• There's a new bill going through the US Congress that will allow the US government to scan your online messages and emails. We feel it's important for our members to be informed of threats to free speech and the EARN IT Act, if passed into law, it could be used to take down smaller platforms or websites with little or no reason including this website. This is an obvious overreach by the US government that already abuses it power as is and it shouldn't stand.

Should "Rules, Terminology, and FAQ." be edited?

Status
Not open for further replies.
quinn24

quinn24

Stay asleep
-
Joined
Aug 15, 2018
Posts
7,071
Online
29d 11h 51m
Disallowed Content:
  1. Traps
This does not explicitly mention all gay shit under a homoerotic context.
Worship or praise (both males and females)
I found this kind of vague, I initially thought it was just directed towards perceived worship/praise towards individuals (ie making threads about how great hannah montana is or the kind of shit that happens in /r9k/ where they make threads about some attention whore from discord or something)
 
Six

Six

Mythic
-
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Posts
4,506
Online
14d 21h 38m
Why not. Nobody reads it anyway.
 
Insomniac

Insomniac

ϟϟ A U T I S M ϟϟ
-
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Posts
36,241
Online
47m
There should only be 3 rules
1. Don’t be a faggot
2. Don’t be a cuckold
3. Don’t be a female

Simple and easy to follow. :feelsokman:
 
Templarcel421

Templarcel421

Gambler fan account
-
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Posts
4,363
Online
9h 22m
Forums don't survive without explicit, defined rules
 
StaroRavager

StaroRavager

Hateful, Disgusted, Alone
-
Joined
Aug 18, 2018
Posts
14,111
Online
8h 18m
There should only be 3 rules
1. Don’t be a faggot
2. Don’t be a cuckold
3. Don’t be a female

Simple and easy to follow. :feelsokman:
Doesn't cover braggers, trolls, LARPs, or fakecells though I guess we can put all of those people in the faggot category
 
MarriedAndLookin4Fun

MarriedAndLookin4Fun

Late stage LDAR
-
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
10,208
Online
16d 13h 54m
  • Incel (Allowed): Person who wishes to be in a romantic relationship, but is unable to despite numerous attempts and a significant amount of time trying.
  • Blackpilled (Conditional): Person who believes in / wants to learn about the Blackpill.
  • Female (Not Allowed): Banned on sight, no exceptions.
I think that the blackpilled thing should be removed, this forum is called incels.is not volcels.is or blackpillednormies.is
We should explicitly accept incels, nobody else
 
StormlitAqua

StormlitAqua

This is not my fault. I was created.
-
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Posts
4,724
Online
24d 18h 59m
Content: No low effort, spam, advertisement, all-caps, or selfies. No NSFW or worship avatars nor signatures.

Usually completely unenforced. Take it out or enforce it.

Forums don't survive without explicit, defined rules
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Everytime I bring up this rule, they always say it's common sense. Well neither autists like me nor females have common sense. Enforce/define the rules or don't have them at all.
 
ScornedStoic

ScornedStoic

Scholar
-
Joined
Apr 5, 2018
Posts
13,091
Online
34d 6h 22m
I'd love to see more enforcement of banning fakecels, although I'm not sure the best way to go about that
 
RopeMaXXer

RopeMaXXer

getting dabbed on by waging
-
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Posts
2,411
Online
29d 13h 17m
I'd separate offenses into two lists
one that can give you a permaban, one that cannot (unless someone is really insistent on being disruptive)
ban-worthy
1. bragging
2. attacking users based on their inceldom/appearance/mental illness
3. bluepilling
4. actual spam, as in posting your youtube channel or posting repetetive content, anything that would set off a real spam filter

suspend-worthy
everything else in rules

also throw out stupid shit like trolling/ baiting and low effort it has no definition and mods are basically retarded and cant uphold something so interpretation heavy.
 
blickpall

blickpall

O T L
-
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
4,694
Online
9d 11h 52m
Content: No low effort, spam, advertisement, all-caps, or selfies. No NSFW or worship avatars nor signatures.

Usually completely unenforced. Take it out or enforce it.
It's been explained to what that rule actually means. You don't agree with it? Tough cookies. Stop crying about it every chance you have.

@OP: We're content with the rules at the moment but we will keep your suggestions in mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top