Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill It takes 13 ms for people to differentiate attractive faces from unattractive faces

Beauty can be perceived very quickly. Olson & Marshuetz (2005) showed that masked presentations of attractive faces (average rating: 7.44 with a range of 6.48-8.67) can be differentiated from unattractive faces (average rating: 2.45 with a range of 1.33-3.52). Faces were presented for 13ms (subjects were unable to accurately report whether a face had even been seen). The average rating of the masked and briefly presented attractive faces was 5.79 while that of the unattractive faces was 4.71 (p<.01).

Strengths

Careful masking proceduresRandom presentation of stimuliAttractive/Unattractive faces matched for emotional expressionCautions
Subjects were able to differentiate between the attractive and unattractive faces, but, not as cleanly as under untimed rating conditions. With untimed ratings, the mean difference between the attractive and the unattractive groups was 5 points (on a 10-point scale); while the masked presentations resulted in a difference of only 1 point.This data suggests that some evaluation of facial beauty happens rapidly (with a masked stimulus lasting only 13ms) and outside of awareness (subjects were unable to accurately indicate whether they had seen a face or not).

Wayne Hooke

Olson, I. R., & Marshuetz, C. (2005). Facial Attractiveness Is Appraised in a Glance.

Source

Research Paper
 
they can tell if your genes are worthy in literally 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 nanosecond there was even video where the humanoids were swiping on tinder and the fucking nanosecond they saw "chad" they were like RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT
 
If she sees a man who looks at all ethnic she swipes left before the picture even loads fully.
 
For reference, it takes 300-400ms to blink your eyes...
 
good thread

this should also make it to blackpill section
@blickpall
 
good thread

this should also make it to blackpill section
@blickpall
Thank you for the mention, this is exactly what we are looking for.

Props to OP.
 
I hate how DNA decides everything. What even is the point of living if you are genetic trash?
 
Beauty can be perceived very quickly. Olson & Marshuetz (2005) showed that masked presentations of attractive faces (average rating: 7.44 with a range of 6.48-8.67) can be differentiated from unattractive faces (average rating: 2.45 with a range of 1.33-3.52). Faces were presented for 13ms (subjects were unable to accurately report whether a face had even been seen). The average rating of the masked and briefly presented attractive faces was 5.79 while that of the unattractive faces was 4.71 (p<.01).

Strengths

Careful masking proceduresRandom presentation of stimuliAttractive/Unattractive faces matched for emotional expressionCautions
Subjects were able to differentiate between the attractive and unattractive faces, but, not as cleanly as under untimed rating conditions. With untimed ratings, the mean difference between the attractive and the unattractive groups was 5 points (on a 10-point scale); while the masked presentations resulted in a difference of only 1 point.This data suggests that some evaluation of facial beauty happens rapidly (with a masked stimulus lasting only 13ms) and outside of awareness (subjects were unable to accurately indicate whether they had seen a face or not).

Wayne Hooke

Olson, I. R., & Marshuetz, C. (2005). Facial Attractiveness Is Appraised in a Glance.

Source

Research Paper
good, i hope everyone knows that i’m worthless
 
they can tell if your genes are worthy in literally 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 nanosecond there was even video where the humanoids were swiping on tinder and the fucking nanosecond they saw "chad" they were like RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT
I can confirm this statement. Women are hardwired to evaluate a man's face literally within milliseconds. They don't even have to look at him directly to determine if he's ugly or not-- they can do it via their peripheral vision. That's why you will NEVER catch a foid glancing at an unattractive man even for a split-second. Her peripheral vision already informed her that he's not worthy of her attention.
 
Last edited:
how the fuck does this have 10 replies with almost 2000 views?
 
Soon these will be the only faces normies can differentiate!

Bul
 
they can tell if your genes are worthy in literally 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 nanosecond there was even video where the humanoids were swiping on tinder and the fucking nanosecond they saw "chad" they were like RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT
:feelsrope:
 
Because the Septembercel revived a thread from May 2018 by replying to a banned member.
Yea i know that, but he necored it 14 mins ago, so this thread got 2k views in may with only 9 replies? was it locked then unlocked or something
 
Yea i know that, but he necored it 14 mins ago, so this thread got 2k views in may with only 9 replies? was it locked then unlocked or something
Ah I see what you mean. I tend to think that IT browse through the archives loads to find things to post, as do most guests. May was a very busy time for the site so I'd guess that lots of threads have disproportionate view to post ratios.

Just a guess however. I'm not sure if guest views count towards the tally or not.
 
why does this thread have so many views lol
 
they can tell if your genes are worthy in literally 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 nanosecond there was even video where the humanoids were swiping on tinder and the fucking nanosecond they saw "chad" they were like RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT

High IQ
 
reading the blackpill archive should be a requirement before you're allowed to post here
 
I hate how DNA decides everything. What even is the point of living if you are genetic trash?
No point
Any success depends on DNA
 
they can tell if your genes are worthy in literally 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 nanosecond there was even video where the humanoids were swiping on tinder and the fucking nanosecond they saw "chad" they were like RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT


How did you become so insane
 
I've always wondered why girls would look at me for like a split second, give me a stupid ass look, and then look elsewhere tbh.
 
Nuke the earth to destruction!!
 
just don't show your face to a foid for more than 12 ms theory
 
pretty good catch OP. brutal tbh.
 
Your genetic worth is decided before you even know it.
 
NT is such a fucking gigacope.

Looks decide your fate before you even open your mouth
 

Similar threads

WorthlessSlavicShit
Replies
6
Views
506
ItsovERfucks
ItsovERfucks
Aquiline
Replies
140
Views
20K
Fancy Alcoholic
Fancy Alcoholic
Sneir
Replies
26
Views
6K
Rabbi Schneerson
R
InMemoriam
Replies
20
Views
3K
ConservativeCel
ConservativeCel
InMemoriam
Replies
66
Views
7K
BornToLose
BornToLose

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top