Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

How feminists can claim men have had it better historically is a joke: men have traditionally been canon fodder, have had really hard, shit jobs...

ItsACrazyWorld

ItsACrazyWorld

Recruit
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Posts
431
...have been sent away from their family, etc. For example, the other day, I was watching a documentary on the Great Wall of China. Effectively every man in the army was drafted to build it. How many hours per day they worked, I have no idea, though you can imagine it's gonna be at least 12. The fucked-up thing though? These men were forced to stay there, work, no days off and were 1000s of miles from their families. Many soldiers had wives & kids (I guess people died by mid 30s then...so even a 20 year old soldier, would often have a couple of kids, probably), who they were forcefully separated from for an indefinite period of time. Allegedly the thing took 200 years to build - imagine that: you live in the south, are taken by the army, moved 1000s of miles North, working 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, until you die, never seeing your family again. And women want to argue that they have had it hard?

In reality, it did get better, since apparently when the general saw the moral of the men dropping, he allowed the wives and kids to move from their hometowns to where the wall was being constructed, effectively building villages along the route to accommodate the workers.

Likewise, look at human history - it's been nothing but fighting the entire time. Men would be sent out into the battlefield, outnumbered, knowing full well they were about to be slaughtered. They were literally worthless...nothing more than canon fodder...

In contrast, I wonder how women would react if they were conscripted and about to be sent into battle, sent over the top of the trenches, knowing they would be gunned down by the enemy? Would they want this form of equality?
 
If ugly men didn't exist, feminists wouldn't have anything to whine about. They will gladly accept being cat called and "molested" by Chads.
 
It's simple. In the eyes of foids, sub8 men don't exist. They're like background objects.

In the eyes of foids, only the Chad Qin Shi Huang and his generals exist. All those nameless solders are just objects not men.
 
Only Chads, despots and millionaires are considered men in that context. Those are the ones they're comparing the average woman to, not average men.
 
It's apex theory, sub8 men and men with no status are invisible.
 
Kings, Chiefs, Warlords, Chad's, and Presidents having a good time = All Men having a blast.
 
It all makes sense when you realize they mean chad. The guys that own the world. The guys that never have to commit due to endless demand. When they say men they do not mean male population.

Oddly enough also the only men they want.
 
Any question that has anything to do with feminists or women In general only has one answer.

Women are adult children who dont have the same cognitive ability that males do.

That's it. Theres no secret hidden reason as to why women think the way they do.

Images 2
 
Just doing all the dirty work
 

Similar threads

NeverEvenBegan
Replies
8
Views
223
Puppeter
Puppeter
Fallout
Replies
15
Views
382
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
highiqpostmaxxer
Replies
14
Views
413
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
Whitefeminineboy
Replies
11
Views
235
lifefuel
lifefuel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top