Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel How is it even possible that people defend blatant degeneracy and shame people for liking 13-year-old girls?

speedtypingincel

speedtypingincel

height > x
-
Joined
May 17, 2019
Posts
3,775
How? Why do feminists defend gay and tranny stuff and name-call others for liking fertile teenagers? How can any sane person defend a degenerate taking a dick in his butt or mutilating himself and shaming men who have healthy testosterone levels which make them attracted to prime girls?

The state of this world.

The state of this world.
 
It's hilarious that they don't care if you're into 90 year old grannies, degenerate trannies, and whores who are so degenerate that they're merely just holes.

But oh God, you're literally the embodiment of evil if you like 13 year old girls, who are already being rammed by Chad! The horror!
 
Have no idea man
 
Old thots 20+ are just for fucking and dumping. Same with non-virgin cunts
 
How? Why do feminists defend gay and tranny stuff and name-call others for liking fertile teenagers? How can any sane person defend a degenerate taking a dick in his butt or mutilating himself and shaming men who have healthy testosterone levels which make them attracted to prime girls?

The state of this world.

The state of this world.
Its part of the depopulation agenda.

Anything that promotes birth rates is forbidden (virile fertile teen girls) but anything that is sterile and doesnt lead to birth(tranny, gays, e.t.c) is promoted.

Fucking clown world tbh ngl
 
Its part of the depopulation agenda.

Anything that promotes birth rates is forbidden (virile fertile teen girls) but anything that is sterile and doesnt lead to birth(tranny, gays, e.t.c) is promoted.

Fucking clown world tbh ngl
 
It's hilarious that they don't care if you're into 90 year old grannies, degenerate trannies, and whores who are so degenerate that they're merely just holes.

But oh God, you're literally the embodiment of evil if you like 13 year old girls, who are already being rammed by Chad! The horror!
 
They're basically used fleshlights.
How? Why do feminists defend gay and tranny stuff and name-call others for liking fertile teenagers? How can any sane person defend a degenerate taking a dick in his butt or mutilating himself and shaming men who have healthy testosterone levels which make them attracted to prime girls?

The state of this world.

The state of this world.
Tfw missed teen love
 
14 is fine 13 is a little too low
 
Clown world, buddy boyo
 
Because it doesn't affect anyone but those two men.
Except it does, when they spread LGBT degenerate propaganda about it afterwards. In fact, it affects every youth that sees this shit then on social media etc
 
Because it doesn't affect anyone but those two men. I understand finding it disgusting, I don't like it either, but if you hate people for it or want to kill them for it like so many here, you're the real degenerate and you deserve every ounce of pain inceldom has caused you. I'm sick of seeing this retarded edgelord fucking bullshit. We have so many real enemies, fuck off with your obsessive gay shit.
Ever since normalizing gayness approaching other men in public to talk has become less of the norm. You are assumed to be gay. Feminists are the problem, Saudi Arabia is right on the fact that it stones them.

And nobody inherently deserves anything, this is morality bullshit.

Even when you talk about someone as if they are a bro, they call you gay. Or when you talk shit about vaginas. White knights call you gay for finding vaginas disgusting.

No I don't promote the stoning of gays but I'm happy that at least one country stones them.
 
Last edited:
The spreading of LGBT propaganda and actual gay people are two totally different things. Correlation is not causation. Homosexuality is a real thing that results from wires being crossed. It's harmless and totally natural, we see it in animals too.

The far left trying to push their anti-hetero agenda is a whole other animal.
Yeah but if you accept homosexuality it let's all the other shit in (lgbt, trannies etc)
That's why I find it better when that door stays completely closed like in Chechnya where no gays exist
 
Saying "it's okay to be gay" isn't degenerate, because it is okay to be gay.
No it's not. And I'm not saying that saying it is degenerate, I'm saying it spreads it more.
 
The spreading of LGBT propaganda and actual gay people are two totally different things. Correlation is not causation. Homosexuality is a real thing that results from wires being crossed. It's harmless and totally natural, we see it in animals too.

The far left trying to push their anti-hetero agenda is a whole other animal.
Lmao at you defending the gays. Homosexuality doesn't naturally occur in humans. Homos are being produced from child abuse. NO normal person is born gay, butt stuff is unnatural. Taking a dick in a hole that's supposed only to spew poop is not natural. It's Sodomy.

And generally speaking the only natural form of sex is PIV since it's the only one that helps humans pass on their genetics.
 
I masturbate to JB's(Jewish Bitches) daily
 
15 is the best age, 13 is too low
 
The age of consent is 16 here. Has been for almost 150 years. Think it's fine being at 16. No need to lower or increase it.
 
The age of consent is 16 here. Has been for almost 150 years. Think it's fine being at 16. No need to lower or increase it.
Kind of weird thing for Marquis de Sade to say
 
15 is the best age, 13 is too low

Firefox JTQF9imCJC

















Keep coping.
 
They know that foids at that age are less shallow than mature ones. They don't want any incel to ascend.
 
Its part of the depopulation agenda.

Anything that promotes birth rates is forbidden (virile fertile teen girls) but anything that is sterile and doesnt lead to birth(tranny, gays, e.t.c) is promoted.

Fucking clown world tbh ngl
I feel happy that more and more people are getting it.
 
The spreading of LGBT propaganda and actual gay people are two totally different things. Correlation is not causation. Homosexuality is a real thing that results from wires being crossed. It's harmless and totally natural, we see it in animals too.

The far left trying to push their anti-hetero agenda is a whole other animal.
Just because many animals do homosexuality doesn’t make it natural

having sex with parents and offspring and eating poop is done by many animals

is that also natural? Jfl

:banhammer::banhammer::banhammer: ITfiltrator
 
The citizens of the United States of America -- and much of the world -- have been indoctrinated into what is properly classified as a religious trance regarding such matters. They are, in objective truth, properly classified as being religiously insane. It is possible for them to do such things in the same way it is possible for them to believe such things as that a man lived inside of a whale for three days prior to being vomited out onto dry land. They are literally religiously insane regarding such matters, and their brains literally deactivate the networks that are capable of rational thought in response to such matters.


Finally, we have demonstrated that attention to engaging social stimuli not only activates the DMN but also deactivates the TPN. In a subsequent study[30] it was shown that this pattern of DMN activation and TPN deactivation was present for humanizing depictions of individuals, whereas dehumanizing depictions, which are associated with decreased moral concern, either involved decreased activity in the DMN or increased activity in the TPN. Taken together, these findings suggest that we are neurologically constrained from simultaneously exercising moral concern and analytic thinking.


"When there's a question of faith, from the analytic point of view, it may seem absurd," said Tony Jack, who led the research. "But, from what we understand about the brain, the leap of faith to belief in the supernatural amounts to pushing aside the critical/analytical way of thinking to help us achieve greater social and emotional insight."


System 1 has been variously characterized as 'intuitive', 'emotion-driven' and 'experiential'; whereas System 2 has been characterized as, 'controlled', 'rule-based', 'rational' and 'analytic'. We know of two lines of work which link cognitive neuroscience to this classical form of dual process theory:one which looks at logical reasoning (Goel and Dolan, 2003), the other moral judgments (Greene et al., 2004). Both identify areas in the DMN and TPN associated with System 1 and System 2 reasoning respectively. Hence, the link between dual-process theories of cognition and the DMN vs.TPN dichotomy appears worthy of further investigation.

They are literally manifesting a form of psychotic decompensation in response to such environmental stimuli,


The DMN is involved with processes of self-reflection, social cognition, and mind-wandering. Hyperconnectivity has been noted in the DMN of individuals at high risk for developing schizophrenia.

Whitfield-Gabrieli et al39 studied patients with schizophrenia; young, at-risk, first-degree relatives; and unaffected controls using fMRI during alternating conditions of wakeful rest and a focused working memory task. While the unaffected controls showed predictable deactivation of DMN during active task, the patients and relatives showed diminished deactivation, as well as greater activity in right DLPFC. This finding has essentially been replicated twice by two other research groups.

It is, indeed, a form of psychosis, and they are, in fact, adherents to an establishment of religion.


A professor at Stanford University, Robert Sapolsky, has said that religion is a mental illness, and that the behaviours exhibited by ‘prophets’ in religious texts are diagnosable acts.

The self-described atheist, who is also a neuroendocrinologist, argues that religion is comparable to a shared schizophrenia.


In this paper, I examine the relationship between social cognition and religious cognition. Many cognitive theories of religion claim that these two forms are somehow related, but the details are usually left unexplored and insights from theories of social cognition are not taken on board.


Some experts theorize that certain schizophrenia symptoms (for instance, paranoia) arise in part from a hyperactive sense of social reasoning. “I’d guess that they’d give lots of teleological answers; more than neurotypical people, and certainly far more than people with Asperger’s,” Heywood says.

The reason why is literally because they are mentally ill believers in the scriptures of an establishment of religion that dictates such. It's the same disease as is manifested by the traditionally religious (or believers in false religions, if you happen to be religious yourself) when they incoherently spew out their word salads.

You can witness this by experiments such as the following.


A new study of Bulgarian men has replicated a previous 2013 experiment on British men. In both studies, the same photographs of adolescent girls (Tanner stages 3-4) were shown to one group of men labelled as age 14-15, and a different set of men labelled as age 16-17. Subjects reported more sexual attraction when the photographs were labelled as 16-17. The researchers conclude:

[T]he consistent finding that the same photographs of younger females, but with different age labels, were assigned significantly different levels of attractiveness suggests that cognitive factors beyond biologically driven sexual attraction were involved in making these ratings. In all the three samples, apparently younger girls were rated as less attractive than older girls despite being the same photographs. We hypothesize that this difference reflects some self-censoring mechanism involved in making such judgments. This may involve a form of comparison between participants’ own sexual attraction to the individual girl and the likely social norms surrounding this judgment.

This finding has now been replicated across four samples, including one that is yet to be reported.

When showing the subjects the same photographs of girls, but labeling them as being 14-15 or 16-17, there is a statistically significant disparity between how attractive they are rated as being, despite being the same photographs. This is because by conventional moral reasoning,


Conventional

The conventional level of moral reasoning is typical of adolescents and adults. To reason in a conventional way is to judge the morality of actions by comparing them to society's views and expectations.
The conventional level consists of the third and fourth stages of moral development. Conventional morality is characterized by an acceptance of society's conventions concerning right and wrong. At this level an individual obeys rules and follows society's norms even when there are no consequences for obedience or disobedience. Adherence to rules and conventions is somewhat rigid, however, and a rule's appropriateness or fairness is seldom questioned.[7][8][9]

the environmental stimulus of the age of the females is all that is required to determine which of their two large scale brain networks they process the matter with. If the ages are set at 14-15, they have been indoctrinated to deactivate their TPNs concomitant DMN activation:


Finally, we have demonstrated that attention to engaging social stimuli not only activates the DMN but also deactivates the TPN. In a subsequent study[30] it was shown that this pattern of DMN activation and TPN deactivation was present for humanizing depictions of individuals, whereas dehumanizing depictions, which are associated with decreased moral concern, either involved decreased activity in the DMN or increased activity in the TPN. Taken together, these findings suggest that we are neurologically constrained from simultaneously exercising moral concern and analytic thinking.

which causes them to lose access to their rational ability to answer the question, and causes them to -- essentially as robots -- regurgitate the response that their establishment of religion dictates be recited.


System 1 has been variously characterized as 'intuitive', 'emotion-driven' and 'experiential'; whereas System 2 has been characterized as, 'controlled', 'rule-based', 'rational' and 'analytic'. We know of two lines of work which link cognitive neuroscience to this classical form of dual process theory:one which looks at logical reasoning (Goel and Dolan, 2003), the other moral judgments (Greene et al., 2004). Both identify areas in the DMN and TPN associated with System 1 and System 2 reasoning respectively. Hence, the link between dual-process theories of cognition and the DMN vs.TPN dichotomy appears worthy of further investigation.

Conversely, when the ages are said to be 16-17, they have less of such a neurological phenomenon manifest; consequently, they are able to rationally assess and respond to the question with their TPNs.

It's no different to how the believers in one set of religious scripture can look at the believers in a different set of religious scripture and imagine them to be insane:


Can a decapitated body lift itself up and gasp for breath? The Book of Mormon seems to say so. The story is found in the Book of Ether and recounts a sword fight between a Jaredite king named Coriantumr (Ether 12:1) and Shiz, the brother of Lib (Ether 14:17).

As the story goes, Lib was killed in a battle with Coriantumr’s army. As a result, Shiz followed Coriantumr in vengeful pursuit, burning cities and killing women and children along the way. Finally the two armies met near the seashore and gave battle for three days. After the third battle, Shiz wounded Coriantumr with “many deep wounds,” and he had to be “carried away as though he were dead.”

After recovering from his wounds, Coriantumr began to feel bad over the fact that “there had been slain two millions of mighty men, and also their wives and their children.” He attempted to make peace with Shiz, but Shiz agreed only if he would be allowed to kill Coriantumr with his own sword. Well, this only infuriated Coriantumr’s people, and so the fighting started all over again.

Eventually the armies meet. For several days men, women, and children fight relentlessly until only Coriantumr and Shiz remain. Ether 15:29 states that in the course of the battle, “Shiz had fainted with the loss of blood.” Taking advantage of the situation, Coriantumr took his sword and “smote off the head of Shiz.” But that isn’t the end. Verse 31 reports that “after he had smitten off the head of Shiz, that Shiz raised upon his hands and fell; and after that he had struggled for breath, he died.” The question is, how can a man without a head raise himself and also struggle for breath?

all the while believing in seemingly equally outlandish things:


Jonah was in the giant fish three days. God commanded the whale, and it vomited the reluctant prophet onto dry land. This time Jonah obeyed God. He walked through Nineveh proclaiming that in forty days the city would be destroyed. Surprisingly, the Ninevites believed Jonah's message and repented, wearing sackcloth and covering themselves in ashes.

The difference is simply that their own religious scriptures cause them to deactivate the brain network that is capable of rational thought, whereas the religious scriptures of others have no such effect on them.


We suggest that this structural feature of the brain underlies the long noted anecdotal tension between materialistic and spiritual worldviews. This linkage is supported by three observations. First, brain areas implicated in analytic thinking (TPN) support cognitive process essential for maintaining a naturalistic world view (e.g. thinking about objects, mechanisms and causes; [29, 49, 71, 73–77]), whereas the brain areas implicated in moral concern (DMN) are associated with thinking about phenomena which have traditionally been thought of as non-physical, namely minds and emotions [78–83]. Second, brain areas associated with materialism (TPN) tend to be suppressed when brain areas associated with moral concern (DMN) are activated [29, 71, 72]. This might explain the tendency to link mind with spirit, i.e. the view that minds and emotions are associated with the extra- or super- natural. Third, brain areas associated with analytic thinking are associated with religious disbelief [73, 74, 84], and brain areas associated with moral concern are associated with religious belief [73] and prayer [84, 85].

It is quite literally by the same exact mechanism that they are seemingly incapable of rationally thinking about such matters as attraction to adolescents. They were conditioned to have such matters automatically cause their rational brain networks to deactivate such that they enter into a state of religious psychotic decompensation that manifests equivalent large scale neurological activation patterns as cognitively anosognosic schizophrenia.


There are self-administered, validated tools as well, such as the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS),11 which is based on a separation of the concepts of “cognitive insight” and “clinical insight.” Clinical insight is described as the awareness of mental illness requiring treatment, while cognitive insight encompasses the patient’s ability to evaluate, reappraise, and modify distorted beliefs or misperceptions. These interpretations are regulated at a “higher level” of cognition, also called metacognition, allowing clinicians to assess self-regulating and self-monitoring functions of thought processes. The BCIS assesses a patient’s objectivity about delusional thinking, previous errors, reattribution of false explanations, and ability to receive corrective information from others. It includes self-reflectiveness and self-certainty subscales in order to measure willingness and capacity to entertain alternate explanations and over-confidence in validity of beliefs.



The results showed a correlation between insight as measured by the BCIS self-reflectiveness index and lower gray matter volume in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). The VLPFC is involved in working memory and decision making. The findings suggest that a reduced VLPFC volume corresponds with a diminished capacity to entertain alternative explanations about one’s misperceptions leading to impairment in awareness of illness.


The ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) is a subdivision of the prefrontal cortex. Its involvement in modulating existing behavior and emotional output given contextual demands has been studied extensively using cognitive reappraisal studies and emotion-attention tasks. Cognitive reappraisal studies indicate the vlFPC’s role in reinterpreting stimuli, and reducing or augmenting responses. Studies using emotion-attention tasks demonstrate the vlFPC’s function in ignoring emotional distractions while the brain is engaged in performing other tasks.[6]


Prefrontal activation in the dlPFC and vlPFC was also associated with deactivation in the DMN, during experiential focus and without previous training [24]. The engagement of prefrontal areas seems concomitant to the disengagement of limbic and DMN systems.


IPC and VLPFC belong to the ventral attentional network that supports attentional filtering and reorienting towards the environment (Corbetta et al., 2008), and is anti-correlated with the preACC/DMN, involved in self- referential processes ( Fox and Raichle, 2007).
 
Last edited:
Anything that happens is by definition natural. It happened by nature; consequently, it is natural. Unnatural things, by definition, don't exist.
 
Seems pretty dumb to me. I mean, sure, they have a right to be annoyed if people are pursuing relationships with these girls, because they can say that it's harmful and whatnot to these people who can't consent. I mean, it's probably more dangerous to have sex with a tranny tbh, seeing as they are clearly mentally ill and thus can't fully consent, and have disproportionately high suicide rates. But anyways, I don't understand why they would hate people for being attracted to girls who are underage while accepting those who are attracted to the same sex or animals or whatever. It's just another form of sexuality I guess, and I don't endorse it. I mean, I myself am attracted to some girls who are underage, because I find youthfulness and innocence arousing, but it doesn't mean I would ever exploit or cause harm just for sexual gratification, nor does it mean that I'm exclusively attracted to them.
 
It's literally because they're religiously insane. The Sex Cult is a 20th century establishment of religion; however, technically it was in the late 19th century when the fraudulent tabloids produced by people other than the CIA caused the initiation of this mass outbreak of crazed psychosis among the mentally ill neurotypical population of this world, which has a pathological disconnection from reality.


"The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon" was a series of highly controversial newspaper articles on child prostitution that appeared in The Pall Mall Gazette in July 1885.

Written by the crusading editor W. T. Stead, the series was a tour de force of Victorian journalism. With sensational crossheads, such as "The Violation of Virgins" and "Strapping Girls Down", the Maiden Tribute threw respectable Victorians into a state of moral panic, and achieved, as a consequence, the implementation of the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1885, which raised the age of consent for girls from 13 to 16, and also re-criminalised homosexual acts.

A tradition continued by the modern day adherents to this establishment of religion, which has been comprehensively falsified and is as legitimate as the anti vaccination movement. It's actually terrifying that such an enormous movement of mentally ill people is currently existent in our world and dominating many of our nations. In the United States of America it is manifesting only by treason, for it is explicitly in violation of the first amendment of our constitution. This doesn't help us any though, for the members of our supreme court are religiously insane treason committers who reference the scriptures of this establishment of religion in allowing it to violate our constitution without constraint.


"It's now clear [anti-trafficking groups] used fake data to deceive the media and lie to Congress," the story charges. "And it was all done to score free publicity and a wealth of public funding."

What's the meat behind those claims? The story details how the Women's Funding Network commissioned a study from a political consulting group run by Beth Schapiro, which devised a totally unscientific method for determining how many online classified ads depicted children. It entailed having a group of adults guess, by looking at a picture in an ad, how old the person depicted was, and then doing it again over time to fuel the charge of explosive growth. Experts interviewed by City Pages point out that this is ridiculous from a methodological point of view — among the many criticisms, there's no way of knowing how old someone is from a picture, there's no way of knowing when the picture was taken, and there's no way of knowing if the picture is even of someone behind the advertised service.

The study, which was funded with public money, was subsequently uncritically picked up nationwide in headlines trumpeting a massive rise in the trafficking of children.

Every single thing that this establishment of religion believes in has been scientifically refuted and explicitly falsified. It is the opinion of the scientific community that they are explicitly a movement of psychotic decompensatory neurotypicals manifesting cognitive anosognosia. They are literally in a state of psychotic decompensation and reference a false reality through a genre of scientifically refuted fiction materials that they falsely and tenaciously believe to be the sole source of information regarding actual reality, despite the fact that their religious scriptures have been scientifically refuted and proven to encode a delusional fantasy world that has never had a presence in the physical existence.

Neurotypicals are explicitly mentally ill and massively socially convergent psychotics. They have a disease, no question about it. Their disease simply is evolutionarily advantageous; they disconnect from reality in mass social convergence into the same alternate reality described in the same themed collection of fiction materials and exterminate the disbelievers. They are dangerous, rabid, mentally ill humans that have the evolutionary strategy of parasitism.

The CIA fabricated the CP components of this existent establishment of religion as part of the MKUltra brainwashing program.


Project MKUltra (or MK-Ultra), also called the CIA mind control program, is the code name given to a program of experiments on human subjects that were designed and undertaken by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency—and which were, at times, illegal.[1][2][3] Experiments on humans were intended to identify and develop drugs and procedures to be used in interrogations in order to weaken the individual and force confessions through mind control.


The tiny article inside The Washington Post on Jan. 13, 1979, read like something from a cartoonishly sinister spy show: “CIA documents released yesterday show the agency once considered using drugs, shock treatments and even removal of parts of the brain to ‘dispose of blown agents, exploited defectors and defecting trainees.’”


Type for-profit
Genre new religious movement


The idea that punishment can be therapeutic is not unique to the Rotenberg Center. In fact, this notion is widespread among the hundreds of "emotional growth boarding schools," wilderness camps, and "tough love" antidrug programs that make up the billion-dollar teen residential treatment industry.

This harsh approach to helping troubled teens has a long and disturbing history. No fewer than 50 programs (though not the Rotenberg Center) can trace their treatment philosophy, directly or indirectly, to an antidrug cult called Synanon. Founded in 1958, Synanon sold itself as a cure for hardcore heroin addicts who could help each other by "breaking" new initiates with isolation, humiliation, hard labor, and sleep deprivation.

how_a_cult_spawned_the_tough_love_teen_industry_630x738.gif



DFAF was founded by Betty Sembler, wife of shopping center developer and Ambassador Mel Sembler. In 1976, Betty and Mel Sembler founded the cult[4] Straight, Incorporated, a "coercive rehabilitation" program in the United States that produced hundreds of reports of abuse of adolescents and their families during its 15 years of existence. Straight was adapted from the controversial therapeutic community programs Synanon and The Seed.


In 1979 Densen-Gerber was the subject of a scathing profile in New York magazine, “The Mysterious Mistress of Odyssey House,” which said, “Most people think of Odyssey House as a solid, benevolent program... Dr Densen-Gerber... has also emerged as an influential spokeswoman for sexually abused children. Today, she has become a familiar figure at public forums and legislative functions, detailing the horrors of addiction and ill treated youngsters... The cameras whirr and the lawmakers reach for the handkerchiefs and appropriations [funds]. It's a good show... But there is another side to this tale...”


Naturally the technique employed in Odyssey's treatment is spelled out in exquisite bits. In essence it is a medical doctor's extension of the original Synanon method. Synanon eschewed 'the use of any medical doctors and just had their boarders kick "cold turkey" spurred on by the jeers and encouragements of ex-addicts who had gone through the same gauntlet. Odyssey is more sophisticated and noticeably better organized and run. It insists on complete and exacting urine checks on all members to make certain no drugs are being used. It has exacting in-take procedures and highly structured promotion levels and rewards. It has penetrating and demanding deep "probe" sessions that do emulate the early marathon Synanon ways, but here Utilize psychiatric methodology as opposed to street wisdom.


Ramirez set up the synanon-based Phoenix House which hired former Synanite Ted Dibble to manage one of its centers. Phoenix House is one of the biggest TCs today. Psychiatrist Dr. Judianne Densen-Gerber visited Dr. Ramirez in Puerto Rico and setup her own synanon-based TC in New York City called Odyssey House. Many entrepreneurs, previously excluded from the lucrative drug rehabilitation trade because of lack of a medical degree, have opened their own second, third, and fourth generation synanon-type therapeutic communities.


This is unprecedented, probably in the history of the United States," commented Dr. Judianne Densen-Gerber, a lawyer, psychiatrist and nationally prominent specialist on child abuse. ( Denson-Gerber is an MD who is thought to be a CIA asset Her husband was on the Warren Commission.) During her visit to Nebraska in December 1990 she said: 'If the children are not telling the truth, particularly if they have been abused, they need help, medical attention. You don't throw them in jail!'


Over the years, the Narcotic Farm experimented with other treatment models, including Synanon. For more on that, see Points: the Blog of the Alcohol and Drugs History Society, Lessons from the Narcotic Farm, Part Five: Matrix House

ARC is also known for its involvement with the MK-ULTRA program (the CIA’s infamous mind-control drug experiments) during which the ARC director received CIA money for LSD research. It was after this scandal that ARC’s fate was sealed. On December 31, 1976, the last subject was transferred out of the lab.


The Connection Between Synanon and Scientology – Part 1: Laying The Groundwork

Congressional hearings in 1974 exposed that Seed Inc. was a Synanon based behavior modification group using brainwashing techniques similar to North Korean prisoner camps. One of the ways it was funded was under CIA program MKSEARCH – U.S. government funding.


A 1979 profile in New York magazine quoted Mayor Edward I. Koch as saying that she was ''one of those seminal forces, original, a go-getter.'' He said there were ''few people who can claim as many accomplishments.''

Dr. Densen-Gerber's success at getting government help became her downfall when the state investigated her use of public funds in the early 1980's and found irregularities. She resigned as executive director of Odyssey House in 1983, but remained active in affiliated programs.

Her influence extended to areas like child pornography. In 1977, her testimony that there were 264 monthly publications devoted to the subject helped persuade the House of Representatives to unanimously pass a bill to regulate it.

IPT, the publication of the Institute for Psychological Therapy, reported in 1992 that later government investigations proved her estimates to be exaggerated by ''several orders of magnitude.''

Dr. Densen-Gerber also commented on many other hot issues from a psychiatric point of view.

In 1991, she went to Omaha to testify in court that her interview with a man convinced her he had witnessed four satanic ritual killings. She characterized herself as an expert at deprogramming survivors of satanic cults.

ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume4/j4_2_1.htm

The Origin of the Myths

In 1976 Robin Lloyd, correspondent for NBC, published For Money or Love: Boy Prostitution in America (Out of Print)(Out of Print).18 In the book, for which a U.S. senator had written an introduction, Lloyd claimed that a huge network of prostitution involving 300,000 boys existed. The notion that child pornography trade is big business was initiated in this book. Yet, nowhere in the book is there any empirical basis for the number 300,000. Indeed, Lloyd admitted that it was a working hypothesis which he had suggested to a number of experts to test their reactions.19 This didn't prevent Judianne Densen-Gerber, director of Odyssey House, a chain of residential treatment clinics for drug addicts, from taking over the figure as if it represented a reliable statistic. She set about to mobilize public opinion against child pornography to which, she said, Lloyd had alerted her.

The media followed the stories of child exploitation in detail. In the national periodicals during 1977 nine articles appeared.20 The New York Times, a paper known to avoid sensationalism, printed 27 articles that year compared to one in the two years before. When in May, 1977 the highly popular television series Sixty Minutes devoted a program to child pornography, a tidal wave of letters to politicians resulted.21 That spring a subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives held a series of hearings on the subject which lasted until autumn, keeping child pornography in the news in the U.S.A. A platform was established by crusaders against child pornography, and in the prevailing climate of moral panic their cries for stronger measures received wide political support.

The chairman of the committee was Representative John Conyers Jr., who had organized the hearings to pass judgment on the proposal of Representatives Kildee and Murphy for a first Federal law against child pornography. It was this series of hearings that would make the question of child pornography a national issue. The first hearing was dominated by the appearance of Judianne Densen-Gerber. Equipped. with some child pornography magazines, she shocked congressional representatives with her claim that she had, together with Robin Lloyd, counted 264 comparable publications that, according to her, appeared monthly (an exaggeration by a factor of several orders of magnitude as we shall see). The figures which Robin Lloyd had mentioned as a working hypothesis were repeated by Densen-Gerber as fact:

Lloyd's book documented the involvement of 300,000 boys, aged 8 to 16, in activities revolving around sex for sale.22

She then multiplied the number by two, because her intuition told her that 300,000 girls were also involved in such activities. She then multiplied it again by two since, according to Lloyd, the real figure was "twice what he (could) statistically validate,"23 and this lead to something like a million children. The chairman Conyers multiplied this again by two since, he reasoned, America had not only one million runaways but another one million school drop outs. In this way the contours of a national disaster were drawn. According to Conyers:

"So we have somewhere possibly in the neighbourhood of 2 million kids who form a ready market for sexual exploitation from pornographers and the like."24

Densen-Gerber could not agree more. The Kildee-Murphy proposal was made law without any opposition: 401 for, 0 against.

The Spread of Rumors

In 1986 the Senate Commission33 under the chairmanship of William V. Roth, Republican from Delaware, came to the same conclusion as the ILIC report. Nevertheless, neither the Roth report nor the ILIC report were able to dampen the spread of rumors about an enormous trade. Even in 1986, the claims of Lloyd and Densen-Gerber continued to come up as facts in official reports: the Meese Commission, initiated by the Reagan administration to prepare a drastic sharpening of the anti-pornography laws, uncritically took over these claims.34 According to the Meese Commission, Congress had discovered that child pornography and child prostitution "have become highly organized, multi-million dollar industries that operate on a nationwide scale."35 The monthly appearance of 264 magazines (Densen-Gerber) was again reported as truth, alongside the 30,000 exploited children of Los Angeles (Lloyd Martin).

The U.S. Supreme Court took over these claims in their first child pornography case, New York v Ferber (1982), saying that child pornography comprised, "highly organized multimillion dollar industries that operate on a nationwide scale."36 The otherwise dignified court was so upset by the alleged extent of the problem that the solicitor for the accused, Herald Price Fahringer, lost his composure and fled the sitting as fast as he could.37

The claims of Lloyd and Densen-Gerber also appeared outside the U.S.A. The report, Exploitation of Child Labour, which was submitted in 1981 to the Commission for Human Rights of the United Nations, claimed: "In the United States there are at least 264 pornographic magazines specializing in pornography concerning children."38 It was claimed that in 1977, 15,000 slides and 4,000 films of child pornography had been intercepted by the police, which was, according to the report, 5% of the total stock in circulation.

According to the United Nations report, the value of trade in child pornography in 1977 was estimated at $500 million. Such estimates are not based on any kind of empirical evidence, and are easy to refute. If these claims were true then the allegedly intercepted slides and films would have had a value of thousands of dollars each.39 In reality, these films were sold for much less, which can be checked with reference to the advertisement brochures of Deltaboek, publisher of homosexual pornography and literature. From here it is apparent that the Golden Boys film series, produced by COQ in Denmark, cost 85 guilders each, which is about $35.

In 1986, Defence for Children International prepared a report on child prostitution in which they claimed: "Estimates on the number of child prostitutes vary from 300,000 to several millions for the U.S. and Canada."40 A year later these figures were taken over by the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.41 This report was later submitted to the Ministers of Justice of the member countries of the Council of Europe. Within the Council of Europe a report on child exploitation was written in which it was claimed that: "A study of boy prostitutes had suggested that there were 300,000 boy prostitutes in the United States, many of whom are designated runaways."42 The claims of the United Nations report were also repeated. As late as 1988 the Dutch language world development magazine, Onze Wereld (Our World), claimed that: "The American (sic) periodical43 Child Abuse and Neglect reported that in the United States at least 264 different child pornography magazines are in circulation. The kiddieporn stars are drawn from the numerous American runaway teenagers."44 The same article made similar exaggerated claims about alleged illicit trade in donor organs obtained from children killed for the purpose. The story about donor organs had also appeared in the report of the Council of Europe, although there was never any evidence and the story was not credible from the beginning.45

The alleged size of the child pornography trade and the many children said to have been involved, are little more than myths. They are the result of the arbitrary multiplication of arbitrary numbers of alleged victims made by a journalist. The claims had taken on a life of their own. The fact that these claims had by 1980 been rejected by thorough official investigations was insufficient to prevent the claim from reappearing, not only in the media but also in other official circles, including the United States Senate, the United States Supreme Court, a Commission of the American Justice Department, the United Nations and the Council of Europe. After the number had been cited in the Hearings of the House of Representatives, it became associated with an ostensibly reliable source. The fact that the original source was anything but reliable was forgotten.
 
Last edited:
Only in burgerstan. The age of consent in most of the world is 14-16, which is pretty reasonable imo.
 
Science has indicated that age of consent is a fully cultural construct having no validity outside of the cultural beliefs of those who adhere to it. There would be no serious problems from a lack of age of consent other than for the cultural belief that there ought to be. The issues of a lack of age of consent are fully emergent from the cultural belief in them. A culture lacking belief in such issues will not experience them, for they are entirely social constructs.

The ideal age of consent is the lowest one that the culture can be made to see no problems emergent from.

I have at this point in my life fully rejected the validity of the Sex Cult. It is an establishment of religion having no validity whatsoever. Science has failed to detect an intrinsic need for an age of consent. It exists in the minds of the people only, and in this manner is no different from gods.

This shouldn't be taken as an endorsement of ignoring it though. Because of the way that the culture is, it does have the risk of causing harm to others if it is violated -- particularly if they are particularly young.
 
Last edited:
Anything below 18 is pedophilia. Didn't you know?
 
14 is fine 13 is a little too low
what if they have big tits and have boyfriend already? reminds me of this one foid way back in school they are no longer innocent angels then
 
It's not the only thing, but yes, that does mean it's natural at the rate at which it happens. Shit eating hasn't persisted at the rate homosexuality has throughout human history, not has incest, but nice fallacies to justify your blind hatred
Except it isn't, butt stuff doesn't pass on genetics. Your bowel isn't where the semen comes from. And after about 30cm inside the rectum inserting anything is dangerous.
 
yet we're wired to be attracted to those too. You're being hopelessly pedantic.
Except we aren't. The reason why almost every single man fetishizes them is because they are rarely seen. You can look back at ancient photos that women didn't hide their breasts and nobody cared. Even in some tribal societies that are untouched by western society women show their breasts and men don't care.
 
You clearly need someone to explain to you how evolution works, it's a tinkerer, not an inventor, and doesn't think consciously with a goal in mind. The design isn't perfect.
You didn't answer.
 
How is it not?

You're delusional. Mouths aren't made for blowjobs yet they happen. You don't have to like to it see it's natural. You're literally fucking brainwashed.
It's not the only thing, but yes, that does mean it's natural at the rate at which it happens. Shit eating hasn't persisted at the rate homosexuality has throughout human history, not has incest, but nice fallacies to justify your blind hatred
people have practiced homosexuality because they think it's acceptable. in the future, incest without pregnancy will be accepted and people will be practicing that more often. i know it. i see people online defending incest without pregnancy. natural means it's what nature intended. homosexuality isn't what nature intended.
 
people have practiced homosexuality because they think it's acceptable. in the future, incest without pregnancy will be accepted and people will be practicing that more often. i know it. i see people online defending incest without pregnancy. natural means it's what nature intended. homosexuality isn't what nature intended.
To add to this, in Japan, incest is legally accepted but it's heavily frowned upon. Doesn't make it natural.
 
You didn't answer.

homosexuality and all other sexual behaviors are the direct result of evolution. There is nothing manifested by biology that isn't by evolution. The evolutionary theory for homosexuality is that in ancient times homosexuals would intermingle with young adolescent males via the social contacts of their nephews, and would provide extra resources to their nephews that made them more competitive with their friends in the process of doing so. Increasing the heterosexual success of their nephews in this way indirectly passes on the genes of the homosexual.

Transexualism is most likely a sneaking mating strategy. That is what it is in the other animal species.
 
homosexuality and all other sexual behaviors are the direct result of evolution. There is nothing manifested by biology that isn't by evolution.
And yet you didn't say how homosexuality was manifested by evolution.
 
And yet you didn't say how homosexuality was manifested by evolution.

I updated the post to explain the current evolutionary theory of homosexuality. I added a theory for transexualism as well; however, it doesn't apply to those who actually castrate themselves obviously. That is likely a pathological expression of it, in the sense of the traditional sexology nomenclature. The most high kinsey scale homosexuality is in the same way. Essentially, the original deviation from absolute fitness (arousal to putting your dick in a vagina) maintains fitness in some indirect way that allows for it to be amplified just as normal sexual behaviors are; however, when the deviation is amplified over the course of evolution it starts to have hyper expressions that are unfit. Evolution doesn't ensure that all are fit. Flamboyant high kinsey scale homosexuality that is purely teleiophilic is possibly without such benefits, but it is just an evolutionary dead end then. Evolution does produce dead ends, after all -- but that doesn't mean it didn't also produce the sequences of fitness -- whether direct or indirect -- leading up to them. High kinsey scale teleiophilic homosexuality is likely an evolutionary dead end that is the multiple generations evolved out expression of the evolutionary benefit had by increasing the resources of one's nephews and other young male relatives who are heterosexual.
 
Last edited:
The evolutionary theory for homosexuality is that in ancient times homosexuals would intermingle with young adolescent males via the social contacts of their nephews, and would provide extra resources to their nephews that made them more competitive with their friends in the process of doing so. Increasing the heterosexual success of their nephews in this way indirectly passes on the genes of the homosexual.
How ancient exactly?
 
Around the time of homosexuality (toward adolescents only, as is the only form that is ever common from time to time) being commonplace in ancient Rome and the like. So, traditional sense of ancient. Homosexuality is thought to have independently evolved in various ancient environments, including China and Rome, with some number of years between each of which I don't know, but with the evidence for it emerging in each case as a form of secondary arousal for adolescent males and then deviating into more evolutionary bizarre seeming expressions by that initial deviation from absolute fitness nevertheless maintaining a secondary form of fitness and causing evolution to create such people as if the secondary fitness were primary fitness for them, as evolution can't tell such things apart over enough generations. Almost always if not always results in what would once have been considered pathological conditions; however, arousal toward adolescent males is just the most weakest of homosexual deviation in fact, because of having the greatest similarity to the true fitness of arousal to signs of femininity, as compared to arousal to grown ass hairy ass bear men, which is clearly a stronger expression of homosexuality. Which makes it all the more ironic that they condemn less deviant forms of homosexuality while so frantically embracing its other expressions having deviated more from fitness yet.
 
Last edited:
Around the time of homosexuality (toward adolescents only, as is the only form that is ever common from time to time) being commonplace in ancient Rome and the like. So, traditional sense of ancient. Homosexuality is thought to have independently evolved in various ancient environments, including China and Rome
A few thousands of years won't change evolution that is 400+ million years old.
 

Similar threads

NEETcel2023
Replies
51
Views
5K
yezhi
yezhi
TheDarkEnigma
Replies
100
Views
11K
Emba
Emba
InMemoriam
Replies
37
Views
5K
La Grande Infamie
La Grande Infamie

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top