[Discussion] Racist Swedish government trying to stop men from marrying Thai women (Feminism's use of demographics to cuck nations)

BummerDrummer

BummerDrummer

Bummer Drummer#8658 Check out my YT •́ε•̀٥
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Posts
14,138
Online
135d 4h 37m
Did I say anything about Colonialism, I spoke about mercantilism the thing that made colonialism beneficial for Britain, and Britain never allowed even minimal industrialisation in India to keep that economic model sustainable and even before leaving faggots left behind dimwit Oxford socialist retards to govern the country. But seriously dude are you this naive anyone can buy a goddamn iPhone or a car in any shithole on this planet, that doesn't require Britain, moreover what was the last thing among these amenities invented in Britain?
Anyone can buy a phone because of colonialism. Colonialism was the main drive of globalism. If Britain had stayed in Europe only nobody would be able to get shit and everyone except for Europe would be stuck in the Stone Age.
 
Made in Heaven

Made in Heaven

Lolipill is the Ultimate Truth
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Posts
3,070
Online
32d 18h 0m
Noodlewhores destroying the white race:feelsautistic:
 
ReconElement

ReconElement

GOC-in-C, V Corps, Death is for me
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 2, 2020
Posts
450
Online
13d 20h 38m
Anyone can buy a phone because of colonialism. Colonialism was the main drive of globalism. If Britain had stayed in Europe only nobody would be able to get shit and everyone except for Europe would be stuck in the Stone Age.
For India I don't know whether it should be called colonisation or not, though for the rest of the dominions it was strictly colonisation, it was in that empire nonetheless, tho modern India's plight is because of elite dimwit socialists who are surprisingly Oxford alumni but this is somewhat justified as manufacturing leads to surplus wealth and surplus wealth leads to good quality of life which ultimately leads to female emancipation and hypergamy and in post industrial western service based shitholes it massively incentivises Chad's and Stacies to rise up in the social ladder at the expense of Incels and low tier cucks
 
Diocel

Diocel

A soup for one please
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Posts
32,151
Online
127d 6h 36m
Funny this race war thread was started by a jew.
 
sadcel69

sadcel69

KHHV recessed chin incel
Joined
Sep 4, 2020
Posts
522
Online
5d 21h 51m
And what of the Thai men? :lul::lul::lul:
 
Uggo Mongo

Uggo Mongo

FastBananaCEO is phone chad
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 17, 2018
Posts
5,908
Online
122d 20h 58m
jfl if you think indians count as a diversity quota when they earn the highest, and spaceX does have indians just indian americans

jfl if you believe europeans raping and pillaging curryland was better :lul:
Seventy-two percent of NASA employees are White or Caucasian, 12 percent are Black or African American, 7 percent are Asian American or Pacific Islander, 8 percent or Hispanic or Latino; 1 percent are American Indian or Alaska Native, and less than 1 percent are more than one race.Jun 3, 2020

Workforce Data | NASA


So 36% of NASA being Indians is a lie.

I'm going to go ahead and say Indians earning the most at NASA is a lie.
 
IncelCream

IncelCream

Legend
★★
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Posts
3,644
Online
17d 16h 55m
1.PNG



one of the comments on the video

Can't escape JBW
@Diocel
@BummerDrummer
@curryZoomercoomer
 
TallCelFag

TallCelFag

kikes and femoids
Joined
Jan 22, 2020
Posts
2,540
Online
43d 7h 53m
The Swedish government are allies for us ricecels.
tbh I don’t particularly disagree with this decision. problem is they’ve outlawed prostitution and Swedish women are unwilling to have sex with sub-6.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
Typical "merican" over reaction. Your retarded anti-sjw ideology isn't going to get any traction over-here in Civilized Europe. I seriously doubt the Swedish government is doing much but over-course Kikes and Americans love thee Sweden bashing.
cope.gif

:feelskek:
Truest of the true kikecels
Bro you aren't even white.
Never said I am. I post about other religions, cultures, and countries all the time because inceldom is an international problem.

India before Europeans was a shithole. No industrialization or technology, split among warring princely states. Europeans brought technology and peace. India as a subcontinent being united only came from the British.
Obviously compared to Anglostan is was a shit hole, that was the state of most of the world. But English didn't bring peace to India at all, and India was probably better off under the Islamic rulers there before. Ancient Indian kingdoms only had the warriors kill each other, not innocent citizens because of how the caste system worked there. The farme

Based. Arent you supposed to be a jew?
I try to call out bullshit whoever it may come from.

LOL, the only asset nordic countries have are their fucking god tier genes. Without that, they are the most boring countries on Earth.
True, they are some of the least innovative countries in Europe. The ugly subhuman looking Anglos are literally the whole reason white people are relevent, and they are an ugly group of people in general

Over for Asians.
For instance in Taiwan, if a riceman finally ascended with a SEA foid (Vietnam, Thailand) Taiwan foids will mock saying, "She's marrying you for the money, PR, etc and eventually cheat on you,...." and if he really ascended with a mayo foid (mostly from Ukraine) noodles will mock too, saying that Asians have small peepee.:dafuckfeels:
The hardest part of being a high IQ people is the foids are also smarter at how to attack males.

Funny this race war thread was started by a jew.
I didn't mean for this to happen, I wanted to show people that women only want diversity when it comes to males so they have more dick. They don't want to have to compete against other groups of women themselves.
 
commander_zoidberg

commander_zoidberg

Major
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
2,487
Online
9d 19h 15m
Anyone can buy a phone because of colonialism. Colonialism was the main drive of globalism. If Britain had stayed in Europe only nobody would be able to get shit and everyone except for Europe would be stuck in the Stone Age.
There is no point arguing with the low IQ ethnics on here mate.

If culture is window dressing then white culture is literally the house in which all other window dressings reside. Half the ethnics who hate on white people would never have existed but for the advances in agricultural productivity or control of infectious disease western civilisation brought. The population just of India and China is greater than the population of the entire world when the great war broke out. China would starve if not for the system of global trade which is a legacy of the Anglo-American empire. Most ethnics live a lot better now than they did before colonialism, how many countries exist today because European diplomats say so?

The norm for Africa for example was savage tribal warfare which often resulted in the genocide of the losing tribe. Many of the slaves shipped to America sold to slavers by blacks were likely conquered in tribal warfare and the only reason they survived at all was the white man would pay for them.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
There is no point arguing with the low IQ ethnics on here mate.

If culture is window dressing then white culture is literally the house in which all other window dressings reside. Half the ethnics who hate on white people would never have existed but for the advances in agricultural productivity or control of infectious disease western civilisation brought. The population just of India and China is greater than the population of the entire world when the great war broke out. China would starve if not for the system of global trade which is a legacy of the Anglo-American empire. Most ethnics live a lot better now than they did before colonialism, how many countries exist today because European diplomats say so?

The norm for Africa for example was savage tribal warfare which often resulted in the genocide of the losing tribe. Many of the slaves shipped to America sold to slavers by blacks were likely conquered in tribal warfare and the only reason they survived at all was the white man would pay for them.
Tbh, China already had primitive forms of factories and such, so even though it might have taken many centuries longer I think they would have eventually reached industrialization on their own, and places like Curry and sandland would have had to worry about Chinese imperialism (if they went down that path).

Even among different European groups, I noticed a strong hate for Anglos in general. I guess hating people who made the most innovations in the last few centuries helps them cope.

1602896270720.png


Don't be fooled by ethnic copers, there's coping going on everywhere.
 
fadedyearly212

fadedyearly212

5’5
★★
Joined
Jun 30, 2020
Posts
193
Online
3d 7h 37m
But they say refugees welcome
:lul: :lul:
they are going to learn their lesson soon
 
LastGerman

LastGerman

Ubermenschcel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Posts
15,390
Online
165d 20h 37m
Funny this race war thread was started by a jew.
Man... I wonder who is all behind of the racial fight in general? Who would benefit from such a skrimish here?

 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
Man... I wonder who is all behind of the racial fight in general? Who would benefit from such a skrimish here?

Cope, tribes have been war mongering before Abraham even existed.
Also, I already said I didn't even expect a race war to happen in here, I thought the discussions would have actually gone to talk about how demographics in terms of gender ratios can destroy males.
 
LastGerman

LastGerman

Ubermenschcel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Posts
15,390
Online
165d 20h 37m
Cope, tribes have been war mongering before Abraham even existed.
Also, I already said I didn't even expect a race war to happen in here, I thought the discussions would have actually gone to talk about how demographics in terms of gender ratios can destroy males.
A race war would never happen here, not on incels.co. Oy vey...
 
F

Forum_User_2345

Major
★★
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Posts
2,194
Online
39d 12h 34m
India is a failing nation like Russia or France that is not taking the industrypill seriously. What if foreigners cut you off from imports? What will the army do?
 
starcrapoo

starcrapoo

Ricecel currently living in hell (SF bay area)
★★
Joined
Mar 8, 2020
Posts
638
Online
23d 16m
Looks look I triggered a bunch of stormfrontcels here rofl. Theyre here again coping with " but muh iNnOvAtIOnS" ROFL

Which race of males is the cause of mass inceldom around the world? (Anglo males + Jewish males). Which race is males are aggressively taking females from other races of males and yet protecting their own (Anglo males + Jewish males)

And they have the gall to ask what am I doing here rofl. These white stormfrontcels need to gtfo here tbh and back to their huwhite nationalist forums jfl
 
Last edited:
your personality

your personality

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
11,865
Online
44d 2h 32m
Never said I am. I post about other religions, cultures, and countries all the time because inceldom is an international problem.
bullshit you clearly took a side with stormfrontcels. You didn't just "post about other religions, culture, and countries:

:feelsclown:
Swedish men taking muh women..........after we moved to Sweden."

@RREEEEEEEEE

Tbh, China already had primitive forms of factories and such, so even though it might have taken many centuries longer I think they would have eventually reached industrialization on their own, and places like Curry and sandland would have had to worry about Chinese imperialism (if they went down that path).

Even among different European groups, I noticed a strong hate for Anglos in general. I guess hating people who made the most innovations in the last few centuries helps them cope.

View attachment 356392

Don't be fooled by ethnic copers, there's coping going on everywhere.
muh progress. Dude anglos are hated because they went and subjugated people in their own lands. Remember the Opium Wars in China? Remember how they threatened Japan to open up to international trade in the 1800s? Remember how they treated Indians as indentured servants in India and tried to enforce their customs on them like banning sati? The Amritsar massacre?
Fuck out of here.
 
Diocel

Diocel

A soup for one please
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 5, 2019
Posts
32,151
Online
127d 6h 36m
I didn't mean for this to happen, I wanted to show people that women only want diversity when it comes to males so they have more dick. They don't want to have to compete against other groups of women themselves.
Yeah sure schlomo.
 
ReconElement

ReconElement

GOC-in-C, V Corps, Death is for me
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 2, 2020
Posts
450
Online
13d 20h 38m
Anyone can buy a phone because of colonialism. Colonialism was the main drive of globalism. If Britain had stayed in Europe only nobody would be able to get shit and everyone except for Europe would be stuck in the Stone Age.
The trauma during industrialisation led to the utopian ideas of socialism and communism from which the former fucked my country more than anything and directly affects my life now put these ideas and all other elite dumbasses that got out of your western left leaning universities where the sun doesn't shine and GTFO, btw you're a soldier boy at best with you're rheoteric this is the job for you go beat some Pakis(if you make it alive) they're fucking your muh kweenz and half a million of them with your Colonism and Rectumism:feelsohh:, fucking coward always shows up here to ruin the rest of my coping day
Tree
 
Last edited:
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
bullshit you clearly took a side with stormfrontcels. You didn't just "post about other religions, culture, and countries:

:feelsclown:
Swedish men taking muh women..........after we moved to Sweden."

@RREEEEEEEEE


muh progress. Dude anglos are hated because they went and subjugated people in their own lands. Remember the Opium Wars in China? Remember how they threatened Japan to open up to international trade in the 1800s? Remember how they treated Indians as indentured servants in India and tried to enforce their customs on them like banning sati? The Amritsar massacre?
Fuck out of here.
You can't complain that people want to mix with the natives if they move there. That's just how it works.

Anglos are hated because they were successful at what every other civilization in the world wish they could have done. Every country that invades another throughout history hasn't treated their populations kindly, except maybe the ancient persians at one time. The British were the ultimate conquerors and rulers of history, they surpassed the Mongols, Aexander the Great, Napoleon, Pharaohs, and every other group of people that ever lived. Now the entire world uses their language, uses English Law in most places, holds Liberalism made by English philosophers like John Locke as the basis of individual freedoms, and so much more.

People forget that the English are the ones that made the agricultural and industrial revolutions. If it didn't exist, Europe would still pretty much be a shit hole, and the so called scientific advancements would have died out because they've happened in many places before but dont explode like the did because of Britain. Britain is also responsible for banning slavery worldwide, and forcing other countries to stop the practice as well.

Also, wanting the people you rule to adopt your cultures and customs happens all the time everywhere. Diversity was an exception throughout history, not the rule.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
Yeah sure schlomo.
Anyone else blatantly starting race wars........no comment.

A Jew starts a conversation about sex ratios, and people focus on the races of the people and yell........JEEWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSS
 
your personality

your personality

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
11,865
Online
44d 2h 32m
You can't complain that people want to mix with the natives if they move there. That's just how it works.
Yeah you can especially when they forbid the opposite. I can complain. That's just how it works.

Edit: where did I even complain about the natives being mixed with so much as I complained about the indentured servitude in my original post? Stop lying.

"muh progress. Dude anglos are hated because they went and subjugated people in their own lands. Remember the Opium Wars in China? Remember how they threatened Japan to open up to international trade in the 1800s? Remember how they treated Indians as indentured servants in India and tried to enforce their customs on them like banning sati? The Amritsar massacre?
Fuck out of here."
Anglos are hated because they were successful at what every other civilization in the world wish they could have done. Every country that invades another throughout history hasn't treated their populations kindly, except maybe the ancient persians at one time. The British were the ultimate conquerors and rulers of history, they surpassed the Mongols, Aexander the Great, Napoleon, Pharaohs, and every other group of people that ever lived. Now the entire world uses their language, uses English Law in most places, holds Liberalism made by English philosophers like John Locke as the basis of individual freedoms, and so much more.

People forget that the English are the ones that made the agricultural and industrial revolutions. If it didn't exist, Europe would still pretty much be a shit hole, and the so called scientific advancements would have died out because they've happened in many places before but dont explode like the did because of Britain. Britain is also responsible for banning slavery worldwide, and forcing other countries to stop the practice as well.
No a significant reason they are hated is because they went and subjugated people in the other lands. Of course countries and the people in these countries that approved of it would hate them.

The rest of your screed is anglophile trash. This isn't about muh progress or muh technology and that's irrelevant.
As people on this forum have said before they would rather live in a technologically primitive society and have a traditional way of life if it meant they could have a family instead of having to live in a technologically advanced society where they get cucked and forced to wageslave for sexhavers.

Also, wanting the people you rule to adopt your cultures and customs happens all the time everywhere. Diversity was an exception throughout history, not the rule.
That doesn't make it right and that the British forced other countries to adopt their cultures and customs is a large reason why they are hated.
Not jealousy.
That's the same kind of reasoning from people mocking incels hating normies saying that incels are just jealous of normies.
Ignoring that incels largely hate normies because they have been treated bad by normies.
 
Last edited:
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
Yeah you can especially when they forbid the opposite. I can complain. That's just how it works.

Edit: where did I even complain about the natives being mixed with so much as I complained about the indentured servitude in my original post? Stop lying.

"muh progress. Dude anglos are hated because they went and subjugated people in their own lands. Remember the Opium Wars in China? Remember how they threatened Japan to open up to international trade in the 1800s? Remember how they treated Indians as indentured servants in India and tried to enforce their customs on them like banning sati? The Amritsar massacre?
Fuck out of here."

No a significant reason they are hated is because they went and subjugated people in the other lands. Of course countries and the people in these countries that approved of it would hate them.

The rest of your screed is anglophile trash. This isn't about muh progress or muh technology and that's irrelevant.
As people on this forum have said before they would rather live in a technologically primitive society and have a traditional way of life if it meant they could have a family instead of having to live in a technologically advanced society where they get cucked and forced to wageslave for sexhavers.


That doesn't make it right and that the British forced other countries to adopt their cultures and customs is a large reason why they are hated.
Not jealousy.
That's the same kind of reasoning from people mocking incels hating normies saying that incels are just jealous of normies.
Ignoring that incels largely hate normies because they have been treated bad by normies.
You said I sided with stormfrontcels. I was thinking you were referring to people gettng mad ethnic women want to be with the majority population of the area.

And almost all cultures essentially force their values on the ones they rule. Look at what happened to countries that were dominated by Islam, they are all now Islamic countries themselves and lost their traditional customs and traditions and even languages in many places. Same thing with Christianity, all the pagans in Europe were forced to adopt the customs of their rulers.What about Chandragupta Maurya in India, he banned the Vedic animal sacrifices that were essential inthe vedic religion and tried to push vegetarianism onto the people.

At the end of the day, most civilizations have done the same to others throughout history, the only reason everyone is so mad at Anglos is because they were so much more successful at conquering than anyone else. You make it seem like somehow Anglos were unique in what they did.
 
ReconElement

ReconElement

GOC-in-C, V Corps, Death is for me
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 2, 2020
Posts
450
Online
13d 20h 38m
You said I sided with stormfrontcels. I was thinking you were referring to people gettng mad ethnic women want to be with the majority population of the area.

And almost all cultures essentially force their values on the ones they rule. Look at what happened to countries that were dominated by Islam, they are all now Islamic countries themselves and lost their traditional customs and traditions and even languages in many places. Same thing with Christianity, all the pagans in Europe were forced to adopt the customs of their rulers.What about Chandragupta Maurya in India, he banned the Vedic animal sacrifices that were essential inthe vedic religion and tried to push vegetarianism onto the people.

At the end of the day, most civilizations have done the same to others throughout history, the only reason everyone is so mad at Anglos is because they were so much more successful at conquering than anyone else. You make it seem like somehow Anglos were unique in what they did.
But I am tired of stormfrontcels rubbing it all over the face, yea, it was there, be happy and let us cope faggots, btw what it really matters to them, they'll die alone anyway. The jains and buddhists were cucks and made the first socialist shitholes on earth which crumbled the Mauryan Empire by the time the grandson of Chandragupta, Ashoka died. They even occupied Afghanistan and parts of Sindh during the Arab Invasion and got defeated miserably though the Arabs never made it deeper than that
 
Last edited:
your personality

your personality

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
11,865
Online
44d 2h 32m
You said I sided with stormfrontcels. I was thinking you were referring to people gettng mad ethnic women want to be with the majority population of the area.
Yeah I said that because you claimed
"Never said I am. I post about other religions, cultures, and countries all the time because inceldom is an international problem."

You blatantly sided with stormfrontcels with saying
:feelsclown:
Swedish men taking muh women..........after we moved to Sweden.
That isn't posting about other religions, cultures and countries but trying to inflame racial tensions.


And almost all cultures essentially force their values on the ones they rule. Look at what happened to countries that were dominated by Islam, they are all now Islamic countries themselves and lost their traditional customs and traditions and even languages in many places. Same thing with Christianity, all the pagans in Europe were forced to adopt the customs of their rulers.What about Chandragupta Maurya in India, he banned the Vedic animal sacrifices that were essential inthe vedic religion and tried to push vegetarianism onto the people.
And that wasn't right either. Inceldom is inevitable too. People have argued in the same way that because inceldom is inevitable incels should STFU and stop complaining. Do you not see the irony in what you are saying?

At the end of the day, most civilizations have done the same to others throughout history, the only reason everyone is so mad at Anglos is because they were so much more successful at conquering than anyone else. You make it seem like somehow Anglos were unique in what they did.
No I hate other invaders that conquered other lands and fucked with people that wanted to be left alone too. But Anglos are the most recent example of people that did that and the world is still largely under Anglo cultural norms.

"The only reason everyone is so mad at Anglos is because they were so much more successful at conquering than anyone else. You make it seem like somehow Anglos were unique in what they did."

No I didn't talk about Anglos being unique. That's you in this entire thread thread gushing about how Anglos created the modern world and claiming everyone that doesn't like Anglos is just jealous. Nevermind that a significant reason that Anglos are hated is because they subjugated people in other countries.
They didn't have to do that but they did. It's normal to hate people that go out of their way to subjugate you.

This is like saying "the only reason everyone is so mad at women is because they were so much more successful in manipulating women than anyone else. You make it seem like somehow women were unique in what they did when it's just a human trait to be manipulative."

It changes nothing and completely ignores how the group people hate is mostly hated because they treated others like trash. Saying that people mad at those that treated them like trash are just jealous is just some juvenile "lol ur just jealous XD" taunt that doesn't address anything.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
Yeah I said that because you claimed
"Never said I am. I post about other religions, cultures, and countries all the time because inceldom is an international problem."
You blatantly sided with stormfrontcels with saying
That isn't posting about other religions, cultures and countries but trying to inflame racial tensions.
There was nothing racial about it bro. If you move to a country, you obviously have to integrate and eventually intermarry, cause otherwise it will lead to inbreeding.

And that wasn't right either. Inceldom is inevitable too. People have argued in the same way that because inceldom is inevitable incels should STFU and stop complaining. Do you not see the irony in what you are saying?
Bro, the difference is that we now claim to be tolerant and don't care about people's immutable traits. Comparing it to what happened in the past is not the same thing, because people in the past didn't claim what they do was moral, they just did it because they can and thought they were superior for winning. It's why I talk shit about places like Israel who still are doing this and replacing the native populations of Palestine. Inceldom is a problem of the present and is ongoing.

No I hate other invaders that conquered other lands and fucked with people that wanted to be left alone too. But Anglos are the most recent example of people that did that and the world is still largely under Anglo cultural norms.

"The only reason everyone is so mad at Anglos is because they were so much more successful at conquering than anyone else. You make it seem like somehow Anglos were unique in what they did."

No I didn't talk about Anglos being unique. That's you in this entire thread thread gushing about how Anglos created the modern world and claiming everyone that doesn't like Anglos is just jealous. Nevermind that a significant reason that Anglos are hated is because they subjugated people in other countries.
They didn't have to do that but they did. It's normal to hate people that go out of their way to subjugate you.

This is like saying "the only reason everyone is so mad at women is because they were so much more successful in manipulating women than anyone else. You make it seem like somehow women were unique in what they did when it's just a human trait to be manipulative."

It changes nothing and completely ignores how the group people hate is mostly hated because they treated others like trash. Saying that people mad at those that treated them like trash are just jealous is just some juvenile "lol ur just jealous XD" taunt that doesn't address anything.
Most people subjugated others throughout history, but Anglos are not subjugating people now. I would say America is doing it now, but that's another story.
As for manipulation, we are still talking about present problems and there's a big difference with talking about issues that effect us now rather than hating a group of people for what happened in the past. That's like being those athiest Jews that always cry about the holocaust and hate Germans today for what happened almost a century ago.
 
Numb

Numb

Woman is father of the Gene.
★★★★★
Joined
May 16, 2019
Posts
10,269
Online
20d 21h 6m
Retarded responses tbh. How do you "seamlessly" integrate when your physical differences are enough to warrant bad reactions and mistreatment by the countries natives?
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
But I am tired of stormfrontcels rubbing it all over the face, yea, it was there, be happy and let us cope faggots, btw what it really matters to them, they'll die alone anyway. The jains and buddhists were cucks and made the first socialist shitholes on earth which crumbled the Mauryan Empire by the time the grandson of Chandragupta, Ashoka died. They even occupied Afghanistan and parts of Sindh during the Arab Invasion and got defeated miserably though the Arabs never made it deeper than that
I didn't know Jains and Buddhists did that, do you have any places I can research more into this?
 
Numb

Numb

Woman is father of the Gene.
★★★★★
Joined
May 16, 2019
Posts
10,269
Online
20d 21h 6m
Bro, the difference is that we now claim to be tolerant and don't care about people's immutable traits
You are an incel and you know how much bullshit society likes to throw out about morals and being tolerant. Yet you are doing a 180 on ethnics now?
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
Retarded responses tbh. How do you "seamlessly" integrate when your physical differences are enough to warrant bad reactions and mistreatment by the countries natives?
True, but eventually it has to happen or your family lineage will die out. Shouldn't have moved at all if you thought about never integrating and merging with the rest of the society there eventually.
 
Numb

Numb

Woman is father of the Gene.
★★★★★
Joined
May 16, 2019
Posts
10,269
Online
20d 21h 6m
True, but eventually it has to happen or your family lineage will die out. Shouldn't have moved at all if you thought about never integrating and merging with the rest of the society there eventually.
Either move to get treated like shit or stay in your shitty country and get killed by the gangs or drug lords. or go homeless and die. It's more of an ultimatum for migrants. Also those people don't care about genetic lineage. They care about making it through the day. Surviving. The pro creating comes after with anchor children
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
You are an incel and you know how much bullshit society likes to throw out about morals and being tolerant. Yet you are doing a 180 on ethnics now?
I said they claim to be like this, the blackpill reveals to us the truth though, and how all of it is bullshit. That's why these liars and larpers need to be exposed for the frauds they are. If we were told the truth from the time we were young, we could have been able to cope better.
 
ReconElement

ReconElement

GOC-in-C, V Corps, Death is for me
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 2, 2020
Posts
450
Online
13d 20h 38m
I didn't know Jains and Buddhists did that, do you have any places I can research more into this?
The didn't occupy Afghanistan just that then afghans were Buddhists and were militarily miserable
 
your personality

your personality

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
11,865
Online
44d 2h 32m
There was nothing racial about it bro. If you move to a country, you obviously have to integrate and eventually intermarry, cause otherwise it will lead to inbreeding.
It was racial though.
You were talking about how it was clown world esque for Swedish immigrants to be complaining about other men taking their women when they moved to Sweden. Talk of rapefugees, Sweden and multiculturalism and how immigrants get mad when their women get stolen is just alt-right talk.

Bro, the difference is that we now claim to be tolerant and don't care about people's immutable traits. Comparing it to what happened in the past is not the same thing, because people in the past didn't claim what they do was moral, they just did it because they can and thought they were superior for winning. It's why I talk shit about places like Israel who still are doing this and replacing the native populations of Palestine. Inceldom is a problem of the present and is ongoing.
What?
What people claim and what they do are two entirely different stories. Just like in the past it's a normal reaction to hate people that go out of their way to subjugate you and enforce their way of life on you.

Most people subjugated others throughout history, but Anglos are not subjugating people now. I would say America is doing it now, but that's another story.
As for manipulation, we are still talking about present problems and there's a big difference with talking about issues that effect us now rather than hating a group of people for what happened in the past. That's like being those athiest Jews that always cry about the holocaust and hate Germans today for what happened almost a century ago.
But the thing is the effects of Anglos subjugating people in the 19th century and prior still have effects today. The fact that it happened makes the possibility of it happening again a desirable outcome in a lot of people's minds in Anglo countries and has contributed to the stereotype that ethnic males are weak, backward, uncivilized, were inferior enough to be ruled over by foreigners. It doesn't just exist in a vacuum where the minute Anglos left ethnic countries things were as they were before.
As @chudur-budur also pointed out during the colonization of places like India trillions of dollars in riches were stolen and they have not been given back to this day.

To this day Britain still refuses to formerly apologize for the Amritsar massacre and General Dyer ordering his troops to fire on peaceful protestors.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
Either move to get treated like shit or stay in your shitty country and get killed by the gangs or drug lords. or go homeless and die. It's more of an ultimatum for migrants
Well, when they choose to move, then they shouldn't stay bluepilled and think they will remain isolated. One way or another, they will have to manage or they will die off.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
It was racial though.
You were talking about how it was clown world esque for Swedish immigrants to be complaining about other men taking their women when they moved to Sweden. Talk of rapefugees, Sweden and multiculturalism and how immigrants get mad when their women get stolen is just alt-right talk.
I was comparing it to whats happening with the difference between the genders in the society. They are happy to import dangerous males into the society, but not females who just want to have families there.

I know bringing up the violent refugees at all would have brought up racial tension looking back, but I don't think this is a race issue tbh. If a country in the middle is going to kill rapists and murderers, where do you think they will want to go? They will want to flee to countries where they can get away with it. Islamic countries actually have lowers rates of murders and rapes compared to western countries because they follow their own version of the Mosaic Laws.

And I don't care if white women are being stolen by all the black dudes or Kike whores are being stolen by rice kpop maxxxers, its all cope to me. As a subhuman 1/10 truecel, I never stood a chance. When a stormcopers cried at how white women shouldnt be with black dudes, I've also laughed at that as well and no one seemed to have a problem with it.

What?
What people claim and what they do are two entirely different stories. Just like in the past it's a normal reaction to hate people that go out of their way to subjugate you and enforce their way of life on you.
Yes, that's why I uploaded this story. The Swedish feminist whores are all up and joyous when they are bringing in men from other places because more dick for them, but then cry when more women are being imported because they won't be able to compete. And the British left India a long time ago now, so there's no need to hate modern day Brits, especially when they have millions of Indians going there as immigrants.

But the thing is the effects of Anglos subjugating people in the 19th century and prior still have effects today. The fact that it happened makes the possibility of it happening again a desirable outcome in a lot of people's minds in Anglo countries and has contributed to the stereotype that ethnic males are weak, backward, uncivilized, were inferior enough to be ruled over by foreigners. It doesn't just exist in a vacuum where the minute Anglos left ethnic countries things were as they were before.
Yes, and guess what? Islamic invaders conquering the whole Middle East, North Africa, and Central Asia all have effects today. The fact that is happened doesn't justify it happening now, as every nation on the planet has been conquered by other foreign groups throughout their history. In fact, India still has its own problems of persecting ethnic minorities in their own countries. You keep talking about the Amritsar massacre, but you are forgetting one that happened even more recently in history in 1984 by the curry government. It's doing it right now in places like Kashmir as well. Do you think Kashmiris think it's better to be ruled by the Indian government rather than the British?

As @chudur-budur also pointed out during the colonization of places like India trillions of dollars in riches were stolen and they have not been given back to this day.
Yes plundering lands and taking their stuff is what happens when nations lose wars.
Reading the article, it seems that the British were taxing people, then using 1/3 of the total tax revenue to buy goods from the country and sell them for profit for the British companies and such.

But if you look at how taxes work nowadays in America, they do a similar thing by using American tax money to fund wars in random countries around the world that make the politicians, arms dealers, and private militaries more and more rich. There is nothing unique about this, most taxation is still a fraud. This is probably still the case in modern India, where tax money is probably being used to fill the pockets of politicians. I think this isnt about how India had trillions stolen, it's more like how taxes are the biggest scam in the history of the planet.
Blue pilled means being fed happy lies. The truth is you as an immigrant might be forced to choose the lesser of two evils, to lose your traditional culture and customs and assimilate to the new one, or die from gangs. What you said is redpilled on the situation.
 
your personality

your personality

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
11,865
Online
44d 2h 32m
I was comparing it to whats happening with the difference between the genders in the society. They are happy to import dangerous males into the society, but not females who just want to have families there.

I know bringing up the violent refugees at all would have brought up racial tension looking back, but I don't think this is a race issue tbh. If a country in the middle is going to kill rapists and murderers, where do you think they will want to go? They will want to flee to countries where they can get away with it. Islamic countries actually have lowers rates of murders and rapes compared to western countries because they follow their own version of the Mosaic Laws.
Outside of multicultural countries like the USA race is closely to tied to nationality and country/territory to say that talking about refugees and mating scarcity isn't a race issue isn't altogether accurate.

And I don't care if white women are being stolen by all the black dudes or Kike whores are being stolen by rice kpop maxxxers, its all cope to me. As a subhuman 1/10 truecel, I never stood a chance. When a stormcopers cried at how white women shouldnt be with black dudes, I've also laughed at that as well and no one seemed to have a problem with it.
Yes, that's why I uploaded this story. The Swedish feminist whores are all up and joyous when they are bringing in men from other places because more dick for them, but then cry when more women are being imported because they won't be able to compete. And the British left India a long time ago now, so there's no need to hate modern day Brits, especially when they have millions of Indians going there as immigrants.
But what did I say in my previous post?
"But the thing is the effects of Anglos subjugating people in the 19th century and prior still have effects today. The fact that it happened makes the possibility of it happening again a desirable outcome in a lot of people's minds in Anglo countries and has contributed to the stereotype that ethnic males are weak, backward, uncivilized, were inferior enough to be ruled over by foreigners. It doesn't just exist in a vacuum where the minute Anglos left ethnic countries things were as they were before."

Anglo influence still exerts a lot of power in today's world even if it is through America now and not the UK.
After the Delhi 2012 rape incident there were news organizations rushing to condemn all Indians and talking about how maybe the British need to come back. The British might have left but the association of Indians being ruled over by the British is still there.

There is no need to hate modern day Brits except those that justify what happened in the past and say India is better for it when that just isn't true and a lot of Indians and people in other ethnic countries suffered under British colonialism.
But those that don't? They didn't choose where they were born or what nationality they are but there is still going to wariness between them and Indians because of past disputes between them and the tendency of a lot of British people to take advantage of ethnic countries. That's just how it is.


Yes, and guess what? Islamic invaders conquering the whole Middle East, North Africa, and Central Asia all have effects today. The fact that is happened doesn't justify it happening now, as every nation on the planet has been conquered by other foreign groups throughout their history. In fact, India still has its own problems of persecting ethnic minorities in their own countries. You keep talking about the Amritsar massacre, but you are forgetting one that happened even more recently in history in 1984 by the curry government. It's doing it right now in places like Kashmir as well. Do you think Kashmiris think it's better to be ruled by the Indian government rather than the British?
So? That isn't Anglo countries business but the business of people that actually live in those lands. Yet even today many Anglo countries can't help but meddle in the affairs of those countries too.

Yes plundering lands and taking their stuff is what happens when nations lose wars.
Reading the article, it seems that the British were taxing people, then using 1/3 of the total tax revenue to buy goods from the country and sell them for profit for the British companies and such.

But if you look at how taxes work nowadays in America, they do a similar thing by using American tax money to fund wars in random countries around the world that make the politicians, arms dealers, and private militaries more and more rich. There is nothing unique about this, most taxation is still a fraud. This is probably still the case in modern India, where tax money is probably being used to fill the pockets of politicians. I think this isnt about how India had trillions stolen, it's more like how taxes are the biggest scam in the history of the planet.
Many jewels, precious metals were stolen from India. It was not just taxes and them ripping people off in trade.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
Outside of multicultural countries like the USA race is closely to tied to nationality and country/territory to say that talking about refugees and mating scarcity isn't a race issue isn't altogether accurate.
Kind of true, but I didn't even have race on my mind. The topic I wanted to discuss was about how feminism uses sex ratio demographics to cuck nations.

Anglo influence still exerts a lot of power in today's world even if it is through America now and not the UK.
After the Delhi 2012 rape incident there were news organizations rushing to condemn all Indians and talking about how maybe the British need to come back. The British might have left but the association of Indians being ruled over by the British is still there.
Yeah, most Americans are of German descent, not Anglo. And clearly they are different nations, as America literally came into existance opposing the British Empire.
I can't speak on the incident you are talking about, but that's life. People have made jokes about how Ukraine should have stayed under Russian control under a video of some Ukranian girl that drove over a bunch of people while texting. I've even heard people say that the Greeks should have stayed under Turkish control because they can't even manage their own economy and finances.

There is no need to hate modern day Brits except those that justify what happened in the past and say India is better for it when that just isn't true and a lot of Indians and people in other ethnic countries suffered under British colonialism.
But those that don't? They didn't choose where they were born or what nationality they are but there is still going to wariness between them and Indians because of past disputes between them and the tendency of a lot of British people to take advantage of ethnic countries. That's just how it is.
I can't say how India would have been with or without British control. If they didn't try, then I think the French or Portugese would have tried to take over that region. And based on how French banned paternity testing in their own country, I can't imagine what they would have done to India.

So? That isn't Anglo countries business but the business of people that actually live in those lands. Yet even today many Anglo countries can't help but meddle in the affairs of those countries too.
That is retarded, so the Arab and Indian government should be free to kill people in the land they control only because they have a monopoly of violence (that's what a government essentially is)? I think if there is ethnic genocide going on, the international communities need to do something about it, whether sanction it to oblivion or some other strategy. I do aknowledge that in the Arab world, the borders are artificially created and not reflecting of the divisions of the ethnic groups, so that is a remnent of a problem created by Allied countries in WW1. As for India, the British should have broken it up into like 20 different countries.

As for America and other countries just targetting places like Iraq now for bomb practice, I hope they get what's coming for them.

Many jewels, precious metals were stolen from India. It was not just taxes and them ripping people off in trade.
It's not ripping people off in trade, the problem wasn't the trading itself, it was using tax money to do it. Taxes are one of the oldest scams in the world that is still around.

And yes, that's called plundering. Most of the jewelry and wealth taken this way was stolen from kings and high caste noblemen, it wouldnt have gotten to the poor people anyways. I know this sounds communist, but I don't feel that bad for the rich and wealthy losing "muh jewelry" or "muh kohinoor", especially since in the Indian system most people were rich from caste birth and inheritance, rather than hard work.
 
your personality

your personality

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
11,865
Online
44d 2h 32m
I can't say how India would have been with or without British control. If they didn't try, then I think the French or Portugese would have tried to take over that region. And based on how French banned paternity testing in their own country, I can't imagine what they would have done to India.
They did try in the 1500s. The problem is not just Britain but countries thinking they know what's best for others and forcing their will on them. It's the exact same attitude white liberals exhibit.

That is retarded, so the Arab and Indian government should be free to kill people in the land they control only because they have a monopoly of violence (that's what a government essentially is)? I think if there is ethnic genocide going on, the international communities need to do something about it, whether sanction it to oblivion or some other strategy. I do aknowledge that in the Arab world, the borders are artificially created and not reflecting of the divisions of the ethnic groups, so that is a remnent of a problem created by Allied countries in WW1. As for India, the British should have broken it up into like 20 different countries.
Well in a dispute between for example people in Britain and people in Ireland even if they were killing each other I don't think that should mean some other nation not related to them like China should come in and intervene.

What happens in Arab and Indian lands and what their government does should be their business and the duty of the people in those lands to oppose it. I'm a strong believer in opposing foreign entanglements in the strictest sense.

Also many times European powers have drawn up the excuse that ethnic countries are fighting with each other as justification to colonize those ethnic countries. I won't fall for it because it has been used as an excuse many times by European countries to more heavily interfere in the affairs of ethnic countries.

As for America and other countries just targetting places like Iraq now for bomb practice, I hope they get what's coming for them.
I don't really care one way or another about foreign affairs today. As BlkPillPres has said incels aren't part of the world anyway and society has moved on without us.

It's not ripping people off in trade, the problem wasn't the trading itself, it was using tax money to do it. Taxes are one of the oldest scams in the world that is still around.
I'm not going to get in a debate about the necessity versus the harm of taxes. There are so many different viewpoints around this issue and it has nothing to with the topic of this thread.

And yes, that's called plundering. Most of the jewelry and wealth taken this way was stolen from kings and high caste noblemen, it wouldnt have gotten to the poor people anyways. I know this sounds communist, but I don't feel that bad for the rich and wealthy losing "muh jewelry" or "muh kohinoor", especially since in the Indian system most people were rich from caste birth and inheritance, rather than hard work.
Again so? It's way more humiliating and an offense for British people that aren't related to Indians to hoard riches and jewlry for themselves. The British took all of that entirely from the subcontinent when they came and never gave it back when they left.
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
They did try in the 1500s. The problem is not just Britain but countries thinking they know what's best for others and forcing their will on them. It's the exact same attitude white liberals exhibit.
Yeah, that's why I think libertarian values on top of whatever the traditional culture is will be the only way for nations to advance into the future.

Well in a dispute between for example people in Britain and people in Ireland even if they were killing each other I don't think that should mean some other nation not related to them like China should come in and intervene.

What happens in Arab and Indian lands and what their government does should be their business and the duty of the people in those lands to oppose it. I'm a strong believer in opposing foreign entanglements in the strictest sense.

Also many times European powers have drawn up the excuse that ethnic countries are fighting with each other as justification to colonize those ethnic countries. I won't fall for it because it has been used as an excuse many times by European countries to more heavily interfere in the affairs of ethnic countries.
There's a big difference between government fighting one another, and a government killing the people it's supposed to protect because they are minorities. I think states in countries should have the right to self determination, so if they want to leave the country they are part of, they should have that right. But when the government tries to stop that, like what recently happened in Spain where the police attacked people for trying to decide their own future, that's when the governments all over the world needs to intervene and make the country pay severely. China itself needs to be stopped by any means necassary for what they are doing against the Uyghars and the Tibetan people in the country. The people can oppose it but it won't do shit, they will get obliterated against the country's military. It could have worked back in the day like of the American revolution even, but now it's not possible realistically. Taking Nazi Germany as another example, I think the allies should have bombed Berlin to oblivion when they were sending millions of Jews to death camps.

Again so? It's way more humiliating and an offense for British people that aren't related to Indians to hoard riches and jewlry for themselves. The British took all of that entirely from the subcontinent when they came and never gave it back when they left.
This is some gigacucked logic. This is like when race copers on here get happy knowing normies of their race have it easier than normies of other races. I don't care what race normie you are, you are all my enemies (unless you accept the blackpill). Whether another Jew mogs me or a cumskin does it, my ER or rope fuel will be at 10/10 no matter what.

And who should get the jewelry? Do you think it should go to random poor Indians who it never belonged to anyways? The government will probably just put it on display or give it to their friends like the oligarchs in Russia who got all the money after the USSR collapsed.
Now if there something of cultural value, like architecture, art, and stuff like that, then I think it would be a completely different issue and something that they should give back. But based on how the government refuses to give back ancient Egyptian stuff to Egypt, I doubt that will happen. Like I dont want to have to go to Britian to see Egyptian stuff, you have your own history and I don't want to miss seeing Egyptian stuff in Egypt because it's somewhere else.
 
your personality

your personality

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 26, 2020
Posts
11,865
Online
44d 2h 32m
There's a big difference between government fighting one another, and a government killing the people it's supposed to protect because they are minorities. I think states in countries should have the right to self determination, so if they want to leave the country they are part of, they should have that right. But when the government tries to stop that, like what recently happened in Spain where the police attacked people for trying to decide their own future, that's when the governments all over the world needs to intervene and make the country pay severely. China itself needs to be stopped by any means necassary for what they are doing against the Uyghars and the Tibetan people in the country. The people can oppose it but it won't do shit, they will get obliterated against the country's military. It could have worked back in the day like of the American revolution even, but now it's not possible realistically. Taking Nazi Germany as another example, I think the allies should have bombed Berlin to oblivion when they were sending millions of Jews to death camps.
Sanctions and reprimands is one thing and many countries do that. But foreign intervention in the form of boots on the ground and moving troops and people from European nations into ethnic countries is what I have a problem with and are moves that have in the past been used by European countries to gain a foothold in ethnic countries.

This is some gigacucked logic. This is like when race copers on here get happy knowing normies of their race have it easier than normies of other races. I don't care what race normie you are, you are all my enemies (unless you accept the blackpill). Whether another Jew mogs me or a cumskin does it, my ER or rope fuel will be at 10/10 no matter what.
No it isn't. Higher classes of your own race hoarding wealth is bad enough. Having people from some foreign land come and steal away the wealth altogether and subjugate you is way more humiliating and offensive.

And who should get the jewelry? Do you think it should go to random poor Indians who it never belonged to anyways? The government will probably just put it on display or give it to their friends like the oligarchs in Russia who got all the money after the USSR collapsed.
Now if there something of cultural value, like architecture, art, and stuff like that, then I think it would be a completely different issue and something that they should give back. But based on how the government refuses to give back ancient Egyptian stuff to Egypt, I doubt that will happen. Like I dont want to have to go to Britian to see Egyptian stuff, you have your own history and I don't want to miss seeing Egyptian stuff in Egypt because it's somewhere else.
The jewelry should be given back. Whether some of it can be divvied among poor Indians should be up to the Indian people to decide.
And your speculation about what the Indian government will do with the jewelry is just that, speculation.
The jewelry doesn't belong to the British. They stole it. You are trying to introduce a hypothetical about how since no one is alive to claim sole possession of the jewlry there's no point in asking for it back. You are mistaken. The jewelry and riches stolen should be given back and returned to India and the Indian people should decide what to do with it.
 
Neggr

Neggr

Kebabcel in western europe, it never began.
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Posts
8,306
Online
20d 10h 29m
idc cos im ethnic, us ethnic guys get our women taken by white guys who are upset white women egos have inflated
Yeah, that's why I think libertarian values on top of whatever the traditional culture is will be the only way for nations to advance into the future.


There's a big difference between government fighting one another, and a government killing the people it's supposed to protect because they are minorities. I think states in countries should have the right to self determination, so if they want to leave the country they are part of, they should have that right. But when the government tries to stop that, like what recently happened in Spain where the police attacked people for trying to decide their own future, that's when the governments all over the world needs to intervene and make the country pay severely. China itself needs to be stopped by any means necassary for what they are doing against the Uyghars and the Tibetan people in the country. The people can oppose it but it won't do shit, they will get obliterated against the country's military. It could have worked back in the day like of the American revolution even, but now it's not possible realistically. Taking Nazi Germany as another example, I think the allies should have bombed Berlin to oblivion when they were sending millions of Jews to death camps.


This is some gigacucked logic. This is like when race copers on here get happy knowing normies of their race have it easier than normies of other races. I don't care what race normie you are, you are all my enemies (unless you accept the blackpill). Whether another Jew mogs me or a cumskin does it, my ER or rope fuel will be at 10/10 no matter what.

And who should get the jewelry? Do you think it should go to random poor Indians who it never belonged to anyways? The government will probably just put it on display or give it to their friends like the oligarchs in Russia who got all the money after the USSR collapsed.
Now if there something of cultural value, like architecture, art, and stuff like that, then I think it would be a completely different issue and something that they should give back. But based on how the government refuses to give back ancient Egyptian stuff to Egypt, I doubt that will happen. Like I dont want to have to go to Britian to see Egyptian stuff, you have your own history and I don't want to miss seeing Egyptian stuff in Egypt because it's somewhere else.
Uyghars
 
Copexodius Maximus

Copexodius Maximus

Truest of the true kikecels
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Posts
7,264
Online
25d 2h 21m
Sanctions and reprimands is one thing and many countries do that. But foreign intervention in the form of boots on the ground and moving troops and people from European nations into ethnic countries is what I have a problem with and are moves that have in the past been used by European countries to gain a foothold in ethnic countries.
I don't have a problem with doing boots on the ground work in countries that genocide the people of the country. I think every ethnicity should have their own country, and anyone who disagrees needs to have the whole world bomb the country to oblivion and give the country no right to say no, cause it's not it's choice to make. This will make sure that everytime some genocide goes on, it's between two seperate countries.

No it isn't. Higher classes of your own race hoarding wealth is bad enough. Having people from some foreign land come and steal away the wealth altogether and subjugate you is way more humiliating and offensive.
No it isn't, it is cucked no matter what. I won't have the wealth no matter what, so I would want to see all these wealthy people dead. When when parasite wealthy person kills another, I would laugh my ass off. Assessing the situation based on which race they are are gigacucked and low iq. This is why curryland will always remain a shit hole, cause copers that think like that will be like "At least it's people of my race destroying my life, and not some other race". Although tbf, I think Islamic rulers have pretty much ruled curryland for close to a thousand years prior to that point, but I bet you will say "at least they can pass as curries" or something lol.

The jewelry should be given back. Whether some of it can be divvied among poor Indians should be up to the Indian people to decide.
And your speculation about what the Indian government will do with the jewelry is just that, speculation.
The jewelry doesn't belong to the British. They stole it. You are trying to introduce a hypothetical about how since no one is alive to claim sole possession of the jewlry there's no point in asking for it back. You are mistaken. The jewelry and riches stolen should be given back and returned to India and the Indian people should decide what to do with it.
Why should it be given back? Why do you think the current government of India deserves the jewelry? Pretty sure things like the diamond kohinoor belonged to the Sikh rulers, and the government has persecuted and killed tens of thousands of Sikhs. It's not stealing, the British controlled the region of India, they won the right to the weatlh of the previous rulers according to Hinduism's own tenants of the Arthashastra. They shouldn't be given back because it was never the Indian government's in the first place, and they were never something that belonged to the common people either.