Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Toxic Femininity LackOfSexPill: Thot complains about celibacy...

  • Thread starter Deleted member 10124
  • Start date
Does she not realize that she just said the opposite of what she believes
 
Hey bluepillers, don't tell incels not to be hateful, teach femoids not to be entitled little sexhaving fucks!
 
Monogamy is equal by definition. Try being celibate for decades you stupid whore. You would rope within the first quarter.
 
What’s the expression when something innocent and pure is violated? Killing Bambi?
 
Such gaslighting is why she shouldn’t be trusted she made a general statement that couldn’t be argued and didn’t argue his actual point
 
Such gaslighting is why she shouldn’t be trusted she made a general statement that couldn’t be argued and didn’t argue his actual point

You know it's gaslighting.
 
Typical piece of shit foid hypocrite.
 
So much stuff they provide for us being their natural stupid selfish self absorbed sanctimonious self righteous self.
 
Typical piece of shit foid hypocrite.


View: https://twitter.com/PopcornBambi/status/1360909541576232961?s=20



View: https://twitter.com/PopcornBambi/status/1360955886794063873?s=20


"Looks don't matter bro at all"...

Tee Heels...

"He was so hawwwtttt"...

Ever. Single. Time.

Who. The. Fuck. Do. They. Think. They're. Kidding.
It’s a lot of a text and hoops for her to just say this.

They try and wrap you up with bs thinking you won't see through it or stay around long enough to see through it.
 
So nobody is entitled to a romantic partner. Well, we can finally let humanity go extinct then.
 
Just a small part from the article in quillette provided by Willian Costello, to show how fucked up the discrepancy between the dating economies of foids and males. They used Gini coefficients (standard to find economic equality) for both sexes and the results are:

He reported that heterosexual females faced a Gini coefficient of 0.324, while heterosexual males faced a much higher Gini coefficient of 0.542. So neither sex has complete equality: in both cases, there are some “wealthy” people with access to more romantic experiences and some “poor” who have access to few or none. But while the situation for women is something like an economy with some poor, some middle class, and some millionaires, the situation for men is closer to a world with a small number of super-billionaires surrounded by huge masses who possess almost nothing. According to the Hinge analyst:

On a list of 149 countries’ Gini indices provided by the CIA World Factbook, this would place the female dating economy as 75th most unequal (average—think Western Europe) and the male dating economy as the 8th most unequal (kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war—think South Africa).

The article is colossal IQ itself (for normies, another tuesday for us), but there is a tweet saying that in Tinder top %20 men are "competing" for top %78 women. This puts the Gini coefficient at 0.58 for an economy like this, slightly worse than the findings above and closer to reality. The game was rigged, it never started for us.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top