Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Is it time for a change of rules on incels.co (poll)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 24293
  • Start date

Title

  • Yes, it's time to change the rules

    Votes: 38 48.1%
  • No, the rules are fine.

    Votes: 41 51.9%

  • Total voters
    79
Deleted member 24293

Deleted member 24293

Banned
-
Joined
Jan 29, 2020
Posts
3,898
Many users actually suggested that we should only accept khhv's here, or that incels.co should only be visible for actual users of this forum to prevent ITcucks and bluepillers from reading our stuff.

I for myself think that it's actually time for a change of rules.
 
You would have to specify what rule changes you're calling for.
 
We don't need even less members.
This forum is near dead as it is.
The only rule change I suggest is moralfagging and agecucks not being allowed.
 
We don't need even less members.
This forum is near dead as it is.
The only rule change I suggest is moralfagging and agecucks not being allowed.
Has it ever been really active?
 
but this forum will die ...

the bluepillers are sometimes 1200.

also

It's almost impossible to verify if someone is a legitimate KHHV.
 
For example: allowing non-KHHV incels.

Would you like that rule to be changed?
I don't wanna hear about people getting to kiss.
i mean what policy do you suggest. as it stands i've seen people admit to kisses and then not get perma'd. the only rule change would be mentioning a kiss or sex = perma on sight.

which i suppose is a decent rule change. would make things more clear cut and smooth
 
I would agree with making this a khhv only forum. I am not sure about making it visible to only users. The main reason serge refuses is because it needs to be public so that the forum would have the funds to keep running.
 
We don't need even less members.
This forum is near dead as it is.
The only rule change I suggest is moralfagging and agecucks not being allowed.
 
I don't get the whole 'this forum is dead thing'. Was it very active in comparison in the past or something?
 
We don't need even less members.
This forum is near dead as it is.
The only rule change I suggest is moralfagging and agecucks not being allowed.
Non khhvs are a minority of the forum. I made a poll about it and only 3 people are non khhvs. We won’t lose that much people if they all get banned
 
Remove the ”blackpilled normie” rule.
 
You can have sex and later become an incel
I don’t support bragging though
 
Non khhvs are a minority of the forum. I made a poll about it and only 3 people are non khhvs. We won’t lose that much people if they all get banned
Escortcels?
Many of the greatest users in this forum have frequented escorts.
 
Escortcels?
Many of the greatest users in this forum have frequented escorts.
I was actually counting escortcels as khhvs. I just made a third option for distinction
 
Don't have a problem with escortcels
 
We need a members only Section on .co .
I can't post shit about my irl stuff because some ITcel will compile it and fuck my anonymity to death.
 
but OP wants escortcels banned.
Oh. I don’t agree with having escortcels banned but I agree with having people who have kissed banned
 
Oh. I don’t agree with having escortcels banned but I agree with having people who have kissed banned

Agreed.

It's a 2020cel trait to be violently anti-escort, even in otherwise decent users like OP.
 
Oh. I don’t agree with having escortcels banned but I agree with having people who have kissed banned
To be strict escortcels are not KHHV... @Diocel i'd like to hear your opinion about this? Can Escortcels be KHHV? I mean practically they aren't!
 
I have an great idea:
Every user shoud get a badge according to his "KHHV"-status.

So we will directly know who a KHHV is and who isn't one.
 
Agreed.

It's a 2020cel trait to be violently anti-escort, even in otherwise decent users like OP.
I'm not violently anti-escort actually. I really don't know about this one
I have an great idea:
Every user shoud get a badge according to his "KHHV"-status.

So we will directly know who a KHHV is and who isn't one.
that is an awesome idea bro :feelsYall:
 
We need a members only Section on .co .
I can't post shit about my irl stuff because some ITcel will compile it and fuck my anonymity to death.
I would say just add an option to make your thread private. I was against something like this before but it would be nice to share personal anecdotes without worrying about being stalked
 
I have an great idea:
Every user shoud get a badge according to his "KHHV"-status.

So we will directly know who a KHHV is and who isn't one.
Wouldn’t people just lie to get the badge? Nvm this is on the basis that it is a non khhv forum.
 
Last edited:
To be strict escortcels are not KHHV... @Diocel i'd like to hear your opinion about this? Can Escortcels be KHHV? I mean practically they aren't!
I guess they don’t fit the definition but can still be treated like one
I mean they are not KHHV but it's okay since they payed, but they should be considerate and not describe their experiences, but people who got success without paying should be perma banned.
I agree. If they keep mentioning it over and over again then they should get a warning or ban
 
Wouldn’t people just lie to get the badge? Nvm this is on the basis that it is a non khhv forum.
Probably.
During the registration process, there should be different options to tick.
Like KHHV/KHV/KV/...
and according to that answer, the user gets his specific badge.
 
I mean you can be a foid and no one would know if you don't tell, fakecels just like to brag.
Most infiltrators usually get discovered before 500 posts. It’s extremely rare for a foid to be able to rack up thousands of posts here especially if she has to talk shit about herself all the time.
Probably.
During the registration process, there should be different options to tick.
Like KHHV/KHV/KV/...
and according to that answer, the user gets his specific badge.
I would say that it should be khhv only with escortcels being allowed as well as long as they don’t brag
 
We don't need even less members.
This forum is near dead as it is.
The only rule change I suggest is moralfagging and agecucks not being allowed.
 
We need a members only Section on .co .
I can't post shit about my irl stuff because some ITcel will compile it and fuck my anonymity to death.
I agree. I dont feel comfortable posting personal stuff since some ITcel could possibly dox me.
 
Ok lets make this a only KHHV forum, but how do we know if someone is KHHV or not?
 
Ok lets make this a only KHHV forum, but how do we know if someone is KHHV or not?
Well that's obviously not possible. Many users agree that escortcels should be allowed as long as they do not brag about it.
 
would be nice for all blackpilled men to unite. maybe a section of the site for people who agree with blackpill, im interested in knowledge from anyone who has it as long as no bragging
 
We need a members only Section on .co .
I can't post shit about my irl stuff because some ITcel will compile it and fuck my anonymity to death.
I agree. I dont feel comfortable posting personal stuff since some ITcel could possibly dox me.
Not only that but probably part of the reason no real threads with tips or advice get off the ground is because people here understandably don't want lurkers benefiting from what is shared.

For example there could be incels that want to share a recipe of what they cooked but don't want nosy outsiders seeing what the recipe was or adding their unnecessary 2 cents on their circlejerk anti-incel reddit subs.

I would say just add an option to make your thread private. I was against something like this before but it would be nice to share personal anecdotes without worrying about being stalked
But then the complexity is introduced on whether the thread could be made public again at some point and would introduce another problem for the mods.
Imo if a system is set up where you can decide whether a thread you post is public or private its status as public or private shouldn't be able to be changed after it is posted.
 
Last edited:
Many users actually suggested that we should only accept khhv's here, or that incels.co should only be visible for actual users of this forum to prevent ITcucks and bluepillers from reading our stuff.

I for myself think that it's actually time for a change of rules.
Personally I would have never joined this place if I didn't see how funny the people here are.
 
We don't need even less members.
This forum is near dead as it is.
The only rule change I suggest is moralfagging and agecucks not being allowed.
 
Yes, the forum should be visible only for registered users!
 
* No tallfags (Anything above 6' (6'1+) is auto-ban)
* No bragging of ANY sort, not even lowkey, or auto-ban.
* Forum only visible for registered users.
* Proposition for mods:

Choose a really good mod that you know you can trust not to DOXX anyone, have him be the saintest of the saints in terms of morality so that he won't doxx us. Then this guy will have to see a picture of everyone joining the site, including a picture confirming height/face/body. From then on, you wouldn't be able to register without going through this process. Also, the mod should be unbiased and PSL expert, able to rate people completely objectively without any biased bullshit. Any 5.5+ PSL gets insta-banned.

* Anyone who posts solely to bait IT should at least be suspended, as they would be an attention whore obsessed with daddy sigma's attention.
* Held hands with a foid? Ever got intimate in any way with a foid? Banned.
* Bluepilled? Banned (examples : Saying women aren't hypergamous, putting the blame for the situation on us, getting very pushy/aggresive about gymcelling, promoting "game" over "looks" etc.)
* Any signs of volcelling? ("Her face is too ugly", "She isn't tall/short enough", "She is way below my looksmatch (BTW JFL at this affirmation because there is no such thing as <<way below>> as an incel as you are at most a 4-4.5 IF YOU ARE TRULY AN INCEL)". Banned. The only acceptable standard is for the foid not to be fat, rest of the standards deserve to have their user banned. IT'S BRUTAL BUT IF YOU ARE TRULY AN INCEL YOU DON'T HAVE STANDARDS ANYMORE.

It's good to have fewer members on here that are actually incels, rather than a bunch of fakecels mixed in with us. My FAKECEL EXTERMINATION PLAN is perfect for nurturing the best environment for incels :feelsokman:

@Personalityinkwell @Diocel @Gymcelled @Pengwin @Colvin76 thoughts? What should get modified in the above statements?
 
I think the forum needs to stay public, I lurked for a year before joining.

>in 4 but It will read our posts
Bad publicity is still publicity.

Not sure about the KHHV only, I'd say whoever mentions getting laid in the past should be permabanned no matter how long ago it was
 
* No tallfags (Anything above 6' (6'1+) is auto-ban)
* No bragging of ANY sort, not even lowkey, or auto-ban.
* Forum only visible for registered users.
* Proposition for mods:

Choose a really good mod that you know you can trust not to DOXX anyone, have him be the saintest of the saints in terms of morality so that he won't doxx us. Then this guy will have to see a picture of everyone joining the site, including a picture confirming height/face/body. From then on, you wouldn't be able to register without going through this process. Also, the mod should be unbiased and PSL expert, able to rate people completely objectively without any biased bullshit. Any 5.5+ PSL gets insta-banned.

* Anyone who posts solely to bait IT should at least be suspended, as they would be an attention whore obsessed with daddy sigma's attention.
* Held hands with a foid? Ever got intimate in any way with a foid? Banned.
* Bluepilled? Banned (examples : Saying women aren't hypergamous, putting the blame for the situation on us, getting very pushy/aggresive about gymcelling, promoting "game" over "looks" etc.)
* Any signs of volcelling? ("Her face is too ugly", "She isn't tall/short enough", "She is way below my looksmatch (BTW JFL at this affirmation because there is no such thing as <<way below>> as an incel as you are at most a 4-4.5 IF YOU ARE TRULY AN INCEL)". Banned. The only acceptable standard is for the foid not to be fat, rest of the standards deserve to have their user banned. IT'S BRUTAL BUT IF YOU ARE TRULY AN INCEL YOU DON'T HAVE STANDARDS ANYMORE.

It's good to have fewer members on here that are actually incels, rather than a bunch of fakecels mixed in with us. My FAKECEL EXTERMINATION PLAN is perfect for nurturing the best environment for incels :feelsokman:

@Personalityinkwell @Diocel @Gymcelled @Pengwin @Colvin76 thoughts? What should get modified in the above statements?
The definition of "IT Bait" is EXTREMELY AMBIGUOUS

you cannot ban someone for that

also, the height rule is dumb and only creates larpers who will just lie about their height

holding hands? hmmm, idk. seems non sexual, although i guess context matters too. same with hugging
 
The definition of "IT Bait" is EXTREMELY AMBIGUOUS

you cannot ban someone for that

also, the height rule is dumb and only creates larpers who will just lie about their height

holding hands? hmmm, idk. seems non sexual, although i guess context matters too. same with hugging
IT bait as in extreme IT bait posts, such as "I'll go ER" "I'll kill women" "Women deserve to die" etc.

Height gets confirmed with the confirmation-picture point I made.

Holding hands with a foid is a definite sign of a fakecel if she's not family related.

With hugging I admit context does matter.
 

Similar threads

R
Replies
30
Views
762
Johnhatenigger12
Johnhatenigger12
Zer0/∞
Replies
28
Views
1K
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
IncelKing
Replies
34
Views
758
NormiesRretarded
N
SecularNeo-Khazar
Replies
0
Views
104
SecularNeo-Khazar
SecularNeo-Khazar

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top