I don't know I never really had a problem with counting everyone up untill age 16 as a child. It's debatable though. I do see the difference between some 15 year old hooking up with a 20 year old and a 20 year old grooming 5-12 year olds.
What about 12 year old foids that have are having sex with multiple 16 year old chads?
No I don't want the age of consent to be 12 if that's what you're asking me. And I would think it's pretty creepy for a 16 year old to fuck 12 year olds but kids fucking other kids is what kids do, especially in this society, I don't think any teen boys out there grooming kids for their dungeons either.
This. I don’t even think there’s any legitimate pedophiles here. Attraction to post-puberty girls is universal among men.
Not a question about cucked laws and stuff. It's a question about you definition of pedophiles and morality. If a 12 year old is having regular sex with 16 year olds, is it immoral for a 20 year old to fuck that 12 year old?
None of this makes sense tbh
Why would a kid fucking other kids somehow mean an old man should be allowed to fuck them, which btw, most of these pedo fucks are 30+ so stop with the charitable numbers. Anyways I've said my peace go talk about it on pedos.co if you ask me
because there is no difference between sex and sex.
no
never said I was a pedo, only that your morality is skewed and your hatred to pedos is not justified.
www.bbc.co.uk
Can you live in harmony with agecucks if aside from that issue they believe in and follow Christian views as told in The Bible?
Another point of infighting that people that aren't incels can exploit @FallenPrime
The last time age of consent and relations between teenage girls and adult men was even open to debate in US, UK, Canada, Australia was 100+ years ago too. You'd unironically get more support from people for repealing women's right to vote before getting support to lower the age of consent and making age gap relationships where the man is much older acceptable again.
Remember how this kind of speech used to be more common here too. There were times when posters here believed "going there" and discussing these things full on in a way no other group did was the right course of action and was based. They seemed to have not considered why this topic is a veritable no go for a reason for other groups.
Disagree tbh this site was way more edgy and had a lot of actual discussion about violence in its early days. It's still much tamer now. There used to be times when threads were made about how this website was at the forefront of the manosphere and how everyone was afraid of incels because they were willing to take "action" IRL and exact their revenge on society in a way no other group was willing to do. Strangely enough a lot of that talk disappeared once the AM and Yoga shootings happened in 2018 and there was enough 'evidence' to try and tie incels to terrorists.
I remember that time too but I remember it being much different. There were a lot of conversations talking about how it's understandable that Islamic terrorists did what they did and there were gifs of 9/11 posted.
Again I have to disagree. There was a lot of talk about rape and jbs even in 2017 and 2018. I was lurking at this time but I clearly remember such discussions being made.
He was a fraud from the start too. It was obvious by how much he shit on incel's copes.
He was a presence for sure.
He's kind of hated now despite the rules of this forum saying there can "technically" be blackpilled normies that have had sex as long as they didn't brag.
Reddit is just more tempered overall because of the stricter rules of engagement and what you can say without getting brigaded or banned tbh
Now that is just the culture of this place lol. There is nothing to be happy about as an incel.
I think this website moved past its edgelord days and as a result is a lot quieter now. This is almost universally seen as bad here but imo all the edgy talk leading up to the AM and yoga occurrences made it really easy for the media to pin the blame on incels and start a new moral panic centered around incels. You know they've tried this forever with mras, mgtow, tfl and the like for so long. They weren't successful though for the longest time because those groups of people were smart enough to know not to explicitly endorse violence or racist edgy rhetoric. The people looking to demonize low smv males got their big break when edgy incels came on the scene. As a result just like the alt-right and their freakouts during and post Charlottesville, the media has used incels as a way to take down manosphere and men's rights communities at large.
If other teens could bang teens, non teens could bang them as well. Your argument is based on emotion rather than logic. Teens aren’t child.
You seem to be intentionally vague.
If you want to call out particular users and provide exact quotes (link the post, quote them EXACTLY) then I'll hear your criticisms but otherwise STFU with your generic paraphrasing BS
who in particular?
You can find any manner of anything, including IT impersonators, so people should only respond to specific and not generic criticisms.
You're moving the goalposts: you mentioned RAPE bro.
Don’t care what normies think. Teens aren’t children. Teens for a very long time of human existence have been having sex with each other. If they can have sex with each other non teens can too. Teens aren’t innocent children.
Agecuckoldry is phariseeism, i.e. upholding random manmade rules instead of God's rules. Where in the bible is it written that teenagers must not marry, or that people with age differences must not marry? All that crap comes from feminism and not from the bible.
Morality doesn't change with time. It was never ever wrong to marry sexually developed young people. On the contrary, it's better for them to marry than to give in to fornication and degeneracy.
