Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Selection for the fittest based on looks is useless in species with no predators

Convergence

Convergence

brazilian spergcel
-
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Posts
623
Traits considered "beautiful" = best genes = better chance of survival. HOWEVER:
66344_evo_resources_resource_image_325_original.gif

49677_evo_resources_resource_image_326_original.gif

Which means that, in species with no predators (like the ones on the top of food chain), selection for the fittest physically is useless. In humans, selection by traits such as IQ is more important as a way to adapt our society, but alas, we can't control how our brains are wired.
Sour reminder that most of us are incels because nature is a bitch.
 
Yeah, our genes aren't necessarily "shitty", they just don't provide an advantage in our weird modern day dating process. Which involves women picking men on sex appeal and/or social status.
 
Foids are attracted to shit like coloured eyes and low hairline, which has nothing to do with survival
 
We don’t have predators but people die to stairs very often. Big muscular Chad with strong bones can survive stairfalls better :feelsgah:
 
Yeah, our genes aren't necessarily "shitty", they just don't provide an advantage in our weird modern day dating process. Which involves women picking men on sex appeal and/or social status.
No, our genes ARE shitty... physically. However, traits favored physically as a means of survival are simply useless nowadays where priority is security and progress. We have survival for granted.
Foids are attracted to shit like coloured eyes and low hairline, which has nothing to do with survival
Colored eyes and low hairline are associated with manliness. Light eyes are tied to caucasians, who were the most successful race in terms of conquering.
 
No, our genes ARE shitty... physically. However, traits favored physically as a means of survival are simply useless nowadays where priority is security and progress. We have survival for granted.

Depends, if you're a manlet yes. But weak jawline? Acne prone? Bug eyes? anything resulting in an ugly face is irrelevant. What matters is physical dominance. So an ugly face, as I stated, is not necessarily shitty genes.
 
In humans, selection by traits such as IQ is more important as a way to adapt our society, but alas, we can't control how our brains are wired.

Biology isn't rational. People don't care why they have their preferences. They only care about satisfying them. :/
 
Depends, if you're a manlet yes. But weak jawline? Acne prone? Bug eyes? anything resulting in an ugly face is irrelevant. What matters is physical dominance. So an ugly face, as I stated, is not necessarily shitty genes.
It is. Weak jawline, bug eyes, etc. are all caused by lack of testosterone. Testosterone decreases our immunity significantly. Women's lizard brain interpret high testosterone as good genes because, if you can survive that far despite your low immunity, your genes are top tier. That's why traits associated with high T are cherished.
 
It is. Weak jawline, bug eyes, etc. are all caused by lack of testosterone. Testosterone decreases our immunity significantly. Women's lizard brain interpret high testosterone as good genes because, if you can survive that far despite your low immunity, your genes are top tier. That's why traits associated with high T are cherished.

Jawline can be created by mewing (in teens)
 
it would be one thing if females were sexually attracted to intelligence

we would be exploring exoplanets by now

but no. jawlines and hairlines are more important
 
THANK YOU FOR REPEATING WHAT I SAID IN A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT WAY TO GET REPLIES

BUT VERY BASED INDEED

SPREADING THIS SHIT IS VITAL FOR THE BLACKPILL

IF RETARDS KEEP BELIEVING WOMENS SELECTION IS LOGICAL THEY WILL RATIONALIZE IT. WHEN THEY SEE IT IS COMPLETELY ARBITRARY AND UNRELATED TO OUR CURRENT SOCIETY

THEY WILL BLACKPILL

THE ONLY HOPE FOR AN "INCEL FUTURE" IS NOT SOME 50IQ IDEA SOME "INCEL REVOLUTION" WILL HAPPEN BUT TO BLACKPILL THE BOTTOM 70% of MEN
(IN LOOKS, SO TOP 70% IN IQ) SO THEY DROP OUT AND LEECH THE SYSTEM.. COLLAPSING IT ENTIRELY
 
Artificial womb and sexbots will save us.
 
In this safer high tech envirnoment, transhumanmaxxing is the key to females making better choices. Otherwise, we need a predator to wipe out this shallow species.
 
Females live like it's still the caveman / Hunter gatherer days. They still haven't caught up genetically. I mean 80% of them reproduced just standing there. The bar isn't set very high
 
it would be one thing if females were sexually attracted to intelligence

we would be exploring exoplanets by now

but no. jawlines and hairlines are more important

May be that's why Aliens are always portrayed like incels by the media.

alien-30-years-discover.jpg


intelligence --> ugly
 
Artificial womb and sexbots will save us.
YES
I think @SchrodingersDick can set everyone straight about this subject because it's a pretty heavy blackpill for the newcels here to swallow...
 
animal species died out because of the foids retarded selection, same thing is going to happen with humans.
 
The problem is traits that matter for natural selection nowadays are chosen based on how rare they are.Blue eyes, blonde hair which regardless of political correctness are still the most desirable traits for a human, and something you can find only on Northern European races, definitely not the most common.

Given the fact that natural selection has been ongoing for thousand of years, the majority of individuals should already be the pinnacle of humanity for the region they inhabit respectively, but easy access to travel and media has ruined the mechanism and just turned it into a marked-like selection, which assign value based on demand and supply


The problem is traits that matter for natural selection nowadays are chosen based on how rare they are.Blue eyes, blonde hair which regardless of political correctness are still the most desirable traits for a human, and something you can find only on Northern European races, definitely not the most common.

Given the fact that natural selection has been ongoing for thousand of years, the majority of individuals should already be the pinnacle of humanity for the region they inhabit respectively, but easy access to travel and media has ruined the mechanism and just turned it into a marked-like selection, which assign value based on demand and supply

It's more like an economic market rather than a survival of the fittest.And this obviously stems from the fact that we left selection in the hand of females
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
52
Views
2K
Mentally lost cel
Mentally lost cel
AsiaCel
Replies
2
Views
146
AsiaCel
AsiaCel
Destroyed lonely
Replies
11
Views
217
Destroyed lonely
Destroyed lonely
GooberMcKee
Replies
2
Views
328
GooberMcKee
GooberMcKee
highiqpostmaxxer
Replies
7
Views
174
uglyugly
uglyugly

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top