- Nov 17, 2017
- 91d 8h 38m
They cannot let ugly males kill themselves on a high scale, for two reasons I think.
- It would disturb the just world fallacy, like Edmund says. Regardless of the exact ideology of the prevalent political system, the elites and their lapdog mainstream media always say that the current social order is as good as ever, if you cannot succeed, it's mostly your fault, anyone who wants to change the system radically is a terrorist, dangerous, you know all the buzzwords. Mass suicides or mass euthanasia would significantly undermine the legitimacy of this propaganda, even if the people killing themselves are the most undesirable individuals of society. The media would have to admit that a large chunk of people are so unhappy that they literally remove themselves, something is clearly wrong.
- However undesirable we are, the elites still want us alive, the role they want us to play is that of the sexless (but not asexual), hardworking taxpayer who keeps his mouth shut, obeys all the rules, works until reaching retirement age and then die at the very instant he reaches it. Maintaining their luxurious lifestyle and paying off the priviliged classes that support the system (foids, lgbtq, favored minorities) requires a lot of money. Sub5 males put way more into the system than what they get out of it. They work, pay tax, but most of them will never have families due to hypergamy. They can be leeched on for decades without ever having to give them anything in return. If ugly incels kill themselves out of desperation when they hit 30, a lot of future work and money they would have provided go out the window.