Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious My Last Thread Before I Do an Incels.co Detox [THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY SYSTEM]

JFL normies “borrowing” money from banks. To be indebted into the system for the rest of their lives enslaved to the masters of the elite ruling class.

Glad I’ll be leeching off the system, really don’t care about working hard so I can make some “Goldstein” richer.

Problem is the system is designed so that you're having your labor stolen either way either by:

1. You pay taxes, governments use some of your tax money to pay interest

2. Your money is competing with the money borrowed into existence by banks, in other words inflation is eroding the value of your money.
Bro you've been here 9 days.

Yes but I've spent hours everyday here just hitting refresh. It's sucking away my life.
Another brainlet thread by a brainlet user. First of all, M1 only applies to checking accounts, not savings accounts. Checking accounts typically don't pay interest or nearly as much interest as a savings account for the reason that you can withdraw from them at any time. Reserve requirements are also significantly different between checking and savings accounts. Your simplified explanation ignores this distinction and conflates M1 with M2. This is brainlet tier logic that shows how little you understand macroeconomics. There's not "10x more M1 money than M0", the current ratio of M1 to M0 for the US is around 2.409 at the moment. You are a dumbass. Checks aren't M0 either, they're M1 because they're negotiable instruments. They're not nearly as good as cash, go try to pay at the grocery store with a personal unendorsed check. You get all your information from Buzzfeed tier infographics and it shows.

Second of all your whole spiel about the gold standard is fucking stupid and ignores so much historical context. The gold standard existed because gold has historically ALWAYS been a currency. It's shiny, rare, and can easily be turned into coins due to its malleability. People have accepted gold for trade for a long time historically, and "central banks" have always been issuing more currency than they had backed by gold. It's called debasement and has been occurring since the time of the Roman empire. Plus, this sort of inflation is actually good for people that owe debt. This is why historically the American working class tried to switch to a silver standard or bimetallism. This inflation also didn't occur to the extent of "a thousand gold notes for every real piece of gold." The reason why the Bretton Woods system failed is because the US government had issued 24 billion dollars when they only had 13.2 billion dollars worth of gold. That's a lot less than a thousand-to-one ratio. Also do you even know what Bretton Woods was? The world didn't switch from Bretton Woods to the dollar, Bretton Woods WAS having the dollar as a reserve currency. In turn the US dollar would be backed by gold. And the world didn't switch from Bretton Woods either, Nixon unilaterally suspended the convertibility of American dollars to gold which pissed off a lot of people.

The US Dollar isn't called the "Petrodollar" either. The nickname "petrodollar" for a currency typically refers to the CANADIAN dollar, which is heavily associated with the value of crude oil on the international market. Alternatively it can refer to revenues gained from exporting oil, or "petrodollars", but that's in no way a generic nickname for the American dollar. Of course to make this point I'm assuming that you meant the American dollar, because if you honestly believe the Canadian dollar is an international reserve currency you're even more of a dumbass than I thought.

The most bizarre part of your stupid argument is that you somehow have managed to stumble upon to accurate conclusions but then somehow think the goals of the monetary system are bad. Yes, we do live in a society where total debt constantly grows. The constantly increasing money supply DOES lead to the creation of numerous more goods and services. Why do you think it just so happened that humanity stopped living in the dark ages at the time of the modern monetary system? That technology suddenly took off, the Industrial Revolution happened, and we all started living better & more comfortable lives than before? It's precisely BECAUSE of modern economics & monetary theory that I'm typing this from a computer in an air-conditioned & heated apartment. Why the fuck is this a bad thing?

Heck, this system even managed to supress hypergamy, one of the most enduring parts of human history. We finally managed to get women under control and created the best time for an average man to live in CENTURIES. All because bankers acting in their OWN self interest wanted to make more money and live better lives. Was there an entire class of subhumans created as a result of this? Yes, they're called people with very severe birth defects (think can't move without assistance) and severe mental retardation. Not typical incels who are just ugly. We've always existed and ended up cloistered in a monastery or forced to raise Prince Chad's child if we were lucky enough to get a wife.

Then you make this claim that somehow the global elites don't need us anymore. If that were true, why do you think they're importing so many people from overseas? Why do you think they want endless reams of people from India who are guaranteed to be incel and unloved? Why you do think that the Chinese government considers the most pressing issue to them to be the massive amount of "surplus men" who simply cannot find a Chinese partner? Why do you think they're literally importing women from the third world and promoting these interracial relationships?

The fact is that the global elites have ALWAYS needed an underclass and they will continue to need them in the future. They still need incels to unclog the robot cleaners. They need incels to write endless code for blenders or CNC machines or to manage live captioning bots. Sure, the average level of skill required for a working class person has gone up quite a bit in the past few years. But it's been that way for millennia. Do you think even the smartest Roman emperor would be able to understand the concept of a credit card or a cash register or the assembly line at McDonalds? Or even what the fuck Arabic numerals are and the concept of "zero?" And the reason why society has advanced so much is the realization by the Chads or the Jews or whoever you think controls the world that for them to enjoy living on yachts with a harem of women, it is necessary for them to grant the incel a stable monogamous marriage and an increasing standard of living. Much like people operate dumbass cash registers today, in about 30 years the average working class person is going to spend all day training artificial neural networks with flashcards and shit so they can drive better or whatever in something totally unrecognizable to us.

Oh yeah, the elites have tried to feed people soy, I'm not disputing that. They got cocky and thought they could convince the average male that inceldom for their 20s is OK, that getting married at 30 to a """former""" slut is somehow a desirable outcome for most men. They thought they could promote cuckoldry and open relationships and whatever else. You know what they're getting in return? The highest rate of mass killings we've ever seen, constant societal unrest, and fear that everything is going to come crashing down for them. And they're working as hard as they can to undo their fuckups, because for a brief period in the 1990s after the fall of the Soviet Union elites lived in an idealist world instead of a pragmatic one and they're all paying the fucking price. Stop pretending that the average incel doesn't have power or that we're "obsolete". That's what elites want us to think and it's what they want to believe as well. But it's not true and that's the reason why we're seeing so many tradthots or even women voluntarily waiting till marriage. They see the writing on the wall such as the roasties who embraced their hypergamy and became single moms who end up alone forever and realize they'd rather suppress their hypergamy themselves than end up as a single mom.

This soy shit is overblown as well and that's on purpose. It's not "normal" behaviour to be a cuckold or be OK with your wife getting gangbanged by 4 men even if it was "in the past". Even the most cucked subreddits on the most cuckolded website think it's OK for a man to break up with a woman because she got fucked by multiple men at once. Imagine how the average person feels. The elites push this narrative that men should be and commonly are OK with being cucked. That's not true. Most men aren't OK with this and shit is going downhill for women who don't voluntarily stop being sluts.

Plus don't forget the most important thing you missed about your whole economy spiel. Women are NEVER net contributors in taxes or consumption. They don't make more than they spend. They rely on men to provide for them and if men stop providing the entire system goes under. And men are no longer providing voluntarily through marriage, so they try child support or alimony or a bachelor's tax. But that just leads men not to bother to work, because they don't get anything in return.

This is one of the lowest IQ posts I think I've ever seen. You really need to educate yourself. This pile of drivel is absolute trash and you need to be ashamed of yourself.

You have zero understanding of economics. I study mathematical economic theory at a TOP GLOBAL UNIVERSITY and am currently in the process of getting a PHD. First off, I know savings accounts constitute M2 more than M1. My post was a huge oversimplification, but those distinctions are completely meaningless. The fact is there is m0 and then there is money above m0 like M1 and M2, and the creation of different types of money is what allows the distortion of wealth. In fact many economists agree with me in that the only real distinction is m0 and m0+. It's clear you've never taken a single course of macroeconmics in your life. You also said "checks aren't m0". I never said they were m0, I said it was m1 but had the power to act like m0 for the time being, which is true. Your illiteracy is astounding.

Your post on the gold standard is absolutely retarded. Gold has not always been the historic currency, in fact it rarely has. Credit was the first form of currency and continues to be so in the present time. The gold standard has been a historical anomaly. Then for the rest of the post you pretty much agreed with me but autistically rambled about how my numbers were off (Which they weren't). The U.S issued 23 billion dollars more in paper than they had in gold, but the fractional reserve banking system extended that on until the ratio was about 1000 to 1. You're so fucking stupid I can't believe you're serious. When the Bretten Woods system was ended, the U.S switched from the gold standard to the petro-dollar. The petro-dollar is another name for the USD since the USD is backed by other countries oil reserves. Other countries have to trade oil in USD, and this gives the USD value because people need it if they want to buy oil. It has nothing to do with money that is dependent on the price of crude like the Canadian dollar.

You're also absolutely retarded for saying the modern monetary system is a good thing. This system has been a hindrance to growth. What allows technological progress and advancement is a positive-money system like Lincoln or Hitler advocated, where money is created debt-free from the issuance of government. The credit banking system only holds us back in this regard as investments that can't pay themselves off in monetary value are discarded.

And about the mass immigration part of your post. The reason the elites are promoting mass migration is because they want to race-mix us all into a global super race, it's all part of the Codenhove-Kalergi plan. They want humanity to become a global-homogeneous race which is easier to control. It has nothing to do about needing more people, in fact if you look at the environmental agenda they actively want people to have less kids. This is all supported by the mainstream elite.

The rest of your post is just stuff about how automation won't replace us. COPE COPE COPE. Automation is different this time in that it will fully replace humanity as the A.I will surpass humanity at literally everything.

Thanks for taking the time to put together the post.

You could have posted a link on fractional reserve banking along with a video and just said, "dis y u inkell," and let the reader do the math. But still, it's nice to see a strong effort post.


Milton Friedman IQ rebuttal.

More like IQ of a turtle rebuttal
just read it, brutal :feelsbadman:

but couldn't it be that those banker elites are just adapting to what happens in society, rather than controlling everything?

That's a possibility as well. I feel there is a bit of both. Society changes, bankers adapt, but bankers also try to influence the general direction of society through various methods as Huxley describes.
This is just capitalist apologetics without any logical causation correlated to it. This is just like soviet union claiming to take Russia out of feudalism and putting men into space because of democratic centralism and scientific management, but upside down. The state-of-the-art of technology is pushed further by savants and the general intellectual class, but what allows it to be widespread is the culture that it emerges from (western civilization being in the forefront of this) and the powers that be stance on it: finding a way to take advantage of it, being neutral but allowing it to go public, using it but confidentialy as a state secret or forbidding it altogether. Using money or living in a capitalist predatorial society doesn't create anything nor create conditions for curbing hypergamy per se, the system just extended the roman patriarchal family model to wageslaves funding their wives who were culturally forbidden to get a job, not because of capitalism.

Carroll Quigley level IQ
 
Last edited:
high iq post, the recent stimulus bill proves your economic points.
Kinda explains why foids got rights, more people in the economy continues enables economic growth.
 
high iq post, the recent stimulus bill proves your economic points.
Kinda explains why foids got rights, more people in the economy continues enables economic growth.

Yep, it's also why they got foids into the workforce. In an economic sense that doubled the population, as it created twice the producers, twice the consumers, twice the tax payers, twice of everything.
 
Just ignore the jews behind the curtain bro.

I guess you haven't read the international jew (Henry Ford) or the protocols of the learned elders of zion?

Yeah. Pls detox... Or Whatever.
 
I thought this said "before I do an Incels.co dox" at first
 
Just ignore the jews behind the curtain bro.

I guess you haven't read the international jew (Henry Ford) or the protocols of the learned elders of zion?

Yeah. Pls detox... Or Whatever.

I would have to write a lot more if I wanted to get into the Jews. I edited it out because I didn't want to spend 10 paragraphs writing about their origins, their collective interest, and racial plans.
 
Now this is something I can get into. Good work fellow HighIQcel! Rothschild have a disposal of resources at their hands.
 
Byebye, was actually starting to read some of your posts tbh and I read this one. Cool economic theory/explanation/understanding. Wish I was more educated on economics to talk more in depth about it but I'm really not.

Unfortunately you will go out like you came in with your threads, with a majority not reading it.
I would have to write a lot more if I wanted to get into the Jews. I edited it out because I didn't want to spend 10 paragraphs writing about their origins, their collective interest, and racial plans.
I could talk about jewish theory for days tbh if you want to count it as economics but it's only because it ties heavily into world history.
 
Byebye, was actually starting to read some of your posts tbh and I read this one. Cool economic theory/explanation/understanding. Wish I was more educated on economics to talk more in depth about it but I'm really not.

Unfortunately you will go out like you came in with your threads, with a majority not reading it.

I could talk about jewish theory for days tbh if you want to count it as economics but it's only because it ties heavily into world history.

I would love to talk about it. TBH i probably won't end up leaving this board at all because I get so drawn into these conversation. I certainly would be willing to talk about the Jewish question anytime I'm on though.
 
I would love to talk about it. TBH i probably won't end up leaving this board at all because I get so drawn into these conversation. I certainly would be willing to talk about the Jewish question anytime I'm on though.
Ok. IMO to tdlr it it's not one big plan but we're just on the ones that have worked for them. Especially if you believe in old testament stories of the jews being brought out of slavery, considering since then they've been planning to have an ethnostate. In that time since now there's been around 200 plans (roughly how many times they've been kicked out of various nations), and the plan we're on now has started since around the jewish owned slave ships started putting blacks in colonial America.

It could be corona or it could be something else but soon enough the jews are going to kill the goy and replace the world into the original 12 tribes of judah, which is why they've been so successful in being elite (Recognization of inherent egoist tribalism in your own human nature)

just a theory though
 
Ok. IMO to tdlr it it's not one big plan but we're just on the ones that have worked for them. Especially if you believe in old testament stories of the jews being brought out of slavery, considering since then they've been planning to have an ethnostate. In that time since now there's been around 200 plans (roughly how many times they've been kicked out of various nations), and the plan we're on now has started since around the jewish owned slave ships started putting blacks in colonial America.

It could be corona or it could be something else but soon enough the jews are going to kill the goy and replace the world into the original 12 tribes of judah, which is why they've been so successful in being elite (Recognization of inherent egoist tribalism in your own human nature)

just a theory though

Who do you think the 12 tribes of judah are? Many like Varg Vikernes believes the red haired people of Ireland are part of this tribe.
 
Not one letter
 
Who do you think the 12 tribes of judah are? Many like Varg Vikernes believes the red haired people of Ireland are part of this tribe.
Not sure on the hair color but it was outlined in the bible. Although I wouldn't be surprised if red haired people or anglos in general are atleast taking some part, although by the end of it these 12 tribes are going to end up splitting the world (I'm not religious btw)
1586139384508
 
I would have to write a lot more if I wanted to get into the Jews. I edited it out because I didn't want to spend 10 paragraphs writing about their origins, their collective interest, and racial plans.
Ok. Just don't mention the jews disposable bro.
 
If u think I'm gonna read all of that u r nuts
 
If YOU are what's considered to be high IQ, then i guess the bar has been set really low after all.
Go back to being banned, you salty blkpillpres worshiper. Almost an NPC with all the copied mannerisms taken from a unique poster. Quick word of advice,Try being original in an unironic way and more posters will respect you.
 
yes,i see very interesting and high iq
 
I realized this site is sucking the life and time out of me. I planned to make threads, go do productive things, and check occasionally check my inbox but I have spent the last 4 hours hitting refresh. This site truly is absorbing my life and for that I must spend less time here. I am taking a break to read and work-out and learn to code, so don't worry I am not leaving, I've come to see many of you as my brothers. Before my break I feel it is my duty to educate the incel community on the international monetary system and how YOU exist to serve the global financial elite and how the reason we even exist as incels in the first place is because of this global technocracy. I will condense this the best I can, but it must still be long enough to fairly educate.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Every-time you borrow money from the bank, money is created. Bankers use money they get from deposits to loan out to you. After you take the money, it's now in two places at once. You have money you just borrowed from the bank, and the depositor has money in his bank account. Now lets say you put that money in your bank account, then borrow the same amount from the bank. The money is now in THREE places at once. In your hand (m0 money)*1, in your bank account (m1 money)*2, and in the depositors bank account (also m1 money). Debt = Money and Money = Debt. Money does not get created without debt. Money is created when it is cycled through the banking system, and each time it cycles through the interest on these debts builds. As in the scenario above, every-time money is created through the debt, it comes with pledged interest that must be reimbursed. This of course is how the banks make profits. While it may seem obvious banks make their profits from interest, most are blissfully unaware that banks profit on interest from money they have created into existence in the first place.

If you follow any dollar back long enough, through the countless times it has been multiplied through the banking system, you'll see it eventually came from the central bank. The central bank is the only entity allowed to create M0 money. The bank loans out this money to the commercial banks, thus setting the cycle in motion. The high IQ are already starting to ask "if all money is created out of debt, how is it ever possible that all debt gets repaid? If everyone paid off their debts to their commercial banks, and the commercial banks paid off their debts to the central banks, there would be no money in the system at all!". And that's exactly correct. It's essentially impossible for all debts to be simultaneously repaid because the amount of debt will always equal the amount of money in existence. In fact the amount of debt will for all practical purposes surpass the money supply because sometimes the central bank pockets the interest commercial banks pay to them. Central banks are suppose to send all profits their nations treasury, but they don't always. In this case there is more outstanding debt than there is money. Any attempt to create more money for debt financing will only create more debt.

1. m0 money is money that exists in the form of currency. You can hold it in your hand, directly spend it, and have unbridled possession of, unlike m1 money
2.. m1 money is money held in your bank account. It's not currency and you can not hold it because it is not really there. Most of the money you deposit into the bank is then loaned out, so while the money exists on your bank balance, it's not really there. This money can be withdrawn(turned into m0 money) or spent through "checks". In this sense, checks are a form of money creation because it allows m1 money to act as m0 money. There is about 10x more m1 money than m0 money.

View attachment 230646View attachment 230648


This system wasn't implemented overnight. It was slowly pushed and crafted over hundreds of years by high-level European bankers. The Rothschilds are often most associated with this system but they really were not the masterminds behind it. The Rothschild's simply forced the English government into a crippling debt crisis by crashing their stock market after the Napoleonic wars, but the Rothschilds were not soley behind the Bank of England, the entity of which England's massive debt was primarily owed to. This banking system was largely put in place by Charles Montagu, and English statesmen in kahoots with Swedish and German financiers. Swedish academics in the 1600s were the first to truly theorize how a central credit system would exist and play out. They theorized a global banking system of interlocking debt networks long before such a thing was considered even theoretically possible. Today that's commonly accepted as the modern economic capital structure.

These high-level bankers created and normalized the "gold standard" as the global economic order in the early 1700s. Many see the gold standard as a rebellious money system, a way to free a society of the banker ruling class. This couldn't be further from the truth. The gold standard was a banker created system allows for the exact same credit-creation phenomenon as explained in paragraph 2 (albeit to a slightly lesser flexibility than the fiat money system). Central banks hold all the gold, loan out gold notes, and allow private banks to create money through gold-based derivatives. The gold standard merely acted to create the illusion of sound money because most people never understood that for every dollar of gold, there was over a thousand gold notes that represented ownership in gold. Thus were there to be a bank run the entire system would collapse, this is eventually why they ended the Bretten Woods Agreement in 1971 and switched to the Petrodollar as the global reserve currency, under both systems the secret powers of the banker elite reign supreme.


View attachment 230649View attachment 230651View attachment 230655


The Banking ruling class have funded both parties in the United States since the days of Andrew Jackson (who contrary to libertarian propaganda was a shill for big bankers as long as it was done through a purely gold backed system). There has been many internal conflicts in the United States government between banking adversaries and forces of banker interest, but banking interests have predominate won. Both parties, the Democrats and Republicans, are designed by and for banker interest. They were designed to be nearly identical in all matters relating to monetary and to an extend fiscal policy so as to create an illusion of freedom amongst the population but to deprive them of any real opportunity for change. When people complain about how democracy doesn't work about politicians never really do anything, they aren't really criticizing democracy, albeit democracy takes the blame; they are criticizing the international banker establishment that controls the government. If you'd like to read more on this subject, Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley is a great place to start. Quigley was the mentor of Bill Clinton, he was a Yale Professor who mentored many of the elites and published "Tragedy and Hope" as propaganda for the ruling class. It outlines the cultural elite's plan for world government and talks a lot more about what I am saying.



View attachment 230660View attachment 230661View attachment 230663


THIS IS LITERALLY WHY YOU INCEL

When one realizes that all money is debt, all debt must be sufficed, the only way to meet interest payments on a perpetual basis is more money, and more money only comes from more debt, it becomes clear to any logically consistent thinker that such a system will create perpetually more debt. Under such a system, the total debt will grow exponentially and thus the money will grow exponentially. In any economic system, as the quantity of money increases, there will either be two results, real economic growth with stable prices or stable prices with no economic growth (or a mix between the two). If the money supply doubles, the quantity of goods and services must double or the general prices of goods must double, or there can be a mixture between the two. This a simple way of describing the history of our society since the founding of the international credit creation banking policy. Rapidly increasing money supply plus rapidly increasing growth albeit the growth slightly lags behind the money supply, hence the inflation we've experienced. As the marginal benefits from the industrial revolution began to reach an end in the 1920s (growth began to slope down on a logarithmic scale), the elites realized rapid population growth was the ONLY WAY to keep up the rapid growth, thus all EUGENICS programs were disbanded, UNIVERSAL MEDICINE became established (inb4 "muricans dont have free healthcare" yes they practically do stfu), and the promotion of mass reproduction regardless of quality became the norm. The elites didn't care if you were 60IQ, had disabilities, were ugly, etc. They just wanted you to pump out babies to keep the GDP growing. Even retards who wouldn't produce anything were useful for this purpose since merely collecting welfare and buying products contributes to real GDP, and justifies the corporate techno-structure and federal governments to borrow more. This is why from the year 1922 - 2008 mostly everyone could find a wife and reproduce if they wanted. The ELITES wanted a perpetual population boom to sustain the global debt system that they themselves created. How they did this is by SUPPRESSING HYPERGAMY with any cultural tool they had at their disposal (social shaming, mass media, abortion bans). The downside to this was since couples were primarily looks-matched, an entire class of subhumans were created that would not exist in any previous time due to eugenics and natural selection (besides the occasional village freak). The only reason we were born is because the elites wanted a mass slave army to keep up with the debt. In 1931 Aldous Huxley (who was a member of the elite) wrote Brave New World to describe the society the elites were creating, and he was deadly accurate. He writes of a class of "deltas, gammas, and omegas" who exist merely as human fodder in a massive governmental-corporate global technostructure.

View attachment 230679View attachment 230680View attachment 230681

By 1986 the elites realized their ideas were unworkable. They realized the population could never keep up with this exponential global debt. The entire world would look like a complete dumpster fire wasteland if they continued that any longer. From 1989 to 2008 the elites restructured the their global plans and for global civilization in such a way that could maintain the global debt structure while holding a relatively stable population. They used Quantitative Easing (a tool invented by Milton Friedman to do this). Central banks would create money and buy debt bonds from existing investment banks and money pools. This allowed the perpetual increase in debt to continue indefinitely because existing debts could always be sold to the central bank at profit with money instantly created at whim*. Bankers could create debt, sell the debt to the central bank, and use that money for more loaning projects. Inflation was controlled by channeling the money into top wealth brackets and foreign money pits like Switzerland and the Cayman Island so its out of circulation. This allows infinite money and debt creation without the need for it to be backed up with perpetual growth of GDP and population.

*"Trickle Down Economics" as it's infamously called was the first stage of this process. As the global debt begun to overtake population and real GDP growth the elites instituted trickle down economics to curb inflation. In the 1970s (and 1980s in Canada, Australia, and much of Western Europe) inflation began to become rampant. It became apparent real GDP and population growth rate could no longer grow at the rate needed to thwart inflation)



View attachment 230686View attachment 230687View attachment 230688

AND THIS is why you are USELESS. The elites no longer need you to merely exist for them to continue their global debt ponzi scheme. Now you're actually a hindrance, a waste of space, part of the lumpenproletariet. The only reason you existed before was to exist as a statistic on a census forum, or a data-point on a corporate sheet so they could justify creating 900K of debt money under the assumption you would consume that much in your lifetime. The elites now have a new strategy to deal with people they don't need anymore, and that's slowly easing them out of existence with mass consumption of soy products and inceldom. All the barriers to hyper-gamy have been removed since 2008 and technologies like social media have allowed it to reemerge more potent than ever before. Only high-IQ, beautiful, talented, and a somewhat reasonable size mass of mid to high level technocratic workers are needed in this global world order, unfortunately incels don't make the cut. We happen to exist as freaks in a transitory period between a world where our mere existence gave us value and a world where we would not exist. We are the carrier pigeons bred just before the telegraph became widespread, we are the typewriters manufactured just before the tech boom, the lost souls orphaned by a purpose of which no longer exists. Whenever you scream at your pillow and ask why you exist, why you're incel, this is why. You exist to serve a technocratic banking elite of whom no longer need you.*"Trickle Down Economics" as it's infamously called was the first stage of this process. As the global debt begun to overtake population and real GDP growth the elites instituted trickle down economics to curb inflation. In the 1970s (and 1980s in Canada, Australia, and much of Western Europe) inflation began to become rampant. It became apparent real GDP and population growth rate could no longer grow at the rate)

View attachment 230689View attachment 230693View attachment 230695
I subscribe to everything written under "THIS IS LITERALLY WHY YOU INCEL". I call it liquidation of the population through markets.
This is Blackpill Economics.
Thank you!
 
Based and Blackpilled post. It's why stocks still above January 2019 levels despite all the bad news, far lower earnings and no end to the virus. Cheap Debt, unlimited leverage, Government power used to keep equity prices high and far from their rightful valuation. All supports the ruling class and Cucks the poor man and retail investors. Rich nigger banks will buy up all the houses and real estate for cheap when the crash happens later this year. Our tax dollars will bail out rich niggers. Average person being the low IQ low Tesosterone sack of shit will let the rich man rape him. The rich literally raped and turned all the women into whores. They rape us of good jobs. And now they will rape poor men of their houses, put the shackles of debt slavery and bring about corporate neofeudalism. Really over
just read it, brutal :feelsbadman:

but couldn't it be that those banker elites are just adapting to what happens in society, rather than controlling everything?
their have been studies done. the rich families from 500 years ago are still rich according to the studies. Banking elites don't have absolute control but they have enough to manipulate the average man to be their dog. America is by far the most manipulated nation by banksters. Trillions can be made and removed by a private entity at any moment. workers rights are trash. the average American is dumber than a dog and brainwashed beyond belief. There is no escape. By the time people realize that they are fucked beyond belief. The climate will be done for, all the wealth hoarded, robots will have replaced the police. Poor people maybe genocided. Instead of having UBI, they will trade resources directly between rich people as they will have 3d printers to make whatever they want, robotic drones to enforce their will, and possibly have every child born have a computer chip that tracks their location and can kill them for being a political dissident.
 
Last edited:
Go back to being banned, you salty blkpillpres worshiper. Almost an NPC with all the copied mannerisms taken from a unique poster. Quick word of advice,Try being original in an unironic way and more posters will respect you.
those Darktriad LARPers are funny

their have been studies done. the rich families from 500 years ago are still rich according to the studies.

The richest families in Florence, Italy have had it good for a while—600 years to be precise.

That’s according to a recent study by two Italian economists, Guglielmo Barone and Sauro Mocetti, who compared Florentine taxpayers way back in 1427 to those in 2011. Comparing the family wealth to those with the same surname today, they suggest the richest families in Florence 600 years ago remain the same now.

“The top earners among the current taxpayers were found to have already been at the top of the socioeconomic ladder six centuries ago,” Barone and Mocetti note on VoxEU. The study was able to exploit a unique data set—taxpayers data in 1427 was digitized and made available online—to show long-term trends of economic mobility.

While researchers admit the flaws to tracing family wealth using surnames, they point out Italian surnames are usually highly regional and tend to pass on linearly. The families at the top of the socioeconomic ladder six centuries ago are the top earners among current taxpayers. Those at the top of the ladder had the most prestigious jobs, while families at the bottom had less esteemed occupations, with earnings below the median.

While it comes as little surprise that families pass on their wealth to their children, it’s still somewhat remarkable that these families were able to maintain their wealth through various sieges of Florence, Napoleon’s campaign in Italy, Benito Mussolini’s dictatorship, and two world wars.

The study adds further evidence on how the rich remain rich. In England, researchers have previously demonstrated how a family’s status in England can persist for more than eight centuries, or more than 28 whole generations. It’s a trait shared by elite families in China, whose high status has persisted since the Mao years.
 
those Darktriad LARPers are funny




Meritocracy has always been a sham. As a poor incel, every single thing is rigged agaisnt you. Every step you take, you face endless obstacles. Its really over for us.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top