Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Soy Inceltears/Normie Logic: If you have bad social skills, you are evil.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 23682
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 23682

mentally crippled by lonely teen years
-
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
38,937
First off, besides the people diagnosed with autism, the vast majority of people here are incels due to their looks.

Inceltears and Normies will constantly tell incels that the reason they don't get laid is because of their bad personality. Some incels will then reference how many men are domestic abusers to their girlfriends, and the response then is that it's incel's social skills that are the problem. If you ask normies what personality means, they actually think it's the same as social skills, when it's actually not.
1591296354690.png

https://www.prismbrainmapping.com/resources/documents/Personality vs Behaviour.pdf
To repeat: personality is what you are; behaviour is what you do, and it's what you do that makes a difference. However, most people believe that personality determines how individuals act, and it's very difficult to shake that belief.
When they say that incels can't get laid because if their bad personalities, they are arguing that incels deserve to be incels. In reality though, there have been many studies that suggest that social skills are 1. influenced by the halo effect, and 2. are developed from positive reinforcement from being good looking. So in the end even social skills come back to looks.

So if you are ugly, you won't have the same social development as Chad, and therefore have a "bad personality", and therefore "deserve" your inceldom. Even if did you had good social skills though, you still likely wouldn't get laid if the girl thought your looks weren't good enough though. In the end, personality, NT, social skills, are very similar to PUA, which comes from bluepill advice.


Once again, NPCs are retarded and have shitty logic, yet don't even realize it.
 
Last edited:
And yet they get angry at rich people who say poor people are poor because they're evil/lazy. It's the same shit, it's the "just world" fallacy
 
whether you are perceived as evil or not is determined by the collective opinions of a community, social skill have to do with being likable, and as far as normies are concerned thats all that really matters when determining your moral value.
 
whether you are perceived as evil or not is determined by the collective opinions of a community, social skill have to do with being likable, and as far as normies are concerned thats all that really matters when determining your moral value.
for incels it's impossible to be likable though. they hate us no matter what, don't kid yourself
 
for incels it's impossible to be likable though. they hate us no matter what, don't kid yourself
obviously. thats why i find it ridiculous whenever someone here talks about trying to change the image of the community, when moralfags complain all the edgy stuff posted on this forum, saying we should appear as peaceful and non confrontative.
 
And yet they get angry at rich people who say poor people are poor because they're evil/lazy. It's the same shit, it's the "just world" fallacy

Yes. And they absolutely refuse to see the equivalence. Usually come up with cop-outs like 'Sex isn't a commodity, incel!' while at the same time advocating for sex worker rights to sell 'sex' and other forms of 'intimacy' simulacra. IT brains are broken and cucked by ruling class ideology beyond any measure.
 
And yet they get angry at rich people who say poor people are poor because they're evil/lazy. It's the same shit, it's the "just world" fallacy
Fucking exactly, a rich person telling poor people they are lazy is the same exact logic as a chad telling an incel he has a shit personality, yet one is acceptable but the other isn't?
 
And yet they get angry at rich people who say poor people are poor because they're evil/lazy. It's the same shit, it's the "just world" fallacy
They are megalomaniacs beyond any comprehension, they cry their entire lives about (perceived) oppression, but when it's about their privilege they'll say they earned it and it's not a real privilege and as much bullshit as they can spew

There's absolutely 0 difference between a normie and a genocidal dictator, and therefore every normie should be treated as much, especially extremely privileged people like chads
 
I had bad social reinforcement growing up. Now im high inhib as fuck
Its over
 
Fuck normies and IT i hope they all commit suicide by overdosing on their wife's bull's cum and get raped by demons in the deepest circle of hell
 
Ofc this would only applies to males, a foid can do no wrong in this gynocentric society
 
Meanwhile in real life gacy and dahmer were sociable extroverts holding bbq parties and going to clubs.
 
That feel when you're a piece of shit because you have bad social skills :feelsbadman:
 
I had bad social reinforcement growing up. Now im high inhib as fuck
Its over
your bad reinforcement was a result of your subhuman face
 
And yet they get angry at rich people who say poor people are poor because they're evil/lazy. It's the same shit, it's the "just world" fallacy
bingo
 
Personality is something that forms in the earliest years of childhood, and is largely set in stone by adolescence and all but fixed by adulthood.

So if you are neurotic because of a troubled childhood and adolescence, there is little you can do about it.

What roasties mean by "good personality" is merely charisma, which is affected by the psychopaths and narcissists who like to abuse them (JFL). These abusers cope with troubled childhoods in a way that is conducive to peacocking well enough to please these roasties' high standards of entry.
 
Last edited:
Imo it is no different than when society treated overtly mentally ill people as evil from the start. You still see this sometimes when mentally ill males who screwed up their or someone else's life in a bad way are portrayed as demons and worthy of an instant death penalty in comment sections.
 
It's amazing how normies conflate "social skills" and "romantic success" with "moral worth", and at the same time denounce those who are financially successful.
 
It's amazing how normies conflate "social skills" and "romantic success" with "moral worth", and at the same time denounce those who are financially successful.
Indeed. The same psychopathic traits which lead to financial success under liberal capitalism also lead to sexual success with roasties -- the faux charisma, manipulation, and even outright criminality.

I suspect the left/right paradigm is largely meant to cement psychopathic hegemony by having leftists effectively advocate for psycho sexual power on the one hand, and rightists effectively advocate for psycho social power on the other hand.

The divide must be because different people have different reasons for hating psychopaths. Rightists resent psychopaths because they are degenerate, and leftists resent psychopaths because they are rich; conversely, rightists love psychopaths for maximizing economic exploitation, and leftists love psychopaths for spearheading sexual perversions.
 
Last edited:
Indeed. The same psychopathic traits which lead to financial success under liberal capitalism also lead to sexual success with roasties -- the faux charisma, manipulation, and even outright criminality.

I suspect the left/right paradigm is largely meant to cement psychopathic hegemony by having leftists effectively advocate for psycho sexual power, and rightists effectively advocate for psycho social power.

The divide must be because different people have different reasons for resenting psychopaths. Rightists resent psychopaths because they are degenerate, and leftists resent psychopaths because they are rich; conversely, rightists love psychopaths for maximizing economic exploitation, and leftists love psychopaths for spearheading sexual perversions.
they "resent" ugly men, that's what truly matters
 
they "resent" ugly men, that's what truly matters
There is truth to what I say. Look at how Pete Buttigieg, a diagnosable psychopath, won the Democratic Iowa Primary by virtue of identifying as a homosexual.

Leftists love psychopaths because they spearhead sexual perversions.

Meanwhile, president Drumpf, while a mere vulgar narcissist, has malignant qualities and is beloved by rightists on account of his economic exploits.
 
It's amazing how normies conflate "social skills" and "romantic success" with "moral worth", and at the same time denounce those who are financially successful.
Based and richpilled
 

Similar threads

Gott _mit _uns94
Replies
4
Views
191
Ventingblackpiller
Ventingblackpiller
Vitarius
Replies
43
Views
1K
suicidecase
suicidecase
Baccbo
Replies
5
Views
267
Mistake
M
Samurai
Replies
68
Views
2K
curryboy420
curryboy420
Norville Wood
Replies
5
Views
414
Darth Aries
Darth Aries

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top