Doesn't change the basic premise, that the system sucked dick and some had to suck more dick and let others suck dick for them. I can imagine it very well. Wars being more brutal is a meme though. Due to the circumstance of the lack of god medical care and lack of modern comfort, yes. What we see today is a compressed view of the chronology. It's not that they fought every day. Even so called wars, like the hundred years war for example were a sequence of smaller campaigns, at least in pre early modern times.
The tournaments were very brutal alone, and wars did happen, they had to go to crusades etc. They were the warrior caste and that was their function in society. They weren't a class. Living life of a medieval nobleman wasn't particularly good life in most cases. From the perspective of modern society, they all had shitty lives in terms of material comfort so it's all very relative and useless.
Wealthy peasant is an oxymoron and a result of later land reformation not feudalism per se.
The "peasantry" would be a broad term in the middle ages. There was a social estate of
laboratores, and it covered all the non-noble people "who worked", plenty of them were very wealthy, wealthier than many of the nobles.
Hear, hear, honor and human dignity, what did you smoke read bro? This honestly sounds like a case of severe autism in a medical way and reeks so much of class character of the publications of the elites of former times. The only writings of peasant caste opinions stems from the uprising. Those people suffered, those people were opressed. It's not that todays world is perfect not nearly, but this is outright wrong.
Oppressed? You sound like some SJW feminist. Honor and dignity comes with religion, if you have none than you can't possibly understand it, but then you also can't understand the middle ages as well, because you don't understand the mentality behind it.
Idk what to tell you anymore. Maybe read the communist manifesto and writings of the peasant uprisings or something. There was certainly a certain self interest and even if not outcome in reality was like that and not a good argument for your wishes of less degeneracy or whatever.
Most famous peasant uprisings happened after the middle ages in fact (16th century, 17th century). Also in most cases, the peasants weren't rebelling against the order as such, but against particular nobles who abused it.
As for communist manifesto, why would that be relevant for anything here? What kind of books did you read about the middle ages anyway? Communism created an actual feudal class of the communist elite tied to the Communist Party which exploited everyone else. It wasn't anything better than feudalism and it aimed to destroy the family on top of it.
The family is the most important aspect of society, I wouldn't mind socialism if it didn't go against the family at all, but once you go against the family, you get what we have now.