Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Men's Looks Matter More Than Women Admit, Study Shows

1526298558656153666012
 
Good good good, let the blackpills flow even stronger.
 
just be attractive and fun
takeaway:
The results showed that as long as a man was considered attractive or moderately attractive, both mothers and daughters would pick the guy who had the most desirable personality traits. But when an unattractive male was paired with the most highly desirable personality profile, neither daughters nor mothers rated him as favorably as a potential romantic partner, compared with better-looking men with less desirable personalities.

Both young women looking for men and mothers seeking boyfriends for their daughters consider a minimum level of attractiveness to be an important criterion in a potential mate, the researchers concluded.
 
Last edited:
Everything a woman says they are attracted to only applies if the man is good looking.
 
Can these fucks stop attempting to prove that water is wet and start moving onto more useful shit, such as what exactly males a man attractive?
 
Good. Next they might actually admit that most women's "minimum looks requirements" when seeking a sexual partner is, typically much higher than a man's. But maybe that's too much to hope for ?

Anyway, I don't understand why people and men in particular have such a hard time conceptualizing and accepting this. I'm pretty sure ancient civilizations knew about women's true nature as it pertains to sexual relations with men and who they'd choose if given a choice. Which is why ancient women were heavily restricted in their mate selection.
 
Good. Next they might actually admit that most women's "minimum looks requirements" when seeking a sexual partner is, typically much higher than a man's. But maybe that's too much to hope for ?

Anyway, I don't understand why people and men in particular have such a hard time conceptualizing and accepting this. I'm pretty sure ancient civilizations knew about women's true nature as it pertains to sexual relations with men and who they'd choose if given a choice. Which is why ancient women were heavily restricted in their mate selection.

I belive they will make new researches too

49
 
Can these fucks stop attempting to prove that water is wet and start moving onto more useful shit, such as what exactly males a man attractive?

They won't publish any studies like that because men will looksmax accordingly and undermine the system that is trying to keep them down.
 
more proof of looks > other stuff
 
you dont exist if you dont place in the top 5 percent
 
Water is wet. Women lie through their fucking teeth, if you press blue pillers about this they will admit to knowing this too, but they'll still put the blame on men for not realizing that women don't mean what they say (While also reprimanding you for pointing this fact out as misogynistic).
 
@FACEandLMS made discussion about it.You can watch it if you didn't watch it.

 
Can these fucks stop attempting to prove that water is wet and start moving onto more useful shit, such as what exactly males a man attractive?
Height, Hair, Eye Area
 
"The results showed that as long as a man was considered attractive or moderately attractive, both mothers and daughters would pick the guy who had the most desirable personality traits. But when an unattractive male was paired with the most highly desirable personality profile, neither daughters nor mothers rated him as favorably as a potential romantic partner, compared with better-looking men with less desirable personalities."

And morons still try to say that personality is an important factor in attracting females. Either females lie to make themselves look better, or they're genuinely stupid and don't know what they're doing.
 
what exactly males a man attractive?
Lookism users figured everything a long time ago. Their guesses are fairly correct, if we would consider little gradations such as fashion tendencies, personal crushes, etc.
And morons still try to say that personality is an important factor in attracting females. Either females lie to make themselves look better, or they're genuinely stupid and don't know what they're doing.
Don't tell me you take anything femoid says about that so damn seriously.
 
Don't tell me you take anything femoid says about that so damn seriously.
Everyone spouts the silly personality platitude as if it applies to ugly males, not just females.
 
For once, I’m glad a thread was brought back. I must’ve missed this.
 
Everyone spouts the silly personality platitude as if it applies to ugly males, not just females.
Not everyone, only femoids and their numale partners. While everything is clear about femoids, numales are just repeat that shit in hopes to get laid/in hopes it would change actual reality (bluepill), or they are just genuinely stupid.
 
In other news the sky is blue. Women need to stop denying the truth.
 
Not everyone, only femoids and their numale partners. While everything is clear about femoids, numales are just repeat that shit in hopes to get laid/in hopes it would change actual reality (bluepill), or they are just genuinely stupid.
They don't think it will change reality, they already think it's reality, which of course means they are genuinely stupid.
 
Not everyone, only femoids and their numale partners. While everything is clear about femoids, numales are just repeat that shit in hopes to get laid/in hopes it would change actual reality (bluepill), or they are just genuinely stupid.
You guys are so legit its unreal.
 
Very legit thread, notice how men rate women's intelligence higher than the other way around... not a surprise whatsoever
 
Looks is ALL that matters to femoids.
 
Women are constantly dishonest about these matters in interviews and questionnaires. As Schopenhauer noted, dissimulation is the rule for women.
 
Anybody who denies that is certifiably insane.
 
I cant find the source.
But i read that foids value attractiveness, beign fun and common interests.
Vs what they say which is stability, character and something else...
So there is a smidgeon of hope maybe...
 
what's next

a study showing us that a white wall is actually white....like the fuck
 
what's next

a study showing us that a white wall is actually white....like the fuck

Scientists/Docs don't care about "how can we help incels".Because it will not bring money for them.

----- Hippocratic oath is lie ------
 
They needed a study for this? Giga kek. At least they're spreading the blackpill.
 
Study proves water is wet. Breaking news at 10.
 
They needed a study for this? Giga kek. At least they're spreading the blackpill.
For us it means nothing. For these retards who still stay bluepilled and "muh persanolity", it does, as they may finally wake up and accept the reality.
 
They won't publish any studies like that because men will looksmax accordingly and undermine the system that is trying to keep them down.

There are studies about this and it is mostly things you can not change such as face and height.
 
Notice how that neither truly valued sincerity and intelligence
 
Both men and women are shallow motherfuckers?? WHO'DA THUNK IT!?!!?!?
 
Scientific blackpill that cucktears is unable to debunk.
 
I felt strafed by a blackpill loaded MG when I read the article:

Chrome 2018 07 20 22 26 45


Chrome 2018 07 20 22 28 29


JFL
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top