

I don't really see it as "disgusting" like I'm disgusted by it and don't want to do it, I am an escortcel
the distinction lies in the outcome. The reason people regard sex as beautiful is because it's required for a civilization to reproduce itself and manifests itself in miniature versions of themselves which they're biologically hardwired to affectionately love and care for whereas shitting, while necessary, only results in digested food in the form of turds floating around in toilet water that no healthy person could ever feel affection for. That is what's deemed beautiful in the prior case and disgusting in the latter, not the objective descriptions of the acts themselves both of which I agree could be described as equally debased
 
only results in digested food in the form of turds floating around in toilet water

Its part of keeping your body healthy and free from infections though, so ironically maybe people should appreciate it more

that no healthy person could ever feel affection for

My point is quite literally that affection has nothing to do with objectivity, its always based on emotions and subjectivity, so one having high value for it, is just as valid a position of one seeing it has having no value

That's the irony of trying to assert that a subjective thing should be valued, since its subjective you don't get to tell other people whether it should be valued or not, whether it should be valued is "up in the air", everyone can have their own position on it

My threads are never about subjectivity, its pointless to argue something subjective because everyone is right under that context

they're biologically hardwired to affectionately love and care for

Yes, that's my point, they aren't being objective
 

Similar threads

MisfitPerson
Replies
31
Views
494
Simba
Simba
screwthefbi
Replies
85
Views
2K
screwthefbi
screwthefbi
Clavicus Vile
Replies
17
Views
372
Autistic Uggo
Autistic Uggo
gymletethnicel
Replies
29
Views
1K
GeneticDysfunction
G

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top