Will IT accuse this thread of being racist like the thread asking the same thing about White countries? Will the results be similarly distributed? We'll see!
Last edited:
Serious How many of you would agree India should be for Indians only?
Pakistan should just nuke it.
India is a shithole ngl
"Pakistan" aka separatist part of India.
Well then India should nuke itself. Don't they all believe in reincarnation? Prove it, faggots.
If they are already at it they could be so kind as to nuke the rest of this god forsaken hellhole as well.
India never existed before the British.
There's a reason almost no one moves there.
India for the Indians. No mayo cumskins allowed in india
"Indian" is not an ethnicity or race, it is a nationality consisting of many ethnicities and races. So this particular example doesn't make sense.
Secondly, there is no "White country". No country has had white nationalism or racial identity at its core since Nazi Germany.
Nonsense. That's like saying China never existed before the communist revolution.
Last edited:
I don't care tbh
Chinese is a culture, and many different ethnicities have tried to claim to be inheritors of Chinese culture. This is not the case for India, there is no unified Indian culture and no unified identity until the British.
BASED.
Cumskin cope as usual.
High IQ. Jfl at low IQ cumskins.
India is for indians, germany for germans etc etc
"There is no Indian culture"
See the hypocrasy of ethnics
There isn't, Kashmir has a very different culture than the Tamils. United curryland and curry culture is a curry cope. This is also typical in their religion, especially Hindu nationals, because they have an inferiority complex and want to associate other religions with theirs."There is no Indian culture"
That's why they live in shit holes.
I am all for Indians coming to our countries, but the issue is the indians don't let white people have good jobs. This is the same in Pakistan.
The west should withdraw work applications until the same is delivered on both ends.
The west should withdraw work applications until the same is delivered on both ends.
let da streetshiters run da street
There is no unified chinese culture as well. Hans are the majority but there are Manchurians, Uighyurs, Tibetans, Mongols. And these are just the bigger groups. China is 1.4 billion. You can't expect them to be homogeneous
But that's besides the point. This is not about ethnicity. To say that X nation did not exist before year Y because year Y is when the current political state developed is a huge cope.
Germany did not exist before 1945. Russia did not exist before 1991. China did not exist before 1949. Britain did not exist before 1702. You get my point?
Dumb Thread
Who TF is trying to go to India?
The place Stinks
Who TF is trying to go to India?
The place Stinks
I never said China was ethnically homogeneous, but many of the ethnic groups there claim to be inheritors of Chinese culture, Han are not the only one who claim to be the true Chinese. This is because the various ethnic groups have rules over one another for millenia and power would shift in traditional Chinese thought when the rulers are unjust and not virtuous, and heaven itself would destroy and replace them.
This is not the case in India at all, as although neighbor ethnic groups had states that fought, there was never a unified identity or nation like in China, especially all of what is now the Indian country. The only mention of anything like a united India was either Bharata, which actually either referred the known world in the epics like Mahabharata and included parts of East Asia with tribes like the Chin and Afghanistan and modern Pakistan (sometimes refers to the geographic landmass). The only united nation I can see historically is that of Aryavarta millenia ago, but that does not include South India and parts of Eastern India, so it's still not a basis of modern Indian identity.
Russian and German are both ethnic groups, Russia existed originally as Kiev Rus in modern day Ukraine and Germans. As for Germany, it didn't exist in name but the German people have been under entities before like Prussia, and Germany was a result of uniting the varying German peoples after successful warfare.
Who does Jammu and Kashmir belong to?
Cause they are the freest country on the planet. You can literally shit on the streets.Dumb Thread
Who TF is trying to go to India?
The place Stinks
Why not to the Kashmiri people? Self determination is a good thing.
Many Indian ethnicities ruled over India as well, everything else seems to be superflous. There was never a single Chinese state that different dynasties and ethnicities in China took turns to rule over. It was one dynasty subjugating and taking land from another much like India. There was still a China just like there was still an India.
Why can't Aryavarya be a basis for modern India? Borders shift all the time. The France we see now is very different from emperor Charmanglane's kingdom.
Even then this assessment is blatantly false. The country and its people had been united, that too very recently under Mughal empire which literally coined the term "Hindustan" . Heck many practices and state systems of British India, including the "rupee" currency was derived from what came before. And that's just one example.
The place has been politically fractured many times but so have been China and others
Again, this is not about ethnicity. Saying that a country never existed before Y cuz the current state did not exist is gigacope. German and Russian ethnicities have existed for some time, but so have the ethnicities that fall under modern India. The only difference is no Indians (except Bangladeshis) have formed an ethnic nation. But that does not mean they were not Indians in the current usage of the word.
This is frankly a rather bizarre assessment of history and anthropology
Their shithole is theirs; no other race should go there tbh.
V
India supa powa 2020.
global economy is going down so india will be supa powa! in no time.
global economy is going down so india will be supa powa! in no time.
Ruled over India, except that never happened, it was all fragmented and differentiated, but that wasn't the case in China. Every Chinese dynasty that succeeded another was following the rule of heaven, where they thought heaven would destroy old immoral ruling peoples. It's not just politically the same, but culturally, which is not the case of India either. There was no such concept in India that united them like they did in China.
Aryavarta can't be the basis for modern India because it specifically referred to the Aryan people of Northern India and their culture. It did not include Southern India and parts of Eastern India. Most Indian nationalists will never agree to this idea because they want control over South India, and it's all an ideological power play.
Mughals did not unite all of India, many parts of South India were not under the control of the Mughal Empire. The term Hindustan was made by foreigner Mughal rulers, and even then it mostly referred to Northern India or the entire continental landmass (not a nation), as even in music Northern Indian music is called Hindustani while South Indian Music is called Carnatic despite them evolving from the same Northern Indian music style.
The usage of rupee and other such things are due to the great influence of Northern Indian in history, as it is also commonly used to refer to money in many other places like Indonesia and Tibet. I only consider China an ancient country because it has huge historical and cultural overlap with another, and many groups claim to be inheritors of Chinese culture. No ethnic group has historically said they are inheritors of Indian culture until modern Hindutva groups came along and pushed their anti-historical narrative.
Your comparison of Russian and German nations to India is dishonest, because each ethnic group had their own nation and not a loose collection of them. India can be more likened to the whole of Europe, a continent of its own, rather than a nation. The reason that Ancient Indians have never formed their own ethnic nations is because nation is a modern concept that derives from Europe, and that's just not how Ancient India existed back then. China just coincedentally had most of those criteria of being a nation.
D
You already know the answer.
Also about the credibility of IT's accusations another member put it well
"It's only racism when whites do it" is yet another arbitrary ideological rule out of the many ones we have in the west nowadays.
Slavery wasn't only practiced by whites at all. Same with imperialism.
Slavery wasn't only practiced by whites at all. Same with imperialism.
Indian supremacists!
Oh wait only white people get accused of heinous supremacy crimes.
Oh wait only white people get accused of heinous supremacy crimes.
Pakistan since they have a majority Islamic population, and Pakistan was created for Islamic people of the subcontinent. The ruler however of J&K was a hindu dindu who didn't care about what the people wanted and joined India. The majority of Kashmiris want to join Pakistan, but due to lack of a support they've been getting ever since 5 Aug 2019 when India illegally stripped it of its rights, I think a lot of Kashmiris don't trust Pakistan anymore, and frankly I don't believe we deserve it anymore. Our country hasn't done shit for them, the only thing that matters is a full-scale war but unfortunately Pakistan is taking a pacifist stance. Many Pakistani soldiers are willing to die for Kashmiris in a war, but the higher ups are unfortunately pacifists.
tbh i may be desperate enough to want to try jbw there. Would it work @Legendarywristcel
shitskins drama
hindu dindus are obsessed with Kashmiri women because of muh white skin.
Would work. I dont care about white guys taking away indian foids. I find most of them unfuckable.
Currywhores are subhumans indeed. Those white dudes are doing us a favor ngl.
Idiots played themselves by throwing away their white genes and mating with yucky curry foids.
Indeed, and then they think we are jealous or something.
Indeed, and then they think we are jealous or something.
You couldnt pay me to stick my pepe into an ugly currywhore.
ironically India is one of the most raped place on earth, thus the term "Indian" doesn't correspond to much as there are several different castes within India that could roughly correspond to different racial categories each with different racial capabilities. To take the clearest example of this, the Brahmins are of the aryan caste meaning thet possess a relatively high percentage of genes from the European steppes which they acquired through generations upon generations of biological warfare and rape against the shitskin dravidian (what you might call Indian if that term is to be used at all) women and the killing off of all the males in the northern territories by the aryan (indo european) yamnaya tribe. Apart from this there have also been african migrations into India diluting the blood even further and making its genepool even more heterogeneous. So in summary India has never really been for indians and the right of conquest has determined which tribe has left its mark on that society, much like how europeans aren't really naturally entitled to europe unless they're willing to fight for it and will perish unless they do so. Nature doesn't give a fuck about what's for whom unless what determines this right is bloodshed and conquest
Based.
Exactly. IT was totally freaking out about the same thread for White countries. (Along with some garbage users on .co.)
stay in india dont come here
America was for white men. That’s how the forefathers wanted it
Similar threads
brazi
Users who are viewing this thread
