D
Deleted member 26506
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- May 23, 2020
- Posts
- 1,804
We all heard that having a woman in the workforce at least makes the economy better,
but I am going to debunk this myth that is being told by neoliberal and leftist economist
Let's say for example a career woman, is even above average, and makes $80,000 per year,
so in average she should add $80,000, or to the GDP
lets say we have 100,000 women like her, and they add $80,000,000,000
now that sounds good for the economy, without feminism they wouldn't work!
but lets say we have a woman, which has 6 children, she doesn't work, and she spends a lot of money on the children
she seems really bad to the economy, but is she?
lets say all of those kids are average, they make $60,000 per year (average salary in the US)
that means, all of them make $300,000 per year combined, which adds a lot more to the GDP long term
and makes the economy better
Never listen to the globalist which believe in overpopulation! having more people doesn't make our economy worse,
there more people to feed, but there also more people to grow food, invent new stuff and contribute back!
everyone after they start work, contribute way more to society then your average "humanitarian" as well, paying taxes, spending and having a normal
jobs is better then giving children cloths that are worth no more then $5
just existing like the average, helps society!
in before people say there "not enough land"
you can put the whole world's popluaiton in texas, with the same density as new york, which means we have a lot of land
and we extract more and more resources, and the more minds we have, the more new stuff we have, lets say 1 in 4,000,000,000 people will bring the next space X
a popluation with 16,000,000,000 people will have 4, while our current 2 (aka we will progress as humans faster)
but I am going to debunk this myth that is being told by neoliberal and leftist economist
Let's say for example a career woman, is even above average, and makes $80,000 per year,
so in average she should add $80,000, or to the GDP
lets say we have 100,000 women like her, and they add $80,000,000,000
now that sounds good for the economy, without feminism they wouldn't work!
but lets say we have a woman, which has 6 children, she doesn't work, and she spends a lot of money on the children
she seems really bad to the economy, but is she?
lets say all of those kids are average, they make $60,000 per year (average salary in the US)
that means, all of them make $300,000 per year combined, which adds a lot more to the GDP long term
and makes the economy better
Never listen to the globalist which believe in overpopulation! having more people doesn't make our economy worse,
there more people to feed, but there also more people to grow food, invent new stuff and contribute back!
everyone after they start work, contribute way more to society then your average "humanitarian" as well, paying taxes, spending and having a normal
jobs is better then giving children cloths that are worth no more then $5
just existing like the average, helps society!
in before people say there "not enough land"
you can put the whole world's popluaiton in texas, with the same density as new york, which means we have a lot of land
and we extract more and more resources, and the more minds we have, the more new stuff we have, lets say 1 in 4,000,000,000 people will bring the next space X
a popluation with 16,000,000,000 people will have 4, while our current 2 (aka we will progress as humans faster)