Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Cope If a new easily transmissible super lethal STD appeared, it would hopefully help reduce inceldom

Mik_TFL

Mik_TFL

Such a lonely day, and it's mine.
★★★★★
Joined
May 23, 2018
Posts
1,433
Just picture it. An std with something like 80% chance of transmission from a single encounter (with condom), that takes 1 year to incubate, but is transmissible by the 3rd day and has a 90% fatality rate. Chads would spread the disease by the dozens each, tens of thousand would die. The only safe option would be for women to fuck virgins. Not only that, but being incel-esque looking would be the only believable way women would have to tell a guy is a virgin (at least for some years after it all starts) It would be glorious.
 
We incels should make research on that kind of virus.
 
As if women are willing to settle with ugly, ethnic, balding manlets, just to avoid a fatal disease. Women care more about satisfaction than safety. Why do you think so many foids ends up with/stay with guys that abuse or even kill them?
 
idk about incel, but it would sure reduce sexhavers numbers
 
you mean like the movie It Follows?
 
As if women are willing to settle with ugly, ethnic, balding manlets, just to avoid a fatal disease. Women care more about satisfaction than safety. Why do you think so many foids ends up with/stay with guys that abuse or even kill them?
Those are not a majority, plus, most of the hedonistic chad-only thots would be dead within 5 years... as would most chads. Sooner or later they'd have to settle, hypergamy would at least roll back to the levels from the pre social media era
you mean like the movie It Follows?
haven't seen that movie
 
It would not help or solve the problem of inceldom, but it would considerably reduce the number of the population, or perhaps not, perhaps a saturation and exaggeration; One only knows that incels would not be affected and would not have to worry too much about the lethality of the virus; that would be a cope for many
 
As if women are willing to settle with ugly, ethnic, balding manlets, just to avoid a fatal disease. Women care more about satisfaction than safety. Why do you think so many foids ends up with/stay with guys that abuse or even kill them?
High IQ
 
Just picture it. An std with something like 80% chance of transmission from a single encounter (with condom), that takes 1 year to incubate, but is transmissible by the 3rd day and has a 90% fatality rate. Chads would spread the disease by the dozens each, tens of thousand would die. The only safe option would be for women to fuck virgins. Not only that, but being incel-esque looking would be the only believable way women would have to tell a guy is a virgin (at least for some years after it all starts) It would be glorious.
High iq tbh
 
High IQ biologycels, we need you to get to work.
Redeen us.
We'll build statues for you and you'll live in history books as legends
 
Cope they'd just become lesbians. But tbh it's not unimaginable, ppl these days don't give a fuck about safe sex because we have some medications to cure early onset stuff... what happens when there's a new strain though. They didn't live through the aids crisis, they think they can just pop a pill and go back to fucking.
 
I would be scared to fuck with that std
 
Lol we are talking about a group of people who would rather fuck dogs than incels. This is a uber cope they would rather die a slow painful death over fucking incels or giving up their privilege of fucking exclusively chads.
 
Lol we are talking about a group of people who would rather fuck dogs than incels. This is a uber cope they would rather die a slow painful death over fucking incels or giving up their privilege of fucking exclusively chads.
Just 10 years ago, before the smartphone era the incel threshold was at least 10% lower, probably even 15%. Half the people here should have been normies.
Cope they'd just become lesbians.
They wouldn't, they have the biological need to feel small and protected. Smell, texture, form... even though the female body is objectively more aesthetically pleasing, women are still wired to be attracted to men.
 
Last edited:
Just 10 years ago, before the smartphone era the incel threshold was at least 10% lower, probably even 15%. Half the people here should have been normies.

They wouldn't, they have the biological need to feel small and protected. Smell, texture, form... even though the female body is objectively more aesthetically pleasing, women are still wired to be attracted to men.
Manlets are considered men by society?:waitwhat:You're copeing, there's tons of 30-40 y/o foids who get divorced and become lesbian.
 
Manlets are considered men by society?
On that bit you are right, Manlets are mostly screwed, though women are in average smaller, some might luck out and find an even smaller womanlet. As for the lesbians... quick wikipedia search yields 0.8% as lesbian and 1.4% as bisexual, I honestly think it's not that far off.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top