Unconsciously, her friends wont think of you as "her boyfriend" her problem, but "our boyfriend".
Preselection is so important to them. They vet their friends' love interests like they're their own. The group has to approve the boyfriend as "our boyfriend". A girls attraction is always co-dependent on what their friends think. Women share the information about their own boyfriends. If it is good, they promote him. If bad, they badmouth him. If the friends criticize him, his value drops. If the man ask something, before answering, women look to each other, to agree on a consensus, and give a group response, not an individual response. Women answer exactly the opposite if you ask it in isolation, or if you ask it in a group, and they find that the other women disagree. If women were monogamous, the coherent thing to do, would be to badmouth her own boyfriend, to discourage other women from having sex with him, but they do exactly the opposite. Women cannot resist the urge of spreading free publicity of having a attractive boyfriend, and get a rush when their girl friends get excited about him.
-- If you have sex with a woman, she will tell her friends every detail. What you did, all the foreplay, what you said, where you touched her, the scar on your shoulder, how your dick penetrated her, how you grunted, how you grabbed her ankle. Every detail. You literally had virtual sex with each one of her friends. *watch Ingmar Bergman's Persona (1966) or Sex in the City for a insight of the female psyche* --
If you are interested in an unknown woman which is part of a group, you have to address the group, and talk to the entire group. If you try to talk only to one woman, the other will attack you, claim your attention, or separate the woman from you, and the woman you are talking to, will check if the rest of the group approves of your conversation. If anything women are the inclined to simulate polygny. All that behavior is only compatible with polygyny. That's why men are individuals, but women are groups.
Preselection is so important to them. They vet their friends' love interests like they're their own. The group has to approve the boyfriend as "our boyfriend". A girls attraction is always co-dependent on what their friends think. Women share the information about their own boyfriends. If it is good, they promote him. If bad, they badmouth him. If the friends criticize him, his value drops. If the man ask something, before answering, women look to each other, to agree on a consensus, and give a group response, not an individual response. Women answer exactly the opposite if you ask it in isolation, or if you ask it in a group, and they find that the other women disagree. If women were monogamous, the coherent thing to do, would be to badmouth her own boyfriend, to discourage other women from having sex with him, but they do exactly the opposite. Women cannot resist the urge of spreading free publicity of having a attractive boyfriend, and get a rush when their girl friends get excited about him.
-- If you have sex with a woman, she will tell her friends every detail. What you did, all the foreplay, what you said, where you touched her, the scar on your shoulder, how your dick penetrated her, how you grunted, how you grabbed her ankle. Every detail. You literally had virtual sex with each one of her friends. *watch Ingmar Bergman's Persona (1966) or Sex in the City for a insight of the female psyche* --
If you are interested in an unknown woman which is part of a group, you have to address the group, and talk to the entire group. If you try to talk only to one woman, the other will attack you, claim your attention, or separate the woman from you, and the woman you are talking to, will check if the rest of the group approves of your conversation. If anything women are the inclined to simulate polygny. All that behavior is only compatible with polygyny. That's why men are individuals, but women are groups.
Last edited:
