- Nov 7, 2017
- 52d 4h 15m
"Your users aren't ugly, they're just not sexually attractive"
@mental_out This should be like shooting fish in a barrel for you.He is kinda right. Not everyone here is ugly. Some are short, mentalcels, pre-adulescent face, racecels. However, there are definitely ugly people here too. But saying beautiful ==atractive is just wrong, beauty is only enough for men. women want much more.
It's just splitting hairs, being sexually unattractive because of physical features is for all intents and purposes being ugly. He's literally saying "Your users aren't ugly, they're just unattractive because of physical features", it's just dumb to act like there's really any difference between the two.It means non-masculine in this context I think, but his main point is that the users here aren’t ugly.
I agree, I’m just querying Cuyen because he has previously claimed to not be ugly (not sure if I believe him with a post count like that though, he might be coping.)It's just splitting hairs, being sexually unattractive because of physical features is for all intents and purposes being ugly.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|[Based] Another God Tier Low Inhibition Video From Saint Hamudi||Inceldom Discussion||21|
|[Blackpill] Normie tier men can't be blackpilled, unless they are autistic/aspies.||Inceldom Discussion||8|
|Is this man's face normie tier?||Inceldom Discussion||15|