COERCIVE CONTROL AND ITS MISSAPPLICATION IN UK LAW:
FITS FEMALE NARRATIVE EXCLUDES FEMALE COERCION OF MALES BY FEMALES:
definition of coercive control by the law:
Any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive or threatening behaviour, violence or abuse between those aged 16 or over who are or have been intimate partners or family members, regardless of gender or sexuality. This can encompass, but is not limited to, the following types of abuse: psychological, physical, sexual, financial and emotional." [
Domestic abuse guidelines for prosecutors]
Hypothesis:
the definition clearly states sexual, emotional and psychological abuse, HOW CAN THE STATISTICS I STATED ABOVE IN MY OTHER POST REPRESENT THE CURRENT STATE OF MALE AND FEMALE DYNAMICS IN RELATIONSHIPS.
WHEREBY A DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF MEN (SIMPS) ARE BEING EMOTIONALLY AND SEXUALLY BLACKMAILED BY THEIR PARTNERS TO CONTINUE THE RELATIONSHIP ON THE FEMALES TERMS.
HOW ARE THE FIGURES THIS SKEWED:
AS we know there are many ways women are abusive emotionally, sexually and psychologically to men:
withholding sex from men
using children as a weapon in marriage (literally hanging over the man until child is of age)
threat of financial ruin if seperated eg 50% of wealth plus child support on top
The inequity of the dating market eg 80/20 rule means by definition, women are “in control power wise” from the very start of the relationship and the power distribution sexually is completely distorted to the female. Due to them having many many more options than males for dating in the tinder age.
My hypothesis is that it is NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE that the conviction rates and charging rates in the above table depict anywhere near THE REALITY OF THE PATTERN OF COERCIVE CONTROL IN THE U.K. IT CANT BE AS THE MANY AVENUES OF COERCIVE CONTROL LISTED ABOVE IS TOO GREAT FOR FEMALES, EG THEY EXERT TOO MUCH POWER NOT TO COMMIT THE CRIME, WITH TOO MANY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IT TO BE EXERTED IN THE POPULATION AT LARGE.
www.google.com
