Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Just a reminder Richard Dawkins but foids are the biggest eugenicists on the planet...

  • Thread starter Deleted member 10124
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 10124

Self-banned
-
Joined
Jul 8, 2018
Posts
13,414


Richard if you're reading this you have nothing to feel ashamed for stating the bleeding obvious... to the bloody oblivious & obtuse... Truth is hate to those who hate the truth.

Ps Jerry Barnett if you're reading this... Racism = lookism (they don't look like you) + ableism (they're not as capable as you) + cacophobia (they're physically aesthetically uglier than you) + heightism (they're not as big & so called strong as you)

Miss out any bases did I?

You won't find a white feminist leftist foid say as much. Heaven forbid.
 
Last edited:
Brutal. In today’s age, foids feel so fucking privileged they aren’t even denying their absurd hypergamy for chad only. :feelsrope:
 
Beyond over if your thread got 1 reply at most
bump
 
Appeal to evolution.

>Bro, it's just evolution get over it. Yes, the best looking places in the world are the ones where the most incels are, but we need to keep getting more beautiful until we are literally walking pieces of art. Sorry man it's natural selection.
 
Appeal to evolution.

>Bro, it's just evolution get over it. Yes, the best looking places in the world are the ones where the most incels are, but we need to keep getting more beautiful until we are literally walking pieces of art. Sorry man it's natural selection.

Its all "just evolution" until rape comes into the picture, then its no longer "natural"
 
Lmao, does anyone really think the best looking guy is the most genetically fit?

The most genetically fit person is the highest IQ individual, which generally isn’t Chad, because that’ll further progress ones lineage, your height and face won’t save you from the guy who invented a gun.
 
Its all "just evolution" until rape comes into the picture, then its no longer "natural"
Exactly. This is all just a lack of empathy and coming up with bullshit excuses for our suffering.
 
Its all "just evolution" until rape comes into the picture, then its no longer "natural"
In other words. It suddenly makes a difference when IM personally affected.

This is typical foid mentality
 
Lmao, does anyone really think the best looking guy is the most genetically fit?

The most genetically fit person is the highest IQ individual, which generally isn’t Chad, because that’ll further progress ones lineage, your height and face won’t save you from the guy who invented a gun.
Hiroshima Nagasaki IQ
 
Does that mean rape is “””just evolution bro!””” because the stronger man is breeding with a woman? Lifefuel for gymcels :forcedsmile:
 
I saw foids on a femcel site talking about wiping ugly men out and it pissed me off so fucking much if every ugly man whent full blown psycho on society these cunts would have a serious problem cause there is a lot of ugly men.
 
Foids will be pushing for eugenics but be looking like this
Uglygirl
 
Lmao, does anyone really think the best looking guy is the most genetically fit?

The most genetically fit person is the highest IQ individual, which generally isn’t Chad, because that’ll further progress ones lineage, your height and face won’t save you from the guy who invented a gun.

Men did not build civilization by looking pretty.

Sexual selection is supposed to be only a secondary mechanism to natural selection.

Sexual selection can't improve a species, it promotes either its normalization via koinophilia, or the development of aberrant characteristics via a fisherian runaway.


 
Lmao, does anyone really think the best looking guy is the most genetically fit?

The most genetically fit person is the highest IQ individual, which generally isn’t Chad, because that’ll further progress ones lineage, your height and face won’t save you from the guy who invented a gun.
It's both. The fittest means the one with superior intelect as well as physical traits to survive competition against others.

The issue is that there is no "competition" anymore. The system provides enough safety that only aesthetical physical traits are valuable.
There's no argument about "evolution" since humans literally subdued the whole "in nature" aspects of our lifes.
 
Foids claim “natural selection” (aka they decide who reproduces) is somehow “right” (aka appeal to nature) but then demand law & order, police, and white knights to protect them from inkwells.
 
Foids claim “natural selection” (aka they decide who reproduces) is somehow “right” (aka appeal to nature) but then demand law & order, police, and white knights to protect them from inkwells.

 
It's both. The fittest means the one with superior intelect as well as physical traits to survive competition against others.

Actually, “survival of the fittest”, when Darwin said it, meant something different to what people think. “Fittest” meant “whoever FITS their environment the best”. It didn’t mean physically fit, or mentally fit. All that matters to nature is “do you fit your current environment?”. By this meaning, things like height, jaw size, hunter eyes, and skeleton size do not matter, since in modern civilization, the things that matter most are IQ, productivity, and ability to cooperate with others.
 
Last edited:
Actually, “survival of the fittest”, when Darwin said it, meant something different to what people think. “Fittest” meant “whoever FITS their environment the best”. It didn’t mean physically fit, or mentally fit. All that matters to nature is “do you fit your current environment?”. By this meaning, things like height, strength and skeleton size do not matter, since in modern civilization, the things that matter most are IQ, productivity, and ability to cooperate with others.
That in itself is a result of the fittest of the past who were both intelectual and physcally fit enough to build a society that was not based on looks alone and could conquer different environments.
The "fittest to their environment" today is being pretty, because every other aspect of survival has been met by consumer society.
 
I wish Adolf Hitler was a woman. They would have created the genetic Übermensch by now
 
That in itself is a result of the fittest of the past who were both intelectual and physcally fit enough to build a society that was not based on looks alone and could conquer different environments.

To some degree, but remember Darwin was studying many different species. Even the shape of a lizards neck was enough to make it a better fit for its environment if it had to eat bugs down holes. Tiny things like that. Or that monkey with the really long finger. IQ doesn’t matter for a lot of animal species. Even physical fitness is often unimportant if the animal is fitting a specific niche in the ecosystem. This is why some speculate that humans enormous intelligence compared to other animals is evidence of some extraordinary event(s).
 
To some degree, but remember Darwin was studying many different species. Even the shape of a lizards neck was enough to make it a better fit for its environment if it had to eat bugs down holes. Tiny things like that. Or that monkey with the really long finger. IQ doesn’t matter for a lot of animal species. Even physical fitness is often unimportant if the animal is fitting a specific niche in the ecosystem. This is why some speculate that humans enormous intelligence compared to other animals is evidence of some extraordinary event(s).
You're kinda agreeing with me but focusing on the nature side of things.
Intelligence + physicallity is what will make the animal fittest or not. Like you said, the lizard that focused on those bugs got to survive (that's intelectual even if a primitive form) meanwhile he was only able to do it because of his physical trait that allowed him to do it.
Intellect matters for every single species, the difference is that the vast majority of them have insignificant brain power compared to modern humans.
 
You're kinda agreeing with me but focusing on the nature side of things.
Intelligence + physicallity is what will make the animal fittest or not. Like you said, the lizard that focused on those bugs got to survive (that's intelectual even if a primitive form) meanwhile he was only able to do it because of his physical trait that allowed him to do it.
Intellect matters for every single species, the difference is that the vast majority of them have insignificant brain power compared to modern humans.

I’d say we both agree, more or less. I just wanted to clarify what Darwin literally meant by “fittest” as it’s often misinterpreted.

One of the tenets of blackpillism is that female reproductive choice is still stuck 500,000 years ago on the Great Plains of Africa. If human females were genuinely attracted to men who were intelligent, emotionally stable, and unlikely to die young, then the world would be in a much better place.
 
I’d say we both agree, more or less. I just wanted to clarify what Darwin literally meant by “fittest” as it’s often misinterpreted.

One of the tenets of blackpillism is that female reproductive choice is still stuck 500,000 years ago on the Great Plains of Africa. If human females were genuinely attracted to men who were intelligent, emotionally stable, and unlikely to die young, then the world would be in a much better place.
True
 

By Horrible I presume she means "Physically undesirable"?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top