Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

If women are attracted to money, then why dont average looking rich guys charge roasties for sex and dates?

F

fyvefhour

Proudly LDARing
★★
Joined
Nov 2, 2020
Posts
158
Seriously, this simple question debunks all of the horse shit of men gaining smv with age and ALL money copes. If money made you sexually desirable, then male prostitutes would he rich dudes charging 1-10k an hour. Ifyou have to pay a woman for ANYTHING including on dates, its exclusively bc you lack SMV. Every woman and man has people theyd sleep w and date for free. If youre courting women ITS OVER
 
What a retarded thread
 
Women aren't attracted to money it's just useful for them.
 
At the end of the day its all transactional.
 
no they wouldn't because no foids would buy from them and men are simps cucks who would probs give foids a discount.
What a retarded thread
Delusional.
Screenshot 2020 11 21 09 54 42
 
foids do not like being charged though, they'll pay for chad sometimes if that. they prefer hot guys with money to pay for their shit
Everyone wants the luxury of being paid for but its not a requirement for women who truely like you. Women beta buxx for the men they want. No one likes being charged obv
 
If money made you sexually desirable, then male prostitutes would he rich dudes charging 1-10k an hour.

I don't understand your reasoning, here.
 
I don't understand your reasoning, here.
Because if you can make massive profit from dating other women, men would do it. They would probably have an entire escorting agency where men just portrayed themselves as rich for women who were sexually attracted to that.
 
Because if you can make massive profit from dating other women, men would do it. They would probably have an entire escorting agency where men just portrayed themselves as rich for women who were sexually attracted to that.

I don't think anyone believes money makes you sexually desirable in the sense that it arouses women or something. It probably is a fetish, though.

Money is just men's carrot. They dangle it the way women dangle their tits and asses.
 
I don't think anyone believes money makes you sexually desirable in the sense that it arouses women or something. It probably is a fetish, though.

Money is just men's carrot. They dangle it the way women dangle their tits and asses.
Tits and ass increase sexual desirability. Money doesnt. This post is for lurking mgtow copers and beta buxxers. Money is used for escortcelling, beta buxx, or relationship provider fraud
 
Tits and ass increase sexual desirability. Money doesnt. This post is for lurking mgtow copers and beta buxxers. Money is used for escortcelling, beta buxx, or relationship provider fraud

Some women will have sex with a rich guy to get access to his money. Does that mean money makes you sexually desirable ? That's a bit of a semantic argument. I would say money makes you sexually "tolerable".
 
Some women will have sex with a rich guy to get access to his money. Does that mean money makes you sexually desirable ? That's a bit of a semantic argument. I would say money makes you sexually "tolerable".
No. If a woman cant tolerate your looks, theyll reject you even with money as some hookers do now. Youre still undesirsble and have 0 SMV, but women will go through with it given she can tolerate you and you give Her something she wants
 
dumbass thread tbh
 
No. If a woman cant tolerate your looks, theyll reject you even with money as some hookers do now. Youre still undesirsble and have 0 SMV, but women will go through with it given she can tolerate you and you give Her something she wants
If we go by your logic, then none of us are incels since women would find us desirable from escortmaxxing.
 
If we go by your logic, then none of us are incels since women would find us desirable from escortmaxxing.
Were you addressing yourself?
 
Totally backwards logic OP

OP is retarded confirmed
Pls tell me how so.
If money= sex appeal the male escorts would be anyone who looks rich
Rich guys would also have the ability to charge women for sex and dates but only chad can do that (and celebs but that can be debated)
 
Pls tell me how so.
If money= sex appeal the male escorts would be anyone who looks rich
Rich guys would also have the ability to charge women for sex and dates but only chad can do that (and celebs but that can be debated)
Firstly, no one says that money is equivalent to sex appeal. Women just want to be with a guy with money so they can benefit from it. A woman paying a rich guy to have sex with her would be completely self-defeating since it is the money she wants, not the guy.
 
Firstly, no one says that money is equivalent to sex appeal. Women just want to be with a guy with money so they can benefit from it. A woman paying a rich guy to have sex with her would be completely self-defeating since it is the money she wants, not the guy.
I shouldve posted this on a red pill forum. It seems as if everyone here is 100% black pilled to the core srry
 
Because they r average looking
 
I don't understand this thread at all. "Women like money, so make them give it up?" Is that what you're saying? Why would they want to do that?
 
I don't understand this thread at all. "Women like money, so make them give it up?" Is that what you're saying? Why would they want to do that?
When i say attraction, i mean sexual attraction. Im trying to prove that any woman who claims money is attractive is looking for beta buxx who Will never be sexually desirable
 
When i say attraction, i mean sexual attraction. Im trying to prove that any woman who claims money is attractive is looking for beta buxx who Will never be sexually desirable

I mean sexual attraction too. If a woman claims money is attractive, why would she give her money away?
 
I mean sexual attraction too. If a woman claims money is attractive, why would she give her money away?
Rich women dont get off to themselves for being rich. If anything the Jeremy meeks case wouldnt have ever happened.
 
Rich women dont get off to themselves for being rich. If anything the Jeremy meeks case wouldnt have ever happened.

And Jeremy Meeks doesn't get off to himself, but he looks good.
 
Hes not gay?

Even if you use that argument with gays and lesbians, they have tops and bottoms where theyre attracted to more masc or more fem dudes....

Even if they did get off to themselves and rich women got off to their own richness, I still don't understand the proposal of this thread. Why would a rich, moneysexual woman give her own money away if she loves money?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top