Blackpill Just some figures to consider and think about

[puanewb]

These figures are appoximate, and each row isn't a direct parallel to the column adjacent. Just think, though, it's the most redpilled but scientific comparison out there. Women fucking the top 20% of men, the cut off being 5'11, and 6'4 inch penis. But how does the IQ percentiles equate to these figures? Well, just just like being sub80-sub90 IQ, you're practically excluded the same way in work(income) and education. If they don't match the adjacent columns, it's just something to think about to give weight to particular body features. The steeper the degradation = the least value it has.

IQ percentile	Height percentile	Social IQ percentile	Penis size percentile
60 = 0.3% percentile	5'11 = ~80% percentile for men	-	~6.4 inch by 5.1 inch = 80% percentile
70 = 2% percentile	6'0 = 84% percentile for men	-	~6.5 inch by 5.2 inch = 84% percentile
80 = 10% percentile	6'1 = 84% percentile for men	-	~6.5 inch by 5.2 inch = 84% percentile
90 = 25% percentile	6'2 = 95-97% percentile for men	-	7.3 inch by 5.7 inch = 97% percentile
100 = 50% percentile	6'3 = ~98% percentile for men	-	7.5 inch by 5.8 inch = 98% percentile
110 = 74% percentile	6'4 = ~98% percentile for men	-	7.5 inch by 5.8 inch = 98% percentile
120 = 90% percentile	6'5 = ~99% percentile for men	-	7.7 inch by 6 inch = 99% percentile
130 = 97% percentile	6'6 = 99.9% percentile for men	-	8 inch by 6 inch = ~99% percentile

In summary,
1 inch of total height will be worth 0.1 inches of penis, therefore penis size is more important than height, but these two statistics correlate with each other so it doesn't really matter that much in practice anyway.
Having a 8x6 inch penis is equivalent to having an IQ of 150 (statistically) so therefore, each 20 IQ points is worth appoximately 2 inch of penis.

 

[SlayerSlayer]

These figures are appoximate, and each row isn't a direct parallel to the column adjacent. Just think, though, it's the most redpilled but scientific comparison out there. Women fucking the top 20% of men, the cut off being 5'11, and 6'4 inch penis. But how does the IQ percentiles equate to these figures? Well, just just like being sub80-sub90 IQ, you're practically excluded the same way in work(income) and education. If they don't match the adjacent columns, it's just something to think about to give weight to particular body features. The steeper the degradation = the least value it has.

IQ percentile	Height percentile	Social IQ percentile	Penis size percentile
60 = 0.3% percentile	5'11 = ~80% percentile for men	-	~6.4 inch by 5.1 inch = 80% percentile
70 = 2% percentile	6'0 = 84% percentile for men	-	~6.5 inch by 5.2 inch = 84% percentile
80 = 10% percentile	6'1 = 84% percentile for men	-	~6.5 inch by 5.2 inch = 84% percentile
90 = 25% percentile	6'2 = 95-97% percentile for men	-	7.3 inch by 5.7 inch = 97% percentile
100 = 50% percentile	6'3 = ~98% percentile for men	-	7.5 inch by 5.8 inch = 98% percentile
110 = 74% percentile	6'4 = ~98% percentile for men	-	7.5 inch by 5.8 inch = 98% percentile
120 = 90% percentile	6'5 = ~99% percentile for men	-	7.7 inch by 6 inch = 99% percentile
130 = 97% percentile	6'6 = 99.9% percentile for men	-	8 inch by 6 inch = ~99% percentile

There's a chapter in 'The War Against Normal People,' Andrew Yang's book, where he talks about a future where the wealthy will homogeneously dominate in ALL the positive traits: looks, AND intellect. In other words, as income inequality rises, LOOKS inequality, and INTELLECTUAL inequality also rises. He may be an optimistic dude, but it's a pretty brutal read, and I could tell he had a shitty incel upbringing.

He truly is the incel candidate.

 

[puanewb]

There's a chapter in 'The War Against Normal People,' Andrew Yang's book, where he talks about a future where the wealthy will homogeneously dominate in ALL the positive traits: looks, AND intellect. In other words, as income inequality rises, LOOKS inequality, and INTELLECTUAL inequality also rises. He may be an optimistic dude, but it's a pretty brutal read, and I could tell he had a shitty incel upbringing.

He truly is the incel candidate.

That's to be expected, we're truly heading for a "eugenic singularity" so to speak, but we're constantly told mass extinctions are totally unnatural for ecosystems, it's not only that they will naturally dominate these spheres but also the beautiful wealthy you speak of will be the first to perfect themselves genetically with the newer technologies they naturally have more immediate access to. We've all made a mistake thinking technology will be the "great equaliser" of humanity.

 

[Deleted member 18214]

Lol at 5"11 being the 80th percentile for men

 

[universallyabhorred]

Having a 8x6 inch penis is equivalent to having an IQ of 150 (statistically) so therefore, each 20 IQ points is worth appoximately 2 inch of penis.

Why mention IQ in relation to height and penis size? While IQ is indeed important in terms of education, employment, and income, a man's IQ hardly affects his SMV, while the latter two trait significantly do, in fact being between slightly below average - slightly above average IQ (90-115) is better for a man's SMV than being a genius (130+ IQ) .

 

[puanewb]

Why mention IQ in relation to height and penis size? While IQ is indeed important in terms of education, employment, and income, a man's IQ hardly affects his SMV, while the latter two trait significantly do, in fact being between slightly below average - slightly above average IQ (90-115) is better for a man's SMV than being a genius (130+ IQ) .

Because being 130 IQ is essentially being 6'4 or having that "porn star penis"; most surgeons would have this level of IQ yet if they're incel (read ugly) they're treated like shit, but they OUGHT to be treated like how 6'4 people/large dicked people are treated. This chart illustrates the contrast in the hypergamy stats and standards. Being 5'11/having an average size penis - i.e -being an average man your worth is essentially being a 60 IQ garbage bag driver

Why mention IQ in relation to height and penis size? While IQ is indeed important in terms of education, employment, and income, a man's IQ hardly affects his SMV, while the latter two trait significantly do, in fact being between slightly below average - slightly above average IQ (90-115) is better for a man's SMV than being a genius (130+ IQ) .

You are not reading the post/thread how I intended. Being less 5'11, for instance 5'4, is less the garbage truck driver tier, eg; everyone on the forum suggesting it is practical sexual death aren't even exaggerating.

 

[Hate_my_life]

6'2 = 95-97% percentile for men

These have definitely being skewed.

Perhaps I'm just experiencing confirmation bias, but I'm getting heightmogged by a lot of high school kids.

7.3 inch by 5.7 inch = 97% percentile

JFL meanwhile foids want nothing less than 7 Inches.

 

[puanewb]

These have definitely being skewed.

Perhaps I'm just experiencing confirmation bias, but I'm getting heightmogged by a lot of high school kids.


JFL meanwhile foids want nothing less than 7 Inches.

Honestly these statistics are United Sates statistics, keep in mind they're racially blind. But I think if we're going by population it may fairer to be blinder also... I'd probably wager that whites and blacks more or less have the same average height in US, not sure about Latinos, as I'm not American and don't have anecdotally to back me up here, but I'm guessing they're generally shorter. Average height for whites (which is probably what we want here, as dating as an ethniccel is probably a whole new can of worm) is probably a few deviations lower. (eg, the average height is higher).

 

[SchrodingersDick]

Because being 130 IQ is essentially being 6'4 or having that "porn star penis"; most surgeons would have this level of IQ yet if they're incel (read ugly) they're treated like shit, but they OUGHT to be treated like how 6'4 people/large dicked people are treated. This chart illustrates the contrast in the hypergamy stats and standards. Being 5'11/having an average size penis - i.e -being an average man your worth is essentially being a 60 IQ garbage bag driver

You are not reading the post/thread how I intended. Being less 5'11, for instance 5'4, is less the garbage truck driver tier, eg; everyone on the forum suggesting it is practical sexual death aren't even exaggerating.

You’re not really saying anything. There is no such thing as how one OUGHT to be treated. IQ has no bearing on SMV other than its utility to make money (and it could be argued that it doesn’t increase SMV, just beta provider status. Either way it gets you penetrating a girl tho).. It matters, but not nearly as much as the traits that aid in violence with other men. Men serve as agents of natural selection with competition for resources and eggs, and women’s sexual selection is more or less preventive measures against their offspring being subject to natural selection. I,e. Breed with the large high T killer because might is right. The big buy will produce a big kid that will make it past the first natural filter.. Intelligence only comes In Handy when the default sexual strategies fail

nigs are violent and chimp out for this very reason. They default to displays of dominance and violence because they don’t have a plan B. And their women reward violent thug behavior.

I don’t know why dick size is important but it is as important as height. I don’t think the volume/competitor sperm displacement is a pressing enough issue for it to be as desired and imperative as height.

Also, a top 20% man is not top 20% in ALL traits. A man that’s top 20% in two traits is around 96th percentile provided those 2 traits are not correlated. A top 20% man may well be like 55th percentile in a few traits

 

[puanewb]

You’re not really saying anything. There is no such thing as how one OUGHT to be treated. IQ has no bearing on SMV other than its utility to make money (and it could be argued that it doesn’t increase SMV, just beta provider status. Either way it gets you penetrating a girl tho).. It matters, but not nearly as much as the traits that aid in violence with other men. Men serve as agents of natural selection with competition for resources and eggs, and women’s sexual selection is more or less preventive measures against their offspring being subject to natural selection. I,e. Breed with the large high T killer because might is right. The big buy will produce a big kid that will make it past the first natural filter.. Intelligence only comes In Handy when the default sexual strategies fail

nigs are violent and chimp out for this very reason. They default to displays of dominance and violence because they don’t have a plan B. And their women reward violent thug behavior.

I don’t know why dick size is important but it is as important as height. I don’t think the volume/competitor sperm displacement is a pressing enough issue for it to be as desired and imperative as height.

Also, a top 20% man is not top 20% in ALL traits. A man that’s top 20% in two traits is around 96th percentile provided those 2 traits are not correlated. A top 20% man may well be like 55th percentile in a few traits

You're right, I didn't mean ought to be treated, I meant that people themselves think they should be treated; an internalised value I've seen people have. Sperm displacement may not be the only evolutionary attribute you should consider here, remember we didn't have hygiene or monogamy in hunter-gatherer times, it can be also a "peacock trait" too that actually causes orgasmic pleasure.

 

[SchrodingersDick]

You're right, I didn't mean ought to be treated, I meant that people themselves think they should be treated; an internalised value I've seen people have. Sperm displacement may not be the only evolutionary attribute you should consider here, remember we didn't have hygiene or monogamy in hunter-gatherer times, it can be also a "peacock trait" too that actually causes orgasmic pleasure.

How does that improve the odds of self propagation for the man or for the foid?

maybe it requires a better, healthier heart and cardiovascular system to get a big dick hard in the first place? That’s one of the reasons we evolved boneless dicks.

 

[Lester]

These figures are appoximate, and each row isn't a direct parallel to the column adjacent. Just think, though, it's the most redpilled but scientific comparison out there. Women fucking the top 20% of men, the cut off being 5'11, and 6'4 inch penis. But how does the IQ percentiles equate to these figures? Well, just just like being sub80-sub90 IQ, you're practically excluded the same way in work(income) and education. If they don't match the adjacent columns, it's just something to think about to give weight to particular body features. The steeper the degradation = the least value it has.

IQ percentile	Height percentile	Social IQ percentile	Penis size percentile
60 = 0.3% percentile	5'11 = ~80% percentile for men	-	~6.4 inch by 5.1 inch = 80% percentile
70 = 2% percentile	6'0 = 84% percentile for men	-	~6.5 inch by 5.2 inch = 84% percentile
80 = 10% percentile	6'1 = 84% percentile for men	-	~6.5 inch by 5.2 inch = 84% percentile
90 = 25% percentile	6'2 = 95-97% percentile for men	-	7.3 inch by 5.7 inch = 97% percentile
100 = 50% percentile	6'3 = ~98% percentile for men	-	7.5 inch by 5.8 inch = 98% percentile
110 = 74% percentile	6'4 = ~98% percentile for men	-	7.5 inch by 5.8 inch = 98% percentile
120 = 90% percentile	6'5 = ~99% percentile for men	-	7.7 inch by 6 inch = 99% percentile
130 = 97% percentile	6'6 = 99.9% percentile for men	-	8 inch by 6 inch = ~99% percentile

In summary,

1 inch of total height will be worth 0.1 inches of penis, therefore penis size is more important than height, but these two statistics correlate with each other so it doesn't really matter that much in practice anyway.
Having a 8x6 inch penis is equivalent to having an IQ of 150 (statistically) so therefore, each 20 IQ points is worth appoximately 2 inch of penis.

tldr but probably suifuel

 

[puanewb]

How does that improve the odds of self propagation for the man or for the foid?

maybe it requires a better, healthier heart and cardiovascular system to get a big dick hard in the first place? That’s one of the reasons we evolved boneless dicks.

I don't want to hypothesise on that matter. There is some literature out there that proves bigger penis is better, your contention being only it is importance be lesser so than height.... While I agree height is probably more evolutionary advantageous, the two things kind of go hand-in-hand, bigger body = bigger penis. Not all the time though.

Now you need to take this within a modern cultural context where the vagina isn't a reproductive organ but a pleasure organ, it changes it's cultural and personal value, this is what we're examining here with tool of statistics. My post isn't to equate 6'4 = 8 inch dick, but rather just compare the fact that an genetic expenditure on height is less than worthwhile than cock these days (eg, why bother with 0.1 inch height when I can get 0.1 inch penis), these statistics aren't meant to draw the inference that there is a direct relationship between their value at all (at least mathematically... but personally). I hope this clarifies things.

 

[FinnCel]

Women hate most men.
Most men have less value to women than animals.

Therefore, men who are forced into loneliness should stop providing services for women.
No trashman coming to empty her dumpster. No postman bringing her mail.
No busdriver taking her to work.
No cashier selling her products in shops.
No company selling her electricity or water.

Men have to make it clear to women that they need us just to survive

 

[puanewb]

Women hate most men.
Most men have less value to women than animals.

Therefore, men who are forced into loneliness should stop providing services for women.
No trashman coming to empty her dumpster. No postman bringing her mail.
No busdriver taking her to work.
No cashier selling her products in shops.
No company selling her electricity or water.

Men have to make it clear to women that they need us just to survive

I don't think men hold too much over women these days in the field of employment...except for male-dominated trades. Do you feel if you unionised all working incels you could change things? Just lol, the surgeons, doctors, etc wouldn't join.
White incels are also different: notice how all the doctorcels are Indian? It may be due to increased demand but how birth rate is lowering, so I don't really understand that unless they're all old and dying/retired. But just like "white flight" in city demography, in employment whites men will just stop going to college. Note all the humanities classes (all female), I could bet that if it wasn't for the state of our society, a lot of people would have been destined by become men of letters, but here most of them are, degreeless, but still performing research on society. Destiny in a funny thing.

 

[RollD20]

Wtf is this does this mean I am retarded?

 

[Deleted member 1042]

There's a chapter in 'The War Against Normal People,' Andrew Yang's book, where he talks about a future where the wealthy will homogeneously dominate in ALL the positive traits: looks, AND intellect. In other words, as income inequality rises, LOOKS inequality, and INTELLECTUAL inequality also rises. He may be an optimistic dude, but it's a pretty brutal read, and I could tell he had a shitty incel upbringing.

He truly is the incel candidate.

 

[puanewb]

View attachment 159512
Wtf is this does this mean I am retarded?

No, it just means that if you're 5'11, you'll be treated like you're a 0.3/10

 

[Deleted member 4159]

There's a chapter in 'The War Against Normal People,' Andrew Yang's book, where he talks about a future where the wealthy will homogeneously dominate in ALL the positive traits: looks, AND intellect. In other words, as income inequality rises, LOOKS inequality, and INTELLECTUAL inequality also rises. He may be an optimistic dude, but it's a pretty brutal read, and I could tell he had a shitty incel upbringing.

He truly is the incel candidate.

Holy shit that is based AF. I need to look into him.