Should Women Be Reduced To Breeding Stock?

  • Thread starter PortraitOfTheAutist
  • Start date

Should Women Be Reduced to Breeding Stock

  • Yes

    Votes: 23 82.1%
  • No

    Votes: 5 17.9%

  • Total voters
    28
PortraitOfTheAutist

PortraitOfTheAutist

Recruit
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
46
Online
0
In my opinion this is the only possible position for women after modern science (not to speak of their modern freedoms) has revealed them for the natural prostitutes and soulless beasts they are.

Women should be raised separately, not taught anything but the most rudimentary language, and then be groomed to be breeding stock. The best females will be bred by the best males: these best specimens will be chosen by a special eugenic council of men. It is true that under this scheme most men would not be fathers, but most men do not desire this anyway; they would, in exchange, get plenty of free sex, which is better than they can say for themselves now.

The noxious influence of women not only in politics and public life, but also in the culture, in the arts and letters, will be eliminated and the biological quality of the race will be improved under the direction and foresight and good taste of men.

It is only in modern society that people have thought such ridiculous things like women and men can be companions. There is almost no ancient or pre-modern society that believed that men and women are "natural companions" that complement each other psychologically. The idea that a woman can be your friend or especially your "soul mate" or "your everything" is a modern piece of stupidity that people typically confuse for nature, when in fact it is just the conventions of your people in this time that have deemed it so. Even today, Arabs don't think that men and women are natural companions and in this they are correct.

Breeding stock is the correct position--not cherished wife or mother or sister, etc.; the idea that women are to be venerated is a Christian-Teutonic piece of stupidity that destroyed the West. They are to be chattel and nothing more.
 
A

a-virgin-nigger

Ultimate Wagecuck
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
1,409
Online
10h 48m
You stole my idea!!!!!
 
TheHapaSlaughterer

TheHapaSlaughterer

Recruit
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
48
Online
0
The 3 fakecel cucks who voted "No" should be utterly ashamed. This is a revolutionary idea, even if (((they))) will never allow its trial and flourishment.
 
E

Evil Genius

Hiiiii
-
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
5,065
Online
0
Yes they are a natural resource and commodity.

Incels should be allowed to form warbands together, and then kill bluepilled pussies and take their women as our harem slaves.
 
Morf12

Morf12

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
358
Online
0
It would cure male mental health almost immediately.
 
PortraitOfTheAutist

PortraitOfTheAutist

Recruit
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
46
Online
0
The 3 fakecel cucks who voted "No" should be utterly ashamed. This is a revolutionary idea, even if (((they))) will never allow its trial and flourishment.
I should have selected the setting that would let you see which user voted for which option.
 
ilieknothing

ilieknothing

Captain
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
1,500
Online
12d 14h 9m
That’s all they are good for anyways
 
PortraitOfTheAutist

PortraitOfTheAutist

Recruit
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
46
Online
0
The unrestrained and hypergamous nature of female sexuality is actually dysgenic, especially when disentangled from those traditional social institutions responsible for sublimating it, thereby harnessing its energies and channeling it towards socially and biologically productive ends. The rise of the so-called love match, founded upon the ashes of medieval Teutonic chivalry and the courtly love idealized by Troubadours, has been disastrous for the west. Blind passion should never be allowed to enter into considerations of a purely eugenic nature, which must involve the purification of the familial bloodline through the amalgamation of the best available racial elements. This can only be done by means of a rigorous "scientific objectivity", meaning a relativistic objectivity by which numerous individual perspectives are synthesized and subsumed into a single underlying thread producing a more intelligible picture, augmented by a process of deep spiritual examination and introspection. Those who are dominated by instinct reveal their brute animal natures through their inability to participate in any ongoing reflective life, hence the subordination of passion as an element in breeding to that of relatively dispassionate observers acting in service of patriarchy.
 
i_a_m_i

i_a_m_i

Modcel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
1,523
Online
84d 16h 3m
I'm too much of a coward to say outright women should be treated like slaves. (though it might benefit society)
I believe eugenics is essential for humanity to survive; however, eugenics doesn't require slavery.

Also gene therapy and embryo selection when they become available might solve this problem almost completely. Artificial wombs would evaporate the need for women altogether.
 
PortraitOfTheAutist

PortraitOfTheAutist

Recruit
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
46
Online
0
I'm too much of a coward to say outright women should be treated like slaves. (though it might benefit society)
I believe eugenics is essential for humanity to survive; however, eugenics doesn't require slavery.

Also gene therapy and embryo selection when they become available might solve this problem almost completely. Artificial wombs would evaporate the need for women altogether.
Monogamy, in being a form of sexual socialism, is the cause of the biological degeneration of mankind which has led to the modern man, a bug man worthy of extermination. Most men and women should probably not breed. The system I propose seeks to improve the quality of the next generation based on long-standing breeding practices; we have also been successful with dogs, horses, and so on. Sparta was such a state that used these methods and it has lasted for 800 years, much longer than any modern state you can name. There are also tribes in Africa and other places that have similar practices and have lasted for a very long time. The specimens of these tribes, like the Nuba, are impressive people, reflecting the wisdom of the eugenic policy.
 
i_a_m_i

i_a_m_i

Modcel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
1,523
Online
84d 16h 3m
[font=Arial, sans-serif]Monogamy, in being a form of sexual socialism, is the cause of the biological degeneration of mankind which has led to the modern man, a bug man worthy of extermination. Most men and women should probably not breed. The system I propose seeks to improve the quality of the next generation based on long-standing breeding practices; we have also been successful with dogs, horses, and so on. Sparta was such a state that used these methods and it has lasted for 800 years, much longer than any modern state you can name. There are also tribes in Africa and other places that have similar practices and have lasted for a very long time. The specimens of these tribes, like the Nuba, are impressive people, reflecting the wisdom of the eugenic policy.[/font]
I agree that it would work. I just think slavery is unjustifiable in any circumstance. There are easier and more practical ways of improving the human gene pool.
 
PortraitOfTheAutist

PortraitOfTheAutist

Recruit
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
46
Online
0
[font=Arial, sans-serif]Monogamy, in being a form of sexual socialism, is the cause of the biological degeneration of mankind which has led to the modern man, a bug man worthy of extermination. Most men and women should probably not breed. The system I propose seeks to improve the quality of the next generation based on long-standing breeding practices; we have also been successful with dogs, horses, and so on. Sparta was such a state that used these methods and it has lasted for 800 years, much longer than any modern state you can name. There are also tribes in Africa and other places that have similar practices and have lasted for a very long time. The specimens of these tribes, like the Nuba, are impressive people, reflecting the wisdom of the eugenic policy.[/font]
I agree that it would work. I just think slavery is unjustifiable in any circumstance. There are easier and more practical ways of improving the human gene pool.
I think the Ancient Greeks had it right, women should be excluded from all government/public life and should be the property of their husbands/fathers. Femoids might protest at first but they would actually enjoy this arrangement much more. The classical Patriarchy must be restored. One of the most important factors to achieving this is the banning of all condoms and birth control, as they're the main factor in allowing femoids to attain as much power as they have.
 
LDARIncel

LDARIncel

Recruit
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
37
Online
0
Can we ban whoever votes no?
 
universallyabhorred

universallyabhorred

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
6,323
Online
70d 1h 11m
How can anyone vote no knowing what disgusting scum women are?
 
11gaijin

11gaijin

Escortcel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Posts
3,935
Online
1h 51m
Lookism fags are voting no
 

Similar threads