Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Here's EXACTLY what we need to do

Do you agree?

  • Yes, I agree

    Votes: 11 73.3%
  • No, I'm a feminist

    Votes: 4 26.7%

  • Total voters
    15
PatriarchZ

PatriarchZ

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 22, 2018
Posts
21
1. Repeal the feminist laws on marital rape
2. Don't give women anything beyond a very basic education. Preferably give them that very primary education at home. Stop sending them to school.
3. Remove women from the workforce
4. Bring back the NO WOMEN ALLOWED motto. A woman's place is at home, not in public.
5. Don't allow women to choose their partners. Only the father will choose and they will obey. They should not make male friends.
6. Make it compulsary for women to take their master's name (be it father or husband) to denote that she is his property.
7. Repeal the feminist laws on wife-beating
8. Do not allow them to own wealth or property.
9. Revoke their voting rights
10. Expect women to keep their eyes down, obey their master at all times, never talk back/observe silence and speak in a low, soft tone.
11. Ban divorce except under extreme circumstances such as incest
12. Bring back burning of women. Bring back whipping and public humiliation.
13. Let them not testify in court except in very rare cases. Swedeish in the Östgötalag it is clearly stated that, since women cannot testify in court, they can breach no oath…. so a complete ban is also up for consideration. ALWAYS SUSPECT THEIR TESTIMONY. Ban them at least, from testifying against their husbands.

BONUS:
14. Don't make it a crime to kill your property (wife) like in Ancient Rome, Gallia (France) etc.
 
Patriarchy is a great solution, bu it's not happening.
 
you missed out the part where it becomes illegal for white men to fuck ethnic girls.
 
UncannyValley said:
it's not happening.

As long as people keep saying stuff like this it'll never happen. Stop it and endorse patriarchy whenever you can.

For the sake of all that is GOOD, women need to be controlled!!
 
PatriarchZ said:
UncannyValley said:
it's not happening.
As long as people keep saying stuff like this it'll never happen. Stop it and endorse patriarchy whenever you can.
For the sake of all that is GOOD, women need to be controlled!!
Western society is far too liberal for any of this to occur
 
UncannyValley said:
PatriarchZ said:
UncannyValley said:
it's not happening.
As long as people keep saying stuff like this it'll never happen. Stop it and endorse patriarchy whenever you can.
For the sake of all that is GOOD, women need to be controlled!!
Western society is far too liberal for any of this to occur

Western men are slowly, but surely waking up. Stop demoralizing people.

The revolution is inevitable... If people remain demoralized, it'll only be postponed.
 
Hate/repressing women etc. is cope
 
@Sergeantincel this guys a cucktears troll, been banned 3 or 4 times already. Uses an old picture (usually a plague doctor or something else from medieval/renaissance) as his pic, puts a poll in every post, and is obsessed with patriarchy.
 
PatriarchZ said:
Western men are slowly, but surely waking up.

No they aren't. They are in an eternal slumber of bluepills.
 
when will all these copers stop already with their trash model of society.

Nature is the true enemy of humankind.

Patriarchycels are as low iq as modern feminists.
 
Zyros said:
when will all these copers stop already with their trash model of society.

Nature is the true enemy of humankind.

Patriarchycels are as low iq as modern feminists.

This sort of society has existed before
 
Krispinwah said:
you missed out the part where it becomes illegal for white men to fuck ethnic girls.

But why?
I want a curry female.
 
KV3 said:
@Sergeantincel this guys a cucktears troll, been banned 3 or 4 times already. Uses an old picture (usually a plague doctor or something else from medieval/renaissance) as his pic, puts a poll in every post, and is obsessed with patriarchy.
 
UncannyValley said:
No they aren't. They are in an eternal slumber of bluepills.

patriarchycels are bluepilled on an ewual level to fedora whiteknights, so calling patriarchy a blackpill measure is wrong
 
Zyros said:
UncannyValley said:
No they aren't. They are in an eternal slumber of bluepills.
patriarchycels are bluepilled on an ewual level to fedora whiteknights, so calling patriarchy a blackpill measure is wrong
In the way that their fantasies won't come true in the modern era? Yeah probably, but a patriarchy would be an ideal world.
 
Cuck-Damage said:
Hate/repressing women etc. is cope

Women are the most problematic creatures, so of course we need a solution!
 
UncannyValley said:
In the way that their fantasies won't come true in the modern era? Yeah probably, but a patriarchy would be an ideal world.

far from ideal. patriarchycels AWAYS ignore the whole lookism part of inceldom, which is far more important than getting sex itself
 
This isn't about pills or incels or anything... except for women's liberation.

Glad to see most men here stand with patriarchs. As for those who don't... WATCH OUT!! We'll come for you
 
Zyros said:
UncannyValley said:
In the way that their fantasies won't come true in the modern era? Yeah probably, but a patriarchy would be an ideal world.
far from ideal. patriarchycels AWAYS ignore the whole lookism part of inceldom, which is far more important than getting sex itself
I'd rather have sex and be treated like shit than have no sex and be treated like shit
 
tbh I'm more for ER's plan of completely banning sex
 
UncannyValley said:
I'd rather have sex and be treated like shit than have no sex and be treated like shit

complete shit answer. You sell patriarchy as thrv"solution for thevwest" yet thr major and main problem of the entire world is lookism whicj you never ever address solutions for.
 
Zyros said:
UncannyValley said:
I'd rather have sex and be treated like shit than have no sex and be treated like shit
complete shit answer. You sell patriarchy as thrv"solution for thevwest" yet thr major and main problem of the entire world is lookism whicj you never ever address solutions for.

Stop giving a shit about what women think of you. They should have NO VOICE, let alone a choice.

That's why we need arranged marriages and marriages by abduction to return.
 
Zyros said:
complete shit answer. You sell patriarchy as thrv"solution for thevwest" yet thr major and main problem of the entire world is lookism whicj you never ever address solutions for.

Are you drunk again lol? Yeah, there's no solution for lookism obviously.
 
PatriarchZ said:
Stop giving a shit about what women think of you. They should have NO VOICE, let alone a choice.

That's why we need arranged marriages and marriages by abduction to return.

Completely missed the point of the post you are answering. Low iq as every pattiarchycel. Main problem of inceldom actualky has nothing to do with women themselves.
 
Krispinwah said:
you missed out the part where it becomes illegal for white men to fuck ethnic girls.

As a white guy with yellow fever, big fu to you sir.
 
Kointo said:
Are you drunk again lol? Yeah, there's no solution for lookism obviously.

No. I will be soon tho but I write like shit duebto very cold weather + phone screen
 
Zyros said:
Completely missed the point of the post you are answering. Low iq

You're an abusive feminazi and you need to be captured or killed ASAP
 
KV3 said:
@Sergeantincel this guys a cucktears troll, been banned 3 or 4 times already. Uses an old picture (usually a plague doctor or something else from medieval/renaissance) as his pic, puts a poll in every post, and is obsessed with patriarchy.
this, ban this retard, im gonna laugh when i see this thread in cucktears
 
PatriarchZ said:
You're an abusive feminazi and you need to be captured or killed ASAP

Nice arguments, nice debate, nice explaining of the blatant and huge holes in your cope societal model.
 
PatriarchZ said:
That's why we need arranged marriages and marriages by abduction to return.

Bride kidnapping has been practiced around the world and throughout history.
 
low IQ thread of the year
 
RandomGuy said:
PatriarchZ said:
That's why we need arranged marriages and marriages by abduction to return.
Bride kidnapping has been practiced around the world and throughout history.

Yes, and rightfully so!!

Zyros said:
huge holes in your cope societal model.

It's just how it has ALWAYS BEEN. Cooking, cleaning, serving men like me... if you got a problem with that you can kiss my ass!

Also anyone who's against patriarchs is a feminist. You're also abusive, just like all feminists. I would happily chop your head off. Actually, it would be very satisfying. All you feminists need to be PURGED!!
 
i would vote for that if i could
 
6a00d8341c464853ef01a3fc9561f7970b-500wi
 
LDPE said:

"A husband could thrash his wife with impunity provided that he used a stick no bigger than his thumb"
 
Quran
Quran (4:34) - "Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great." Contemporary translations sometimes water down the word 'beat', but it is the same one used in verse 8:12 and clearly means 'to strike'.

Quran (38:44) - "And take in your hand a green branch and beat her with it, and do not break your oath..." Allah telling Job to beat his wife (Tafsir).


Hadith and Sira
Sahih Bukhari (72:715) - A woman came to Muhammad and begged him to stop her husband from beating her. Her skin was bruised so badly that it is described as being "greener" than the green veil she was wearing. Muhammad did not admonish her husband, but instead ordered her to return to him and submit to his sexual desires.

Sahih Bukhari (72:715) - "Aisha said, 'I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women'" Muhammad's own wife complained Muslim women were abused worse than other women.

Sahih Muslim (4:2127) - Muhammad struck his favorite wife, Aisha, in the chest one evening when she left the house without his permission. Aisha narrates, "He struck me on the chest which caused me pain."

Sahih Muslim (9:3506) - Muhammad's fathers-in-law (Abu Bakr and Umar) amused him by slapping his wives (Aisha and Hafsa) for annoying him. According to the Hadith, the prophet of Islam laughed upon hearing this.

Abu Dawud (2141) - "Iyas bin ‘Abd Allah bin Abi Dhubab reported the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) as saying: Do not beat Allah’s handmaidens, but when ‘Umar came to the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) and said: Women have become emboldened towards their husbands, he (the Prophet) gave permission to beat them." (This is graded sahih - authentic. It is also reported in Sunan Ibn Majah 9:1985, also graded sahih) At first, Muhammad forbade men from beating their wives. As the hadith indicates, he rescinded this once it was reported that women were becoming emboldened toward their husbands. Beatings in a Muslim marriage were deemed necessary at times to keep the woman in her place.

Abu Dawud (2142) - "The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife." The authenticity of this chain of narration is characterized as daif (weak), however, a similar verse from Sunan Ibn Majah 3:9:1986 is said to be hasan (sufficient).

Abu Dawud (2126) - "A man from the Ansar called Basrah said: 'I married a virgin woman in her veil. When I entered upon her, I found her pregnant. (I mentioned this to the Prophet).' The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: 'She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you. The child will be your slave. When she has begotten (a child), flog her'" A Muslim man thinks he is getting a virgin for a wife, then finds out that she is pregnant. Muhammad tells him to treat the woman as a sex slave and then flog her after she delivers the child. (Despite multiple chains of narration, this hadith is graded as daif).

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 969 - Requires that a married woman be "put in a separate room and beaten lightly" if she "act in a sexual manner toward others." According to the Hadith, this can be for an offense as petty as merely being alone with a man to whom she is not related.

Kash-shaf (the revealer) of al-Zamkhshari (Vol. 1, p. 525) - [Muhammad said] "Hang up your scourge where your wife can see it"
Notes
Contemporary apologists often squirm over this relatively straightforward verse from the Quran (4:34) - which gives men the right to beat their wives if they have even a "fear" of disloyalty or disobedience. Their rhetorical aerobics inspired us to write a separate article:

Wife Beating- Good Enough for Muhammad, Good Enough for You

Others are not nearly as squeamish. Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradhawi, one of the most respected Muslim clerics in the world, once made the famous (and somewhat ridiculous statement) that "It is forbidden to beat the woman, unless it is necessary." He went on to say that "one may beat only to safeguard Islamic behavior," leaving no doubt that wife-beating is a matter of religious sanction. (source)

Dr. Muzammil Saddiqi, the former president of ISNA (the Islamic Society of North America), a mainstream Muslim organization, says it is important that a wife "recognizes the authority of her husband in the house" and that he may use physical force if he is "sure it would improve the situation." (source)

Sheikh Dr. Ahmad Muhammad Ahmad Al-Tayyeb, the head of Al-Azhar, Sunni Islam's most prestigious institution says that "light beatings" and "punching" are part of a program to "reform the wife" (source).

CAIR's Dr. Jamal Badawi endorses corporal punishment as "another measure that may save the marriage" (source). He doesn't make clear how striking a woman will make her more inclined to staying with her assailant, unless Badawi is implying that teh beating instills a fear of more serious consequences should if she attempt to leave.

Egyptian cleric, Abd al-Rahman Mansour, said in a 2012 televised broadcast that, in addition to discouraging the wife from filing divorce, beatings would inspire the wife to "treat him with kindness and respect, and know that her husband has a higher status than her." (source)

During Ramadan of 2010, another cleric named Sa'd Arafat actually said the woman is "honored" by the beating (source). No one else seemed terribly surprised or upset by this.

An undercover report from progressive Sweden in 2012 visited 10 mosques and found that 6 actually advised beaten women not to report the abuse to the police. These women were also told that they must submit to non-consensual 'sex' with their husbands. (source)

In the birthplace of Islam, about half of Saudi women are beaten at home. "Hands and sticks were found to be used mostly in beating women, following by men’s head cover and to a lesser extent, sharp objects." (source)

In 2016, the Council of Islamic Ideology proposed a bill - ironically named the Protection of Women against Violence Act - that actually included exceptions for "lightly beating" defiant wives. (source)

According to Islamic law, a husband may strike his wife for any one of the following four reasons:
- She does not attempt to make herself beautiful for him (ie. "let's herself go")
- She refuses to meet his sexual demands
- She leaves the house without his permission or for a "legitimate reason"
- She neglects her religious duties
Any of these are also sufficient grounds for divorce.

Respected Quran scholars in the past interpreted verse 4:34 with impressive candor. Tabari said that it means to "admonish them, but if they refused to repent, then tie them up in their homes and beat them until they obey Allah’s commands toward you." Qurtubi told wife-beaters to avoid breaking bones, if possible, but added that "it is not a crime if it leads to death." (source)

Muslim apologists sometimes say that Muhammad ordered that women not be harmed, but they are actually basing this on what he said before or during a battle, such as in Bukhari (59:447) when Muhammad issued an order for all the men of Qurayza be killed and the women and children taken as slaves. (Having your husband murdered and being forced into sexual slavery apparently doesn't qualify as "harm" under the Islamic model).

But, in fact, there are a number of cases in which Muhammad did have women killed in the most brutal fashion. One was Asma bint Marwan, a mother or five, who wrote a poem criticizing the Medinans for accepting Muhammad after he had ordered the murder of an elderly man. In this case, the prophet's assassins literally pulled a nursing infant from her breast and stabbed her to death.

After taking Mecca in 630, Muhammad also ordered the murder of a slave girl who had merely made up songs mocking him. The Hadith are rife with accounts of women planted in the ground on Muhammad's command and pelted to death with stones for sexual immorality - yet the prophet of Islam actually encouraged his own men to rape women captured in battle (Abu Dawood 2150, Muslim 3433) and did not punish them for killing non-Muslim women (as Khalid ibn Walid did on several occasions - see Ibn Ishaq 838 and 856).

In summary, according to the Qur'an, Hadith and Islamic law, a woman may indeed have physical harm done to her if the circumstances warrant, with one such allowance being in the case of disobedience. This certainly does not mean that all Muslim men beat their wives, only that Islam permits them to do so.
 
We need to reset to the 1950s.
 

Similar threads

Balding Subhuman
Replies
10
Views
420
Minamoto
Minamoto
sultryloser
Replies
44
Views
2K
Nagger
Nagger
AsiaCel
Replies
36
Views
981
gotet
gotet
AsiaCel
Replies
10
Views
335
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top