LifeFuel Pinkpill feminism got banned on reddit, Female dating strategy is next

[Gymcelled]

Should be just "gtfo" when addressing a foid here tbh Plenty of pictures of tits online to satiate that desire already. One foid's tits aren't that special. And by asking them for a picture you are still flattering them in a way. They need to be treated how an unwanted male cuck would be: told to gtfo here.

I used tits or gtfo as an example of foids trying to get their privilege, not as an example to follow

 

[To koniec]

Equality

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

something that will ruin this site for guys that have had enough negative experiences with women and don't want exposure to them in any capcity.

How is there any capacity of exposure if you don't actually visit the 'debate foids' subforum though?
At moments we feel like we can't take it, you just don't participate.

As if women will argue in good faith. As if they can make good arguments. As if they'll be willing to spend their time arguing with subhumans
Plus they'd become the center of attention

I don't actually require someone to debate with me in good faith to enjoy a debate.
I ultimately never know 100% where someone's faith lies, it's always speculation.
If they can't make good arguments then TBH it will just be boring for me and I'll pop my head in and point out there stupidity in 5 seconds and move on to a more interesting thread.

Easy arguments could be good training material for newcels though, who weirdly seem to be joining this place in HS which makes me wonder if they've even built up any debate skills or time-tested confidence in their own viewpoints which you gain by actually defending them.

Most oldcels have years under their belt of arguing in other forums to build up their skills and I'm worried we might be coddling Gen Z so that if they ever do need to debate a foid they'd just collapse.

He claims it's inevitable since there are women larping as guys here already. My point is: who gives a fuck if they can't cash in on that privilege since if they reveal they are women they'll get banned?

If it's actually possible for them to cash in on the privilege here then we need to examine our internal problems because we should be blackpilled enough that this doesn't happen.

That's actually a good "stress test" for how blackpilled the community is: if women are actually able to enjoy female privilege here because we immediately simp to them, then we have not internalized our blackpill revelations to a significant enough degree.

I fully expect that any who do so (and I probably will be among them) should be mocked by the rest of the community for their weakness, and we should accept that criticism in good nature.

he admitted in a previous post that the no foids allowed rule here cuts down on foid participation

I think you misread the context of that comment: when I said "you can make it less convenient" I was talking about requiring cam verification that a member is male, as specified in the following sentence that you did not quote.

 

[waste matter]

One scumbag down many more to be taken down

 

[Deleted member 27204]

How is there any capacity of exposure if you don't actually visit the 'debate foids' subforum though?
At moments we feel like we can't take it, you just don't participate.

The fact that you could now know that foids could participate on this forum is enough to reduce interest in it for a lot long time members here. Look at how @FullTimeLoser and others reacted negatively (and justifiably so) when Naama Kates post on incels was pinned in Inceldom Discussion

I don't actually require someone to debate with me in good faith to enjoy a debate.
I ultimately never know 100% where someone's faith lies, it's always speculation.
If they can't make good arguments then TBH it will just be boring for me and I'll pop my head in and point out there stupidity in 5 seconds and move on to a more interesting thread.

Easy arguments could be good training material for newcels though, who weirdly seem to be joining this place in HS which makes me wonder if they've even built up any debate skills or time-tested confidence in their own viewpoints which you gain by actually defending them.

Most oldcels have years under their belt of arguing in other forums to build up their skills and I'm worried we might be coddling Gen Z so that if they ever do need to debate a foid they'd just collapse.

There is no need to debate foids in the first place.

If it's actually possible for them to cash in on the privilege here then we need to examine our internal problems because we should be blackpilled enough that this doesn't happen.

That's actually a good "stress test" for how blackpilled the community is: if women are actually able to enjoy female privilege here because we immediately simp to them, then we have not internalized our blackpill revelations to a significant enough degree.

I fully expect that any who do so (and I probably will be among them) should be mocked by the rest of the community for their weakness, and we should accept that criticism in good nature.

Bullshit. This is a utopian ideal that never worked no matter hwo it was attempted in previous manosphere spaces. It will always lead to more infighting because its a biological tendency for men to simp for women and hold women in higher regard overall.

 

[Deleted member 27249]

The fact that you could now know that foids could participate on this forum is enough to reduce interest in it for a lot long time members here. Look at how @FullTimeLoser and others reacted negatively (and justifiably so) when Naama Kates post on incels was pinned in Inceldom Discussion

There is no need to debate foids in the first place.

Bullshit. This is a utopian ideal that never worked no matter hwo it was attempted in previous manosphere spaces. It will always lead to more infighting because its a biological tendency for men to simp for women and hold women in higher regard overall.

How is there any capacity of exposure if you don't actually visit the 'debate foids' subforum though?
At moments we feel like we can't take it, you just don't participate.

I don't actually require someone to debate with me in good faith to enjoy a debate.
I ultimately never know 100% where someone's faith lies, it's always speculation.
If they can't make good arguments then TBH it will just be boring for me and I'll pop my head in and point out there stupidity in 5 seconds and move on to a more interesting thread.

Easy arguments could be good training material for newcels though, who weirdly seem to be joining this place in HS which makes me wonder if they've even built up any debate skills or time-tested confidence in their own viewpoints which you gain by actually defending them.

Most oldcels have years under their belt of arguing in other forums to build up their skills and I'm worried we might be coddling Gen Z so that if they ever do need to debate a foid they'd just collapse.

If it's actually possible for them to cash in on the privilege here then we need to examine our internal problems because we should be blackpilled enough that this doesn't happen.

That's actually a good "stress test" for how blackpilled the community is: if women are actually able to enjoy female privilege here because we immediately simp to them, then we have not internalized our blackpill revelations to a significant enough degree.

I fully expect that any who do so (and I probably will be among them) should be mocked by the rest of the community for their weakness, and we should accept that criticism in good nature.


I think you misread the context of that comment: when I said "you can make it less convenient" I was talking about requiring cam verification that a member is male, as specified in the following sentence that you did not quote.

I don't have the mental capacity to read all of this, but is this soyboy faggot actually suggesting we allow women to post here?

Literally EVERYONE will simp. Any post made by a woman will get a 1000 replies while posts by regular incels will get drowned. They will get the attention, use this site to gaslight, draw in more fakecels to post here, fakecels and women hook up, and this site literally stops being an incel site all together. and I would never post here if a woman did. pretty sure most incels wouldn't.

Wizard is the same faggot who is known for being a soyboy and bluepiller simp for women. I wouldn't take him seriously.

 

[Deleted member 27204]

I don't have the mental capacity to read all of this, but is this soyboy faggot actually suggesting we allow women to post here?

Yeah

Literally EVERYONE will simp. Any post made by a woman will get a 1000 replies while posts by regular incels will get drowned. They will get the attention, use this site to gaslight, draw in more fakecels to post here, fakecels and women hook up, and this site literally stops being an incel site all together. and I would never post here if a woman did. pretty sure most incels wouldn't.

Fr it always ends up that way every time it's attempted.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

The fact that you could now know that foids could participate on this forum is enough to reduce interest in it for a lot long time members here.

The fact that escortcels can brag about their accomplishments probably reduces interest for some members too, what's your point?

Sometimes you need to balance out the interests of some members against others.

That said: if we did allow foids to become "members" we should come up with a special designation for male members ("citizens" or "supermembers" maybe?) just to make it clear that they are not considered equals and are 2nd-class. Maybe a "submembers" heading for them? That should obviously apply to any non-foids who use such debate platforms to brag about their romantic or sexual histories too.

Encountering that is upsetting so obviously such suifuel should be avoided when we are vulnerable (retreat to safe space: all other forums) but in times we feel strong I think it's a good idea to test our mettle against our triggers.

Look at how @FullTimeLoser and others reacted negatively (and justifiably so) when Naama Kates post on incels was pinned in Inceldom Discussion

I'm not proposing we allow them into Inceldom Discussion.
We should probably rename it "inceldom discussion by incels" to clarify that non-incels are not welcome (and would not be able) to offer input there.

Bullshit. This is a utopian ideal that never worked no matter hwo it was attempted in previous manosphere spaces.
It will always lead to more infighting because its a biological tendency for men to simp for women and hold women in higher regard overall.

Biological tendency is not a guarantee of behavior.
It's something we believe we can overcome to SOME degree or else we wouldn't try spreading blackpill ideas at all.
If we're worried about continuous exposure to that being disruptive, we could perhaps not make it a fulltime thing.

Like for example you might have "Foid Friday" so foids are only able to post in the debate forums on Fridays, and then the other 6 days they are not able to participate.
Or maybe even "Foid February" where foids are only able to post topics/replies in a containment forum for them on the shortest month of the year, and then we have the other 11 months to detox.

 

[Deleted member 27249]

Yeah

Fr it always ends up that way every time it's attempted.

Don't waste time debating this. Anyone who thinks this issue is even up for discussion is too bluepilled to be reasoned with

 

[Deleted member 27204]

Don't waste time debating this. Anyone who thinks this issue is even up for discussion is too bluepilled to be reasoned with

 

[RollD20]

I dont even use leddit anymore