Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over My oneitis didn't show up to my orgy

B

based_meme

I.N.C.E.L. High Command, Psychological Operations
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Posts
28,308
We've been texting back and forth for 15 years. She's the most amazing person in this world. I can't just can't stop thinking about her.

Last weekend I hosted an orgy at my bachelor pad overlooking time square. All of the beckies and stacies showed up, as expected naturally, but every time the doorbell rang my heart skipped a beat that it could be her.

I was getting my dick sucked by one of the stacies and a high tier is becky was sucking on my balls, and I was thinking about why she hasn't texted me back. Then when I was about to cum, I got a text saying from her saying she thinks I'm really sweet, but she sees me as a friend and thinks of me like a brother. I couldn't even finish on stacy and becky's face. I asked all 20 girls and the guys (3 of my closest billionaire brocels) who were there to go home because of how upset I was.

It was at that moment that I realized how fucking over it is for me, buddy boyos. How can I cope with this? I'm thinking of just opening a window and jumping from the penthouse floor all the way down.

GOD, it's just so tough being an incel these days.

759.gif


0a155634e9e0a3e044a2d33dde8cd23f.gif


old-man-crying.gif


tenor.gif
 
Last edited:
Almost got me there. Reported anyways
 
Then when I was about to cum, I got a text saying from her saying she thinks I'm really sweet, but she sees me as a friend and thinks of me like a brother. I couldn't even finish on stacy and becky's face.
Brutal, we got ya, bro.
Almost got me there. Reported anyways
:feelshaha:
 
Brootal. My condolences
 

That was my reaction too. Fakecels aren't satirized enough tbh. This caricature post is basically the end result of that slippery slope.
 
That Dean .gif, why post a gl male just to prove a point?!
 
:feelskek: Hilarious post, ngl.
 
That was my reaction too. Fakecels aren't satirized enough tbh. This caricature post is basically the end result of that slippery slope.
Oh, so this doesn't happen very often? This graycel didn't know.
 
Will the suffering ever end
 
Oh, so this doesn't happen very often? This graycel didn't know.

There are some users who try very hard to convince others they're incels and not fakecels.

This post is also poking fun at the recent wave of escort threads.
That Dean .gif, why post a gl male just to prove a point?!

Really brocel? It should be obvious. The sentence right above it juxtaposes nicely with the fact that the expression is coming from a chad.
 
Last edited:
if you made it sound slightly less exaggerated and more sincere then fakecels would comment on the thread about how they unironically agree and can relate
 
if you made it sound slightly more less exaggerated and more sincere then fakecels would comment on the thread about how they unironically agree and can relate

The thought definitely had crossed my mind, but the lowIQcels wouldn't have picked up on it and reported the shit outta me. KEK
 
The thought definitely had crossed my mind, but the lowIQcels wouldn't have picked up on it and reported the shit outta me. KEK
reminds me of that thread where the guy went on a date with a girl, talked to her for hours and did drugs with her and then she unfriended him on snapchat because "It was nice going out with you but we just didn't click" and he was like "This is one of the most insanely brutal blackpill moments I've ever experienced, this is what life as an incel is like"
 
This satirises femcels and oneitises.
 
reminds me of that thread where the guy went on a date with a girl, talked to her for hours and did drugs with her and then she unfriended him on snapchat because "It was nice going out with you but we just didn't click" and he was like "This is one of the most insanely brutal blackpill moments I've ever experienced, this is what life as an incel is like"

Yeah, that was kinda ridiculous.
This satirises femcels and oneitises.

I wasn't thinking about femcels tbh, because they're literally a meme, but yeah I can see how it would target them too.
 
character in OP's story isn't a fake cel, he's genuinely incel towards his oneitis

OK, I'm just gonna go ahead and assume you're kidding. Please don't give the fakecels an out.
 
OP mogs me brutally with 20 foids in an orgy. The most Stacies I've fucked in one night was 19. Absolute suifuel :feelsrope:
 
I'm not kidding.
The fact we acknowledge we can be "incel despite not wanting to fuck men who would fuck us" means we acknowledge that you can be incel despite refusing sexual opportunities with those who offer them due to not being attracted.

Wait, what? WTF is this faggotry?

Are you trying to say in some roundabout way that refusing homosexual propositions makes you a volcel? Because that's what "incel despite xyz" means.

The straight example would be, "boyos, 50 beckies wanted my dick, but I'm only interested in stacies. The incel life. It's over."

It's like you're reading my OP seriously and thinking to yourself, "well, of course, this man is an incel."

ConfusedSoulfulAracari-size_restricted.gif


What is this world anymore? Getting honked at by our own forum users. :feelsclown:
If it applies to monosexual standards, it also applies to not wanting to fuck landwhales, not wanting to fuck non-virgins, not wanting to fuck non-klingons, only wanting to fuck 1 girl in the world and she died 200 years ago, etc.

See, this is where you fall down the slippery slope and go off the deep end.

Your idea of what an incel is is more ridiculous than what any blue pilled normie out there thinks.

According to this retardation, you could be a married man with a handful of adult children, but still be an incel because you can't ever in this reality fuck the 2D loli in your avi, if that's all you're really attracted to.
 
I will see you in ban appeals :lul:
 
Kinda gay ngl
 
Are you trying to say in some roundabout way that refusing homosexual propositions makes you a volcel?
If you define sex/celibacy in terms of oral/anal stuff in addition to vaginal, yes. If you define sex/celibacy purely in terms of vaginal penetration, then no.

If celibacy is fasting in terms of the "food" that is penis-in-vagina sex, then obviously acts of sodomy (ass/mouth) cannot be breakfast. They are not true sex, they do not alter virginity, etc.

But I find a lot of people DO want to include those, in which case you need to acknowledge all repulsive sources you opt not to pursue (or accept) as a choice.

I suppose you could argue about whether or not it's a choice at all though, like if you can't help your instincts and following them to avoid sex w/ disgusting partners.

If it's "not volcel to avoid people who repulse me" then this wouldn't just apply to fags but also to rejecting ugly chicks who can't get you hard, and there is a lot of criticism towards those who do that.

The straight example would be, "boyos, 50 beckies wanted my dick, but I'm only interested in stacies. The incel life. It's over."
If you allow a "volceldom towards those you don't want to fuck is not volceldom at all" through the door with fags/trannies then next is negresses/HIV and next is beckies and next is stacylites.

See, this is where you fall down the slippery slope and go off the deep end.
I'm not falling down any slope, simply telling you what the logical end point of inconsistent semantics is.

Your idea of what an incel is is more ridiculous than what any blue pilled normie out there thinks.
I have no fixed idea of what an incel is.
Voluntariness is a continuum, vol/invol is a false dichotomy, discrete labels which are merely directions on a spectrum in reality, not actually 2 distinct groups we fall into.

According to this retardation, you could be a married man with a handful of adult children, but still be an incel because you can't ever in this reality fuck the 2D loli in your avi, if that's all you're really attracted to.
There's two points of distinction here, really.

Firstly how to define a "celibate" (prior to any vol/invol terms) if that is to mean lack of sex (escortcels would disagree) or lack of romantic relationship (cucked blueballs husbands would disagree) or a lack of the two together (probably the thing man of us want).

The second, once we determine if someone falls into the celibate category, is that weird "let's define it according to the amount of choice/control someone has over it" thing that's caused a schisms in the loveshy communities the past decade or so.

There is "celibacy in general" (do you have any relationships at all) and "celibacy in respect to" (do you have any relationships with X)

If we want an absolute "in regard to all" definition, then defining "voluntary" in respect to ALL requires acknowledging the voluntary rejection of unappealing things in all forms.
 
If you define sex/celibacy in terms of oral/anal stuff in addition to vaginal, yes. If you define sex/celibacy purely in terms of vaginal penetration, then no.

If celibacy is fasting in terms of the "food" that is penis-in-vagina sex, then obviously acts of sodomy (ass/mouth) cannot be breakfast. They are not true sex, they do not alter virginity, etc.

But I find a lot of people DO want to include those, in which case you need to acknowledge all repulsive sources you opt not to pursue (or accept) as a choice.

I suppose you could argue about whether or not it's a choice at all though, like if you can't help your instincts and following them to avoid sex w/ disgusting partners.

If it's "not volcel to avoid people who repulse me" then this wouldn't just apply to fags but also to rejecting ugly chicks who can't get you hard, and there is a lot of criticism towards those who do that.


If you allow a "volceldom towards those you don't want to fuck is not volceldom at all" through the door with fags/trannies then next is negresses/HIV and next is beckies and next is stacylites.


I'm not falling down any slope, simply telling you what the logical end point of inconsistent semantics is.


I have no fixed idea of what an incel is.
Voluntariness is a continuum, vol/invol is a false dichotomy, discrete labels which are merely directions on a spectrum in reality, not actually 2 distinct groups we fall into.


There's two points of distinction here, really.

Firstly how to define a "celibate" (prior to any vol/invol terms) if that is to mean lack of sex (escortcels would disagree) or lack of romantic relationship (cucked blueballs husbands would disagree) or a lack of the two together (probably the thing man of us want).

The second, once we determine if someone falls into the celibate category, is that weird "let's define it according to the amount of choice/control someone has over it" thing that's caused a schisms in the loveshy communities the past decade or so.

There is "celibacy in general" (do you have any relationships at all) and "celibacy in respect to" (do you have any relationships with X)

If we want an absolute "in regard to all" definition, then defining "voluntary" in respect to ALL requires acknowledging the voluntary rejection of unappealing things in all forms.
15F9E5A5 3C84 4E9B BDB3 D10C49CE2A0C
 
Oneitis is pure. Pure girls do not have orgies. Does not compute.
 
Was about to report this until I realized it was just satire
 
If you define sex/celibacy in terms of oral/anal stuff in addition to vaginal, yes. If you define sex/celibacy purely in terms of vaginal penetration, then no.

If celibacy is fasting in terms of the "food" that is penis-in-vagina sex, then obviously acts of sodomy (ass/mouth) cannot be breakfast. They are not true sex, they do not alter virginity, etc.

But I find a lot of people DO want to include those, in which case you need to acknowledge all repulsive sources you opt not to pursue (or accept) as a choice.

I suppose you could argue about whether or not it's a choice at all though, like if you can't help your instincts and following them to avoid sex w/ disgusting partners.

If it's "not volcel to avoid people who repulse me" then this wouldn't just apply to fags but also to rejecting ugly chicks who can't get you hard, and there is a lot of criticism towards those who do that.

What the absolute fuck is this? No dude, inceldom isn't defined by where a dick goes, or by sexual orientation. (WTF?! KEK) It's a binary state that's determined by you being selected out of mating due to your shit tier genetics. There is no "incel continuum." You are not more, less or equally incel as another. JFL! You're NOT incel because you say to yourself, "well, I don't consider oral and anal to have anything to do with celibacy, so..." That is some SJW tier faggot gymnastics.

It's the same kind of bullshit that trannies pull off when they try to convince others that sexual orientation is on a spectrum and somehow flip the script to include fucking trannies in the ass or getting a blowjob by them "TOTALLY STRAIGHT BRO!" Some poor sods even fall for it and believe the garbage.

Volcel is when you ARE selected, but you reject them. It's that simple. If a 1/10 landwhale shows sexual interest in you and you reject her, you're a volcel. I wouldn't blame you for rejecting her, but you're still volcel, because she might be rejecting your other bros.

If you allow a "volceldom towards those you don't want to fuck is not volceldom at all" through the door with fags/trannies then next is negresses/HIV and next is beckies and next is stacylites.
Yes, this is the slippery slope, and this is what you initially did by claiming by that rejecting gay sex means you're volcel. GTFO with that faggotry.

I'm not falling down any slope, simply telling you what the logical end point of inconsistent semantics is.

You're purposefully muddying the waters and including variables that no one here in their right mind would factor into what incel means.

I have no fixed idea of what an incel is.
Voluntariness is a continuum, vol/invol is a false dichotomy, discrete labels which are merely directions on a spectrum in reality, not actually 2 distinct groups we fall into.

There you go again. There is no motherfucking spectrum. If a woman is attracted to you but not to me and you reject her, you're the volcel and I'm the incel. That's it, really.

There's two points of distinction here, really.

Firstly how to define a "celibate" (prior to any vol/invol terms) if that is to mean lack of sex (escortcels would disagree) or lack of romantic relationship (cucked blueballs husbands would disagree) or a lack of the two together (probably the thing man of us want).

The second, once we determine if someone falls into the celibate category, is that weird "let's define it according to the amount of choice/control someone has over it" thing that's caused a schisms in the loveshy communities the past decade or so.

There is "celibacy in general" (do you have any relationships at all) and "celibacy in respect to" (do you have any relationships with X)

If we want an absolute "in regard to all" definition, then defining "voluntary" in respect to ALL requires acknowledging the voluntary rejection of unappealing things in all forms.

This is all nonsense. You're partitioning things in a way that suits your "inceldom is a continuum" narrative. You can't be incel towards women, but volcel towards men. That makes absolutely no fucking sense. Like I said, that's the same kind of bullshit that trannies use to try and "convert" desperate and lonely straight men towards their degeneracy.
 
Last edited:
OP mogs me brutally with 20 foids in an orgy. The most Stacies I've fucked in one night was 19. Absolute suifuel :feelsrope:

Dude you can't make those kinds of jokes lol, something like that is actually plausible in your case, I wouldn't even assume you were joking
 
Brutal

Im thinking about visiting Gandy too after not having sex for a week now and my virginity restoring
 
Dude you can't make those kinds of jokes lol, something like that is actually plausible in your case, I wouldn't even assume you were joking
How is that even remotely possible lol, I've never even had a threesome and there are users who have
 
How is that even remotely possible lol, I've never even had a threesome

You probably could afford one though, if you haven't had one, its because you don't want to do it

TBH I don't see the point of it, I can only really fuck one hole with my single dick, it just seems more like an ego trip kind of thing to have multiple women there, plus I like playing around with one chick and see what does what to her body, how she responds to certain things, me in a threesome just leaves me busting a nut in like 20 mins, having barely fucked either of the two of them or even made them work for their money

So I paid double the price, for half the experience, and the whores got paid their usual full pay for doing half of their work

Threesomes only really benefit the seller tbh, the buyer is always at a loss

I guess it would be a good experiences to try once, but its not something I would do more than twice

and there are users who have

JFL, is there some escortcel discord I don't know about, I've never heard of such users
 
You probably could afford one though, if you haven't had one, its because you don't want to do it

TBH I don't see the point of it, I can only really fuck one hole with my single dick, it just seems more like an ego trip kind of thing to have multiple women there, plus I like playing around with one chick and see what does what to her body, how she responds to certain things, me in a threesome just leaves me busting a nut in like 20 mins, having barely fucked either of the two of them or even made them work for their money

So I paid double the price, for half the experience, and the whores got paid their usual full pay for doing half of their work

Threesomes only really benefit the seller tbh, the buyer is always at a loss

I guess it would be a good experiences to try once, but its not something I would do more than twice



JFL, is there some escortcel discord I don't know about, I've never heard of such users

Well, part of me wants to know what it's like to have two Stacies lick my penis at the same time

But I've heard that threesomes with whores are logistically difficult since I have to switch condoms constantly, so that's why I haven't tried it yet. That and they cost twice as much.
 
Brutal. It's over.
 
Well, part of me wants to know what it's like to have two Stacies lick my penis at the same time

But I've heard that threesomes with whores are logistically difficult since I have to switch condoms constantly, so that's why I haven't tried it yet. That and they cost twice as much.

Maybe that's only for high end whores, pretty sure you can negotiate something with less rules with some SEA or EE bitches, of course there's more risk though
 

Similar threads

balkanceI
Replies
28
Views
522
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
babygengar
Replies
35
Views
178
babygengar
babygengar
samsamwin
Replies
4
Views
140
Efiliste
Efiliste
FrothySolutions
Replies
9
Views
165
curryboy420
curryboy420
NatsumeSouseki
Replies
7
Views
220
NatsumeSouseki
NatsumeSouseki

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top