Sex Outside of Marriage doesn't NECESSARILY Make You a Degenerate, BUT

[ItheIthe]

The setup that allows sex outside of marriage IS very much degenerate. Why? Because it allows for people to take advantage of one another, it leads to broken homes, and desensitizes one to the point of not fully appreciating relationships.

In other words:

Someone who has sex in an "LTR" isn't necessarily a vile offender IF that person is genuinely in love and genuinely seeks a life-long monogamous relationship out of the arrangement. HOWEVER, breaking up (Except due to infidelity) from this IS degenerate, because you are breaking your partner's heart and destroying a sacred bond over something that is reconcilable. This is a form of unfaithfulness and is equivalent to divorce. "Breaking up" after a couple of dates is one thing (Sex should be reserved for only a long-commitment because sex shortly after meeting enables you to be taken advantage of). "Breaking up" after a genuine commitment has been made is another thing, and that is being unfaithful. Don't think you can stand someone? Stop after a few dates instead of using them. Do you really love the person? Work out your kinks.

On the other side of the fence are those who abuse relationships and sex. Those who are non-committal, yet use a facade of true commitment for sex. Those who hookup and engage in all other sort of shameful acts. Those who tell themselves they will be committed UNTIL something "better" (A delusion because leaving a relationship will hurt emotionally) comes along or until they get "bored". This is full-fledged degeneracy and there is nothing more to it.

 

[Deleted member 306]

A wall of cope. Sex is like food. You don't marry to eat something.

 

[ItheIthe]

A wall of cope. Sex is like food. You don't marry to eat something.

No, sex is supposed to bring two people together in a sacred bond, not be used to drive them apart through taking advantage of one another.

Stop coping with your degeneracy-approval.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

Sex outside of marriage is an abomination.

 

[ItheIthe]

Sex outside of marriage is an abomination.

The SETUP is an abomination.

But what of a man and a woman, genuinely seeking a monogamous life-long relationship? I mean, not "dating" for fun, but to truly love each other? Are they evil for partaking in what is the set societal standard and expectation from everyone, even if they do so seeking wholesome and commendable results? I don't think so.

It is the "breakup" that is bad. It is equivalent to divorce. A man should not break a woman's heart and destroy the relationship just because she is not perfect, and vice versa. It is the responsibility of each party to work things out, not dispose of the relationship as if it means nothing, because it does not. Indeed, it is very vile, and in the end, great emotional harm is inflicted upon EACH party.

 

[nausea]

No, sex is supposed to bring two people together in a sacred bond, not be used to drive them apart through taking advantage of one another.

Stop coping with your degeneracy-approval.

 

[Darthmat]

God what a bunch of cucks.

 

[Deleted member 2299]

It's 2018 LTRs aren't a thing

 

[Deleted member 279]

I don't know, as soon as you start letting people think it's okay to have premarital sex they start getting more and more casual with it until ONS and FWBs become the norm. Fornication is degenerate unless you're raping a slut to put it in its place, IMO.

 

[ItheIthe]

I don't know, as soon as you start letting people think it's okay to have premarital sex they start getting more and more casual with it until ONS and FWBs become the norm. Fornication is degenerate unless you're raping a slut to put it in its place, IMO.

Exactly, that is part of the problem. Once the lines are blurred, everything becomes acceptable, and you are seeing that now with people having sex with 15 people before marriage.

If I was starting a society, I would ABSOLUTELY ban sex outside of marriage, so that the lines are not blurred, and so that relationships are not defiled, and people are not taken advantage of.

HOWEVER, in this society, we are too far gone. I think there are absolutely some people who genuinely want to bear the fruits of a loving, monogamous relationship, and are doing it within the confines of the expected and preached standard. My warning here would be to not "break up" after making a commitment, because that is defiling what should be a sacred bond, and destroying yourself as well as your "ex" emotionally.

 

[nausea]

HOWEVER, in this society, we are too far gone

this is the problem

 

[Deleted member 279]

 
HOWEVER, in this society, we are too far gone. I think there are absolutely some people who genuinely want to bear the fruits of a loving, monogamous relationship, and are doing it within the confines of the expected and preached standard. My warning here would be to not "break up" after making a commitment, because that is defiling what should be a sacred bond, and destroying yourself as well as your "ex" emotionally.

I agree that we are too far gone already but I believe in a revolution rather than reform. Either that or nuclear annihilation tbh.

 

[nausea]

nuclear annihilation

 

[Pasteleiro]

Through a conservative mindset it is. If you aren't conservative, why bother?

 

[ItheIthe]

I agree that we are too far gone already but I believe in a revolution rather than reform. Either that or nuclear annihilation tbh.

I am all for a revolution. Call me up when you garner an army tbh. It is far past time and that is something I have said many times.

 

[nausea]

I agree that we are too far gone already but I believe in a revolution rather than reform. Either that or nuclear annihilation tbh.

I am all for a revolution. Call me up when you garner an army tbh. It is far past time and that is something I have said many times.

the saint has already contributed

 

[Framecel222]

So let's consider this hypothetical example: two people marry and have sex, but after years they begin to grow apart and no longer like each other. What would you propose they do?

 

[nausea]

So let's consider this hypothetical example: two people marry and have sex, but after years they begin to grow apart and no longer like each other. What would you propose they do?

nope you wrong

 

[Akarin]

So let's consider this hypothetical example: two people marry and have sex, but after years they begin to grow apart and no longer like each other. What would you propose they do?

force them to be together or get exiled from the society

 

[Framecel222]

nope you wrong

Shut the fuck up retard, you have nearly 6000 posts and not once have you contributed to a discussion. You should be mercy killed because living as a sub-50 IQ mongoloid is a fate far worse than death.

 

[nausea]

nope you wrong

Shut the fuck up retard, you have nearly 6000 posts and not once have you contributed to a discussion. You should be mercy killed because living as a sub-50 IQ mongoloid is a fate far worse than death.

your example above does not compute in a righteous society

 

[Framecel222]

your example above does not compute in a righteous society

Dude I'm sorry but I'm probably gonna have to put you on my ignore list. I ask OP a question in the hopes of further developing the discussion and you simply respond with "nope you wrong?" Every single post you write is exactly like that. Super low effort shit with no thinking involved.

Here's my advice: instead of quickly typing out the first thing that comes to mind, take a few seconds to think about what you're saying. The forum would be a lot better off for it.

I feel bad even making fun of you because you seem to be so dumb that it isn't even your fault. You can't help it, you genuinely don't understand what's wrong with your posts. This is how I picture you:

 

[nausea]

Dude I'm sorry but I'm probably gonna have to put you on my ignore list. I ask OP a question in the hopes of further developing the discussion and you simply respond with "nope you wrong?" Every single post you write is exactly like that. Super low effort shit with no thinking involved.

Here's my advice: instead of quickly typing out the first thing that comes to mind, take a few seconds to think about what you're saying. The forum would be a lot better off for it.

I feel bad even making fun of you because you seem to be so dumb that it isn't even your fault. You can't help it, you genuinely don't understand what's wrong with your posts. This is how I picture you:

don't do such vile act, I am sorry for the misunderstanding

 

[TheIncelPill]

>Sex Outside of Marriage doesn't NECESSARILY Make You a Degenerate...

Cope.

 

[Deleted member 306]

No, sex is supposed to bring two people together in a sacred bond, not be used to drive them apart through taking advantage of one another.

Stop coping with your degeneracy-approval.

Sex is nothing but a primitive instinct

 

[ItheIthe]

So let's consider this hypothetical example: two people marry and have sex, but after years they begin to grow apart and no longer like each other. What would you propose they do?

They would be forced to stay together. A falling out only happens due to a lack of care, and that is on them.

Perhaps they could separate but for a TIME, so that what they are missing can be brought into light. Like that saying, "You don't know what you have until it's gone". They could separate for a time so that they may be brought back together with a rekindled appreciation for one another. HOWEVER, it would be ILLEGAL for them to have sex with other people during this time, as that if a form of adultery.

 

[blackpill_incel]

No, sex is supposed to bring two people together in a sacred bond, not be used to drive them apart through taking advantage of one another.

Stop coping with your degeneracy-approval.

Yes. Degeneracy must be stopped