And that's part of why it's called MOTHER nature; for only a 'foid could behave and treat men in such a cruel manner.
FACT: at various points throughout human history, SEVERAL 'foids for every individual male was able to procreate, while all those other males remained incel. Or at best, thrown a few old chewed up leftover scraps once the alphas were done and had their pick of the carcass first. You see, the fact that some men are tall, that some men don't lose their hair, that some men naturally put on muscle even without trying or the fact that human penis size can vary so greatly and so on is all by design. Mother Nature is playing a cruel trick on most men. Most men were predetermined by their genetics to either be Chad (that ALL women want) or incel.
Human civilization has been able to neutralize female nature more or less at various points throughout history; from the Victorian values to the 1950s values (or Islamic Fundamentalism) many examples from different time periods can be found: enter the beta provider. Being a beta provider is of course detestable (especially in today's world) but when female sexuality was controlled, it gave average guys a shot. These values work against mother nature and ensure a greater chance that a male 5 will get a female 5 and so on. without all of that, even the female 1's feel entitled to the male 8's and above. That is simply their nature. We already know the stats. Tale as old as time. But this is why patriarchy, slut shaming, etc are good. To expect female sexuality to be treated the same as male sexuality presupposes that they are one and the same and that's the main thing that the cucks, the leftists, et al get completely wrong with their womens' rights horseshit.
At present we seem to definitely be regressing back to prehistoric times as far as how mate choice is regulated. And just as we see in so many mammal species as well as our own, the females really only want the best of the best in terms of genetics. Things will likely only get worse in the future to come.
FACT: at various points throughout human history, SEVERAL 'foids for every individual male was able to procreate, while all those other males remained incel. Or at best, thrown a few old chewed up leftover scraps once the alphas were done and had their pick of the carcass first. You see, the fact that some men are tall, that some men don't lose their hair, that some men naturally put on muscle even without trying or the fact that human penis size can vary so greatly and so on is all by design. Mother Nature is playing a cruel trick on most men. Most men were predetermined by their genetics to either be Chad (that ALL women want) or incel.
Human civilization has been able to neutralize female nature more or less at various points throughout history; from the Victorian values to the 1950s values (or Islamic Fundamentalism) many examples from different time periods can be found: enter the beta provider. Being a beta provider is of course detestable (especially in today's world) but when female sexuality was controlled, it gave average guys a shot. These values work against mother nature and ensure a greater chance that a male 5 will get a female 5 and so on. without all of that, even the female 1's feel entitled to the male 8's and above. That is simply their nature. We already know the stats. Tale as old as time. But this is why patriarchy, slut shaming, etc are good. To expect female sexuality to be treated the same as male sexuality presupposes that they are one and the same and that's the main thing that the cucks, the leftists, et al get completely wrong with their womens' rights horseshit.
At present we seem to definitely be regressing back to prehistoric times as far as how mate choice is regulated. And just as we see in so many mammal species as well as our own, the females really only want the best of the best in terms of genetics. Things will likely only get worse in the future to come.
Last edited:
