Well, I'm no expert in the matter but from my experience being insecure isn't a trait that makes you operate better or help at certain objectives, that's desperation and self actualization of one's own shortcomings and incapablites which leads to envy and externalization of one's inner and personal problems which helps with developing characteristic such as decisiveness. Insecurity on the other hand is more of a state of hopelessness, it only lead to hesitation and fear of trying out new things you're unfamiliar with. I don't think there is a way to sugar coat insecurity tbh. It's a weak trait. Desperation on the other hand manifests in one's own shadow.
Fallacies found:
Insecurity is not a state of hopelessness. Hopelessness is giving up and LDARing. If you're insecure you're at least feeling the reason to be insecure enough to not accept the situation to feel the anxiety/ fear intense enough to make it an emotion.
In my opinion going in without proper knowledge/ understanding/ reflexes is what gets you fucked. That's why women like the devil may care attitude. Shows someone didn't fall behind enough to put their life in a lockdown mode from insecurity.
Women want men to be stupid, and intelligence is often a failo because it can show anxiety.
Insecurity detects threat, and feels that, amidst bullshit giddy optimism, that on the logistics/ technicals/ rational basis of everything you will lose. Proactive insecurity looks truth in the face, while pain aversion insecurity looks for copes.
The kind of insecurity I am talking about is the angry, perfectionistic, lockdown my life until I win kind.
I believe in that power. I believe in showing people that not giving a shit about the contexts of what's natural, what people are primally looking for is good. And if society were all uptight and perfectionistic that we would live in a better world.
I am not sugar coating it, or fairy braiding. I am just clarifying what the real insecurity that actually helps secure what you're afraid of is good for.
If you go happy-go-lucky then that can lead to disaster. It's better to be insecure. Why?
Let's say you suck at basketball. If you wanna get better you should be an angry perfectionist about your own flaws.
reasons why:
-if you didn't, and you just did it because you love it... well... that doesn't actually come along in most people's criteria/ state of enjoyment. People don't really like to develop skills from an unskilled position because our ego HATES being the underdog. We perform better being the top dog.
So it's necessary to find the right amount of delusions that you're top dog, and not given top dog position to dominate your competition through pure exertion of hatred, and yet serenity of feeling assured you are good (this takes self delusion, and you can't be considerate of criticisms about self delusion, but you also can't tell people anything self delusional if you are to be credible. You must be able to be contradictory in your narratives, of what you let-on/tell people, and what you believe for yourself at a certain time. You should only bring around people what can be substantiated.) You need entitlement/ hope/ a good enough position/ to be at least 5/10 to make this work. Remember.
People want to be on top naturally. So getting angry you're not on top is better than hinging all of your drive on your enjoyment level of developing a skill. Human narcissism affects us both in negative and positive ways.
-If you suck, and can't focus, then being overly happy, and wanting to be positive/ taking positive advice can be a death trap. If you're overly happy, and you stick to what's positive, then you will probably turn away from waht you're trying to be good at if you hit slumps in your situation/ it gets too hard.
Positive people easily turn away from negative situations when their preferred state of life conditions are making it all positive. Positive people want positivity all the time, and gravitate away from making a positive out of a "negative" situation when it gets too hard.
Sucking at basketball will be hard going.
Because it'll give you the flipside emotional feed from losing. Which is self doubt, sadness, etc.
Settling on being angry always makes you motivated. Relying on being positive is more pleasurable, but it's easy dismantled. Because when you hit a failure/ bad stepdown then you will receive demotivating self-talk cycles.
Being angry turns demotivating/ negatively critical self-talk cycles into more motivation (but there needs to be hope for looksmaxxing to make this work).
If you are taking positive advice, like never be too hard on yourself, always stay positive and YET YOU ARE SUCKING AT BASKETBALL, then you're not gonna take the issue of you sucking at basketball enough to fix it. And being positive doesn't give you a grudging drive. It just gives you a release of the negativity, but that doesn't give you incentive to work very hard. It's an intellectualized severance away from your visceral negative emotions. Which CAN work don't get me wrong. But people with a positive mindset/ normies have usually a very weak drive/ conviction when thigns have high stress.
But when you look at everything with high expectations/ ego/ entitlement then you will constnatly work to perfect yourself. Insecurity works best when you're a hard core person and have high egotistical expectations.
-Insecurity as I SAID works for the general human polarity of feeling anxiety. In relation to how we fit lofty positions. We're not a super-species who are excited to do things that are hard. We are scared when we are not top-dog.
We prefer succeeding with pain aversion while looking like we are strong struggle warriors in a lot of ways.
If you try to feel constantly confident in every situation, and you don't address the problem, then it's not focused on. Trying to liven up / spread the goodness doesn't make you focus on the problem. insecurity makes the problem aware for you. Being constantly confident makes you a derp.