Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious My Last Thread Before I Do an Incels.co Detox [THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY SYSTEM]

MENSA_IQcel

MENSA_IQcel

Banned
-
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Posts
1,171
I realized this site is sucking the life and time out of me. I planned to make threads, go do productive things, and check occasionally check my inbox but I have spent the last 4 hours hitting refresh. This site truly is absorbing my life and for that I must spend less time here. I am taking a break to read and work-out and learn to code, so don't worry I am not leaving, I've come to see many of you as my brothers. Before my break I feel it is my duty to educate the incel community on the international monetary system and how YOU exist to serve the global financial elite and how the reason we even exist as incels in the first place is because of this global technocracy. I will condense this the best I can, but it must still be long enough to fairly educate.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Every-time you borrow money from the bank, money is created. Bankers use money they get from deposits to loan out to you. After you take the money, it's now in two places at once. You have money you just borrowed from the bank, and the depositor has money in his bank account. Now lets say you put that money in your bank account, then borrow the same amount from the bank. The money is now in THREE places at once. In your hand (m0 money)*1, in your bank account (m1 money)*2, and in the depositors bank account (also m1 money). Debt = Money and Money = Debt. Money does not get created without debt. Money is created when it is cycled through the banking system, and each time it cycles through the interest on these debts builds. As in the scenario above, every-time money is created through the debt, it comes with pledged interest that must be reimbursed. This of course is how the banks make profits. While it may seem obvious banks make their profits from interest, most are blissfully unaware that banks profit on interest from money they have created into existence in the first place.

If you follow any dollar back long enough, through the countless times it has been multiplied through the banking system, you'll see it eventually came from the central bank. The central bank is the only entity allowed to create M0 money. The bank loans out this money to the commercial banks, thus setting the cycle in motion. The high IQ are already starting to ask "if all money is created out of debt, how is it ever possible that all debt gets repaid? If everyone paid off their debts to their commercial banks, and the commercial banks paid off their debts to the central banks, there would be no money in the system at all!". And that's exactly correct. It's essentially impossible for all debts to be simultaneously repaid because the amount of debt will always equal the amount of money in existence. In fact the amount of debt will for all practical purposes surpass the money supply because sometimes the central bank pockets the interest commercial banks pay to them. Central banks are suppose to send all profits their nations treasury, but they don't always. In this case there is more outstanding debt than there is money. Any attempt to create more money for debt financing will only create more debt.

1. m0 money is money that exists in the form of currency. You can hold it in your hand, directly spend it, and have unbridled possession of, unlike m1 money
2.. m1 money is money held in your bank account. It's not currency and you can not hold it because it is not really there. Most of the money you deposit into the bank is then loaned out, so while the money exists on your bank balance, it's not really there. This money can be withdrawn(turned into m0 money) or spent through "checks". In this sense, checks are a form of money creation because it allows m1 money to act as m0 money. There is about 10x more m1 money than m0 money.

1586120672007
1586120742083


This system wasn't implemented overnight. It was slowly pushed and crafted over hundreds of years by high-level European bankers. The Rothschilds are often most associated with this system but they really were not the masterminds behind it. The Rothschild's simply forced the English government into a crippling debt crisis by crashing their stock market after the Napoleonic wars, but the Rothschilds were not soley behind the Bank of England, the entity of which England's massive debt was primarily owed to. This banking system was largely put in place by Charles Montagu, and English statesmen in kahoots with Swedish and German financiers. Swedish academics in the 1600s were the first to truly theorize how a central credit system would exist and play out. They theorized a global banking system of interlocking debt networks long before such a thing was considered even theoretically possible. Today that's commonly accepted as the modern economic capital structure.

These high-level bankers created and normalized the "gold standard" as the global economic order in the early 1700s. Many see the gold standard as a rebellious money system, a way to free a society of the banker ruling class. This couldn't be further from the truth. The gold standard was a banker created system allows for the exact same credit-creation phenomenon as explained in paragraph 2 (albeit to a slightly lesser flexibility than the fiat money system). Central banks hold all the gold, loan out gold notes, and allow private banks to create money through gold-based derivatives. The gold standard merely acted to create the illusion of sound money because most people never understood that for every dollar of gold, there was over a thousand gold notes that represented ownership in gold. Thus were there to be a bank run the entire system would collapse, this is eventually why they ended the Bretten Woods Agreement in 1971 and switched to the Petrodollar as the global reserve currency, under both systems the secret powers of the banker elite reign supreme.


1586120871215
1586120911586
1586121085019



The Banking ruling class have funded both parties in the United States since the days of Andrew Jackson (who contrary to libertarian propaganda was a shill for big bankers as long as it was done through a purely gold backed system). There has been many internal conflicts in the United States government between banking adversaries and forces of banker interest, but banking interests have predominate won. Both parties, the Democrats and Republicans, are designed by and for banker interest. They were designed to be nearly identical in all matters relating to monetary and to an extend fiscal policy so as to create an illusion of freedom amongst the population but to deprive them of any real opportunity for change. When people complain about how democracy doesn't work about politicians never really do anything, they aren't really criticizing democracy, albeit democracy takes the blame; they are criticizing the international banker establishment that controls the government. If you'd like to read more on this subject, Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley is a great place to start. Quigley was the mentor of Bill Clinton, he was a Yale Professor who mentored many of the elites and published "Tragedy and Hope" as propaganda for the ruling class. It outlines the cultural elite's plan for world government and talks a lot more about what I am saying.



1586121354891
1586121377298
1586121411790



THIS IS LITERALLY WHY YOU INCEL

When one realizes that all money is debt, all debt must be sufficed, the only way to meet interest payments on a perpetual basis is more money, and more money only comes from more debt, it becomes clear to any logically consistent thinker that such a system will create perpetually more debt. Under such a system, the total debt will grow exponentially and thus the money will grow exponentially. In any economic system, as the quantity of money increases, there will either be two results, real economic growth with stable prices or stable prices with no economic growth (or a mix between the two). If the money supply doubles, the quantity of goods and services must double or the general prices of goods must double, or there can be a mixture between the two. This a simple way of describing the history of our society since the founding of the international credit creation banking policy. Rapidly increasing money supply plus rapidly increasing growth albeit the growth slightly lags behind the money supply, hence the inflation we've experienced. As the marginal benefits from the industrial revolution began to reach an end in the 1920s (growth began to slope down on a logarithmic scale), the elites realized rapid population growth was the ONLY WAY to keep up the rapid growth, thus all EUGENICS programs were disbanded, UNIVERSAL MEDICINE became established (inb4 "muricans dont have free healthcare" yes they practically do stfu), and the promotion of mass reproduction regardless of quality became the norm. The elites didn't care if you were 60IQ, had disabilities, were ugly, etc. They just wanted you to pump out babies to keep the GDP growing. Even retards who wouldn't produce anything were useful for this purpose since merely collecting welfare and buying products contributes to real GDP, and justifies the corporate techno-structure and federal governments to borrow more. This is why from the year 1922 - 2008 mostly everyone could find a wife and reproduce if they wanted. The ELITES wanted a perpetual population boom to sustain the global debt system that they themselves created. How they did this is by SUPPRESSING HYPERGAMY with any cultural tool they had at their disposal (social shaming, mass media, abortion bans). The downside to this was since couples were primarily looks-matched, an entire class of subhumans were created that would not exist in any previous time due to eugenics and natural selection (besides the occasional village freak). The only reason we were born is because the elites wanted a mass slave army to keep up with the debt. In 1931 Aldous Huxley (who was a member of the elite) wrote Brave New World to describe the society the elites were creating, and he was deadly accurate. He writes of a class of "deltas, gammas, and omegas" who exist merely as human fodder in a massive governmental-corporate global technostructure.

1586122132932
1586122161181
1586122195372


By 1986 the elites realized their ideas were unworkable. They realized the population could never keep up with this exponential global debt. The entire world would look like a complete dumpster fire wasteland if they continued that any longer. From 1989 to 2008 the elites restructured the their global plans and for global civilization in such a way that could maintain the global debt structure while holding a relatively stable population. They used Quantitative Easing (a tool invented by Milton Friedman to do this). Central banks would create money and buy debt bonds from existing investment banks and money pools. This allowed the perpetual increase in debt to continue indefinitely because existing debts could always be sold to the central bank at profit with money instantly created at whim*. Bankers could create debt, sell the debt to the central bank, and use that money for more loaning projects. Inflation was controlled by channeling the money into top wealth brackets and foreign money pits like Switzerland and the Cayman Island so its out of circulation. This allows infinite money and debt creation without the need for it to be backed up with perpetual growth of GDP and population.

*"Trickle Down Economics" as it's infamously called was the first stage of this process. As the global debt begun to overtake population and real GDP growth the elites instituted trickle down economics to curb inflation. In the 1970s (and 1980s in Canada, Australia, and much of Western Europe) inflation began to become rampant. It became apparent real GDP and population growth rate could no longer grow at the rate needed to thwart inflation)



1586123267011
1586123287266
1586123378475


AND THIS is why you are USELESS. The elites no longer need you to merely exist for them to continue their global debt ponzi scheme. Now you're actually a hindrance, a waste of space, part of the lumpenproletariet. The only reason you existed before was to exist as a statistic on a census forum, or a data-point on a corporate sheet so they could justify creating 900K of debt money under the assumption you would consume that much in your lifetime. The elites now have a new strategy to deal with people they don't need anymore, and that's slowly easing them out of existence with mass consumption of soy products and inceldom. All the barriers to hyper-gamy have been removed since 2008 and technologies like social media have allowed it to reemerge more potent than ever before. Only high-IQ, beautiful, talented, and a somewhat reasonable size mass of mid to high level technocratic workers are needed in this global world order, unfortunately incels don't make the cut. We happen to exist as freaks in a transitory period between a world where our mere existence gave us value and a world where we would not exist. We are the carrier pigeons bred just before the telegraph became widespread, we are the typewriters manufactured just before the tech boom, the lost souls orphaned by a purpose of which no longer exists. Whenever you scream at your pillow and ask why you exist, why you're incel, this is why. You exist to serve a technocratic banking elite of whom no longer need you.*"Trickle Down Economics" as it's infamously called was the first stage of this process. As the global debt begun to overtake population and real GDP growth the elites instituted trickle down economics to curb inflation. In the 1970s (and 1980s in Canada, Australia, and much of Western Europe) inflation began to become rampant. It became apparent real GDP and population growth rate could no longer grow at the rate)

1586123419632
1586123543307
1586123638771
 
Last edited:
Impressive post
 
>Joined 3/28/2020
I'm not tryna hate on my own kind, but how are you gonna post random shit and "detox" less than two weeks in?
 
Good thread read it too but too low IQ to express my thoughts.
 
So you’re basically saying get rich?

 
Didn't read, but number of atom's in the universe IQ
 
>Joined 3/28/2020
I'm not tryna hate on my own kind, but how are you gonna post random shit and "detox" less than two weeks in?
Who cares about your economy conspiracy thesis lmao. Put that somewhere that people will actually be interested.

I've made it clear my posts are for intellectuals, you clearly are not smart enough. I am not interested in having posters who don't have sufficient attention spans or intelligence levels to properly analyze what I write.
 
Looks pretty interesting ngl, gonna read it later
 
This is a lot for me
 
Good thread read it too but too low IQ to express my thoughts.

You aren't low IQ if you read it. It takes a tremendous IQ to accurately take part in a debate or discussion about this.
 
Don’t have the attention span to read that
 
So, in other words, incels in the eyes of the global "government" a.k.a. "elites" became useless eaters and the only way to escape is by getting rich enough.
 
This documentary here is a good introduction tbh
 
I don't know to what extent I agree with the organised conspiracies behind this, but the concepts you outlined are real and interesting to look into. In response to the last part, I'd say the elites do need us, because a large part of such a complex system existing at all is the fact that it's so complex. If the basses w ere removed from the picture there would be nothing to obscure the fact that the 'value' elites use doesn't really exist, and so no way for them to be able to justify using it.
 
I have watched a video about this before nice post
 
yeah but i didnt read this shit
 
So, in other words, incels in the eyes of the global "government" a.k.a. "elites" became useless eaters and the only way to escape is by getting rich enough.

Essentially yes, although the chances of you getting rich are 0.001% so it's not even worth trying.

The general idea is that in the past the elites wanted a mass army of workers so they mass-produced humans. This mass-production of humans was top priority and the quality of humans was second. Uglies and deformed freaks reproduced as was needed to keep up the debt machine. While useful at the time, now these people are useless as only skilled labor and a relatively small amount of specialists are needed because we changed our entire monetary system not to depend on unlimited growth. Now they are just useless eaters because we don't need people just for the sake of having people anymore.
 
@Atavistic Autist Bright minds think alike
 
Dude, are you autistic?
Because high IQ could be also a symptom of autism
 
The general idea is that in the past the elites wanted a mass army of workers so they mass-produced humans. This mass-production of humans was top priority and the quality of humans was second. Uglies and deformed freaks reproduced as was needed to keep up the debt machine. While useful at the time, now these people are useless as only skilled labor and a relatively small amount of specialists are needed because we changed our entire monetary system not to depend on unlimited growth. Now they are just useless eaters because we don't need people just for the sake of having people anymore.

That's why they have imported a ton of ethnics for low quality jobs, but now are converting them essentially into incels(not much further value in unskilled labor reproduction).
 
Dude, are you autistic?
Because high IQ could be also a symptom of autism
Megacope, some user here crunched the math and autists as a group have lower than average IQs.
 
Dude, are you autistic?
Because high IQ could be also a symptom of autism

I am autistic yes. Why do you ask?

That's why they have imported a ton of ethnics for low quality jobs, but now are converting them essentially into incels(not much further value in unskilled labor reproduction).

The reason they are importing ethnics is not for any labor shortage or growth needs, that's a lie the globalists use to justify it. They are in the process of carrying out the Kalergi plan, something I could write about too. They want to merge humanity into a single globo-homogeneous race as they see it will fit better with their global government project.
 
I've made it clear my posts are for intellectuals, you clearly are not smart enough. I am not interested in having posters who don't have sufficient attention spans or intelligence levels to properly analyze what I write.
Yeah I read it and it's basically a 600 word version of "the rich don't need incels in the new world" post that's been seen a bunch of times.

Also it seems blatantly dishonest to account the social programs implemented in the early 1900s to a decision by those in control and not to fix the damage done by the great depression.

Sidenote: America just doesn't have free medicine. This is barely arguable. Medical companies are literally infamous in the US for how harshly they charge ppl.

On top of that, not only does being against hypergamy goes back much further than the earlier banking system establishment, but suppressing hypergamy, especially a few decades ago would be one of the worst ways to boost the population.
 
Literally mind-shattering levels of IQ post.
I applaud you.
 
Yeah I read it and it's basically a 600 word version of "the rich don't need incels in the new world" post that's been seen a bunch of times.

Also it seems blatantly dishonest to account the social programs implemented in the early 1900s to a decision by those in control and not to fix the damage done by the great depression.

Sidenote: America just doesn't have free medicine. This is barely arguable. Medical companies are literally infamous in the US for how harshly they charge ppl.

On top of that, not only does being against hypergamy goes back much further than the earlier banking system establishment, but suppressing hypergamy, especially a few decades ago would be one of the worst ways to boost the population.

Explain how suppressing hypgermany is bad for population growth. The perfect conditions for population growth is pure monogamy with encouragement of big families.
 
this is so high IQ brocel. feel free to pm me if you need any question with learning to code, i've been making a living off it for 4 years
 
Explain how suppressing hypgermany is bad for population growth. The perfect conditions for population growth is pure monogamy with encouragement of big families.
-Husband dies in one of the many wars in the 1900s?
-either partner is incapable of having children?
-death due to childbirth which was even more common decades ago?
Children can no longer be had.
A monogamous society also encouraged things like waiting longer for sex and getting a good match, further stunting the process.
On top of this, having large families wasn't encouraged. It was a byproduct of society during a population boom. Different places go through this all the time. If anything during the time period you brought up, the nuclear family was encouraged wayyyy more.
A society where sex with little birth control is allowed and encouraged, regardless of whether or not it's with a husband/wife, would probably give better results.
 
JFL normies “borrowing” money from banks. To be indebted into the system for the rest of their lives enslaved to the masters of the elite ruling class.

Glad I’ll be leeching off the system, really don’t care about working hard so I can make some “Goldstein” richer.
 
Bro you've been here 9 days.
 
I realized this site is sucking the life and time out of me. I planned to make threads, go do productive things, and check occasionally check my inbox but I have spent the last 4 hours hitting refresh. This site truly is absorbing my life and for that I must spend less time here. I am taking a break to read and work-out and learn to code, so don't worry I am not leaving, I've come to see many of you as my brothers. Before my break I feel it is my duty to educate the incel community on the international monetary system and how YOU exist to serve the global financial elite and how the reason we even exist as incels in the first place is because of this global technocracy. I will condense this the best I can, but it must still be long enough to fairly educate.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Every-time you borrow money from the bank, money is created. Bankers use money they get from deposits to loan out to you. After you take the money, it's now in two places at once. You have money you just borrowed from the bank, and the depositor has money in his bank account. Now lets say you put that money in your bank account, then borrow the same amount from the bank. The money is now in THREE places at once. In your hand (m0 money)*1, in your bank account (m1 money)*2, and in the depositors bank account (also m1 money). Debt = Money and Money = Debt. Money does not get created without debt. Money is created when it is cycled through the banking system, and each time it cycles through the interest on these debts builds. As in the scenario above, every-time money is created through the debt, it comes with pledged interest that must be reimbursed. This of course is how the banks make profits. While it may seem obvious banks make their profits from interest, most are blissfully unaware that banks profit on interest from money they have created into existence in the first place.

If you follow any dollar back long enough, through the countless times it has been multiplied through the banking system, you'll see it eventually came from the central bank. The central bank is the only entity allowed to create M0 money. The bank loans out this money to the commercial banks, thus setting the cycle in motion. The high IQ are already starting to ask "if all money is created out of debt, how is it ever possible that all debt gets repaid? If everyone paid off their debts to their commercial banks, and the commercial banks paid off their debts to the central banks, there would be no money in the system at all!". And that's exactly correct. It's essentially impossible for all debts to be simultaneously repaid because the amount of debt will always equal the amount of money in existence. In fact the amount of debt will for all practical purposes surpass the money supply because sometimes the central bank pockets the interest commercial banks pay to them. Central banks are suppose to send all profits their nations treasury, but they don't always. In this case there is more outstanding debt than there is money. Any attempt to create more money for debt financing will only create more debt.

1. m0 money is money that exists in the form of currency. You can hold it in your hand, directly spend it, and have unbridled possession of, unlike m1 money
2.. m1 money is money held in your bank account. It's not currency and you can not hold it because it is not really there. Most of the money you deposit into the bank is then loaned out, so while the money exists on your bank balance, it's not really there. This money can be withdrawn(turned into m0 money) or spent through "checks". In this sense, checks are a form of money creation because it allows m1 money to act as m0 money. There is about 10x more m1 money than m0 money.

View attachment 230646View attachment 230648


This system wasn't implemented overnight. It was slowly pushed and crafted over hundreds of years by high-level European bankers. The Rothschilds are often most associated with this system but they really were not the masterminds behind it. The Rothschild's simply forced the English government into a crippling debt crisis by crashing their stock market after the Napoleonic wars, but the Rothschilds were not soley behind the Bank of England, the entity of which England's massive debt was primarily owed to. This banking system was largely put in place by Charles Montagu, and English statesmen in kahoots with Swedish and German financiers. Swedish academics in the 1600s were the first to truly theorize how a central credit system would exist and play out. They theorized a global banking system of interlocking debt networks long before such a thing was considered even theoretically possible. Today that's commonly accepted as the modern economic capital structure.

These high-level bankers created and normalized the "gold standard" as the global economic order in the early 1700s. Many see the gold standard as a rebellious money system, a way to free a society of the banker ruling class. This couldn't be further from the truth. The gold standard was a banker created system allows for the exact same credit-creation phenomenon as explained in paragraph 2 (albeit to a slightly lesser flexibility than the fiat money system). Central banks hold all the gold, loan out gold notes, and allow private banks to create money through gold-based derivatives. The gold standard merely acted to create the illusion of sound money because most people never understood that for every dollar of gold, there was over a thousand gold notes that represented ownership in gold. Thus were there to be a bank run the entire system would collapse, this is eventually why they ended the Bretten Woods Agreement in 1971 and switched to the Petrodollar as the global reserve currency, under both systems the secret powers of the banker elite reign supreme.


View attachment 230649View attachment 230651View attachment 230655


The Banking ruling class have funded both parties in the United States since the days of Andrew Jackson (who contrary to libertarian propaganda was a shill for big bankers as long as it was done through a purely gold backed system). There has been many internal conflicts in the United States government between banking adversaries and forces of banker interest, but banking interests have predominate won. Both parties, the Democrats and Republicans, are designed by and for banker interest. They were designed to be nearly identical in all matters relating to monetary and to an extend fiscal policy so as to create an illusion of freedom amongst the population but to deprive them of any real opportunity for change. When people complain about how democracy doesn't work about politicians never really do anything, they aren't really criticizing democracy, albeit democracy takes the blame; they are criticizing the international banker establishment that controls the government. If you'd like to read more on this subject, Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley is a great place to start. Quigley was the mentor of Bill Clinton, he was a Yale Professor who mentored many of the elites and published "Tragedy and Hope" as propaganda for the ruling class. It outlines the cultural elite's plan for world government and talks a lot more about what I am saying.



View attachment 230660View attachment 230661View attachment 230663


THIS IS LITERALLY WHY YOU INCEL

When one realizes that all money is debt, all debt must be sufficed, the only way to meet interest payments on a perpetual basis is more money, and more money only comes from more debt, it becomes clear to any logically consistent thinker that such a system will create perpetually more debt. Under such a system, the total debt will grow exponentially and thus the money will grow exponentially. In any economic system, as the quantity of money increases, there will either be two results, real economic growth with stable prices or stable prices with no economic growth (or a mix between the two). If the money supply doubles, the quantity of goods and services must double or the general prices of goods must double, or there can be a mixture between the two. This a simple way of describing the history of our society since the founding of the international credit creation banking policy. Rapidly increasing money supply plus rapidly increasing growth albeit the growth slightly lags behind the money supply, hence the inflation we've experienced. As the marginal benefits from the industrial revolution began to reach an end in the 1920s (growth began to slope down on a logarithmic scale), the elites realized rapid population growth was the ONLY WAY to keep up the rapid growth, thus all EUGENICS programs were disbanded, UNIVERSAL MEDICINE became established (inb4 "muricans dont have free healthcare" yes they practically do stfu), and the promotion of mass reproduction regardless of quality became the norm. The elites didn't care if you were 60IQ, had disabilities, were ugly, etc. They just wanted you to pump out babies to keep the GDP growing. Even retards who wouldn't produce anything were useful for this purpose since merely collecting welfare and buying products contributes to real GDP, and justifies the corporate techno-structure and federal governments to borrow more. This is why from the year 1922 - 2008 mostly everyone could find a wife and reproduce if they wanted. The ELITES wanted a perpetual population boom to sustain the global debt system that they themselves created. How they did this is by SUPPRESSING HYPERGAMY with any cultural tool they had at their disposal (social shaming, mass media, abortion bans). The downside to this was since couples were primarily looks-matched, an entire class of subhumans were created that would not exist in any previous time due to eugenics and natural selection (besides the occasional village freak). The only reason we were born is because the elites wanted a mass slave army to keep up with the debt. In 1931 Aldous Huxley (who was a member of the elite) wrote Brave New World to describe the society the elites were creating, and he was deadly accurate. He writes of a class of "deltas, gammas, and omegas" who exist merely as human fodder in a massive governmental-corporate global technostructure.

View attachment 230679View attachment 230680View attachment 230681

By 1986 the elites realized their ideas were unworkable. They realized the population could never keep up with this exponential global debt. The entire world would look like a complete dumpster fire wasteland if they continued that any longer. From 1989 to 2008 the elites restructured the their global plans and for global civilization in such a way that could maintain the global debt structure while holding a relatively stable population. They used Quantitative Easing (a tool invented by Milton Friedman to do this). Central banks would create money and buy debt bonds from existing investment banks and money pools. This allowed the perpetual increase in debt to continue indefinitely because existing debts could always be sold to the central bank at profit with money instantly created at whim*. Bankers could create debt, sell the debt to the central bank, and use that money for more loaning projects. Inflation was controlled by channeling the money into top wealth brackets and foreign money pits like Switzerland and the Cayman Island so its out of circulation. This allows infinite money and debt creation without the need for it to be backed up with perpetual growth of GDP and population.

*"Trickle Down Economics" as it's infamously called was the first stage of this process. As the global debt begun to overtake population and real GDP growth the elites instituted trickle down economics to curb inflation. In the 1970s (and 1980s in Canada, Australia, and much of Western Europe) inflation began to become rampant. It became apparent real GDP and population growth rate could no longer grow at the rate needed to thwart inflation)



View attachment 230686View attachment 230687View attachment 230688

AND THIS is why you are USELESS. The elites no longer need you to merely exist for them to continue their global debt ponzi scheme. Now you're actually a hindrance, a waste of space, part of the lumpenproletariet. The only reason you existed before was to exist as a statistic on a census forum, or a data-point on a corporate sheet so they could justify creating 900K of debt money under the assumption you would consume that much in your lifetime. The elites now have a new strategy to deal with people they don't need anymore, and that's slowly easing them out of existence with mass consumption of soy products and inceldom. All the barriers to hyper-gamy have been removed since 2008 and technologies like social media have allowed it to reemerge more potent than ever before. Only high-IQ, beautiful, talented, and a somewhat reasonable size mass of mid to high level technocratic workers are needed in this global world order, unfortunately incels don't make the cut. We happen to exist as freaks in a transitory period between a world where our mere existence gave us value and a world where we would not exist. We are the carrier pigeons bred just before the telegraph became widespread, we are the typewriters manufactured just before the tech boom, the lost souls orphaned by a purpose of which no longer exists. Whenever you scream at your pillow and ask why you exist, why you're incel, this is why. You exist to serve a technocratic banking elite of whom no longer need you.*"Trickle Down Economics" as it's infamously called was the first stage of this process. As the global debt begun to overtake population and real GDP growth the elites instituted trickle down economics to curb inflation. In the 1970s (and 1980s in Canada, Australia, and much of Western Europe) inflation began to become rampant. It became apparent real GDP and population growth rate could no longer grow at the rate)

View attachment 230689View attachment 230693View attachment 230695
Another brainlet thread by a brainlet user. First of all, M1 only applies to checking accounts, not savings accounts. Checking accounts typically don't pay interest or nearly as much interest as a savings account for the reason that you can withdraw from them at any time. Reserve requirements are also significantly different between checking and savings accounts. Your simplified explanation ignores this distinction and conflates M1 with M2. This is brainlet tier logic that shows how little you understand macroeconomics. There's not "10x more M1 money than M0", the current ratio of M1 to M0 for the US is around 2.409 at the moment. You are a dumbass. Checks aren't M0 either, they're M1 because they're negotiable instruments. They're not nearly as good as cash, go try to pay at the grocery store with a personal unendorsed check. You get all your information from Buzzfeed tier infographics and it shows.

Second of all your whole spiel about the gold standard is fucking stupid and ignores so much historical context. The gold standard existed because gold has historically ALWAYS been a currency. It's shiny, rare, and can easily be turned into coins due to its malleability. People have accepted gold for trade for a long time historically, and "central banks" have always been issuing more currency than they had backed by gold. It's called debasement and has been occurring since the time of the Roman empire. Plus, this sort of inflation is actually good for people that owe debt. This is why historically the American working class tried to switch to a silver standard or bimetallism. This inflation also didn't occur to the extent of "a thousand gold notes for every real piece of gold." The reason why the Bretton Woods system failed is because the US government had issued 24 billion dollars when they only had 13.2 billion dollars worth of gold. That's a lot less than a thousand-to-one ratio. Also do you even know what Bretton Woods was? The world didn't switch from Bretton Woods to the dollar, Bretton Woods WAS having the dollar as a reserve currency. In turn the US dollar would be backed by gold. And the world didn't switch from Bretton Woods either, Nixon unilaterally suspended the convertibility of American dollars to gold which pissed off a lot of people.

The US Dollar isn't called the "Petrodollar" either. The nickname "petrodollar" for a currency typically refers to the CANADIAN dollar, which is heavily associated with the value of crude oil on the international market. Alternatively it can refer to revenues gained from exporting oil, or "petrodollars", but that's in no way a generic nickname for the American dollar. Of course to make this point I'm assuming that you meant the American dollar, because if you honestly believe the Canadian dollar is an international reserve currency you're even more of a dumbass than I thought.

The most bizarre part of your stupid argument is that you somehow have managed to stumble upon to accurate conclusions but then somehow think the goals of the monetary system are bad. Yes, we do live in a society where total debt constantly grows. The constantly increasing money supply DOES lead to the creation of numerous more goods and services. Why do you think it just so happened that humanity stopped living in the dark ages at the time of the modern monetary system? That technology suddenly took off, the Industrial Revolution happened, and we all started living better & more comfortable lives than before? It's precisely BECAUSE of modern economics & monetary theory that I'm typing this from a computer in an air-conditioned & heated apartment. Why the fuck is this a bad thing?

Heck, this system even managed to supress hypergamy, one of the most enduring parts of human history. We finally managed to get women under control and created the best time for an average man to live in CENTURIES. All because bankers acting in their OWN self interest wanted to make more money and live better lives. Was there an entire class of subhumans created as a result of this? Yes, they're called people with very severe birth defects (think can't move without assistance) and severe mental retardation. Not typical incels who are just ugly. We've always existed and ended up cloistered in a monastery or forced to raise Prince Chad's child if we were lucky enough to get a wife.

Then you make this claim that somehow the global elites don't need us anymore. If that were true, why do you think they're importing so many people from overseas? Why do you think they want endless reams of people from India who are guaranteed to be incel and unloved? Why you do think that the Chinese government considers the most pressing issue to them to be the massive amount of "surplus men" who simply cannot find a Chinese partner? Why do you think they're literally importing women from the third world and promoting these interracial relationships?

The fact is that the global elites have ALWAYS needed an underclass and they will continue to need them in the future. They still need incels to unclog the robot cleaners. They need incels to write endless code for blenders or CNC machines or to manage live captioning bots. Sure, the average level of skill required for a working class person has gone up quite a bit in the past few years. But it's been that way for millennia. Do you think even the smartest Roman emperor would be able to understand the concept of a credit card or a cash register or the assembly line at McDonalds? Or even what the fuck Arabic numerals are and the concept of "zero?" And the reason why society has advanced so much is the realization by the Chads or the Jews or whoever you think controls the world that for them to enjoy living on yachts with a harem of women, it is necessary for them to grant the incel a stable monogamous marriage and an increasing standard of living. Much like people operate dumbass cash registers today, in about 30 years the average working class person is going to spend all day training artificial neural networks with flashcards and shit so they can drive better or whatever in something totally unrecognizable to us.

Oh yeah, the elites have tried to feed people soy, I'm not disputing that. They got cocky and thought they could convince the average male that inceldom for their 20s is OK, that getting married at 30 to a """former""" slut is somehow a desirable outcome for most men. They thought they could promote cuckoldry and open relationships and whatever else. You know what they're getting in return? The highest rate of mass killings we've ever seen, constant societal unrest, and fear that everything is going to come crashing down for them. And they're working as hard as they can to undo their fuckups, because for a brief period in the 1990s after the fall of the Soviet Union elites lived in an idealist world instead of a pragmatic one and they're all paying the fucking price. Stop pretending that the average incel doesn't have power or that we're "obsolete". That's what elites want us to think and it's what they want to believe as well. But it's not true and that's the reason why we're seeing so many tradthots or even women voluntarily waiting till marriage. They see the writing on the wall such as the roasties who embraced their hypergamy and became single moms who end up alone forever and realize they'd rather suppress their hypergamy themselves than end up as a single mom.

This soy shit is overblown as well and that's on purpose. It's not "normal" behaviour to be a cuckold or be OK with your wife getting gangbanged by 4 men even if it was "in the past". Even the most cucked subreddits on the most cuckolded website think it's OK for a man to break up with a woman because she got fucked by multiple men at once. Imagine how the average person feels. The elites push this narrative that men should be and commonly are OK with being cucked. That's not true. Most men aren't OK with this and shit is going downhill for women who don't voluntarily stop being sluts.

Plus don't forget the most important thing you missed about your whole economy spiel. Women are NEVER net contributors in taxes or consumption. They don't make more than they spend. They rely on men to provide for them and if men stop providing the entire system goes under. And men are no longer providing voluntarily through marriage, so they try child support or alimony or a bachelor's tax. But that just leads men not to bother to work, because they don't get anything in return.
 
Thanks for taking the time to put together the post.

You could have posted a link on fractional reserve banking along with a video and just said, "dis y u inkell," and let the reader do the math. But still, it's nice to see a strong effort post.
Another brainlet thread by a brainlet user. First of all, M1 only applies to checking accounts, not savings accounts. Checking accounts typically don't pay interest or nearly as much interest as a savings account for the reason that you can withdraw from them at any time. Reserve requirements are also significantly different between checking and savings accounts. Your simplified explanation ignores this distinction and conflates M1 with M2. This is brainlet tier logic that shows how little you understand macroeconomics. There's not "10x more M1 money than M0", the current ratio of M1 to M0 for the US is around 2.409 at the moment. You are a dumbass. Checks aren't M0 either, they're M1 because they're negotiable instruments. They're not nearly as good as cash, go try to pay at the grocery store with a personal unendorsed check. You get all your information from Buzzfeed tier infographics and it shows.

Second of all your whole spiel about the gold standard is fucking stupid and ignores so much historical context. The gold standard existed because gold has historically ALWAYS been a currency. It's shiny, rare, and can easily be turned into coins due to its malleability. People have accepted gold for trade for a long time historically, and "central banks" have always been issuing more currency than they had backed by gold. It's called debasement and has been occurring since the time of the Roman empire. Plus, this sort of inflation is actually good for people that owe debt. This is why historically the American working class tried to switch to a silver standard or bimetallism. This inflation also didn't occur to the extent of "a thousand gold notes for every real piece of gold." The reason why the Bretton Woods system failed is because the US government had issued 24 billion dollars when they only had 13.2 billion dollars worth of gold. That's a lot less than a thousand-to-one ratio. Also do you even know what Bretton Woods was? The world didn't switch from Bretton Woods to the dollar, Bretton Woods WAS having the dollar as a reserve currency. In turn the US dollar would be backed by gold. And the world didn't switch from Bretton Woods either, Nixon unilaterally suspended the convertibility of American dollars to gold which pissed off a lot of people.

The US Dollar isn't called the "Petrodollar" either. The nickname "petrodollar" for a currency typically refers to the CANADIAN dollar, which is heavily associated with the value of crude oil on the international market. Alternatively it can refer to revenues gained from exporting oil, or "petrodollars", but that's in no way a generic nickname for the American dollar. Of course to make this point I'm assuming that you meant the American dollar, because if you honestly believe the Canadian dollar is an international reserve currency you're even more of a dumbass than I thought.

The most bizarre part of your stupid argument is that you somehow have managed to stumble upon to accurate conclusions but then somehow think the goals of the monetary system are bad. Yes, we do live in a society where total debt constantly grows. The constantly increasing money supply DOES lead to the creation of numerous more goods and services. Why do you think it just so happened that humanity stopped living in the dark ages at the time of the modern monetary system? That technology suddenly took off, the Industrial Revolution happened, and we all started living better & more comfortable lives than before? It's precisely BECAUSE of modern economics & monetary theory that I'm typing this from a computer in an air-conditioned & heated apartment. Why the fuck is this a bad thing?

Heck, this system even managed to supress hypergamy, one of the most enduring parts of human history. We finally managed to get women under control and created the best time for an average man to live in CENTURIES. All because bankers acting in their OWN self interest wanted to make more money and live better lives. Was there an entire class of subhumans created as a result of this? Yes, they're called people with very severe birth defects (think can't move without assistance) and severe mental retardation. Not typical incels who are just ugly. We've always existed and ended up cloistered in a monastery or forced to raise Prince Chad's child if we were lucky enough to get a wife.

Then you make this claim that somehow the global elites don't need us anymore. If that were true, why do you think they're importing so many people from overseas? Why do you think they want endless reams of people from India who are guaranteed to be incel and unloved? Why you do think that the Chinese government considers the most pressing issue to them to be the massive amount of "surplus men" who simply cannot find a Chinese partner? Why do you think they're literally importing women from the third world and promoting these interracial relationships?

The fact is that the global elites have ALWAYS needed an underclass and they will continue to need them in the future. They still need incels to unclog the robot cleaners. They need incels to write endless code for blenders or CNC machines or to manage live captioning bots. Sure, the average level of skill required for a working class person has gone up quite a bit in the past few years. But it's been that way for millennia. Do you think even the smartest Roman emperor would be able to understand the concept of a credit card or a cash register or the assembly line at McDonalds? Or even what the fuck Arabic numerals are and the concept of "zero?" And the reason why society has advanced so much is the realization by the Chads or the Jews or whoever you think controls the world that for them to enjoy living on yachts with a harem of women, it is necessary for them to grant the incel a stable monogamous marriage and an increasing standard of living. Much like people operate dumbass cash registers today, in about 30 years the average working class person is going to spend all day training artificial neural networks with flashcards and shit so they can drive better or whatever in something totally unrecognizable to us.

Oh yeah, the elites have tried to feed people soy, I'm not disputing that. They got cocky and thought they could convince the average male that inceldom for their 20s is OK, that getting married at 30 to a """former""" slut is somehow a desirable outcome for most men. They thought they could promote cuckoldry and open relationships and whatever else. You know what they're getting in return? The highest rate of mass killings we've ever seen, constant societal unrest, and fear that everything is going to come crashing down for them. And they're working as hard as they can to undo their fuckups, because for a brief period in the 1990s after the fall of the Soviet Union elites lived in an idealist world instead of a pragmatic one and they're all paying the fucking price. Stop pretending that the average incel doesn't have power or that we're "obsolete". That's what elites want us to think and it's what they want to believe as well. But it's not true and that's the reason why we're seeing so many tradthots or even women voluntarily waiting till marriage. They see the writing on the wall such as the roasties who embraced their hypergamy and became single moms who end up alone forever and realize they'd rather suppress their hypergamy themselves than end up as a single mom.

This soy shit is overblown as well and that's on purpose. It's not "normal" behaviour to be a cuckold or be OK with your wife getting gangbanged by 4 men even if it was "in the past". Even the most cucked subreddits on the most cuckolded website think it's OK for a man to break up with a woman because she got fucked by multiple men at once. Imagine how the average person feels. The elites push this narrative that men should be and commonly are OK with being cucked. That's not true. Most men aren't OK with this and shit is going downhill for women who don't voluntarily stop being sluts.

Plus don't forget the most important thing you missed about your whole economy spiel. Women are NEVER net contributors in taxes or consumption. They don't make more than they spend. They rely on men to provide for them and if men stop providing the entire system goes under. And men are no longer providing voluntarily through marriage, so they try child support or alimony or a bachelor's tax. But that just leads men not to bother to work, because they don't get anything in return.

Milton Friedman IQ rebuttal.
 
Last edited:
Too much takes makes head hurt
 
Megacope, some user here crunched the math and autists as a group have lower than average IQs.
That is why is said "could". Because there are few autists who are actually having no problems with math or STEM in general
 
just read it, brutal :feelsbadman:

but couldn't it be that those banker elites are just adapting to what happens in society, rather than controlling everything?
 
Why do you think it just so happened that humanity stopped living in the dark ages at the time of the modern monetary system? That technology suddenly took off, the Industrial Revolution happened, and we all started living better & more comfortable lives than before? It's precisely BECAUSE of modern economics & monetary theory that I'm typing this from a computer in an air-conditioned & heated apartment. Why the fuck is this a bad thing?

Heck, this system even managed to supress hypergamy, one of the most enduring parts of human history. We finally managed to get women under control and created the best time for an average man to live in CENTURIES. All because bankers acting in their OWN self interest wanted to make more money and live better lives.
This is just capitalist apologetics without any logical causation correlated to it. This is just like soviet union claiming to take Russia out of feudalism and putting men into space because of democratic centralism and scientific management, but upside down. The state-of-the-art of technology is pushed further by savants and the general intellectual class, but what allows it to be widespread is the culture that it emerges from (western civilization being in the forefront of this) and the powers that be stance on it: finding a way to take advantage of it, being neutral but allowing it to go public, using it but confidentialy as a state secret or forbidding it altogether. Using money or living in a capitalist predatorial society doesn't create anything nor create conditions for curbing hypergamy per se, the system just extended the roman patriarchal family model to wageslaves funding their wives who were culturally forbidden to get a job, not because of capitalism.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

sinclair_silence
Replies
6
Views
436
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
S
Replies
1
Views
135
Repulsive123
Repulsive123
AsiaCel
Replies
12
Views
646
lazy_gamer_423
lazy_gamer_423
Electus
Replies
52
Views
1K
gymletethnicel
gymletethnicel
AsiaCel
Replies
5
Views
313
AsiaCel
AsiaCel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top