Should "Rules, Terminology, and FAQ." be edited?

Status
Not open for further replies.
quinn24

quinn24

Stay asleep
-
Aug 15, 2018
7,022
Disallowed Content:
  1. Traps
This does not explicitly mention all gay shit under a homoerotic context.
Worship or praise (both males and females)
I found this kind of vague, I initially thought it was just directed towards perceived worship/praise towards individuals (ie making threads about how great hannah montana is or the kind of shit that happens in /r9k/ where they make threads about some attention whore from discord or something)
 
Insomniac

Insomniac

ϟϟ A U T I S M ϟϟ
-
Oct 4, 2018
36,257
There should only be 3 rules
1. Don’t be a faggot
2. Don’t be a cuckold
3. Don’t be a female

Simple and easy to follow. :feelsokman:
 
Templarcel421

Templarcel421

Gambler fan account
-
Feb 7, 2018
4,370
Forums don't survive without explicit, defined rules
 
StaroRavager

StaroRavager

Hateful, Disgusted, Alone
-
Aug 18, 2018
14,122
There should only be 3 rules
1. Don’t be a faggot
2. Don’t be a cuckold
3. Don’t be a female

Simple and easy to follow. :feelsokman:
Doesn't cover braggers, trolls, LARPs, or fakecells though I guess we can put all of those people in the faggot category
 
MarriedAndLookin4Fun

MarriedAndLookin4Fun

Late stage LDAR
-
Nov 8, 2017
10,223
  • Incel (Allowed): Person who wishes to be in a romantic relationship, but is unable to despite numerous attempts and a significant amount of time trying.
  • Blackpilled (Conditional): Person who believes in / wants to learn about the Blackpill.
  • Female (Not Allowed): Banned on sight, no exceptions.
I think that the blackpilled thing should be removed, this forum is called incels.is not volcels.is or blackpillednormies.is
We should explicitly accept incels, nobody else
 
StormlitAqua

StormlitAqua

This is not my fault. I was created.
-
Mar 1, 2018
4,724
Content: No low effort, spam, advertisement, all-caps, or selfies. No NSFW or worship avatars nor signatures.

Usually completely unenforced. Take it out or enforce it.

Forums don't survive without explicit, defined rules
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Everytime I bring up this rule, they always say it's common sense. Well neither autists like me nor females have common sense. Enforce/define the rules or don't have them at all.
 
ScornedStoic

ScornedStoic

P.D.
-
Apr 5, 2018
12,499
I'd love to see more enforcement of banning fakecels, although I'm not sure the best way to go about that
 
RopeMaXXer

RopeMaXXer

getting dabbed on by waging
-
Jun 10, 2018
2,334
I'd separate offenses into two lists
one that can give you a permaban, one that cannot (unless someone is really insistent on being disruptive)
ban-worthy
1. bragging
2. attacking users based on their inceldom/appearance/mental illness
3. bluepilling
4. actual spam, as in posting your youtube channel or posting repetetive content, anything that would set off a real spam filter

suspend-worthy
everything else in rules

also throw out stupid shit like trolling/ baiting and low effort it has no definition and mods are basically retarded and cant uphold something so interpretation heavy.
 
blickpall

blickpall

O T L
-
Nov 8, 2017
4,725
Content: No low effort, spam, advertisement, all-caps, or selfies. No NSFW or worship avatars nor signatures.

Usually completely unenforced. Take it out or enforce it.
It's been explained to what that rule actually means. You don't agree with it? Tough cookies. Stop crying about it every chance you have.

@OP: We're content with the rules at the moment but we will keep your suggestions in mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top