Seems one of the mods caved to WLB whining so I will not focus on any particular species here as in prev thread but rather a broad comparison which comes to mind at an objection I read.
Is there something particular about the human species where we think human males deserve sex, but not males of other species?
We don't seem to care much for example about how newborn boy cattle in diary industry get killed for meat before they can coom.
I think some of us extend empathy towards fellow human incels, so I am wondering about why there is hostility towards those who go beyond that and extend empathy to other species' incels.
Like for example, if it's cucked to let a dying lion fuck your GF then it's also cucked to let a dying incel fuck your GF.
People who protest this are basically saying "you're a dirty cuck if you'd help me ascend on my deathbed, keep your GF to yourself chad"
Or "my idealistic standards are so important that I'll choose to cope my entire life by getting handjobs from a man (myself) while giving handjobs to a man (myself)"
It's extreme irony that on all the focus on how gay it is to fuck a roasty (which is true: she's full of chad's cum, you're not even fucking a woman, you're fucking chad's hardened cum wrapped in a woman) the hand-fappers don't realize they're doing something just as bad.
This doesn't apply to me because I have never once coomed via my hand, manual interaction is solely for positioning it to fuck my sock properly, and my sock is a girl.
- - -
The point being though, I think irony may be the proper term for lecturing someone else about being a cuck while the very thing you're telling them to do would deny you sexual access, thus actually cucking yourself.
It is more cucked to cockblock yourself than to become an ascended incel who remembers his origins and wants to share GF one-time-only with dying incel because of empathy for fellow man.
Words live bye said:
Is there something particular about the human species where we think human males deserve sex, but not males of other species?
We don't seem to care much for example about how newborn boy cattle in diary industry get killed for meat before they can coom.
I think some of us extend empathy towards fellow human incels, so I am wondering about why there is hostility towards those who go beyond that and extend empathy to other species' incels.
Like for example, if it's cucked to let a dying lion fuck your GF then it's also cucked to let a dying incel fuck your GF.
People who protest this are basically saying "you're a dirty cuck if you'd help me ascend on my deathbed, keep your GF to yourself chad"
Or "my idealistic standards are so important that I'll choose to cope my entire life by getting handjobs from a man (myself) while giving handjobs to a man (myself)"
It's extreme irony that on all the focus on how gay it is to fuck a roasty (which is true: she's full of chad's cum, you're not even fucking a woman, you're fucking chad's hardened cum wrapped in a woman) the hand-fappers don't realize they're doing something just as bad.
This doesn't apply to me because I have never once coomed via my hand, manual interaction is solely for positioning it to fuck my sock properly, and my sock is a girl.
- - -
The point being though, I think irony may be the proper term for lecturing someone else about being a cuck while the very thing you're telling them to do would deny you sexual access, thus actually cucking yourself.
It is more cucked to cockblock yourself than to become an ascended incel who remembers his origins and wants to share GF one-time-only with dying incel because of empathy for fellow man.
